dawkins has become like chomsky where there's two types of conversations you can have about the dude and unfortunately the one you're more likely to have is by far the less interesting― balls, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:19 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkI much prefer calling him out for being a stupid racist dick tbh.― oppet, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:00 AM (33 minutes ago)
― balls, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:19 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I much prefer calling him out for being a stupid racist dick tbh.
― oppet, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:00 AM (33 minutes ago)
both OTM
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 09:36 (eleven years ago) link
Hooray for Florida!
Only 49 more states to go! Hooray for Florida !I-95 and I-75 will be jammed for the next month or so with druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida , because this is the first state in the union to require drug testing to receive welfare!Hooray for Florida ! In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free."Applicants must pay for the drug test, but are reimbursed if they test drug-free. Applicants who test positive for illicit substances, won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment. Those who fail a second time will be banned from receiving funds for three years!Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?Forward this if you agree!Let's get welfare back to the ones who need it, not to those who won't get a job.I AGREE, DO YOU?https://www.facebook.com/HitLikeIfAgreed?ref=hlt
I-95 and I-75 will be jammed for the next month or so with druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida , because this is the first state in the union to require drug testing to receive welfare!
Hooray for Florida ! In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free."
Applicants must pay for the drug test, but are reimbursed if they test drug-free. Applicants who test positive for illicit substances, won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment. Those who fail a second time will be banned from receiving funds for three years!
Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?
Forward this if you agree!Let's get welfare back to the ones who need it, not to those who won't get a job.I AGREE, DO YOU?
https://www.facebook.com/HitLikeIfAgreed?ref=hlt
― supermassive pot hole (seandalai), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:28 (eleven years ago) link
really just judging u for being friends w/whoever posted this
― infirm neophytic child (zachlyon), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:34 (eleven years ago) link
How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?
Hahaha fuck your job, dude!
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:38 (eleven years ago) link
The Venn diagram of "people who believe all welfare recipients should get drug tests" and "people who oppose background checks for buying a gun" is a perfect circle. A circle of stupid, stupid people.
― Huston we got chicken lol (Phil D.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:45 (eleven years ago) link
"because they want to shoot druggies!!! hray!"
― Mark G, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:49 (eleven years ago) link
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/21143_649830845046372_688765536_n.jpg
George TakeiLike This Page · 56 minutes ago
Don't like this unless you laugh within two seconds. If you leave a spoiler comment, others will shame you.
Okay, he's just getting plain smug at this point.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:36 (eleven years ago) link
read a great blog post about how Takei is a patriarchal misogynist dick, despite being forward on some issues
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:51 (eleven years ago) link
just like Star Trek TOS
― we're up all night to get picky (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:53 (eleven years ago) link
Oh snap. Also OTM.
― carl agatha, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:53 (eleven years ago) link
wtf at only like if u get it & spoiler comment. are his readers really that stupid that they should feel proud of understanding the "joke" and get to shame those who post it?
― Jibe, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:55 (eleven years ago) link
w8 waht is the other kind
― I turned away to leave these few in thought and contemplation (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (eleven years ago) link
can't tell you, sorry
― supermassive pot hole (seandalai), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:06 (eleven years ago) link
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/324802551516106752
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:08 (eleven years ago) link
starting to feel bad for the guy
― we're up all night to get picky (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:10 (eleven years ago) link
I'm kind of neutral on Dawkins but "my words mean what I intend" seems like a silly thing for an intelligent person to assert.
― dschinghis kraan (NickB), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:17 (eleven years ago) link
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/statuses/311802605263273984
"My words mean what I intend", says Dawkins. "CAN PIG FEEL MORE??"
― the kind of man who best draws girls' eyeballs (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:24 (eleven years ago) link
Richard Dawkins gives me a headache.
― carl agatha, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:26 (eleven years ago) link
Good old Humpty Dumpty semantics.
