Posts you had second thought about and decided not to post - put them here

Never realized how close he and my son were in age.

lol

When is H's birthday?

(I think 4 is my favorite age for kids. 4-5ish. I used to always request that age when I worked at a camp. They're (often) hilarious.)

10/20/09

e i found some breed-specific species converter site that seems to think x8 is the multiplier for pug age > human age

you know i think benson is a g, and he is puppyish as hell, but i couldn't in good conscience call him a a puppy

•calling a female poster "baby" isn't acceptable [Started by I have a friend who works at Kroger (Matt P) in November 2013, last updated 1 minute ago by sarahell on Moderator Request Forum] 23 new answers

― frogbs, Wednesday, 13 November 2013 00:59 (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

looool

― how's life, Wednesday, 13 November 2013 01:09 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

trying to score some of that sweet "moronic doofstance", I call it

headshot

is it emotionally fulfilled parsing banal pop cultural ephemera for ideological heresy?

For fuck's sake, it's meant to be 'a straight actor who performs X acts in pornographic movies for the sole purpose of incurring monetary gain - Y FOR PAY

a straight actor who portrays a straight actor known for roles in the partridge family and LA law: SUSAN DEY FOR PAY

― goole, Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:15 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

*for the sole purpose etc

― goole, Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:16 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I mean, if you're going to half-ass it like this, why even bother?

take it to the damned thread ffs

straight female actor who performs sapphic acts if it feels right for the part- LESBIAN FOR THESPIAN

― golfdinger (darraghmac), Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:55 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is acceptable.

u sweet talkin brute u

...

I was nine when Fred, my pet cockatiel, was murdered. I went to the washroom so no one would see me cry.

xp well if you feel much more revulsion towards the cultural signifiers of black working class commodity fetishism than towards other kinds of commodity fetishism etc then you perhaaaaaps have questions to be asking of yourself.

― Merdeyeux, Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:03 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's a fair point. I know I'm gonna get in hot water for suggesting this post, but arguably gold chains etc aren't necessarily specific to black working class cultures any more and haven't been for quite a few decades. i don't like this song. i think lily allen's attempt at parody and cutting social commentary is weak, massively misguided and really rather insensitive, especially when put under the scrutiny of a line by line/shot by shot dissection. as a send-up of pop and consumerist culture it forgets a number of things and winds up as straight-up hypocrisy. but it also concerns me that people are willing to call her an out-and-out racist/sexist etc because of an ill-advised and poorly-executed attempt to take the piss out of pop / fashion as well as those who exploit it. disregarding allen's back-story (and her historical spat with azealia banks, which i only found out about yesterday and is completely indefensible), it's a massively ill-thought-out bit of work especially for a comeback single and i agree with a huge number of points made. but there's also an element of hysteria surrounding this, much of which involves analysing this video/song in microscopic detail and branding it outwardly and intentionally offensive. i would say that it's simply a failure. it fails on every level in what it's trying to do. it's a crap song for a start. the lyrics are sub-comedic and just plain dumb. the video might be taking the piss out of thicke, cyrus et al but only by replicating and exaggerating exactly what happened in those videos thus nullifying any social commentary it sets out to make. the whole thing is awful, but i believe it is trying to make a wider point. it's just a shame that that point is lost, almost entirely because of how badly executed it is and how easy it is for internet pundits to tear it to pieces and show it up for how unintentionally insensitive the results are. still, i don't believe it wasn't made with good intentions somehow, i just think they got lost along the way.

jesus fuck we need to go over some ground rules fr posting itt folks

deems ✓

thread is strictly for pass/ag cattiness and judicial semi-silence

otm

posts like

- i dont fucking thinks so

Or

- yeah well you would

Or even

- lol

All welcome, but i mean posting then following up yr own post or c&p and answering at length itt, this is just basically making this thread the thread you wouldnt post to, it is an outrage tbpfh

where do i post posts that i wanted to post in here and then decided not to?

Man i hate to be all bethlehem doorman but that cant be our problem nahmsayn

there's nothing to stop you posting that to the relevant thread (lily allen) deems

yes there is. it's a busy afternoon.

