Amazon Kindle (ebook thingy)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2819 of them)

what would be good - free ebook copy with the hardback, the same way they do for vinyl.

koogs, Monday, 10 December 2012 08:28 (eleven years ago) link

really obvious move too.

price and release schedules for ebooks are beginning to annoy me greatly.

first u get the flower, then u get the honey, then u get the stamen (darraghmac), Monday, 10 December 2012 09:44 (eleven years ago) link

one month passes...

http://i.imgur.com/wW87h.jpg

Cunga, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:01 (eleven years ago) link

I was on Amazon looking at the comparison chart of features between different models of Kindle. I was trying to figure out if the most basic e-ink Kindle or the paperwhite had an earphone jack and the ability to play MP3s. The chart didn't list MP3 as a supported file format and claimed those two Kindles had zero "audio support". This seems rather incredible to me.

My question is, was Amazon just overlooking these simple and obvious features and they really exist on all the Kindles? Or did they actually cripple the cheap ones that much?

Aimless, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:29 (eleven years ago) link

my entry-level kobo doesn't have mp3 playback. at only 2GB it wouldn't be much use as a player anyway, but 2GB is >1000 books.

koogs, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:35 (eleven years ago) link

yeah I don't think the basic e-ink Nooks, Kindles, etc are meant to do anything but display books. That's actually what I like about my nook. There's no clicking away to check this or that or futz with the music.

consistency is the owlbear of small minds (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:39 (eleven years ago) link

I don't need mega-capacity for the music. I am thinking of using the Kindle while camping. I could scrape by with 200 songs and maybe only 100 books for the couple of weeks I'd be out.

Aimless, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:39 (eleven years ago) link

No more audio support for eInk Kindles. I think the Kindle Touch has it, but not the Paperwhite.

schwantz, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:47 (eleven years ago) link

No text-to-speech at all then? I don't really use it but I know a few people who do.

Jaq, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:49 (eleven years ago) link

the old kindles had an experimental mp3 player option, it was really shitty though. new ones don't have it.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:55 (eleven years ago) link

The idea was that people who wanted audio features would buy a Kindle Fire. Almost nobody used the audio on the eInk Kindles.

schwantz, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:56 (eleven years ago) link

The el cheapo reader I had before I got a nook, the Skytex Primer, does everything. MP3s, videos, voice memos... sadly the battery life SUXXORZ.

consistency is the owlbear of small minds (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:57 (eleven years ago) link

I see that Amazon sells a refurbished Kindle Touch. It has a tiny speaker and MP3 support. Thanks for the tip, schwantz. I'm now thinking hard about getting one.

Aimless, Thursday, 17 January 2013 17:58 (eleven years ago) link

The front light on the Paperwhite is pretty nice, though. Don't want to bring your phone (in Airplane mode) camping? Or maybe buy a little iPod shuffle?

schwantz, Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:02 (eleven years ago) link

Everytime i buy a kindle book they try to get me to buy the audio version too so that's where the text to speech went

President Keyes, Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:06 (eleven years ago) link

I feel like it's a bad look to have a product line where the more expensive version lacks features one of the cheaper versions has. This always just makes me throw up my hands and want to buy something else.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:08 (eleven years ago) link

No smart phone for me. I am a geezer and I have mostly fallen off the techno-bus. I can see the attraction of the iPhone as a do-all gadget, but I've always shyed away from the stiff monthly service charges and my extremely barebones cell phone is of the no-contract type.

Aimless, Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:10 (eleven years ago) link

I feel like it's a bad look to have a product line where the more expensive version lacks features one of the cheaper versions has. This always just makes me throw up my hands and want to buy something else.

― space phwoar (Hurting 2), Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:08 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

eh i kinda like that they've stripped out the extraneous stuff and made this a device just for reading, nothing else. kinda wish they'd take out the shitty web browser too.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:20 (eleven years ago) link

The Kindle Paperwhite is the next year's version of the Kindle Touch, not a higher-end version (at least in Amazon's way of thinking).

schwantz, Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:22 (eleven years ago) link

and the mp3 capabilities were always listed as an "experimental" feature

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:23 (eleven years ago) link

Its mp3 capabilities are/were very limited but I managed to play an ebook from emusic using them

abanana, Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:34 (eleven years ago) link

Is the Paperwhite worth getting as opposed to some other basic eReader? I have a lot of ebooks I want to read on something other than my computer monitor and I don't need anything fancy but I do want something nice that will last awhile. A friend of mine got some no-brand reader and it really sucked. Its battery stopped keeping a charge within two weeks and its screen was really dark.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:36 (eleven years ago) link

if youre going camping get a regular kindle cuz the battery lasts forever, the kindle fire prob only lasts like 8 hours

zero dark (s1ocki), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:37 (eleven years ago) link

the lighting and battery life are both really really nice. the only thing with the lighting is that it has some unevenness near the bottom of the screen - it's not awful but it is noticeable and would probably irritate some people. i think it's the way to go though, mainly because amazon's library is so much larger than what you would have access to with an anonymous ereader.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:38 (eleven years ago) link

I don't know if that was directed towards me but I am definitely not going camping.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:50 (eleven years ago) link

Naw, i'm the guy going camping.