― lazulum, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:27 (eleven years ago) link
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins5h Easy for Dawkins to criticise the soft target of Christianity. http://bit.ly/15zvscE He doesn't have the guts to take on Islam.Details
It seems pretty apparent that by "Dawkins" in this tweet, he meant "Rowan Atkinson".
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:28 (eleven years ago) link
not sure why we're on the facebook thread with this, btw.
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BODQxMzY3MTY0MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTg2MDgxMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR5,0,214,317_.jpg
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:30 (eleven years ago) link
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/399818_603804056297372_914863069_n.jpg
Still trying to work this out...
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:07 (eleven years ago) link
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lji7tbJ3Se1qd47y7o1_500.jpg
― balls, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:09 (eleven years ago) link
When the creator of that enters a dark room, he turns the light off switch off
― Bobby McFerrin, Quantum Physicist (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:32 (eleven years ago) link
music on world off makes total sense to me
― Mordy, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:49 (eleven years ago) link
You can either switch the world off or switch the music on, but not both at once.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:53 (eleven years ago) link
The meme creator is pointing out that we live in a dark age of neither music nor world.
― lazulum, Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:01 (eleven years ago) link
actually if you assume that world and music only have two, binary states -- off and on - then the only way to read it is that music and world are either both on or both off at the same time.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:31 (eleven years ago) link
a damning condemnation of world music imo
― infirm neophytic child (zachlyon), Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:34 (eleven years ago) link
hahaha
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 25 April 2013 01:05 (eleven years ago) link
I think we need a double-pole double-throw switch for this scenario
― noddynadweiner (silby), Thursday, 25 April 2013 01:23 (eleven years ago) link
can pig feel more
― lag∞n, Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:22 (eleven years ago) link
not really, no
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:27 (eleven years ago) link
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/933917_364596206994000_1796912130_n.jpg
― mh mh mh mh (qiqing), Thursday, 25 April 2013 06:15 (eleven years ago) link
Is that Cammie from Street Fighter?
― Fetchboy, Thursday, 25 April 2013 06:20 (eleven years ago) link
Reminds me of that run we had last year where some feeder posted about digging into the folds of fat on his vict^H^H^H^HloverKinda wondering now if that's a thing. "Feeder" texts over "thinspo" pictures.
― Øystein, Thursday, 25 April 2013 18:02 (eleven years ago) link
http://actuallygrimes.tumblr.com/post/48744769552/i-dont-want-to-have-to-compromise-my-morals-in-order
― the pinefox, Thursday, 25 April 2013 19:01 (eleven years ago) link
anyone over 18 posting about not "fitting in" really needs their adulthood credentials revoked
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 19:13 (eleven years ago) link
http://sphotos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/603851_455530811201294_1318100842_n.jpg
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:09 (eleven years ago) link
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vmpSO2BbYCE/TMLqj3TM8kI/AAAAAAAANBU/QXrbovd4RJM/s320/hitler_baby.gif
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:12 (eleven years ago) link
That Grimes post is OTM.
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:25 (eleven years ago) link
^^
― carl agatha, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:42 (eleven years ago) link
I also liked the Grimes post
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:46 (eleven years ago) link
I think it is dire
― the pinefox, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:58 (eleven years ago) link
Exactly which bit of a post that says "I'm sick of female musicians being sexualised, objectified and harassed" do you have a problem with, pinefox?
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2013 21:35 (eleven years ago) link
Presumably he means "female musicians being sexualised, objectified and harassed" is dire, to be fair.
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:51 (eleven years ago) link
its cool except the parts about being taken out of context and being called cute, one should not complain about those things
― lag∞n, Friday, 26 April 2013 01:13 (eleven years ago) link
"im tired of being congratulated for being thin because i can more easily fit into sample sizes from the runway"
stealth brag
most of it seemed right to me though
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 April 2013 01:20 (eleven years ago) link
xp yeah was gonna say, people call muscular men cute all the time, myself included. the post's heart was in the right place though. i don't know who grimes is except it sounds like she's a musician, is the context behind the post important in that sense?
― chilli, Friday, 26 April 2013 02:39 (eleven years ago) link