400 odd words abt lily allen and her shitty video suggests not that busy

400 words of anguished over-analysis is nothing to dog latin, bless him

One of many things stopping it is that the relevant thread is on ilm

Tho if i werent busy id c/p it but under my name, thatd be larks

darraghmac wrote this on thread Posts you had second thought about and decided not to post - put them here on board I Love Everything on 14-Nov-2013

well if you feel much more revulsion towards the cultural signifiers of black working class commodity fetishism than towards other kinds of commodity fetishism etc then you perhaaaaaps have questions to be asking of yourself.

― Merdeyeux, Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:03 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

That's a fair point. I know I'm gonna get in hot water for suggesting this post, but arguably gold chains etc aren't necessarily specific to black working class cultures any more and haven't been for quite a few decades. i don't like this song. i think lily allen's attempt at parody and cutting social commentary is weak, massively misguided and really rather insensitive, especially when put under the scrutiny of a line by line/shot by shot dissection. as a send-up of pop and consumerist culture it forgets a number of things and winds up as straight-up hypocrisy. but it also concerns me that people are willing to call her an out-and-out racist/sexist etc because of an ill-advised and poorly-executed attempt to take the piss out of pop / fashion as well as those who exploit it. disregarding allen's back-story (and her historical spat with azealia banks, which i only found out about yesterday and is completely indefensible), it's a massively ill-thought-out bit of work especially for a comeback single and i agree with a huge number of points made. but there's also an element of hysteria surrounding this, much of which involves analysing this video/song in microscopic detail and branding it outwardly and intentionally offensive. i would say that it's simply a failure. it fails on every level in what it's trying to do. it's a crap song for a start. the lyrics are sub-comedic and just plain dumb. the video might be taking the piss out of thicke, cyrus et al but only by replicating and exaggerating exactly what happened in those videos thus nullifying any social commentary it sets out to make. the whole thing is awful, but i believe it is trying to make a wider point. it's just a shame that that point is lost, almost entirely because of how badly executed it is and how easy it is for internet pundits to tear it to pieces and show it up for how unintentionally insensitive the results are. still, i don't believe it wasn't made with good intentions somehow, i just think they got lost along the way.

That wasnt me

in your opinion it wasn't you, maybe not in my opinion

Just like Eagles, this thread never dies!

I dont want the mods to get involved here and i dont know how this has happened but that wasnt me i swear

who is to say who ever 'introduces' the discourse? the discourse precedes us, it is there, latent and ethereal

whether the discourse is attributed to deems or to dog latin seems almost arbitrary

the pinefox wrote this on thread keep the meme alive: Pippa's Arse on board I Love Music on 13-May-2011

OI MATES SOME BIG BOTTOM BIRD IS ALL OVER THE NEWSY WEWSIES, I"M GONNA MAKE ME A 'ORRIBLE POST ABOUT IT TO ME ILXOR CHUMS, ALSO BLOOD SAUSAGE IS DELICIOUS

if anything it's too much the other way but i mean

Christmas music is the Don Henley of musics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vWHNwmzf1o

it's like deodorant and breathmints for assholism. preventative measures that are really just about having taken them as opposed to how effective they actually are

I'm not pointing them, out it's what I do because I don't know how to killfile you.

Thread back on course, gw deems

think i prefered when this guy was just boring instead of boring right up his own hole

He has many sides to him

"skilled at pithily evaluating the efforts of colleagues"

http://img2.imagesbn.com/p/9781579907037_p0_v1_s260x420.jpg

i always hated arcade fire until i started posting here and began liking them out of spite

why would you not post that where it belongs.

"Oh, goodness. A comment about the Arcade Fire that contains snark about both the band and ILX. This will not do, oh no, this will not do."

Sorry, I wasn't going to post those at first, had second thoughts, and then realized I was already in the right place.

This really is a collection of particularly uninteresting records and Haim

― imago-er not a show-er (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 19 November 2013 04:43 (5 hours ago)

http://i.imgur.com/8SbgzuI.jpg