The BBC

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2150 of them)

^ we refer to this as BBC Gaia

sktsh, Sunday, 16 March 2014 19:22 (ten years ago) link

the review show was fucking terrible, good riddance

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:09 (ten years ago) link

however, what will bidisha do now??

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:09 (ten years ago) link

too soon?

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:10 (ten years ago) link

That article is from match 2013

koogs, Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:22 (ten years ago) link

March 2013

koogs, Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:22 (ten years ago) link

once a month is still TOO MUCH

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:27 (ten years ago) link

The final episode is this Sunday, apparently.

painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture (DavidM), Thursday, 27 March 2014 22:59 (ten years ago) link

http://www.thestage.co.uk/news/2014/03/bbc-axes-review-show-20-years/

I hope they bring back Tom Paulin one last time, if only in order for him to call Harry Hill's X-Factor musical Zionist propaganda, or something.

painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture (DavidM), Thursday, 27 March 2014 23:05 (ten years ago) link

three weeks pass...

I just saw the last episode without knowing it was being cancelled, I hadn't seen it in a few months. It and Culture Show and any other similar programmes used to annoy me a lot but I enjoyed them enough to watch them regularly for something like 10 or more years; sometimes there was really good stuff in there.
I'd prefer to think the internet has replaced these shows than the idea that anyone interested in this sort of stuff has dwindled that badly.
BBC 4 really has turned to shit. I don't think I'd mind if BBC was sold, especially if it meant people stopped getting harrassed about tv licences, because I've always dreamed of not having a tv someday.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 01:09 (ten years ago) link

BBC Broadcast was already sold to an Autralian hedge fund several years ago. What other bits do you think should be sold? And who do you think should be the buyer?

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 April 2014 11:58 (ten years ago) link

Don't think Robert cares as long as his 'dream' "of not having a tv someday" is realized.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 18 April 2014 12:53 (ten years ago) link

I'll admit I don't know much about the issue and if I am curious enough, I hope all the facts don't take too many hours to read.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 13:15 (ten years ago) link

I don't even have a dream.

pick it up for ripple laser (onimo), Friday, 18 April 2014 13:28 (ten years ago) link

just take responsibility for your own life and get rid of your own damned TV and leave the BBC intact for those of us who want it and appreciate it, even for its flaws.

it definitely wasn't designed to be a pants pocket player (stevie), Friday, 18 April 2014 16:26 (ten years ago) link

and who want to pay for it

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 16:32 (ten years ago) link

not really any sentient argument for paying for market-level shit like bbc1 radio1 etc via a poll tax enforced by criminal censure

that shit should all be privatized and the less market amenable public interest stuff financed via general taxation

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 16:34 (ten years ago) link

I live with other people, it isn't my tv.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 16:37 (ten years ago) link

Actually, fuck privatising the BBC. A TV licence is cheaper than the cable package I'd inevitably be forced to buy in the name of 'choice' in a post-privatised world. I consider that my licence pays for multiple channels and radio stations where I never have to watch an advert for anything but another BBC programme. BARGAIN.

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:07 (ten years ago) link

yeah the serenity you get from not having to watch adverts is probably less valuable than ending a system that criminalizes hundreds of thousands of people irrespective of whether they consume bbc content, two thirds of whom are women, along with plenty of non-english speakers, the indigent and vulnerable, whoever the capita tv licensing etc vermin can intimidate most easily in lieu of a search warrant, and dozens of whom are then imprisoned when they can't afford the fine

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:15 (ten years ago) link

I have a friend who said the investigating people she met were polite and easy to convince. But I get the impression others are more demanding? If I moved into my own place with no tv, would I possibly have to convince them I don't use the iPlayer or the radio function on my CD player?

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 17:29 (ten years ago) link

there is no obligation to acknowedge them at all unless they have a search warrant

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:34 (ten years ago) link

But what if they did have a warrant? How much do you have to prove.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 17:36 (ten years ago) link

hundreds of thousands of people? really?
I know a real piece of work who takes pride in refusing to pay for a TV licence (despite being well able to, and watching it very loudly all day) and she won't answer her door unless you do a 'special knock' because she's scared of being busted. However, she's never had anything more than a letter every so often.

kinder, Friday, 18 April 2014 17:39 (ten years ago) link

bbc scotland news is a disgrace. Biased towards the no to independence campaign. Its really turning me against the news department of the BBC.

