At What Point In Your Life Did Your Personality Get "Set" (If Indeed, It Ever Did)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (226 of them)
They've done studies (sorry, cannot quote chapter and verse) that intraversion/extroversion manifests itself as early as infancy.

I don't think there's a definite psychological knowledge regarding this. I myself have most certainly turned from an introvert to an extrovert, and it's been at least partly deliberate.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, the why am I who I am is more interesting than the bit, I think.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago) link

gabbneb OTM!!! free will is a narrative illusion created by necessity to address the cognitive gaps in the OODA loop!!

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:07 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/sq/oodaloop.jpg

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Note use of "Implicit" there! It's all bullshit at the quantum level son!

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Tuomas, shyness is not the same as actual intraversion. Many people can and do train themselves out of shyness.

Introversion/Extraversion is the scale of whether you draw strength (or relaxation) from being alone, and expend that energy in being with others (intraversion) or whether you draw strength or energy from being with others, and expend energy being alone (extroversion).

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Italics tags ate my post.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago) link

This seems like a good thread but frustrates me b/c it is one of those thoughtful ones that I don't really have time for at work.

Things that have stuck out for me
- a house settling on it's foundations
- the distinction between behavior and personality
and this:
Specifically, as you get older you notice how less energy you have, and how less you will have in the future, and it becomes a goal to just get things - housing, companionship, a career - to a state where it's off the "to worry about" list, to stop them being a drain on what you have left to live your life.

As I've gotten older things I used to care about greatly - going out, meeting people, being stylish and "cool" - just aren't important anymore. I tend to believe this is a natural part of growing older but many of my acquaintences, many older than me, still seem to have the same values and same lifestyle I did 6 or 7 years ago. So perhaps these are personality elements for these people?

I've found myself becoming happier as I've learned to drop my more shallow ideas about what's important in life. Instead I've learned to just focus on what makes me happy, a simple goal that often leads to the most simple and basic things.

Maybe from the outside this would seem like a change of personality but I think it's just a deepening of self-awareness. I know people who know me best, like my family, would say I've never changed through out all the phases and periods of my life. I've been probably the same core person since I was 13. (I would say the same about them)

Something that perplexes me on this thread is the constant bringing in of romantic relationships. how does this influence who you are anymore than other relationships?

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link

I've done way too much therapy to really have any mystery left about "why I am this way". There is a danger in too much self knowledge. It can be as paralysing as lack of self knowledge.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Perhaps romantic relationships can touch a person more deeply than any other, thus can hurt more acutely (and affect future behaviour) if they go badly wrong?

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Introversion/Extraversion is the scale of whether you draw strength (or relaxation) from being alone, and expend that energy in being with others (intraversion) or whether you draw strength or energy from being with others, and expend energy being alone (extroversion).

Well, I think such scale would be almost impossible to measure in any objective way, so you can't claim science proves introversion/extroversion manifests at an early age and doesn't change after that. All we have is people's interpretations of themselves.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:14 (seventeen years ago) link

I began my career as a snarky, impatient "iconoclast" around eight or nine years out of my mom's junk, to answer the thread question

learning to be patient and nice with other people is part of my quotidian behavior now, but that took a lot (A LOT) of breaking in

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:14 (seventeen years ago) link

it took about 3 months on ILX ha ho

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:16 (seventeen years ago) link

That's true CJ.

A relationship I was in a few years ago did change me for the worse for awhile. It took awhile to heal those wounds and feel whole again. It's amazing how much damage abusive, fucked-up people can inflict on you - esp. when you think you're not suseptible to that anymore.

I've been in therapy since I was 19 and even though sometiems it's a drag I feel it's been absolutely essential to my happiness and stability. But therapy is often like a relationship and you have to find the right person for it work best. I'm grateful I've been seeing the same woman since the beginning. More like a long deep friendship really.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Perhaps romantic relationships can touch a person more deeply than any other, thus can hurt more acutely (and affect future behaviour) if they go badly wrong?

