Rolling Cannabis Politics Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1879 of them)

yea. it's decriminalized here in MA but that doesn't solve my problem of having to ask around all the other parents of small children that i hang out with if they know where i can buy pot. i haven't smoked in a long time because i don't know anyone who smokes pot (or better stated, i don't know whether they smoke pot and i haven't asked if t

marcos, Monday, 7 April 2014 22:08 (ten years ago) link

it's a step though, i admit. decriminalization is ultimately a good thing to put MA on the path to legalization

marcos, Monday, 7 April 2014 22:10 (ten years ago) link

i don't know anyone who smokes pot (or better stated, i don't know whether they smoke pot and i haven't asked

I was in this situation for a while but then realized that one of my former co-workers has a long pony tail and plans his summer vacation around Phish shows. Only a couple months til this is a just a historical artifact.

joygoat, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 00:11 (ten years ago) link

xp: yeah, having kids definitely causes me to place more stringent criteria on who I let myself associate with and how.

take a piece of mr. baxter's hand (how's life), Tuesday, 8 April 2014 13:12 (ten years ago) link

http://americanlivewire.com/wp-content/uploads/139161893742-551x400.jpg

oh plz plz plz pennsylvania

Mordy , Tuesday, 8 April 2014 23:40 (ten years ago) link

i heard somewhere that legalization may be on the ballot in MA in 2016. i don't know if i'll still be here but that would be rad. i also spend enough time in VT that i'll take it there, too

marcos, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 13:19 (ten years ago) link

but i was told crime rates would rise

http://rt.com/usa/colorado-crime-change-legalization-study-017/

reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 10 April 2014 16:55 (ten years ago) link

The scientists determined that medical marijuana did not contribute to higher crime levels and may even contribute to lower levels of crime, particularly homicide

Omg the stoners were right: reefer will lead to world peace

Mordy , Thursday, 10 April 2014 17:04 (ten years ago) link

Piece in nytimes about the Brooklyn DA not planning to prosecute low level pot offenses.

calstars, Friday, 25 April 2014 00:21 (ten years ago) link

two weeks pass...

hey, any word on all the "no cannabis money in banks" stories of last year? has any of that been resolved?

marcos, Monday, 12 May 2014 18:33 (nine years ago) link

also, what's going on in washington? anyone there would wants to comment? seems like i only hear about stuff going on in colorado

marcos, Monday, 12 May 2014 18:38 (nine years ago) link

WA has been slow to roll this out, though a few weeks ago they announced the locations where sales will take place (hey, a block from my house! that'll be weird). Right now they are awarding licenses to growers, processors, and sellers. No one business can do more than one step, and each step is taxed, and each step is permitted. WA liquor control board is a very conservative body, and unsurprisingly way slower than CO. The growers can now start legally growing, I think, or we're close to it, and then in 12 weeks it can start to be processed, then sold. So we're looking at summer.

stangelo (anky), Monday, 12 May 2014 18:46 (nine years ago) link

in the meantime dozens of quasi-legal delivery services have popped up. I mean of course there's always been delivery, but now the feeling is that no one is going to F with what they're doing. supposedly they (I) pay sales tax.

the sales location thing has been fascinating to watch. being in the city a thousand feet from a park, school, police station, federal building, transit center (and more) has made for very few locations. None in downtown seattle, none on capitol hill (1 at 23rd and union but more CD), six in Sodo, an industrial area. At least one of those is near a light rail station. None in the majority-minority part of the city. one a block from my house.

stangelo (anky), Monday, 12 May 2014 18:49 (nine years ago) link

can't be a 1,000 ft from a police station? that's weird.

marcos, Monday, 12 May 2014 19:05 (nine years ago) link

frankly the only one of those that makes any sense is a school. and that's still dumb.

marcos, Monday, 12 May 2014 19:06 (nine years ago) link

yah what if booze had the same restrictions

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Monday, 12 May 2014 19:08 (nine years ago) link

whoops not cop shops but A new state law says you can have a licensed retail store for recreational marijuana, but it can’t be located within 1,000 feet of many facilities: schools, parks, transit centers, arcades, or libraries. In Seattle, that 1,000-foot rule means most of the city is off-limits. Smaller cities may have no eligible sites.

stangelo (anky), Monday, 12 May 2014 19:25 (nine years ago) link

I live in a small university town in WA and I heard July 1st for the opening of the three stores we're supposed to get but I'll believe it when I see it. Please note when I moved here 8 years ago (prior to liquor store privatization) there was exactly one place to buy liquor in town; apparently soon we'll have three times that many to buy weed. Lots of smaller/more conservative places have moratoriums in place and won't allow any at all, or won't for a year or so after everything sort of settles down.

I'm not sure if the WSLCB is inept or overly cautious or just wanted CO to go first and see what sort of problems they encountered but it's kind of annoying.

