russell brand - C or D?

the third person pronoun thing was just part of the entire package. what was his response supposed to be when the one guy started riffing on how he couldn't understand brand on the radio but he was fairly comprehensible in person?

All of the hosts seem kinda high.

By which I'm trying to not say "dumb".

how could it not be rude in any place to speak about someone as an object of idle curiositity while in their presence

I think that that one woman was calling him 'he' because she was clearly unsure of his name. She tentatively called him Willy at one point cos obviously the subject of German reunification had been weighing heavily on her mind, but then she reverted to 'he' again after that. So I think it was more awkwardness due to that than it was bad manners.

That would make sense if Mika hadn't emphatically introduced him at the beginning of the segment.

Third person in front you was considered rude as hell when I was growing up in the states, but I am old and from good stock.

Come on, surely that's considered rude in the US. I've never heard otherwise.

Well, I mean, there are certain contexts where it might not be, but I think in those cases, it would not be rude in the UK either.

As far as what passes for rude in the US -- this wasn't in the US, it was in TV. Cable TV. Morning "news."

morning "joe"

the guy named joe wasn't even there. if that IS his real name.

I saw this. It's pretty good toward the end when he does an imitation of the inane discussion style of these cable news talk shows, but most of it is just rambling. I could do without the come-ons too, but I guess it's as good a way as any as disrupting the show and throwing people off their guard, which is the point. Whoever that guy was (I guess it's not Scarborough? I've never watched the show) seems like a moron.

iirc the dude brought up russell's chest display before he brought up mika's, and her degree of swooning was pretty priceless. just seemed like your standard amusing enough russell brand talk show appearance to me, but i guess maybe people aren't used to his shtick

or maybe they're more familiar with your standard morning joe episode than i am and laughing at the atypical madness

Dunno anything about this show, but that clip implied it was being simulcast on the radio? That might explain the third person/what he looks like stuff.

it kind of seemed like the morning joe hosts weren't very well prepared for his schtick

I think Brand has become something of a hero in the last year or two. He openly acknowledges what an insecurity-driven twat he used to be and I think he's genuinely trying to be good. His, um, cultural contributions have been notably improved as well - he's not a bad writer and if he took himself more seriously I think he could even be a very good one.

His FX show is awful. He'll have a grain of a funny insight here and there and just bury it with babble.

yeah it helps that I read his articles but mostly avoid his TV appearances

"Any of you who know a little bit about history and fashion will know that Hugo Boss made the uniforms for the Nazis," Brand reportedly said at the podium. "The Nazis did have flaws, but, you know, they did look f--king fantastic, let's face it, while they were killing people on the basis of their religion and sexuality."

http://www.eonline.com/news/455738/russell-brand-defends-hugo-boss-nazi-jokes-at-gq-men-of-the-year-awards

http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/201385/rs_560x415-130905113450-560.russell-brand-tweet.cm.9513.jpg

I was watching the Channel 4 programme on Colour footage of the rise of Hitler and the name Hugo Boss came up in relation to the Uniforms he designed then mentioned in his standard adverts during the Reich. I was trying to place where I knew the name from, not sure if it was this controversy or how popular his firm was at certain times and who was wearing clothing by him in the 60s & 70s.
Henry Ford apparently donated all the profits of German sales of Ford cars to the Nazi party in the late 20s/early 30s too. Not that taht has anything to do with his Brandness.

I'd tend to think what Brand says in that soundbite quoted above was pretty accurate.

ugh "nazis looked great" is such a lame, old gag.

I like his performance in the tempest. This adlib (an extra on the disc) is kind of amazing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBOMSzhIfjk

Just got round to watching the GQ thing. Genuine lols.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inB-6R1-4ng

fantastic.

russell brand's quite funny

it's pretty wonderful. more hypocrisy than bill hicks, obv, but he's the closest thing to him

http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2013/sep/13/russell-brand-gq-awards-hugo-boss

it's almost as if the fashion industry is especially humourless

being ejected from a gq awards seems like a better evening than staying at the gq awards.

oh he is very annoying tho isnt he? like bill hicks, yes.

one day u will turn up, browbeaten & genuflecting, at the tentflap of the ilx commune, and we will let u in

Hicks' canonization conveniently overlooks a lot of straight dickery imo

I guess Brand has that Puck-ish thing going for him, the subversive glint. Hicks was just angry. Sometimes funny, but often mostly angry. But Brand seems as well suited to the internet age as Hicks was to the underground comedy era.

ilx has been browbeating me for years tbrr, the absence of genuflection is prob more down to their being bad at is than any real backbone on my part, either way i'm not going near yr flaps on my knees

it took me a long time to get over the twitchy annoying visual and stop being irritated enough to actually listen and/or pay attention to him but I have to say I really do enjoy him

Dating Jemima Khan, apparently. He splashed out and took her to Song Que.

Just re-read his Thatcher piece, which I still think captures something personal and profound that most obits fell short of.

the biggest ron paul stan on my facebook feed during the last two presidential elections is now the biggest reposter of russell brand posts.

oh no, that's that then

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/26/russell-brand-needs-more-than-wild-emotions

With women singers, escalation has gone from Debbie Harry's mildly revealing miniskirts of 25 years ago, through Madonna's bondage gear, to the semi-nudity of Christina Aguilera and Rihanna, to the actual nudity of Miley Cyrus.

haha okay dude

Everything Brand has said, I’ve heard before, especially since Occupy’s 2011 heyday; the radical suggestion that, yes, “Shit is fucked up, and bullshit,” was not first uttered by Brand and should not be more exciting nor appealing by virtue of emerging from his cheeky smile. As has often been pointed out, there is a constant conflict at play when radical or militant ideas or images enter the popular imaginary under capitalism (I’ve noted the example here before of a riot scene in a Jay-Z/Kanye music video): At the same time radical ideas might spread and resonate across mainstream and pop media platforms (and thus provide the potential for rupture), these ideas and images are recuperated immediately into capital. Brand calls for revolution, and online media traffic bounces, magazines sell, bloggers like me respond, advertisers smile, Brand’s popularity/notoriety surges, the rich, as ever, get richer.

Secondly, and more immediately worthy of attention given current Brand fever: His framing of women is nothing short of the most archetypal misogyny. I’m not asking Brand to be perfect, but I am asking that we temper celebrations of him according to his very pronounced flaws. Writer Musa Okwonga, responding to Brand and possibly coining the term “Brandwagon” was swift to elevate feminist concerns, too often ignored in the excitement around a celebrity appearing to have good politics....

http://www.salon.com/2013/10/25/i_dont_stand_with_russell_brand_and_neither_should_you/

http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=11299

oh nooooooo i was fearing this bump would be that stupid piece

complete load of throwing-my-toys-out-of-the-pram bollocks obv

Some people saw Bussell Brand outwit/take down Jeremy Paxman. Some people saw the exact opposite.

i'll confess i didn't read all of that article, but for somebody who complains a lot about how some Leftists behave to one another the writer sure seems to want to tell everybody what they ought to think

don't think i'm interested in reading apologists for hierarchy any more either

British leftist politics are super weird for us 'Mericans

it's a pathetic unfunny cliche but that scene in Life of Brian sums things up pretty accurately