having so few followers is quite unpleasant
Welcome to this universe and how it works. In the universe two streets over from this one several hundred thousand people breathlessly await my every next word on the subject of floor wax and how to optimize your relationship to it.
Here, though, no such luck. Here I'm just lucky that my mother loves me. Have you called yours lately?
― Aimless, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 03:48 (ten years ago) link
Here I'm just lucky that my mother loves me. Have you called yours lately?
Alas, both of my parents are deceased. This prevents me from calling my mother. (Not kidding, and not lying in order to garner sympathy.)
Welcome to this universe and how it works.
Yeah, I know that's how things usually are in life. But that doesn't mean I have to like it.
And I do hope that you, Aimless, were on to something about Twitter becoming socially irrelevant not too long from now. I can't help but wonder how future generations will look back on this thing called Twitter. If you really think about Twitter, it really seems stupid, like a really stupid invention. At least, it does to me. But this is where people are at these days. If you wish to try communicate with people today, Twitter is becoming more and more of a necessity to do so. Many people don't even bother with email anymore. If you wish to contact them, they usually say: Contact me on Twitter.
― am.curious.sometimes, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 04:10 (ten years ago) link
i never ever get that, seriously
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 05:24 (ten years ago) link
what ARE you saying about the animals?
― the Shearer of simulated snowsex etc. (Dwight Yorke), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 07:23 (ten years ago) link
give us sample tweets
do u hashtag
I do sort of wish Twitter would die sometimes. If I didn't have to use it for work I'd possibly delete my account. I'd miss using it to find new bars/restaurants - I think that's about it.
― Evil Juice Box Man (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 09:00 (ten years ago) link
I use it for purely social reasons. Met a lot of new IRL friends.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 11:31 (ten years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/fashion/technology-and-the-college-generation.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
^^ story about college kids today finding email a hassle, preferring to communicate with their professors Twitter, FB, and texts.
― disgruntled punter (Je55e), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 13:50 (ten years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/JCRE6LR.png
― ᶓ͠סּᴥ͠סּᶔ ᶓͼ᷆ₓͼ᷇ᶔ (gr8080), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 14:53 (ten years ago) link
uh
― smang culture (DJP), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:04 (ten years ago) link
“E-mail has never really been a fun thing to use,” said Ms. Judge, 19. “It’s always like, ‘This is something you have to do.’ School is a boring thing. E-mail is a boring thing. It goes together.”
Sorry to be a dick about this but I'm not going to feel bad when this particular student doesn't manage to find out I'm giving a quiz.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 16:13 (ten years ago) link
@filmclubbristol is an ilxor
― kinder, Tuesday, 1 October 2013 21:04 (ten years ago) link
I just tried to find @amcuriosnj and I got nuffin. I am now following jody_beth and filmclub, however, just for... no good reason.
― one over two first letter human (Zora), Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:55 (ten years ago) link
I just tried to find @amcuriosnj and I got nuffin
This should take you there: https://twitter.com/AmCuriousNJ(No offense, but, you left out the 'u' in 'curious'. That might be why you didn't get any search results.)
If you're referring to my statement
If you wish to try communicate with people today, Twitter is becoming more and more of a necessity to do so. Many people don't even bother with email anymore. If you wish to contact them, they usually say: Contact me on Twitter.
I say you're fortunate if you never get that response. And
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/fashion/technology-and-the-college-generation.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0^^ story about college kids today finding email a hassle, preferring to communicate with their professors Twitter, FB, and texts.― disgruntled punter (Je55e), Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:50 PM
― disgruntled punter (Je55e), Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:50 PM
Yeah, this is what I'm talking about. Though, it's not only today's college kids that I've heard this from.
Yes, I do hashtag.
Here are some sample tweets RE animal welfare that I have posted:
am.curious.sometimes @AmCuriousNJ 28 Sep#AnimalWelfare For FREE: You Can Help Animals- and -Pet Shelters- with a free click! http://theanimalrescuesite.greatergood.com/clickToGive/ars/home …
am.curious.sometimes @AmCuriousNJ 29 SepModern chickens grow so big, so fast, they can barely stand! Chickens deserve better. Join the fight: http://bit.ly/1e4CF8P #CluckNo
The first sample tweet is one I post almost every day because it is referring to an on-going charity program where, each day, you can help animals for free worldwide.
