Rolling Marvel Cinematic Universe thread (+ a poll: Classic or Dud?)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2860 of them)

they should just start adapting the hostess ads

I thought that's what they were already doing

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:05 (nine years ago) link

This desperate attempt to maintain the Spider-License without actually making another Spider-Man film feels very AfterM*A*S*H/Hogan Family-esque.

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:18 (nine years ago) link

I actually think a Daily Bugle show isn't a half bad idea.

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:18 (nine years ago) link

peter parker making jim-face to the camera every time jonah yells about spidey

da croupier, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:22 (nine years ago) link

the newsroom except with pictures of spiderman occasionally

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:24 (nine years ago) link

i wonder if simmons, elizabeth banks, tobey maguire and bill nunn would actually be down to do a like eight-episode thing for cable or whatever. i mean maguire did the spoils of babylon.

da croupier, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:33 (nine years ago) link

Of course that's already been done, albeit with a character that Marvel owns

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pulse_(comics)

Number None, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:35 (nine years ago) link

The strongest runs on Spider-Man IMO are those that focus more on the ensemble and reduce Spider-Man to something like a supporting role. The Pulse is definitely in line with that, yes.

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:44 (nine years ago) link

Like, I think I'm starting to realize that I just don't care that much about Spider-Man/Peter Parker as a character divorced from the context of his supporting cast.

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 17:45 (nine years ago) link

I for one would LOVE to see a Trouble trainwreck adaptation

Nhex, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:10 (nine years ago) link

"And that baby that her future husband's brother's future wife eventually had...became the Amazing Spider-Man."

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:13 (nine years ago) link

Millar is such a creep. Remember the covers for these things?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Marvel_Trouble_1.jpg

Number None, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:40 (nine years ago) link

I remember lots of suggestions in the lead-up to its release that it was gonna be something sleazy.

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:46 (nine years ago) link

tbf they're not that off from other YA-targeted book covers. i didn't actually get a crepey vibe from those

Nhex, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:22 (nine years ago) link

http://www.comicvine.com/spider-mans-tangled-web/4050-7255/

This series was mostly about his supporting cast. The Rhino two part story was my favourite, it was much like that Simpsons episode in which Homer gets the crayon removed from his head and can't deal with being intelligent.
Nothing else really grabbed me.

Venom had quite a lot of titles so that wouldn't be too hard. But those were mostly reliant upon insatiable Venom fans in the 90s.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:02 (nine years ago) link

Hi, I remember that Flower for Algernon-style Rhino story. It was pretty all right.

Nhex, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:14 (nine years ago) link

Milligan and Fegredo, IIRC?

i only wanted freidn (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:16 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, I just checked and it's even called "Flowers For Rhino". I'm sure they did the Frogman story too. Paul Pope and Bruce Jones did some stories too.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:26 (nine years ago) link

Back then I didn't appreciate Fegredo but now I realise he really can draw.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:31 (nine years ago) link

Tangled Web was kind of an anthology series with each arc (or issue) being a different writer/artist combo, right? I remember picking up the Paul Pope one, and maybe a couple others

jenny holzer, ilxor (mh), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:43 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, there was a Greg Rucka issue about one of the Kingpin's goons which got a lot of praise

Number None, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 21:54 (nine years ago) link

that was a good issue! all those are available on marvel's ipad app.

Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 22:00 (nine years ago) link

Milligan did not write the Frog-Man story that Fegredo drew.

Spider-Man didn't appear at all in Paul Grist's b&w Daily Bugle series iirc?

the incredible string gland (sic), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 22:46 (nine years ago) link

There is an issue about a supervillain bar where they all drink and talk. When it came out I thought it was one of the best Spidey stories ever because the ending sent a shiver down my spine but I have mixed feelings about it now for a reason that I've soured on the genre in general: it doesn't generate it's own heat. The awe comes from the reference to big stories of the past.

That's how too much of the genre works now. It exploits the feelings people have for past stories by building stories around them that enshrine the old ones but don't shine by themselves.
But now I don't even think the death of Gwen Stacy was that good either. In fact it was probably the start of an awful superhero trend.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 23:52 (nine years ago) link

three weeks pass...

i didn't know mike colter was up for the role of luke cage - he's fantastic in the good wife and i can totally see him as luke.

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 5 December 2014 10:03 (nine years ago) link

Ohhhhhhhhhhhh that dude! Yeah that is excellent casting

the farakhan of gg (DJP), Friday, 5 December 2014 14:23 (nine years ago) link

Among projects in development are an animated Spider-Man comedy that would be produced by Chris Miller and Phil Lord, the team behind “22 Jump Street” and “The Lego Movie”

that actually sounds like it could be good? wtf sony you're letting me down here

bizarro gazzara, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 10:15 (nine years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOyJqGtP-wU

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 13:06 (nine years ago) link

two months pass...

