words that annoy

"Deconstruct" has a pretty different spin, too, doesn't it? Or have I been totally missing some of the connotations of "unpack?" It seems like the general use is just to ... take a claim or idea that seems to bundle together or contain lots of internal ideas/assumptions and ... unpack the contents for individual examination.

That's how I use both deconstruct and unpack. Though deconstruct does carry all the baggage of Derridean deconstruction, that involves abstruse language games, and has connotations of taking apart that claim or idea in a rarefied academic manner. This is why, outside of discussions with people that have a similar background to mine, I will use unpack instead of deconstruct.

Problematize ... that was used in almost every writing assignment in my major (er, concentration ... to use the institution's term) when I was an undergrad.

No wonder you smoke so much.

^^ ha ha ha! Yes, I simultaneously smoke and problematize my smoking. American Spirits allow for five minutes of deconstruction time.

yea "problematize" is great, haha. i have trouble using it seriously anymore after so many undergrad theory papers

"i'm going to problematize the vagina" my college housemate once said, for a paper in feminist phil

yea "problematize" is great, haha. i have trouble using it seriously anymore after so many undergrad theory papers

I actually have this trouble as well. However, "problematic" is one of those words that I can't stop using. It comes in handy in professional communications, and is my diplomatic version of "wrong," "stupid," and or "likely to be fucked up."

I love both problematize and problematic, especially the latter.

I had a lecturer who'd correct anyone who said 'problematic'. He would admonish them that the correct word was 'problemic'. Also: many people say 'methodology' when they mean 'method'.

I had a lecturer who'd correct anyone who said 'problematic'. He would admonish them that the correct word was 'problemic'

Is it, or is it not? Now I'm confused and worried haha!

I use cheers a lot in email sign offs as well. I'm terrible for it.

there ain't no 'problemic' in the o e d.

my mother and my brother both use 'cheers' for signoffs in conversation and email (& brother's girlfriend has started doing it too): i dislike it cos 'cheers', to me, has always meant 'thank you' (or the sound of making a toast), so i immediately think 'wait wait for what am i being thanked?'.

i dislike the word 'brutalised' when it is used to mean 'drunk' e.g. 'oh man i got totally brutalised last night' - I have heard it a few times now, I guess a more extreme version of your usual 'bladdered' or 'wrecked' or and etc, but it always gets me stuck on this loop of 'wait what does 'to brutalize' mean again?'

I know a Canadian who says 'cheers'. Is that acceptable?

as a canadian, without equivocation: no.

ok some equivocation: ive actually started to get used to it, as it's almost the default sign-off where i live now, but it really jarred for a while because it just seemed so forced as some affected demonstration of pretentious faux-british civility. i actually like the word, so it's prob more down to specific people ive met, who i suspect have adopted it recently and who deploy it with a certain sense of self-satisfaction, tho maybe im imagining that. but for a long time it was almost like:

"ok, talk to you later"

"ok, cheers"

"yup...wait what?"

"anyhoo" ... I don't know where it came from. It obviously came from somewhere and trickled down to the general populace. I don't understand why people say this. Maybe this is why I find it annoying.

Sometimes, when someone signs off on an email with "cheers," it looks to me like some kind of stage direction, and I'm like ... it wasn't that great of an email, man

irregardless

(the word, not in reference to xpost)

"anyhoo" ... I don't know where it came from.

I sort of see it as the language equivalent of wearing ties with cartoon characters on. Not saying that the two overlap, just that it seems to be trying to imbue the mundane with gruelling, bleak cheeriness.

Lots of candidates for me - although for the moment all I can think of are the review cliches 'tour de force' (not a single word I know, but the particles don't irritate) and 'magisterial'.

It just annoys the fuck out of me.

The word "blog" to mean "blog post," as in "In my last blog, I mentioned..." or "I'm going to go home and write a blog about it!"

cheers meaning thanks is fine by me because when I'm signing an email/letter, thats what I want it to mean!

ladder of email formality:
cheers/thanks
regards
kind regards

I dont think Ive ever written "yours sincerely" in an email but possibly in a job app one.

This:

"ok, talk to you later"

"ok, cheers"

"yup...wait what?"

Is completely wrong. I'd say "cheers" to the guy at the bottle shop after he hands me my change and drinks, but not as a "goodbye" to someone wtf?

well you could if you considered it a contraction of 'cheerio'

Hmm I suppose so!

hubby

^^^new display name 4 u and i'm srs this time

no i'm HHooHHHooHH-oob

fair enough.

contumely

A phrase, but:

"No room in the inn."

(said to me by a stranger on the subway last week as a number of people tried to get onto the packed car we were on)

A big fat fuck-you to "Cack-handed."

Blame it on Jess Harvell; he made it up.

Nice Jaymcing, Jaymc.

i don't like the word "forefront"

"Snob."

Sounds disgusting, looks disgusting (thanks to associations with "snot"), often used in an annoying way.

Stop saying this, people!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojY1Sj1-E0Q&feature=fvw

"Palimpsest" which is another one of those big-vocab words that people acquire and then overuse and try to steer conversations in directions where it can be dropped. It's like a post-grad stoner word.

I can't see there being a lot of use for that one! Or are they all using it metaphorically?

I've actually noticed artists overusing it as a work title.

Haha, I have used "Palimpsest" as the title of a work!

But I have, you know, a genuine abiding interest in palimpsests! What else would you call them?

I should add that the work in question was quite literally concerned with a surface which had been inscribed upon again and agin over time. You know, like a palimpsest!

Maybe the subject is a little tired rather than the word?

And maybe people should stop using literal titles.

dang dude this is just embarrassing

No it isn't. Just because Spencer says so doesn't mean the whole WORLD has to agree

It is definitely used a lot though, I agree

I should add that the work in question was quite literally concerned with a surface which had been inscribed upon again and agin over time. You know, like a palimpsest!

don't mean to tell you yr work, but i'm pretty sure you were actually looking for 'pimpliest'

http://www.jangalang.com/images/acne-bad.jpg

Adam, you have a special dispensation. It's all copacetic, bra!

"Yup."

Mostly just when drawn out: yuuuup.

A guy at work uses the word "excellent" an obscene amount — but never just once, it's always "EXcellent, EXcellent!", with an accent on the first syllable.

Palimpsest is a great word when deployed well, great in meaning, etc. The "sest" part, and the associations with "incest" just give it a weird feeling.

The recent trend of overusing "extrapolate".