Bitcoins

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1410 of them)

yeah its surprising someone w a sick ass botnet hasnt just declared that they have all the bitcoins

lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:21 (ten years ago) link

Bitcoin is just a long story of how libertarians discover what financial regulation is for, piece by piece, as lack of it begins to affect them negatively.

frogbs, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:25 (ten years ago) link

haha

lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:43 (ten years ago) link

!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 10 January 2014 17:52 (ten years ago) link

damn, whose?

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Friday, 10 January 2014 18:21 (ten years ago) link

so chi

|$̲̅(̲̅ιοο̲̅)̲̅$̲̅| (gr8080), Monday, 20 January 2014 17:38 (ten years ago) link

Marc Andreessen's case for Bitcoin:

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/21/why-bitcoin-matters

o. nate, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:15 (ten years ago) link

Editor’s note: Marc Andreessen’s gigantic pointed skull is full of bitcoins

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:21 (ten years ago) link

a tumblr of things that people claimed were the next personal computer/internet

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:23 (ten years ago) link

A random spectator at a televised sports event held up a placard with a QR code and the text “Send me Bitcoin!” He received $25,000 in Bitcoin in the first 24 hours, all from people he had never met.

except that it was all from himself

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:24 (ten years ago) link

No doubt Andreessen's quite biased, but he makes some good points. I don't buy his argument that Bitcoin's first-mover advantage will guarantee dominance in the crypto-currency sphere though. If you can accept and process one form of crypto-currency, it's a negligible additional effort to accept and process a different form, so I don't think the network effects are as strong as he claims. I still think Tyler Cowen nailed this - eventually as crypto-currencies proliferate the value of any particular currency in circulation has to fall to equal the marginal cost of launching a new one.

o. nate, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:26 (ten years ago) link

its funny he touts all these benefits to business and then the benefit to consumers is you wont get hacked which of course is actually a benefit to business, the benefit to consumers is what no fraud/dispute protection

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:29 (ten years ago) link

I've come to think that bitcoin probably is some of the things that its supporters claim, and is not others. E.g. it makes sense to me that it's a very useful way to transfer money or make payments globally without friction/fees. However, I don't think it's going to be a successful tax avoidance strategy, or money laundering device, or drug-purchasing tool forever, and I certainly don't think it's going to become some kind of universal currency that will upend currency and the banking system as we know it.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:30 (ten years ago) link

i have yet to see anyone make a good argument why any person would want to use these over a debit/credit card, buying drugs excepted

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:31 (ten years ago) link

the friction/fees are all incurred by the business

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:32 (ten years ago) link

If you're paranoid about ID theft would be one. Or if you don't have a credit card.

The better argument I've heard is that people could use it for international remittances instead of services that charge high fees.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:33 (ten years ago) link

not to mention that the security overhead is ridiculous to ask non technical people to handle, someone gets yr wallet infos and all yr bitcoins are gone

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:34 (ten years ago) link

if the US government fails I would think Bitcoin would be pretty useful

frogbs, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:35 (ten years ago) link

xp right -- I mean the fees incurred by the business drive up your cost in the end too, but you're not going to make a decision based on that. However, it's possible there could be smaller merchants who would rather just not take credit cards at all -- etsy-type sellers, who could accept bitcoin.

The bigger problems to me are security and stability in the price. If you're just going to transfer quickly in/out of bitcoin for payment purposes only, the stability is less of a problem, as an article here or in the other thread pointed out.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:37 (ten years ago) link

Or if you don't have a credit card.

The better argument I've heard is that people could use it for international remittances instead of services that charge high fees.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:33 AM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

how are you getting the bitcoins w/o the credit card what are the fees associated with that, what abou the fee when you have to transfer bitcoin back into local currency after remittance, and this is all ignoring the obvious market realities that existing systems like money wiring or w/e can just lower their fees to compete w bitcoin

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:38 (ten years ago) link

not to mention that the security overhead is ridiculous to ask non technical people to handle, someone gets yr wallet infos and all yr bitcoins are gone

― lag∞n, Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:34 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah this is a big barrier, although there might be a tech solution to it. Fingerprint sensor activated wallet or such.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:38 (ten years ago) link

If you're just going to transfer quickly in/out of bitcoin for payment purposes only, the stability is less of a problem, as an article here or in the other thread pointed out.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:37 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there would be fees for this, bitcoin only becomes feeless if its the default currency which is never gonna happen this is all so stupid

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:39 (ten years ago) link

yeah this is a big barrier, although there might be a tech solution to it. Fingerprint sensor activated wallet or such.

― signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:38 AM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

everything is breakable, if there were thousands of dollars just lying around on peoples phones it would start to disappear very fast

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:40 (ten years ago) link

smh at dealbook what a piece of shit thats some techcrunch level letting people sell their own book in yr pages

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:41 (ten years ago) link

I don't think Western Union would be able to lower fees enough to compete with something that is literally zero cost. Factor in the in and out exchange fees and I still don't think so.