The second sample tweet is how the ASPCA suggested members should word the tweet. (Personally, I probably wouldn't have use a hashtag like #CluckNo because it sounds too odd to me.)
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 00:32 (ten years ago) link
Also, I have several semi-technical questions RE Twitter. If anyone provides some answers, thanks in advance.
1.(Brief Re-cap: I've had my Twitter account since Thurs., Sept. 19, 2013. I tweet about animal welfare primarily, but sometimes also tweet about music, arts/culture (vague, I know), and investigative journalism news stories that I think are interesting/important.) Earlier today, someone that I followed decided to block me. My question is: Is this unusual? I thought blocking was done to spam accounts and/or accounts with offensive material, neither of which I engage in with Twitter or otherwise.
2.If I wish to use a #hashtag that doesn't already exist, how do I create it? Is it just a matter of keying it in on my notebook computer? I know that there's a #hashtag for almost everything but, just in case.
3.When using the DM (Direct Message) feature, is the character limit also 140? Obviously, I haven't used DM yet. I just want to get an idea what to expect when I do.
Thanks.
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 01:21 (ten years ago) link
just post lots dick pics best way to boost yr klout
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 01:23 (ten years ago) link
done
― markers, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 01:25 (ten years ago) link
brb
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 01:25 (ten years ago) link
sock
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 01:42 (ten years ago) link
Hmmm...Not quite the helpful answers I had hoped for...
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 04:36 (ten years ago) link
Hello. It sounds like you are having a technical issue with your Twitter account that may be a little hard for us to diagnose from the information given alone.
Tweet this ticket number I am issuing you so we can locate your account: "9140-2953822-EE306". Please format it exactly as shown, excluding the quotation marks. Once you do this we will be able to verify the error you are experiencing and correct it.
Thank you for tweeting with Twitter!
― sleepingbag, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 05:00 (ten years ago) link
"seventeen dollars a month is a small price to pay for peace of mind"
― markers, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 05:14 (ten years ago) link
Thanks to Treeship, @filmclubbristol, and Zora for following me. I've followed all three of you back.
One other question about #hashtags: Does anyone know if you can use symbols (aside from #) in hastags? Symbols like: $, >, %. Might seem like an odd question but I'm just tryin' to learn this 'Twitter thing'.
I do sort of wish Twitter would die sometimes. If I didn't have to use it for work I'd possibly delete my account...― Evil Juice Box Man (LocalGarda), Tuesday, October 1, 2013 9:00 AM
Fortunately, I don't have to use Twitter for work. Not yet, at least. But, I do know the feeling of wishing Twitter would die. And I can definitely understand the desire to delete the Twitter account.
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 19:20 (ten years ago) link
For what it's worth I don't think I'd be likely to engage with a stranger who keeps asking me to check my email.
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 19:29 (ten years ago) link
If that's meant for me: I'm not trying to engage with that person on Twitter. That actually refers to a different matter, having to do with a magazine I subscribe to. Their customer service absolutely sucks! And there's apparently something very, very wrong with their email. Approx. 75% (no exaggeration) of the emails to and from that magazine 'disappear' somewhere, (into spam folder? hacked?) both ways: to and from the magazine: the email *truly fails* to get to the intended recipient 75% of the time. You have a choice: Either have the emails go completely unacknowledged or advise the intended recipient to check his/her email. What would you do? Also, two more points: These people (at the magazine) *refuse* to acknowledge that there's any problem with their email (the problem isn't on my end: I've done several 'test-runs' with other email recipients, and there's no problem on my end), and these people solicit email communication. So, if they're soliciting this stuff, and they refuse to check what they're soliciting, what would do? Advising him to check his email isn't my attempt to get him to follow me on Twitter, it's advice to him that his company's email 'system/software' (or whatever the technical term is) is fucked-up and if he wants the email he solicits, he should check his email. Hope that explains that.