Well the bomb just dropped:

http://io9.com/its-official-spider-man-will-appear-in-the-marvel-movi-1684857245

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 05:17 (nine years ago) link

Marvel just announced that Spider-Man will appear in an unspecified Marvel film, that takes place in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Then after this "appearance":

"Sony Pictures will thereafter release the next installment of its $4 billion Spider-Man franchise, on July 28, 2017, in a film that will be co-produced by Kevin Feige and his expert team at Marvel and Amy Pascal.... Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger. Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films."

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? It could mean that we're getting a whole new Spider-Man franchise, or another Andrew Garfield movie... or maybe even that Sinister 6 film that's been kicking around forever. However, July 28th 2017 is currently set as the date for Marvel's Thor: Ragnarok — but hell, that might all change now.

Honestly, we're inclined to think that just about anything Sony was previously developing is most likely thrown out the window, including spin-offs. And Marvel will no doubt be taking the wheel on the character's development from here on out. Especially with this line so clearly printed in the Marvel release, "Together, they will collaborate on a new creative direction for the web slinger." That's big.

Oh and also, Spider-Man coming over to Marvel may lead the way for other Marvel characters showing up in Spider-Man movies as well "Marvel and Sony Pictures are also exploring opportunities to integrate characters from the MCU into future Spider-Man films."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 05:17 (nine years ago) link

Apparent new timeline:

SPIDER-MAN 7/28/17
THOR 3 11/3/17
BLACK PANTHER 7/6/18
CAPTAIN MARVEL 11/2/18
INHUMANS 7/12/19

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 05:21 (nine years ago) link

all the shoes drop

mh, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 05:22 (nine years ago) link

Except for Ditko's.

oochie wally (clean version) (sic), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 05:45 (nine years ago) link

feel kinda bad for andrew garfield - he was a really good peter parker (and emma stone was a great gwen). shame the scripts they were landed with were so sub-par.

tbh, after five movies with peter parker in 12 years i'd be happy if they gave him a rest for a while and put miles morales in the suit in the marvel universe.

bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 09:24 (nine years ago) link

nah, Garfield sucks. I'm glad he's dead

Number None, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:06 (nine years ago) link

Oh hooray maybe we'll finally get to see Spidey's origin story.

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:54 (nine years ago) link

he was a really good peter parker

I kind of think the opposite - he was a bit too cool as Peter, but really good as Spider-man; gangly physique and good with a wise-crack. Maguire was the other way round IMO.

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:56 (nine years ago) link

i kinda looked at him as the john romita version of peter as opposed to maguire's steve ditko version

bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 12:02 (nine years ago) link

any great spiderman movie has to realise that peter parker is the central character, not his costumed alter ego, and peter parker should always be the saddest sack this side of charlie brown

a cake of three ingredients (stevie), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 12:10 (nine years ago) link

though that's an interesting take, bizarro

a cake of three ingredients (stevie), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 12:11 (nine years ago) link

i dunno if peter parker needs to be a sad sack so much as he needs to be teetering on the edge of meltdown at all times - flat broke, being yelled at by jjj, worrying about aunt may, dealing with girl problems, his backup costume got ripped to shreds and ffs now the rhino's rampaging through downtown manhattan as well argh

bizarro gazzara, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 12:52 (nine years ago) link

chap and stevie otm

Nhex, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 13:42 (nine years ago) link

miles morales is supposed to be pretty young, right? so probably not a donald glover role? trying to think who would make a good miles and i keep scaring myself w/ the idea of jaden smith taking over the franchise.

Mordy, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 16:15 (nine years ago) link

iirc Amy pascal blamed After Earth on her inability to say no to will smith but between its failure and will joining suicide squad I'd hope we're jaden free

Pretty doubtful it won't be Peter Parker though. Can't see them wanting any hubbub or confusion getting in the way of the cheers when Spidey swings into cap 3

da croupier, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 16:18 (nine years ago) link

It won't NOT be Peter Parker I mean

da croupier, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 16:19 (nine years ago) link

i think it might be since in the comix they're bringing miles into the main canon (and shutting down ultimate) and they've talked about aligning the comix canon w/ the nu-media canon

Mordy, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 16:21 (nine years ago) link

post-world smashy, they're going to probably have:

- Peter and Mary Jane married
- Miles Morales is a young Spider-Man
- Maybe other spider types running around post-Spiderverse. Spider-Gwen?

mh, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 16:27 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.