I agree that there are like a million possible ways for bitcoin to not turn into what its boosters think it can turn into, and that the odds are against it, but I still think it has some interesting possibilities.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:43 (ten years ago) link

its not zero cost my god how many times do you have to have this pointed out to you

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:44 (ten years ago) link

Well, to be fair to Dealbook, they also recently published a post-mortem on Bitcoin, arguing that Bitcoin was as good as toast and analyzing the misconceptions of its backers.

xxp

o. nate, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:44 (ten years ago) link

they couldve gotten the pro bitcoin line maybe from someone who wasnt the most heavily invested in it of anyone in the world

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:47 (ten years ago) link

its not zero cost my god how many times do you have to have this pointed out to you

This is a fair point. If you don't want to be exposed to Bitcoin currency fluctuations, you can't keep your money in Bitcoins, so the cost of any one transaction is the sum of (1) fees to convert your currency to Bitcoin plus bid-ask spread, (2) transaction fee associated with the Bitcoin transaction itself, and (3) fees + spread to convert back to currency on the other end. This is probably not negligible, but still could end up being less than an international wire (I have no idea how much those cost) and possibly more convenient too. I do think this will probably just motivate international wire services to improve their service and cut fees, but if so that's a win-win for everyone (except I guess people who have their life savings in Bitcoin).

o. nate, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:48 (ten years ago) link

yeah thatd be cool but it does nothing for the viability of bitcoin

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:51 (ten years ago) link

im quite sure theres a shitload of other costly infrastructure that would have to be worked into that equation too, real life will intrude upon the beautiful logarithm

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:53 (ten years ago) link

bitcoin, massively open online education... what other deeply stupid shit have genius technologists attempting to disrupt industries they no nothing about come up with recently

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 16:54 (ten years ago) link

its not zero cost my god how many times do you have to have this pointed out to you

This is a fair point. If you don't want to be exposed to Bitcoin currency fluctuations, you can't keep your money in Bitcoins, so the cost of any one transaction is the sum of (1) fees to convert your currency to Bitcoin plus bid-ask spread, (2) transaction fee associated with the Bitcoin transaction itself, and (3) fees + spread to convert back to currency on the other end. This is probably not negligible, but still could end up being less than an international wire (I have no idea how much those cost) and possibly more convenient too. I do think this will probably just motivate international wire services to improve their service and cut fees, but if so that's a win-win for everyone (except I guess people who have their life savings in Bitcoin).

― o. nate, Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:48 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think this is right, except I disagree that international wire services necessarily could just cut fees to compete. Maybe, maybe not. At some point it's not profitable for them to do so anymore. They have high overhead.

signed, J.P. Morgan CEO (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:02 (ten years ago) link

and bitcoiin related businesses would have to have high overhead to compete with them on service, the part of bitcoin thats "zero cost" transferring the funds is also effectively zero cost for for the wire services

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:07 (ten years ago) link

I'm still struggling to see any legit use for Bitcoin that doesn't involve doing something illegal or on shaky legal ground. I really wish it was around for the 2004-2006 poker boom.

frogbs, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:08 (ten years ago) link

Isn't the most attractive thing for most people in the short term that it relatively keeps climbing in value per coin? And it's only doing so because it's a fad. Beyond that I don't get why it exists.

Evan, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:38 (ten years ago) link

it exists cause theyre gonna end the tyranny of taxation lol

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:40 (ten years ago) link

No, dogecoin will.

Evan, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:45 (ten years ago) link

if anything though this whole experiment seems to be exposing the libertarian viewpoint as less "fuck the upper class because nobody should have that much power" and more "fuck the upper class because I'm not one of them"

frogbs, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:50 (ten years ago) link

this is news to me that libertarians hate the upper class

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:53 (ten years ago) link

anyone here interested in making a joke currency? (or has dogecoin already claimed all the jokes)

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 17:56 (ten years ago) link

im interested in making a joke illegal marketplace where i steal all the bitcoins

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:06 (ten years ago) link

Trader Jokes

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:28 (ten years ago) link

Editor’s note: Marc Andreessen’s gigantic pointed skull is full of bitcoins

― lag∞n, Wednesday, January 22, 2014 4:21 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

my coworker just glanced over at my screen to see why i was http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1002961/muttley-laugh-o.gif'ing so hard

i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:28 (ten years ago) link

srsly that photo doesnt even tell the whole story my god

http://i.forbesimg.com/media/lists/people/marc-andreessen_416x416.jpg

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:30 (ten years ago) link

thats his real head

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:30 (ten years ago) link

bitcoin is prob an alien currency

lag∞n, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:39 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.