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 20:15 (ten years ago) link
Oh, and he's a snippet from an email (one of the few emails that actually got to the intended recipient at that magazine) that the customer service rep/editorial assistant (Christopher) sent to me instructing me to tweet to the intended email recipient (Mark) in order to keep on top of the situation (maybe Christopher is beginning to realize there's something wrong with the company email), (from the email exchange, Christopher to me): "Tweeting is always an effective strategy. Unfortunately I'm no longer in HQ on a regular basis (back in NJ for a while for various family reasons) but I will tell mark to keep an eye out for your email." (Christopher is the one who neglected to capitalize Mark's name in that passage, not me.) So, you see, you're encouraged to tweet to these people in order to make sure he/she actually gets the email. That should explain the matter, I think.
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 20:32 (ten years ago) link
This thread is now the antithesis of twitter.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 20:33 (ten years ago) link
Oh, and he's a snippet
That should be: here's a snippet
― am.curious.sometimes, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 20:42 (ten years ago) link
you're a funny one aren't ya
― the Shearer of simulated snowsex etc. (Dwight Yorke), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 20:44 (ten years ago) link
My Twitter account was set up partly for professional purposes, in that I and some of my co-workers were encouraged to be active on Twitter, I identify my occupation in my bio, I sometimes (but by no means exclusively) tweet about work stuff, etc. So we have a little committee at work that meets semi-regularly to discuss strategies for social media, and early on we realized that the best way to gain Twitter followers was just to follow a ton of people. While I did want to gain followers, I didn't care *so much* about it that I was willing to indiscriminately follow a bunch of random people. (I figured it would just clog up my feed.) But my coworkers who did so -- those who started following 1,000+ right away -- managed to pick up at least a few hundred followers fairly quickly.
― Geoffrey Schweppes (jaymc), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:25 (ten years ago) link
if someone follows me who has thousands of followers and follows ~the same amount of people i just assume they some bullshit spammy business dude
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:28 (ten years ago) link
otm
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:43 (ten years ago) link
there are get followers now omg type services that can make you look heaps popular (e.g. our new prime minister's twitter account gained like 60,000 followers overnight)
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:46 (ten years ago) link
fucking cannot believe i just said that
anyway
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:47 (ten years ago) link
you can buy 10k followers for $60! http://ipmtech.com
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:49 (ten years ago) link
holy shit
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:51 (ten years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/wq6lAZ5.jpg
― ᶓ͠סּᴥ͠סּᶔ ᶓͼ᷆ₓͼ᷇ᶔ (gr8080), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 22:10 (ten years ago) link
"spies of sorts"
― obi wankin' obi (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 October 2013 22:24 (ten years ago) link
I am shocked - SHOCKED, I SAY - to learn that Twitter has never turned a profit. $1 billion IPO cash-in here we come wheeeee
― Hip Hop Hamlet (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 October 2013 23:40 (ten years ago) link
more like social peedia
― JEFF 22 (Matt P), Friday, 4 October 2013 00:01 (ten years ago) link
hey
― ienjoyhotdogs, Friday, 4 October 2013 01:13 (ten years ago) link
They changed the TL again. I don't mind the auto-showing of pictures, but the darker 'reply retweet etc' buttons make it very messy to look at.
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 October 2013 12:48 (ten years ago) link
app or web?
― markers, Friday, 4 October 2013 15:29 (ten years ago) link
stock symbol squatting? +1000% profithttps://www.google.com/finance?q=OTCMKTS:TWTRQ
― best null wave (bnw), Friday, 4 October 2013 15:47 (ten years ago) link
nothing's changed for me. autoshowing of pictures would suck pretty hard
― k3vin k., Friday, 4 October 2013 16:50 (ten years ago) link
I meent web, Markers. On mobile I use tweetbot (which didn't implement those annoying blue lines tg)
And then there's this: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-04/twitter-may-be-forced-to-extend-character-limit/4999514
― In the airplane over the .CSS (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 4 October 2013 18:53 (ten years ago) link
lol analysts
― lag∞n, Friday, 4 October 2013 18:54 (ten years ago) link
Documents filed with US Securities and Exchange Commission show Twitter had 218 million active users as of June 30, and lost nearly $US80 million on nearly $US317 million in revenue in 2012.
i don't understand money but doesn't this just mean they were 237 million in the black?
― k3vin k., Friday, 4 October 2013 19:12 (ten years ago) link
I think it means they had close to $400 million dollars in expenses
― smang culture (DJP), Friday, 4 October 2013 19:13 (ten years ago) link