New Apple Lust Objects for 2010 and onward

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (16745 of them)

It does, very aggressively, in that the cache is actively updated (i.e. at the same time as the database), so threads like this are always read from memory. Half of the accesses are 100% in memory (the other half are googlers who naturally pollute the cache and need to be read from the database).

To be honest, if we'd had cloud infrastructure and the memory we have these days, I wouldn't have bothered with caching at all. Just designing the database well enough (to make 90% of the accesses clustered index reads) would have been enough.

Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:22 (eleven years ago) link

I'd probably have been a bit more standardly lazy and just done aggressive object caching via Spring mapping the db, along with the indexing

framework framework framework

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:27 (eleven years ago) link

Yes I deliberately avoided any ORM stuff. My head was (and still is at) stateless stateless stateless. Except of course the cache, but that's a special type of state - one that can be centralised and that operation doesn't depend on. It's the functional programming thing. It's all just servlets. No session state. Very easy to understand because there are minimal interactions between different operations.

Keith, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:29 (eleven years ago) link

this is reminding me of a silly ilx-related project idea I had

but back on topic, when the heck am I getting a retina iPad mini damn it.

mh, Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:31 (eleven years ago) link

can we implement up-middle-finger swipe for suggest ban

do you even frogbs? (cozen), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:31 (eleven years ago) link

mh, I'm wondering the same thing. I will preorder one. Hoping 6-18 months.

Women, Fire, and Dangerous Zings (silby), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:37 (eleven years ago) link

Should have my 27" iMac by this time next week.

Dr. Alfred P. Falfa (WilliamC), Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:48 (eleven years ago) link

Got our hands on a 27" iMac today. Lovely thing, but the screen is still hella shiny, the calibration is way off and the whole thing too bright for proper repro work :-(

Have you calibrated it? Just run through the "calibrate" options in System Prefs>Displays>color. Beyond that, spend some money on a calibrator. Monitors are never that good out of the box, but Apple uses pretty decent IPS screens and you should be able to get good results. But for proper repro work you should be using a proper monitor!

http://www.eizo.com/global/solutions/graphics/index.html

dan selzer, Thursday, 7 February 2013 23:23 (eleven years ago) link

i saw a blog post recently (possibly one of the nerdy iphone dev blogs i read, but i have a horrible feeling it might have been gruber or sth) where the guy was saying the one thing that keeps him awake at night as someone who has invested his career in apple, and should be keeping apple awake at night, is the fact that they clearly have no one who understands sync

caek, Friday, 8 February 2013 00:10 (eleven years ago) link

that blog post was otm

caek, Friday, 8 February 2013 00:10 (eleven years ago) link

you don't need to sync everything will be in the cloud

yay cloud

mh, Friday, 8 February 2013 00:17 (eleven years ago) link

ok sync = internet for the purposes of this argument

caek, Friday, 8 February 2013 00:18 (eleven years ago) link

btw that was complete sarcasm, 100% of the stuff I work on for my job these days involves data sync services for an audience that has slow ass internet connections or even work disconnected

mh, Friday, 8 February 2013 00:19 (eleven years ago) link

dropbox 4ever

eris bueller (lukas), Friday, 8 February 2013 00:21 (eleven years ago) link

if these iWatch reports are true feel like apple is really jumping the shark

乒乓, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 14:30 (eleven years ago) link

it's really unclear to me whether or not wearables are just going to be a niche market or not

markers, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:22 (eleven years ago) link

I will be looking forward to the markers report on wearables in 2013

mh, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:24 (eleven years ago) link

http://missingbite.com/picts/tn.retrowatch.jpg

stet, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:32 (eleven years ago) link

feels like apple had a meeting where they were like 'what other common conventional markets can we REINVENT. where can we INSTILL DESIRE INTO THE CONSUMER.' and somebody said watches and maybe it was aronud the time that kickstarter for the ipod nano wearable wristwatch thing was taking off. what a bad idea

乒乓, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:38 (eleven years ago) link

like probably a lot of apple's success so far has been adding luxury or status-symbol value to markets where there previously was none? laptops, phones, desktop - get rid of that ugly biege garbage can, replace with this ultra sleek and expensive looking aluminium sex machine.

but I dunno if I see banker dudes leaving their patek phillipes at home so they can show off the iWatch.

乒乓, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:39 (eleven years ago) link

thought I read that it could hold passwords for your apple devices, so you wouldn't have to type "bondage007shadesofgrey" all the time anymore

Euler, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:43 (eleven years ago) link

that functionality could be put right in the iphone and/or ipad too though

markers, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:44 (eleven years ago) link

but I dunno if I see banker dudes leaving their patek phillipes at home so they can show off the iWatch.

