Swiping people left and right: the Tinder/hook-up culture discussion

that would be considered a date. hooking up is really just having sex for the sake of sex, it's not casual sex per se. there is no communication involved in hooking up.

I meant going out as a group or just meeting someone out?

I understand now. I guess i'm really just discussing a specific form of hooking up then, one that involves completely shutting down emotionally.

i'm kinda skeptical that's possible

still trying to figure out how Treeship thinks Tinder is *only* the picture yet has gone on four or five Tinder dates!

they have like a tagline too, right and you can see mutual friends... the way i would use it was just swiping based on appearance. i'm the problem as much as tinder i guess. but yeah, what others have said, the elaborate profiles are equally problematic. what's missing in this sort of communication isn't more data

i think van horn street is on the mark about how depressing it can be to try to wade through hook up culture looking for a relationship. but the alternatives seem poor too. dating is just fucking scary: it's frightening to think about never meeting the right person and it's scary to think about sharing your life with someone and opening yourself up to pain.

i guess i want to clarify the vulnerability comment that people took issue with. i understand that the ideal is to be able to be totally open and comfortable and whatever but as a single person, each time i've done that i've ended up feeling shattered eventually. not that other people did anything wrong, necessarily, it's just the nature of the game. unlike your family, partners can abandon you. this being the case i can understand why people would want to "shut down"

no, family can also abandon you.

yes, that is true. sorry i was speaking from privilege there

general point still stands re. dating/relationships: there is no easy answer, and no matter what chances are you are going to take some serious emotional blows

i agree it's hard. on the upside i think having a support system and/or partner fail you / break your heart has the potential to make it easier.

you become more resilient. it might be an important part of life/development

zing has crashed twice instead of letting me post but I think Treeship has finally got it

nothing makes the last breakup sting less than the next one, or moving on and finding fulfillment

simon and garfunkel/ "i am a rock" solution still underrated though. i think that's still where i am rn

I thought Paul Simon was a dickhead to women

i have no idea. was referring to the narrator of that song that is meant to be ironic, where the narrator talks about being closed off and defensive and finding fulfillment in his books

so irony is underrated huh

I still don't understand whether Van Horn Street is saying that the large majority of students in his college got all the way through it without being in a romantic relationship, having someone they'd call a "boyfriend" or "girlfriend," etc. or whether he's just saying they don't go out on "dates" (i.e. two people making a scheduled arrangement to see a movie or eat at a restaurant.)

The latter seems unsurprising, the former I would actually think is weird. And the college kids I know often do have boyfriends or girlfriends.

in my world of young people i.e. the under-25s i know there's definitely much more fluidity between friendship and romance and seemingly less of a need to define relationship statuses than there is w/ people even just a few years older

^ for whatever reason, I was like that even 20 years ago before it was common. I wondered why it wasn't like that for nearly everyone else. I'm not sure what that means....

I still don't understand whether Van Horn Street is saying that the large majority of students in his college got all the way through it without being in a romantic relationship, having someone they'd call a "boyfriend" or "girlfriend," etc. or whether he's just saying they don't go out on "dates" (i.e. two people making a scheduled arrangement to see a movie or eat at a restaurant.)

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, December 15, 2014 10:30 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

My experience is mostly the former part, but researching what was the situation for undergrad kids today (18-22 years old say) I discovered it's the latter.

blaming "hook-up culture" seems slightly off the mark to me (and i'm not convinced it's so universal either). you don't have to wade through casual sex if you don't want to, but no given way of meeting new people is going to give you an idealised long-term relationship just because you want one. awkward dead-end first dates during which you realise you have nothing in common with the person opposite you aren't going to make you feel any better than emotionless random hook-ups, give or take a hangover.

(there's really no guaranteed route to finding yourself a life partner - drunken hook-ups can certainly be one, though, i think the most stable and long-term marriage i know started with a drunken hook-up - and you probably have to accept that on some level. i don't feel that hook-up culture "benefits no one" even if it doesn't lead anywhere.)

a lot of women like tinder because you can't be bothered by dudes until you've liked them. something to think about.

Their romance operandi — hooking up and hanging out — flouts the golden rule of what makes marriages and love work: emotional vulnerability.

oh that's the goldren rule?

xp it wouldn't take much for okcupid to implement such a system as well. it can also be implemented unofficially - my gf and i only started messaging after we'd both 'liked' each other

in my world of young people i.e. the under-25s i know there's definitely much more fluidity between friendship and romance and seemingly less of a need to define relationship statuses than there is w/ people even just a few years older

― Merdeyeux, Monday, December 15, 2014 10:36 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think some of this might be age rather than generation, like people under 25 tend to have more of a "cool with whatever" attitude, or pretend to have one even if they don't. Getting older makes you pickier about your relationship choices and definitions. For some reason I often think of a female friend who described an internet date experience like this: "So when we went back to my apartment, he was like 'so listen, I just got out of a divorce, and I'm just not up for anything too serious right now, is that ok?' And I was like, 'you know what, no, that's not ok. I don't want this kind of thing anymore.'"

i've been thinking about this and i realized that in order to know whether i want to associate with someone, i only feel totally comfortable when i'm able to see how they treat other people. i need to observe their behavior a little bit. this is another reason it's important to meet ppl irl. it works on ilx too, but okc or dating app wouldn't really allow you to see that sort of thing.

that's pretty fair, man alive!