This is very true, and I'm probably walking proof of that. But also, I've been affected more - good and bad - on a personality-shaping level by close friends than by lovers. So I place more importance on them.

My observation is that people - especially women, but also men - feel more pressure to change their personalities in order to attract mates. Do people feel the same pressure to change to attract friends? Maybe they do. I've always been fairly blind to peer pressure and don't really understand its mechanics. But I do feel and am overly aware of the pressures to act, look, *be* a certain way in order to attract males.

The disdaining of changing one's core personality for a lover is part of mine own growth (?) / changing, trying not to put SO MUCH PRESSURE on myself to have a lover, (which I did to myself, for much of my life) and accepting that a single state is a valid lifestyle.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Do people feel the same pressure to change to attract friends? Maybe they do. I've always been fairly blind to peer pressure and don't really understand its mechanics.

Actually, that's not entirely true. I do understand its mechanics, I just seem utterly powerless to follow the principles, and wouldn't even want to in most cases.

The trick, I suppose, is to cultivate friends who embody your ideals and hope that the peer pressure will be positive. I think I am a more positive person for being in the influence of people like Ed and Emsk, for example.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, I think such scale would be almost impossible to measure in any objective way

it isn't! Ever heard of Jungian tests? I-E S-N F-T J-P and all that?

There have been whole threads about these tests, and although they may not be "objective" the results that they provide are certainly meaningful as descriptive tools.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Can someone tell me why there should be a clear distinction between personality and behaviour? I think personality can be seen as a set of relatively fixed modes of behaviour. Whether this behaviour is directed inwards (thoughts) or outwards (action) isn't necessarily important. Also the whole thoughts/action dichotomy is kinda false, because there can't be one without the other.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I find this thread really interesting: not just the question of whether your personality ever becomes fixed, but also that of whether your 'personality' is the thing other people see when they look at you, or the thing you see when you look at yourself. I find that I'm constantly aware of what I perceive to be the stand-out worst aspects of my personality, and am always trying to keep them from becoming manifest in what I say and do (because i do believe that outward conformity can affect inner reactions, that by practicing right behaviour you can train yourself into it - I think if I didn't believe in this I'd feel that I had no hope). This means I really have very little sense of how I come across to others: I sometimes think people see the less-optimal person I suspect myself of being, and sometimes think they see the ideal person I'd like to project myself as, and sometimes think they see something else entirely that I'm too self-absorbed to recognise. Or maybe (most likely) they're not looking all that hard, and I'm the only one who really cares.

ampersand, spades, semicolon (cis), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost

Are actions always true to inward thoughts though? You can alter your behaviour to be contrary to your personality. (though maybe that tendency is a personality trait itself.)

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:28 (seventeen years ago) link

There have been whole threads about these tests, and although they may not be "objective" the results that they provide are certainly meaningful as descriptive tools.

Yeah, but not meaningful in this discussion, because they're based on the assumption of a relatively stable self rather than self-in-a-flux, and therefore are biased towards proving the former.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:29 (seventeen years ago) link

This means I really have very little sense of how I come across to others

I think we all do really, and you're right about all the other stuff too (obv. we care more than anyone else does about ourselves).

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I think that we are all using the words in very subtly different senses. This may not even be a subtlety of language problem, but whether you are coming at such words from a philosophical, psychological or common-usage PoV (and even within psychological, you've got Freudians v. Behaviourists v. Cognitives who are all going to have slightly different models and therefore usages of these words.)

My take on it, is that behaviour *may* be an outward manifestation of personality, but it may also be influenced by external influences that are nothing to do with personality.

You see Behaviour as foremost, I see Personality as foremost. That's a difference of gestalt or worldview or whatever the word is.

Yeah, but not meaningful in this discussion, because they're based on the assumption of a relatively stable self rather than self-in-a-flux, and therefore are biased towards proving the former.