― 乒乓, Wednesday, February 13, 2013 8:39 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I aint a banker dude but no way am I ditching any of my Nixons for a lol iWatch

skeet-skeet-gate (Spottie_Ottie_Dope), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:47 (eleven years ago) link

yeah but I guess it could add a layer of security, so that if someone stole your phone but didn't get your watch, then they couldn't access your data

fuck a watch obi

Euler, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:56 (eleven years ago) link

wonder if people looking at their watches all the time will be better or worse than people pulling out their phones and looking at them all the time

zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:59 (eleven years ago) link

real talk

mh, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:07 (eleven years ago) link

people being annoying in public needs disruption

zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:24 (eleven years ago) link

I feel like I became part of the generation that screws around with multiple conversations at once what with the phones and everything

mh, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:34 (eleven years ago) link

sending my email on your dancefloor

mh, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:34 (eleven years ago) link

http://kfury.com/what-an-apple-watch-is-good-for

markers, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:38 (eleven years ago) link

Did people feel as conspicuous and twattish using early mobile phones in public as people do using Siri? Because until that changes Siri is dead, basically.

stet, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:33 (eleven years ago) link

maybe those 80s giant phones? but i'm happy enough using Siri alone

Nhex, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 17:44 (eleven years ago) link

I don't think people look anymore twattish using Siri in public than e.g. texting in public

Euler, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:02 (eleven years ago) link

texting is silent, plus you can doing all sorts of stupid ass things imperceptibly; talking to an inanimate objects always looks insane

Nhex, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:20 (eleven years ago) link

as much as a i love to say "computer; tea; earl grey"

Nhex, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 19:21 (eleven years ago) link

using siri in public is particularly twattish because after asking a question there's always 10 seconds of silence followed by 'NO, FUCK'

walloreinhart (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:23 (eleven years ago) link

second most egregious thing about siri is it still taking 10 secs even when you're asking it system-level qns like what's the time

☻ີ☻ັ☹ີ☻ີ☻ᵌྉ (cozen), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:28 (eleven years ago) link

word. especially compared to the Google search app, it's really sad

Nhex, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:46 (eleven years ago) link

Do any PC makers come close to the Macbook Pro trackpad in use?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:47 (eleven years ago) link

does the magic trackpad work with PCs?

乒乓, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:51 (eleven years ago) link

word. especially compared to the Google search app, it's really sad

this. I've actually lost count of the number of times I've said something into siri and it's offered to search the web for 'cretaceous teaspoon'

walloreinhart (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 21:04 (eleven years ago) link

or similar

walloreinhart (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 13 February 2013 21:04 (eleven years ago) link

were you looking for cretaceous teaspoon to cretaceous tblspoon conversions?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 13 February 2013 21:24 (eleven years ago) link

two weeks pass...

i saw a blog post recently (possibly one of the nerdy iphone dev blogs i read, but i have a horrible feeling it might have been gruber or sth) where the guy was saying the one thing that keeps him awake at night as someone who has invested his career in apple, and should be keeping apple awake at night, is the fact that they clearly have no one who understands sync

― caek, Friday, February 8, 2013 12:10 AM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://barebones.com/support/yojimbo/icloud.html

lol

caek, Thursday, 28 February 2013 08:13 (eleven years ago) link

it's too bad drew houston proved impervious to jobs' reality distortion field

unprepared guitar (Edward III), Thursday, 28 February 2013 15:40 (eleven years ago) link

I heard Jobs offered him something insulting like $100k

eris bueller (lukas), Thursday, 28 February 2013 16:32 (eleven years ago) link

iCloud has been almost totally useless for me.

Dropbox is the centerpiece of my life, my bread and butter, how I do just about all my business and non-business. It is maybe the best thing that has ever happened to me.

dan selzer, Thursday, 28 February 2013 16:35 (eleven years ago) link

when is google drive going to consume Dropbox I wonder

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Thursday, 28 February 2013 17:56 (eleven years ago) link

i don't think Google even wants to be in that business, their opinion is that local storage is dead and everything should live in the ... well, on their servers.

plus it's for-pay, has a tightly focused mission ... just not a cultural fit.

eris bueller (lukas), Thursday, 28 February 2013 18:17 (eleven years ago) link

nah, Google is trying to compete w/ dropbox. They've got this whole thing where Google drive appears on your desktop and all your files are represented as physical files, but it's not that useful since all the google docs are of course just aliases to the website anyway. But it lets you drop other files into the folder and they upload like Dropbox.

dan selzer, Thursday, 28 February 2013 18:50 (eleven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.