should ilxors be tempbanned for taking their beefs to other social media? (twitter/fbook/myspace/etc)?

I stopped defending ppl who did not ask me to defend them because it was pointed out to me that my defenses were as hurtful and insulting as the original attacks.

Now I usually just post "STFU" and call it a day.

;_;

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

http://www.bfcgroup.com/helluvatough/billydeesign.jpg

sure, gimme 24 hours in there

there are lots of ppl here with lots of different issues -- even in their ~brains~! v. v. few of them have spent 11 years so routinely embroiled in this kind of crap. she is unique only in her remarkable solipsism and commitment to victimhood

voted no btw

All of you lolling at the crazy lady - I wish you 24 hours in her brain.

― Andrew Farrell, Friday, October 19, 2012 7:26 PM (47 minutes ago)

man, you really have a way with words. i wish i had a friend like you!

Serious question (and I do mean this earnestly), mostly to AF: does ILX offer any benefit to WCC and her brain?

damn @ these results, did anyone voice a "yes" opinion itt?

A few.

i think a few did.

my real takeaway from this is that next time i throw up a poll i'm gonna try to create a clusterfuck to jack up the participation

answer is obv no in this instance but it "depends"

does ILX offer any benefit to WCC and her brain?

sure it does -- as an audience. i'd imagine most other venues don't bother, but we've spent a decade wrenching ourselves up about trying to deal with her fairly; what could be more delicious than having ppl talk about her?

I think that's unfair.

so do i honestly

benefit of ilx is the same as its benefit to any who post here

perhaps so

like most everyone else here, i think she is a bright and talented and intersting person. but good lord have we not been through this very thing a thousand times

benefit of ilx is the same as its benefit to any who post here

you're getting paid for viral product placements too? I thought it was just Ned and I

some have apparently even made several thousand american dollars!

(nb i am by no means trying to equate this poster with that, but i'm sure that various ppl have different reasons for being here)

I really didn't like when people made this personal by commenting on reviews others had made on amazon.com. I personally enjoy using amazon prime to watch streaming video, though.

benefit of ilx is the same as its benefit to any who post here

I didn't phrase the question very well; what I wonder is how the "good for mental health" vs. "not good for mental health" tips.

I, for example, think ILX has an overall benefit to my quality of life (oh god did I just say that?); is that the same for WCC, or does ILX have a negative impact? If negative, what is our ethical obligation here wrt her QOL?

i don't think it's reasonable (or possible) to presume what's best for wcc

Guys this is all starting to sound horribly paternalistic tbqh :/

Excessive overmantectiveness.

Trayce I appreciate your concerns but there are men talking here.

"and I'm leeeeeeaving, onnnn a mansplain"

ok lol

Trayce I appreciate your concerns but there are men talking here.

:O finally a man to tell us what to think!!

vg, best lol i've had in two days (including salt lake trib endorsing obama)

Any of you ladies heard Rush? Pretty rad band, I think you would dig them

I dunno, man, they're a pretty complex band. Wouldn't want anybody to get a headache trying to understand them.

Ugh I heard they wrote a song about a book

Chicks don't dig 5/4

kinda funny you all going off on a mansplaining tangent over a question asked by a woman

yeah do u see what we did there

also it was a totally legit question, yalls heads in the sand

acted dumb? xp

By WCC logic I'm gonna go ahead and call WCC an anti-Semite.

― quincie, Thursday, 18 October 2012 23:29 (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I, for example, think ILX has an overall benefit to my quality of life (oh god did I just say that?); is that the same for WCC, or does ILX have a negative impact? If negative, what is our ethical obligation here wrt her QOL?

― quincie, Saturday, 20 October 2012 03:46 (12 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If it's alright, I'm going to go ahead and assume that you don't entirely have WCC's best interests at heart there, son. Is that alright?

yes because you cant disagree w/someones logic and still have concern for them

I mean, you don't have to have her best interests in mind, a wide collection of views are encouraged, but if you're looking for your ethical obligations, lets start with your ethical obligation not to hilariously call her an anti-semite?

I don't think you understand...they were calling her an anti-semite as a compliment

she v obviously did not call her an anti semite, do you seriously not see what that sentence means

Reading comprehension + ire = "zuh?" x infinity

why is AF referring to "quincie" as "son"?

She (erk, sorry with the 'son' there, then) did call WCC an anti-semite! That is literally how the sentence goes, she didn't say "if we follow WCC's logic then I would be able to call WCC an anti-semite", she just went "okay that's what I'm doing".

I'm not for a second suggesting that quincie thinks that WCC is an anti-semite, but if you are going to go there for your logical yuks, then you don't later get to concern troll and not get called out.

(erk)

this is something i do not believe: andrew farrell is an anti-semite.

look i just literally called you an anti semite

jeeezus

lol logical yuks understanding what people are talking abt how gouache what a concern troll

why does every thread have to turn into a burrito stall

-fin-

there's always money in the burrito stall!