Scooby Doom (۩), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:39 (ten years ago) link

btw you can use iplayer as long as its not a live program. Just watch it after the progs finished on catch up

Scooby Doom (۩), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:40 (ten years ago) link

they won't have a warrant unless unless they have already amassed or feigned enough 'evidence' to convince a magistrate that you require but do not have a tv licence

they very rarely obtain warrants anyway, there are foi reqests to individual police forces confirming this

"I don't even own a TV"

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:42 (ten years ago) link

so, they can't come in?

kinder, Friday, 18 April 2014 17:43 (ten years ago) link

bbc scotland news is a disgrace. Biased towards the no to independence campaign. Its really turning me against the news department of the BBC.

― Scooby Doom (۩), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:39 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

the bbc will always act as a state broadcaster, supine to whichever administration, the most credulous of all tv channels during the iraq war and now happily normalizing/rationalizing the current government's welfare polciy (though there are minor correctives and exceptions)

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/07/bbc-j10.html

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:51 (ten years ago) link

I hate the way BBC News are pushing welfare bullshit, but I've heard that when the government of the day gets more than 60 per cent of the vote, which is the case right now, there's an onus on the state broadcaster not to challenge their policies.

I'm just wary of any privatisation, including handing over the licence monitoring job to Crapita, more than I am exercised about £12/month*.
Besides, you can use iPlayer and/or the radio without a licence. What you aren't supposed to do is watch live TV.

*The last time I had no licence and a Crapitan on my doorstep, he tried to front his way into my flat by pretending he was one of the builders working on my kitchen. He got told. The real builders were massively entertained by seeing him frog-marched out with 'You. FUCK. OFF. NOW!'

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:53 (ten years ago) link

hundreds of thousands of people? really?

― kinder, Friday, 18 April 2014 18:39 (12 minutes ago)

uhuh, ~200k p/a

so, they can't come in?

― kinder, Friday, 18 April 2014 18:43 (8 minutes ago)

~99% time no

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:54 (ten years ago) link

Yet they never manage to catch Charles Moore, who writes columns about refusing to have a licence. BTW, if you work at the BBC and are found not to have one, you're sacked.

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:56 (ten years ago) link

they would never catch charles moore cuz the capita salesmen who earn pro rata will always victimize poor areas

they have never visited me in an upper middle class inner suburb of london (full of tv execs and at least one bbc 'talent' nearby)

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 17:59 (ten years ago) link

Why is radio and iPlayer made exceptions? They don't have adverts either, so it is basically free in that case.

This has nothing to do with quality but one of the current weather reporters for Scottish news is incredibly beautiful.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 18 April 2014 18:01 (ten years ago) link

I hate the way BBC News are pushing welfare bullshit, but I've heard that when the government of the day gets more than 60 per cent of the vote, which is the case right now, there's an onus on the state broadcaster not to challenge their policies.

― baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:53 (8 minutes ago)

don't think this is true in any formalized sense, bbc kowtows via the natural inertia of hegemony in a a british context

section 4 of their charter covers informality

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:04 (ten years ago) link

nb i don't require a tv license, the only live tv broadcasts i watch are russian hd football or tennis streams, which still necessitates having a tv license since they are shown simultaneously via domestic broadcasters, so i take a bottle of wine to my (tv licensed) cuz nextdoors in order to watch them

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:10 (ten years ago) link

*The last time I had no licence and a Crapitan on my doorstep, he tried to front his way into my flat by pretending he was one of the builders working on my kitchen. He got told. The real builders were massively entertained by seeing him frog-marched out with 'You. FUCK. OFF. NOW!'

― baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:53 (18 minutes ago)

since you had corroborating evidence from the builders you might have reported this to the police as aggravated trespass / harassment / assault / whatever and complained to capita independently (the individual wastemen presumably being logged to certain addresses and identifiable)

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 18:22 (ten years ago) link

lol

caek, Friday, 18 April 2014 19:12 (ten years ago) link

I might have done, but since he didn't actually cross the threshold, all I could do was to escort him from the block knowing the 'trades' button didn't work to get him back in. If you'd registered that important detail you wouldn't have introduced the coulda/shoulda/woulda element, right?