I've had (and friends have had) the opposite experience where you're dating someone who's going through a divorce and it's like, idk, I'm not going to be able to give you a 100% commitment because you are still married to some other person

xp man alive yeah that sounds legit, better to be honest about intention and call it off early

i've been thinking about this and i realized that in order to know whether i want to associate with someone, i only feel totally comfortable when i'm able to see how they treat other people. i need to observe their behavior a little bit. this is another reason it's important to meet ppl irl. it works on ilx too, but okc or dating app wouldn't really allow you to see that sort of thing.

― vigetable (La Lechera), Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:41 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A woman I know once told me this. It is something so obvious, practical and common sense yet I realised almost no one I had ever met thought like this. Or, more precisely, few people I had met chose a serious mate based on this concept. That in itself was a shock to me, which is why I was initially so shocked by its practicality when she told me it.

? that's what the first date is for

xp man alive yeah that sounds legit, better to be honest about intention and call it off early

― Nhex, Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:52 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, I mean point being that it's an example I think of of people who were "cool with whatever" when they were younger who hit an age where suddenly they realize they're not.

imo the only benefit of apps and websites is to meet people you might otherwise never run into in your life as-is. you only have so many friends-of-friends, work acquaintances, neighborhood whoevers. other than that, the technology doesn't really do anything. you still have to do whatever it is you do when you meet someone.

i mean, it used to be your parents or busybodies from your church doing this stuff; thank god those days are long gone

or they've experienced enough "whatever" to know what they're not cool with xp

? that's what the first date is for

― goole, Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:02 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

not the people i know. but i guess that says more of those around me. i'm sure it is much more common in other circles, so i believe what you say. hope this doesn't sound too 'contradictory'/paradoxical

if you don't notice how your dates/friends treat others, you should probably think about how you treat others

it has nothing to do with noticing, it has more to do with what qualities you prioritise in your mate, your previous experiences in relationships, and many other variables.

i'm sure many people live clear-cut lives, but many others are stuck in the complexities of relationships, trauma, love, etc.

I have no idea what a clear-cut life is, but basic human interactions with others are a clear indicator of how you're going to interact, long-term

i think in theory i agree with you, and try to act that way myself, but unfortunately human interactions aren't always laid out simply and people don't talk about their feelings/intentions. i think favouring healthy relationships is obviously a start, but relationships don't seem so 'logical' and intentions are not so 'clear-cut', is what i'm saying. a large portion of 'casual' relationships are based on an "absence of decision"...which is what i guess you guys are calling "cool w whtvr".

and people are not always themselves in the first few dates. there's always this motivation to impress and overcompensate. and asking a slew of serious/interrogatory questions will put your date off pretty soon, i'd wager. but maybe this is a generational thing.

I think we're talking about more key things you can pick up on right away, like "does this person treat the wait staff of a restaurant like human beings"

is being visibly terrified of everyone a swipe left or swipe right?

nb i don't know which direction is the positive one

kind of nervously swipe back and forth until the card flies off the screen

I think we're talking about more key things you can pick up on right away, like "does this person treat the wait staff of a restaurant like human beings"

― valleys of your mind (mh), Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:23 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'm not sure how that is a key thing, unless you notice your date is treating them poorly. If they treatment them normally/politely, i wouldn't think the person is necessarily a better person. but yeah, this is part of what different people prioritise, i suppose.

in my experience, most people around me have not mistreated waiters, so it's hard to tell who they really were based on these general human interactions, where everyone kind of acts accordingly--i want to say basic human decency?

you have been lucky enough not to run into people who lack decency, then!

also stuff like "does this person frequently make jokes at the expense of others" or "does this person get into heated arguments over petty things" -- does this person have a baseline level of personal integrity? no profile would be able to tell me that. i'd have to see it for myself.

xp

yeah, i'm willing to concede to that, because i spent most of my life in a medium-sized city. huge cities tend to be pretty surreal to me, so yeah

LL otm, also people who talk over you in person or don't seem interested in engaging with what you're saying -- it's harder to fake that online.

I have no idea what size of the city has to do with it! I've seen people be jerks everywhere.

also stuff like "does this person frequently make jokes at the expense of others" or "does this person get into heated arguments over petty things" -- does this person have a baseline level of personal integrity? no profile would be able to tell me that. i'd have to see it for myself.

― vigetable (La Lechera), Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:31 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

While this is entirely true, one gets a sense of another person fairly quickly though right? Three or four emails back and forth, how the other person reacts, tells you loads no? I've not had a single bad experience with internet dating. And certainly no things like people acting rude in public or anything. Intuition and a general sense of the other person, even if only after a couple of letters, weeds out traits like this. At least it has done for me. (But then I haven't tried tinder and always write with someone for a week or two first)

Three or four emails back and forth, how the other person reacts, tells you loads no?
It tells you loads of stuff that they're willing to show you. Not the full picture by any stretch. I don't trust people easily though -- this is probably already abundantly clear.