Aimless, Thursday, 17 January 2013 19:35 (eleven years ago) link

i've seen the paperwhite light, were i you i might well get a separate clip-on light and a normal kindle touch aimless (have you a way to charge the light? mine charges off the same usb as the kindle itself).

i've got the fabled 4gb kindle keyboard with mp3 capability, never used that feature. used the browser a lot travelling last year tho.

lemmy's rabbles (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 January 2013 20:43 (eleven years ago) link

My wife loves the Paperwhite.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:07 (eleven years ago) link

haha that sounds like a druggy euphemism

i have a regular kindle and i couldn't be happier that all it does is display books. no music, no internet, no thanks. just books and my highlights/notes.

this customer is a jerk (La Lechera), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:10 (eleven years ago) link

love my keyboard model, but tbrr i could drop the keyboard, mp3, browser, landscape mode and text-to-voice and it would only improve it. not worth getting a new one but they're not features i'd lose any sleep over.

lemmy's rabbles (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:14 (eleven years ago) link

i thought i would miss the keyboard in moving to the new one but i really haven't

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:19 (eleven years ago) link

somehow i've switched to reading everything on my new phone's kindle app :/

keef qua keef (Jordan), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:20 (eleven years ago) link

like 700 pages of the Instructions so far

keef qua keef (Jordan), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:21 (eleven years ago) link

honestly the biggest reason is because the backlit screen disturbs my girlfriend less at night than the light from the kindle case (which in turn was a big improvement from having a lamp on).

keef qua keef (Jordan), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:22 (eleven years ago) link

Carl really likes her paperwhite.

Jeff, Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:22 (eleven years ago) link

honestly, I think if you want to listen to mp3s while reading, you should get a cheap mp3 player

zero dark thirty 2: zero dark forty five (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:38 (eleven years ago) link

one of the great things about the entry level kindle is that it doesn't do five billion things

zero dark thirty 2: zero dark forty five (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:39 (eleven years ago) link

<3 my Paperwhite
I had a previous version with the cover w/ a built-in light at the corner and there's no comparison in evenness of light and ease of reading.
Also finding that being able to read comfortably in my pitch black bedroom helps my concentration immensely.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:48 (eleven years ago) link

only thing that would improve the Paperwhite are physical page turning buttons

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:48 (eleven years ago) link

Also, the ability to shoot bullets.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:50 (eleven years ago) link

Sorry, Milo, cheap shot, I concede. :)

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:50 (eleven years ago) link

it doesn;t have the buttons?!!

tho they have a pleasingly solid tiny click that drives a person mad at night

lemmy's rabbles (darraghmac), Thursday, 17 January 2013 21:52 (eleven years ago) link

I thought I'd really miss the buttons (I still have my version 2 Kindle keyboard), but was surprised how natural it was to turn pages on a Touch when I picked up my daughter's.

Jaq, Thursday, 17 January 2013 22:01 (eleven years ago) link

ditto my kobo mini. also seems pretty resistant to fingerprints, which i thought would be a problem.

the one problem is picking it up without page turning - the bezel is quite small and the slightest touch on the screen is enough. and it's hard to tell which direction the page has turned (there's no animation) so you have to guess how to undo it. i've taken to bookmarking every 2 or 3 pages rather than let it remember my place.

koogs, Friday, 18 January 2013 08:03 (eleven years ago) link

out of the loop on actually *buying* books for these things (or equivalent). is paying hardback price for a new novel the norm? will it come down when the paperback is out?

ledge, Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:32 (eleven years ago) link

no the norm is for the kindle version to be cheaper, hardbacks often in the $25-$30 range while the kindle version is usually in the $12-$15 range

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:35 (eleven years ago) link

but since the publisher sets the price, there is variation

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:35 (eleven years ago) link

ok fuck bloomsbury then.

ledge, Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:36 (eleven years ago) link

ledge, they are often in the same order of magnitude in the uk. think hydrogen sonata, say, is £9.49 digital and £20rrp physical but the physical is available for £12 or so (amazon)

koogs, Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:38 (eleven years ago) link

Never found much difference except in the ease of thieving it. Over to you mr pubisher.

b'hurt's tauntin' (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:40 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.