DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

i read a comment once that included the line "I paid taxes for the right to walk on the pavement" (i think this was about that EDL arrest thing) which was kind of lol but mostly sad. reminded me of a time in school when I claimed to be Jesus and this kid came up with the rather witty remark "no ken, Jesus was English", to confounding faces.

I think I replied to the tax comment: "dude I think you may be paying too much tax" but got no replies.

You should have said it to that kid, too.

Just how long long did you keep up this claim of being Jesus?

hes not jesus, but he has nearly the same initials

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7ol0sxufg1rpfehzo1_400.jpg

is this hogwash or ACTUAL DOOM?

http://pro.moneyweek.com/myk-eob-tpr123/PMYKP703/

on further watching it seems like nasty anti-welfare propaganda, done in an unnerving adam curtis style

when all the cities started lighting up on that map, there was a dot over Spurn Head, population 6-ish

xxp Total fucking hogwash. The cost of welfare and benefits is a tiny fraction of the UK's economic debt. This is just a scaremongering advert for some bullshit magazine subscription.
Debunking here:
http://coppolacomment.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-end-of-britain-not-yet.html

that blog is good; just fell down a 'guaranteed basic income' wormhole thanks to it

thanks snoball

Just as well that baby is on its way or people might have to notice this ridiculous "porn-blocking" policy.

Another attempt to appease Daily Mail readers.

Cameron wrote to the search providers asking them to pretend that it was an opt-out block, rather than an opt-in one, right?

Is this the same man who appeared on Woman's Hour this morning and said he didn't see a problem with Page 3?

Wait what

xxp Total fucking hogwash. The cost of welfare and benefits is a tiny fraction of the UK's economic debt. This is just a scaremongering advert for some bullshit magazine subscription.
Debunking here:
http://coppolacomment.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-end-of-britain-not-yet.html

Thankyou for this btw, very good blog post

The Sun and the Mail Online stand to make an absolute bomb out of an opt-in porn policy, I would imagine. Except it won't work.

Considering the proposals will everyone with a copy of 'Irreversible' have their collars felt?

Good smokescreen for Lynton Crosby all this, eh?

Not that I care that much about Lynton Crosby or even think there's much of a story there but Cameron's squirming over it is hilarious if somewhat inexplicable

How would this thing even work? Would ISPs simply block known porn sites or would they check content for keywords or what? Cos if it's the latter then I've seen it suggested that it could prevent teenagers from accessing LGBT sites etc

It's just a cover to distract attention away from other shit. Pretty soon in the DAILY MAIL OMG ROYAL BABY SOUVENIR EDITION there'll be a bit in the bottom corner of page 13 where some government spokesperson says "Oh that porn filter thing? It'll be opt in instead, using software ISPs already provide."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/jul/22/cameron-no-ban-sun-page-3

chill guys, objectification doesn't deprave and corrupt unless it's got cocks in it

How would this thing even work?

It won't, essentially.

Well, Rupert Murdoch doesn't own any pr0n websites.

if the ban were to be introduced does anybody know where i'd be able to obtain bikini shots of barely legal teens?

People interested in such photos could still buy the Daily Mail in a newsagent.

thanks, that's good to know

Basically if this becomes law, anyone you see on a bus reading the Daily Mail is probably a ped0.

i tend to make that assumption anyway, since most Daily Mail readers wouldn't be caught dead on a bus

What's the Daily Express's line on all this?

PENSIONERS TO COOK THEN DROWN IN ARCTIC HEATWAVE THUNDERFLOOD NIGHTMARE

will there be a sting operation to review what the PM's google search terms contained in the past?

or will any findings be classified as "for research purposes" #townsend

xxxp Dirty Desmond must be rubbing his hands with glee given the boost it will provide for his p0rn channels, I should think

Better throw away that old vhs copy of "the accused".
Haven't most soaps had the odd rape and abused woman?
I don't watch them but I'm sure it's been mentioned.

i can't believe you have just admitted to owning such things on a public internet forum

under currently existed paedo porn rules, couldn't we report the sun hq for all the pictures they have of half naked 16 yr old girls in their archives?

what's the legal status of those actually, will they have had to censor all archived copies, physical and online? or does it come under same kind of exemption as like a 17th century painting of a naked kid? and if some dirty old goat dilligently collected all sun under-18 page 3s until they changed the law and the police raided his house for something unrelated, could he get arrested for those?

that totally sounds like im 'asking for a friend' but im not, honest. just curious at the whole tangled legal mess of all this

It depends NI - had you been collecting this stuff before or after the ban came in? By the way, rather you than me, mate, think you made a bad decision.

Less a decision, more a hobby. A sticky hobby.

i see my role more as curator than pervert

In seriousness I don't know what the legality of page 3 is but I think it's a manifestation of a kind of creepy, bad British sexuality and some manifestation of that or other will always be allowed/enforced whatever else gets banned

Like in Russia, you get the combination of shockingly brutal state homophobia + yet anorexic blonde sex-doll ideal for the women and girls. In a particular strata of America you get gaybashing and slutshaming and purity rings + yet the coiling, jumping, smiling bodies of cheerleaders. In Italy and some other latin countries, teenagers having anal sex to get round the catholic sexual taboos because those taboos are so strong + the idea that a Woman is Beautiful and Sensual.

Parallels might be drawn with Iran and Saudi too but I'm not qualified to say. To be honest the above is probably horribly reductive too. But the point is there's always some form of sexuality that's allowed in, and page 3 is ours.

http://i.imgur.com/MNnay3w.jpg?1

up against tough competition, claire perry making valiant play for the actual most stupid current MP: http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/07/24/cameron-porn-advisors-website-hacked-threatenslibels-blogger/

http://flickeringcolours.net/v2/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/double-facepalm-picard-riker-2.jpg