Pitchfork's Chris Ott takes No Prisoners

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1924 of them)

Going Cheese: Chris Ott, ILX Cunts, and the Prison of Belief

ain't it funny how the night bus moves

he always came across as a great guy in Kerrang! in the 90s (some dude), Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:48 (ten years ago) link

while this seems like a pretty flimsy thing to write a paper on, I wouldn't be surprised if message boards become a topic of academic interest

I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Thursday, 6 March 2014 19:50 (ten years ago) link

ain't it funny how the night bus moves

― he always came across as a great guy in Kerrang! in the 90s (some dude), Thursday, March 6, 2014 2:48 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

okay you got me there, major larfs

the tune was space, Thursday, 6 March 2014 20:01 (ten years ago) link

Nate posted a response to some of you over on Facebook:

So that big Twitter back-and-forth between me and Ott has spilled over into some ILX debate that I wish I could clarify there. (see link below.) Since I can't post there -- I forgot my login info some 7ish years and three computers ago -- I wanted to point out a couple things.

1) My snarking at Ott was probably a bad idea, since the feeling of being set upon by outsiders is the fuel that sets his nitro-burning funny car on a collision course with wackiness. That said, the fact that we don't actually follow each other on Twitter but he jumped right out with a "MUST CREDIT ME" beef moments after I posted the link to my EMP abstract set off a big red flag. I do my best not to get wrapped up in inane beefs like that, since it almost never produces anything of value (unless you value hate-@s), but years of me being fed up with him shitting on my critical peers and friends took reckless precedence this time.

2) That said, he jumped to a lot of defensive conclusions based solely on the abstract (and probably a grudge against Pitchfork, ILX, whatever he ate for breakfast, etcetera), and while I didn't mention Hipinion by name in the abstract itself (and used unfair, heat-of-argument terms like 'circle-jerk' to describe the thread he claims I hijacked), I planned on attributing the messageboard and giving them their due, much like every circa-2011 "What Is Night Bus?" article I found on the Web did.

3) In fact, the paper I have planned (and haven't finished yet) starts with the idea that it's possible for something to start as a joke or a parody -- or at least come across like one, as most HRO-voice excursions in to subgenre-coinage are -- yet still get at something that actually resonates in wider terms outside of genre, as the CFCF mixes (which are rooted in that Hipinion dialogue) set out to prove.

4) And even then, aside from the necessary introductory historical context as mentioned above, the paper's almost entirely about pointing out, exploring, and emphasizing the aesthetics that these early adopters were getting at -- not claiming ownership over it, sanitizing it, or creating a revisionist history. Especially since "night bus" has since been discounted and declared "dead" by trend-fatigued bloggers and has largely fallen out of use.

5) I have no interest in gaining "cred" or whatever -- I've already done a couple EMP panels in the past, and it's a fun thing I get to do every so often as a way to connect with other music enthusiasts. Mostly I'm just interested in throwing around some ideas without the expectation that they'll be taken as gospel in academic circles. (And not to diminish said academic circles, but I'm far more interested in getting into dialogues with people from more journalistic/critical circles.)

Murgatroid, Thursday, 6 March 2014 20:04 (ten years ago) link

honeybus > night bus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn0hsxzE5eU

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 6 March 2014 20:42 (ten years ago) link

fresher than the sweetness in water...

afriendlypioneer, Thursday, 6 March 2014 21:02 (ten years ago) link

Thanks, Nate!

nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:00 (ten years ago) link

haha, nate's post convinces me to scroll back up the thread to get the whole story.

i'm sure all that guy wants is for you to reject "the man," man, and post content free on a blog. like god intended when he created the earth 6,000 years ago.

Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:02 (ten years ago) link

Live vlog and prosper

Evan, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:31 (ten years ago) link

patrin doesn't know how to sign up for a new account?

JoeStork, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:36 (ten years ago) link

Or maybe he doesn't want one

Scooby Doom (۩), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:40 (ten years ago) link

He seems to look upon this board with nearly as much scorn as Ott

nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:45 (ten years ago) link

*cries*

Derping 2, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:48 (ten years ago) link

well, that's fine, but "i can't post there" comes off a little disingenuous then.

JoeStork, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:49 (ten years ago) link

he meant "I can't post there because it makes me feel unclean"

nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:52 (ten years ago) link

Why should he sign up again to make one post? Why does it matter if someone posts that thought for him?

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:53 (ten years ago) link

"i can't post here because i don't care enough about you jackholes to sign up for another gd email account"

Derping 2, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:55 (ten years ago) link

He seems to look upon this board with nearly as much scorn as Ott

Nah. I decided to take a break some years back because of personal reasons (stress, anxiety, etcetera) and felt like I didn't really fit. It's not scorn (definitely not on an Ott-type caliber; this is not possible). More that I got fed up with the shit I was getting into, a lot of it my fault.

well, that's fine, but "i can't post there" comes off a little disingenuous then.