I'm also right near the Idaho border and I'm curious about how all that's going to pan out - the hippiest town in Idaho is right over the border from me, not sure if they're going to just throw their hands up and resign themselves or if they're going to crack down hard somehow. I was also reading something last week about places in the eastern suburbs of Spokane actively hoping to get business from places in Idaho that are decidedly more conservative than my neighbors.

joygoat, Monday, 12 May 2014 19:37 (nine years ago) link

None in the majority-minority part of the city.

This is interesting because there are soooo many dispensaries on Rainier, including three clustered together just a couple blocks from my house.

steendriver dysphoria hoos (The Reverend), Monday, 12 May 2014 21:00 (nine years ago) link

yeah, weird right? Everyone will have to go up and over beacon hill to sodo and Georgetown.

stangelo (anky), Monday, 12 May 2014 21:07 (nine years ago) link

arcades?

how's life, Monday, 12 May 2014 21:12 (nine years ago) link

ha do arcades still exist?

marcos, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 14:33 (nine years ago) link

Apparently!

http://www.arcadelocations.net/PlaceSearch.php?state=Washington

how's life, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 17:24 (nine years ago) link

we have a couple in SF

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 17:43 (nine years ago) link

cool

The Reverend, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 08:24 (nine years ago) link

i know this is a sentiment shared by everyone in this thread and anyone advocating legalization, but i've been thinking a lot about how completely ludricous, utterly bonkers, fucking batshit crazy it is that anyone would give enough of a shit about cannabis that they would spend billions of dollars to keep it illegal and try to incarcerate the millions and millions of people who use it. i mean, at some level i have always that thought this, going back all the way to my early stoner days as a teenager, so it's not a new revelation. but something about the larger media attention on legalization and the CO and WA state experiments have just kind of made me feel that there is not even a remotely good or even reasonable argument for prohibiting it.

marcos, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 18:28 (nine years ago) link

like it's long entered a territory in which i think you are just a fucking buffoon for thinking it should be illegal.

marcos, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 18:29 (nine years ago) link

Oh yeah. It's complete lunacy. The only people left opposing it are either completely maniacal insaniacs or people who stand to lose their jobs in the drug-war.

how's life, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 18:36 (nine years ago) link

Two groups with an inordinate amount of power over the American political process, it should be noted

building a desert (art), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 18:44 (nine years ago) link

It's complete lunacy.

Like any psychoactive drug, cannabis can be abused enough to fuck up your life, usually as part of a larger mix of drugs and alcohol. Stories circulate in society about this kind of abuse and it forms the nucleus of opposition to legalization. It causes people to focus on the potential for harm in legalization, while being blind to the massive harm that's been caused by prohibition.

Locking up millions of mostly young people and funneling billions of dollars to murderous thugs who sow corruption wherever they operate is surely worse than any societal harm we are preventing through prohibition, but you have to recognize there will be various problems associated with legalization, too. It is a trade off, but a hugely beneficial one, taken as a whole.

epoxy fule (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 18:48 (nine years ago) link

oh! you poor dear

epoxy fule (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 20:45 (nine years ago) link

can i just
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rl-rcmNLv8k

marcos, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 20:47 (nine years ago) link

I'm not going to stop you...bottoms up

calstars, Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:28 (nine years ago) link

i wish i could remember how to put a youtube video on loop because i kinda love that

sitting on a claud all day gotta make your butt numb (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 May 2014 06:37 (nine years ago) link

Urgh, that video is terrible. Adolescent cannabis culture is even worse than hippie cannabis culture.

DISMISSED AS CHANCE (NotEnough), Thursday, 15 May 2014 07:00 (nine years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/magazine/the-bud-light-ification-of-bud.html?_r=0 about mass-market weed to arrive in the future

some very sloppy writing though:

The plant is relatively cheap and easy to grow, and not complicated to process either.

two paragraphs later:

The inefficiencies continue to pile up after the harvest. Marijuana has to be cured, then trimmed, before it is sold, and much of this work is still done by hand. Workers use scissors to cut away tough outer leaves and expose the smokable part of the plant. It’s a labor-intensive process...

marcos, Monday, 19 May 2014 15:51 (nine years ago) link

so a labor-intensive process done by hand, but it's not a complicated process

marcos, Monday, 19 May 2014 15:52 (nine years ago) link

ime that's accurate. it's time-consuming to harvest but not complicated. and definitely easy to grow.

Mordy, Monday, 19 May 2014 15:52 (nine years ago) link

i get the point though, it's complicated now but won't be in the future given standard agricultural technology used for widespread legal crops. it just could've been written a little better, imo

marcos, Monday, 19 May 2014 15:53 (nine years ago) link

looking forward to a How It's Made episode about big ag marijuana cultivation.

how's life, Monday, 19 May 2014 16:00 (nine years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/04/opinion/dowd-dont-harsh-our-mellow-dude.html?_r=0

such a dumb piece

marcos, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 19:18 (nine years ago) link

so many lolz

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 19:22 (nine years ago) link

"I drank this entire bottle of vodka and got TOTALLY SICK why didn't anybody warn me??!?"

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 19:23 (nine years ago) link

maureen can't master her high


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.