Well, I've been taking these tests on and off for twenty years, and they have stayed fairly stable in their results! I'm not sure what you want to read into that.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Most parents I know are surprised to see how set their children's personalities appear to be almost straight out of the womb. On top of that I think the most powerful force in our lives is habit. Cognitive as well as behavioral. I suspect that very few of us have ever witnessed a fundamental personality change.

Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Are actions always true to inward thoughts though? You can alter your behaviour to be contrary to your personality. (though maybe that tendency is a personality trait itself.)

Yeah, but there's always a reason (an inward thought, that is) for you behaving against what you/others perceive as your personality. One can't truly act against one's "inner self", only against some fixed idea of it.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, more like 25 years. I'm older than I thought. :-(

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, I've been taking these tests on and off for twenty years, and they have stayed fairly stable in their results! I'm not sure what you want to read into that.

I'm not saying some, or even most people don't stay stable throughout their lives. All I'm saying is that deliberate change is not impossible.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:34 (seventeen years ago) link

i see personality and behaviour as intrinsically linked. of course they can change but in practice/experience perhaps this is a rarity.

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago) link

This is a bit of a devils advocate post but anyway

how much is 'deliberate change' cheating on the tests?

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm sure this is going to x-post again, but also, Tuomas, I am interested in how old you are. Because...

1) it would be funny if I'd been taking these psychological tests longer than you've been alive
2) I am curious to see if your fairly behaviourist view on personality as a thing in constant flux is due to your still being in the intense flux-period

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm sure that deliberate change is entirely possible ...... but is deliberate change a true, fundamental change or just a person acting to cover up whatever flaw it is they are trying to overcome, which yet persists underneath all the gloss they are deliberately applying?

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:37 (seventeen years ago) link

I suspect that very few of us have ever witnessed a fundamental personality change.

When I have it's usually due to some outside force like drug abuse.

Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I think CJ is very much onto something.

Also, deliberate change is much easier in adolescence - even into your early to mid 20s. Even if semi-set, the personality then is still a lot more malleable then than it is at 30 or 40 or later.

But these life-changing personality-changing events - heartbreak, bereavement, etc. - is that the equivalent of a structural support being knocked out of the foundations of your house? Or is it the cracking of this lovely gloss and paint and plasterwork with which you've covered your perceived faults.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost to CJ: or what if they keep perceiving the flaw even after it's long gone, and keep covering the place where it used to be with layer upon layer of unnecessary gloss?

Ed, it might not be cheating but... idealising, instead.

ampersand, spades, semicolon (cis), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm sure this is going to x-post again, but also, Tuomas, I am interested in how old you are. Because...
1) it would be funny if I'd been taking these psychological tests longer than you've been alive
2) I am curious to see if your fairly behaviourist view on personality as a thing in constant flux is due to your still being in the intense flux-period.


I'm 27, but I don't think that's important. My own personality has been pretty stable for several years now, but that hasn't made me think it is totally impossible for it to change (though I agree it's probably less likely as we get older). And I don't see myself as a behaviourist, I don't think people are automatons, but I don't think their personalities are totally separate from outside forces either. In fact, people who think everything is set in childhood or teenage seem to have a more deterministic view than I have.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm sure that deliberate change is entirely possible ...... but is deliberate change a true, fundamental change or just a person acting to cover up whatever flaw it is they are trying to overcome, which yet persists underneath all the gloss they are deliberately applying?

If a flaw doens't come through, is never ever demonstrated, does it exist? Because we're very close to thought-crime here.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, on a personal level, it's entirely possible that I have been looking for stable elements of mine own personality *because* I suffer from a mental illness that whips my moods and my behaviour around fairly unpredictably on a regular basis - that I've *needed* to find some "core" me underneath the mental illness - and also all the external changes caused by constant upheaval of moving.

many of the questions on the Jung tests, I have to kind of think "well, this is different depending on the phase of mania or depression" and try to judge which answer is more relevant. Maybe that goes along with the idealising thing.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:46 (seventeen years ago) link

xpost to CJ: or what if they keep perceiving the flaw even after it's long gone, and keep covering the place where it used to be with layer upon layer of unnecessary gloss?