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 19:26 (ten years ago) link

yeah don't be so pissy, 'frog-marched out' left trespass ambiguous but irrespective of that, attempting to gain entry through impersonation is still worth reporting to the police

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 19:36 (ten years ago) link

Maybe less of the calling others pissy when in the midst of own epic attack of same - but feel free to call the cops if you're ever in that situation, OK?

*sigh*

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 20:03 (ten years ago) link

nah not really trying to engage yr own ample delusions of reference nor remotely doubting the capacity of fearsome west end matriarch big suze to send the capita bro packing with his tail between his legs so much as avowing the general principle, since the next person they victimize may well lack capacity (linguistic, mental, etc)

these people are cunts who behave entirely unconscionably so it is worth pursuing them when they betray very least their own protocols, and possibly the law too, not that they would ever get convicted for that (although a quick search shows a couple dozen tv license enforcers are successully prosecuted every year) but it's at least dubious enough to report it in order to expedite a private complaint to their employer

Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (nakhchivan), Friday, 18 April 2014 20:18 (ten years ago) link

*sigh*

baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 18 April 2014 20:38 (ten years ago) link

hey nakh do "market level" commercial rivals to radio 1 broadcast hour-long documentaries about teenage domestic abuse? do they play 65 hours of specialist music a week? do young people not deserve to have their culture reflected on the radio without being told what kind of pizza to be eating and what sort of mobile phones to buy?

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 19 April 2014 09:36 (ten years ago) link

fuck outta here

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 19 April 2014 09:38 (ten years ago) link

that shit should all be privatized and the less market amenable public interest stuff financed via general taxation

http://www.brandsoftheworld.com/sites/default/files/styles/logo-thumbnail/public/0018/4202/brand.gif

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 19 April 2014 09:39 (ten years ago) link

I hear args (certainly from people in classical music/R3 listeners) that R1/2 is basically just a 24/7 commercial because it broadcasts music that is distributed by private interests. Unlike R3 which has much of its avant-garde funded by public arts bodies.

I love R3 but I never had much for this. The BBC is about all sorts of output, has always been, and then music fundamentally (by what it is an, by whom it is made by, etc etc) muddies the waters anyway.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 19 April 2014 09:58 (ten years ago) link

how much of BBC output is core BBC? I ask because the BBC seems in my lifetime to have essentially become a core outsourcing department (with extremely expensive Big Four consultants and a high level of managerial bureaucracy).

However, presumably buildings (W1 and Salford), the full news chain of production (some journos, playout, engineering etc) are still entirely BBC.

my entire being revolts against BBC privatisation, but a combination of having to money chase the "you get taxpayers' money, be more populist"/"you're indistinguishable from itv/sky" right-wing BBC-hating fork, and an apparently supine news editorial policy means I scrape around a bit when looking for detail. plus an awful lot is spent on the bureaucracy of outsourcing, as I say (crucially, less than in-house production, but of course the money goes to different people).

probably still a higher percentage of arts programming, right? radio: 3 has become a bit of a battleground for the fork mentioned above, but although 4 seems to outsource to external production companies as much as TV, the editorial policy seems sound? Sounds from TH like R1 is still providing something beyond the remit if many popular music commercial stations. Olympics coverage was remarkable, an extraordinary feat of cross-platform broadcasting, but it knew it didn't have to fight it's wearying public funding arguments for that. what else?

Fizzles, Saturday, 19 April 2014 10:23 (ten years ago) link

three weeks pass...

This is essential viewing whilst it is still on iplayer, could listen to Ian Nairn talking forever, wasters like Richard Clay, Helen Czerski and the odious Brian Cox take notes please. Not that any of them will ever be worth shit.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01rn270/Nairn_Across_Britain_From_London_to_Lancashire/

under the cobblestones, le dogshit (xelab), Saturday, 10 May 2014 21:17 (ten years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.