I can now. Registration took a couple hours. Not sure why I picked a late-period Sun Ra LP for my username other than that I like the record, but w/e

lanquidity, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:58 (ten years ago) link

(tho I'm not interested in posting about gripe stuff for the most part, just yakkin' about music, figuring stuff out, the usual)

lanquidity, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:59 (ten years ago) link

welcome back!

Scooby Doom (۩), Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:03 (ten years ago) link

welcome back, sir.

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:03 (ten years ago) link

yo is it true that lanquidity got sonned in a cheese beef with Ott

hi n8

gimme the lute (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:05 (ten years ago) link

hey dude, i'm not even involved in this debate, sorry for harassing you but welcome!

JoeStork, Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:06 (ten years ago) link

yo is it true that lanquidity got sonned in a cheese beef with Ott

This has made the whole ordeal worth it

lanquidity, Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:15 (ten years ago) link

serious use of "stakeholder" re: message board citation beef is amazingly classic.

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 March 2014 01:08 (ten years ago) link

haha otm

mookieproof, Friday, 7 March 2014 01:23 (ten years ago) link

to call back to earlier in the thread, now at least i know his i.t. job is real

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 March 2014 01:25 (ten years ago) link

welcome back nate, however briefly

PSY talks The Nut Job (forksclovetofu), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:03 (ten years ago) link

lot of posts about an inconsequential pop music opinion-haver, i see, gj ilx

k3vin k., Friday, 7 March 2014 03:06 (ten years ago) link

^^^shit-stirrer sad that he missed the prime beef

mookieproof, Friday, 7 March 2014 03:19 (ten years ago) link

i barely see k3v on ilx now he's sticking to his promise not to troll the race thread

you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Friday, 7 March 2014 07:24 (ten years ago) link

CAD OTMx2

Charles, hatless (sic), Friday, 7 March 2014 13:49 (ten years ago) link

also poor nate getting dragged back in here :(

Charles, hatless (sic), Friday, 7 March 2014 13:50 (ten years ago) link

Whatever the rights and wrongs of any individual case, Ott always appears so obnoxious that if he were kidnapped by Somali pirates I'd feel bad for the pirates.

What is wrong with songs? Absolutely nothing. Songs are great. (DL), Friday, 7 March 2014 14:08 (ten years ago) link

"You guys hijhack ships for money? You should get telemarketing jobs and do piracy on your free time for the love of it!"

I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Friday, 7 March 2014 14:10 (ten years ago) link

it's so funny/sad to see guys mourn the aspiration towards principles and ethics in '80s/'90s indie by demanding everyone engage ethically with '80s/'90s indie sounds.

da croupier, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:13 (ten years ago) link

work for haliburton, who gives a fuck, UNLESS YOU HAVE A FUZZBOX THEN NO

da croupier, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:14 (ten years ago) link

hmmm

https://twitter.com/wewenthenfap

goole, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:28 (ten years ago) link

ilx up and spontaneously twittermorphized. machine sentience!

Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:31 (ten years ago) link

New registrant Twin Stars of Pence should frequent the base ball board.

Andy K, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:56 (ten years ago) link

that is a really awful concept twitter, even by concept twitter standards

two months pass...

I found that article utterly unreadable

Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Friday, 9 May 2014 19:47 (ten years ago) link

straight gibberish

adam, Friday, 9 May 2014 19:50 (ten years ago) link

isn't it always

afriendlypioneer, Friday, 9 May 2014 19:52 (ten years ago) link

The ultimate problem for Apple, Beats and any other media distributor is that people want to experience art for themselves. These marketers speak in terms of data, simplification, and “music discovery,” an asinine formalization of “turning on the radio.” It’s not about discovery, the “user experience,” or their “trust” in your brand: it’s about finding a way we can arrive at music, on our own terms, free of the hype, advertisements, PR chicanery, and editorial bias you’re offering. We’re not paying you to tell us what to like: we’re paying you to provide us an easy platform through which to navigate music.

Shut up, and take our money.

famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 9 May 2014 19:52 (ten years ago) link

[guy I've never heard of and have no reason to care about]’s CV reads like [incomprehensible reference to old-ass shitty movie], and [disclaimer that just leaves me more baffled. Plucked from the back room of [???] by [namedrop of some other dude I have never heard of and don't give a shit about] in [21 fucking years ago asshole, some of your readers are that age], Rogers lived out the decade as a hybrid digital hipster [what the fuck does that mean?], parlaying his double-threat reputation as a web designer and music industry insider into a lucrative if fruitless position at Yahoo! in the early 2000s [wanks, frustratingly unable to cum]. Honing an innate talent for concept-evangelism [motherfucker what?], Rogers absorbed the slick, bulletproof jargon [come again?] of his peers in digital marketing, and set out on his own, forming [Circle Jerx, Inc., now defunct] in 2007.

Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Friday, 9 May 2014 20:13 (ten years ago) link

Killer lede graf brah. Tell me more.

Doritos Loco Parentis (Hurting 2), Friday, 9 May 2014 20:13 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.