I'd say that's a lack of self-awareness and/or self confidence which the person might need to address. I do think you can learn to be more self-aware, and I do think it's entirely possibly to become more self-confident and to be able to trust one's own judgement better. Outside influences play a huge part in this, i.e. learning to trust others, and having the good sense to keep away from people who hurt you or exacerbate your own personal insecurities withe the way they behave towards you.

I may be rambling now.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:49 (seventeen years ago) link

If a flaw doens't come through, is never ever demonstrated, does it exist?

Yes, of course it does. A person may appear breathtakingly confident (in the context of a relationship, say) but still suffer pangs of jealousy and insecurity. Just because they keep it under control and don't allow it to sabotage the relationship, it doesn't mean to say it's not still there inside them.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Should someone who's had p@edophilic thoughts but never acted upon them in any way consider themselves a p@edophile?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I'd say yes.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:57 (seventeen years ago) link

I found the girl in Malick's The New World attractive.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago) link

you're not a murderer until you've murdered somebody.

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Is someone who's had fleeting daydreams about murdering people (possibly righteous, possibly unwarranted) cosndier themselves someone with murderous impulses, even if it's just a daydream?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:59 (seventeen years ago) link

x-post.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:00 (seventeen years ago) link

is it also possible that someone might act themselves into a certain personality without it being a 'corrective' to perceived flaws: that they'd think 'i am the kind of person who [likes to read]' and then, when faced with a choice of actions, pick the one that seems most suitable for 'the kind of person who [likes to read]'. Not out of some active desire to invent themselves, but unconsciously, trying to be consistent with their self-image. And if you do it more and more often, you become more 'set in your ways' - you don't really need to ask yourself 'what do i really want to do now' because you already know that the answer is 'as a person who [likes to read], what i want is [to read a book]'. That you've constructed an outside layer of self which is quick and easy to refer to, a simpler and more understandable version of your personality - which could either protect you, cling like a second skin, or maybe someday start to chafe.

ampersand, spades, semicolon (cis), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Those two guys were jailed in the UK this week for having planned to rape two underage girls they were talking to in an internet chat room. They never met them, never actually raped them. But the intent was there, and that was apparently enough to get them locked away for quite a considerable time (I can't remember exactly how long thweir sentence was, but it was something like 5 or 7 years).

C J (C J), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Actively plotting in cahoots with other people (and having images etc as further evidence) is a step on from a completely unacted-upon thought.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:04 (seventeen years ago) link

(I typed this lot about two hours ago then got called out of the office so it's probably irrelevant or has already been said but I'm going to post it anyway, just because)

An overall personality can be considered set, but there are always changes taking place. As a species we learn from experience (or at least we should) and this in turn affects our behaviour in similar situations. I know behaviour doesn't necessarily always equate to personality but it plays a huge role in how others see us (which in turns affects how we see ourselves).

People (or most people) tend to want to be liked. This affects, if not their personality, then at least the persona they put across. Sometimes it's not even a conscious thing.

I can't define the "real" me, but I do know that me at work != me at home != me out with friends != me on the internets but there are big enough overlaps that I don't consider myself to have multiple personalities, just different modes, or something.

onimo (onimo), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:05 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a differnce between an impulse and a desire, duh.

During certain parts of my cycle, I think about suicide an average of 3 or 4 times an hour. I don't actually go to the doctor until they start to become detailed plans and active desire, rather than flitting almost reflexive impulses.

But a thought never has to have expression in order to have effect, and to be part of a personality. That background of suicidal hum is part of my personality, though I do my best to suppress and ignore it.

Fire and Worms (kate), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:05 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.