ADMIN LOG WATCH 2

I wonder what the threshold is. 50 posts in under 10 minutes is pretty extreme even for wins, but I feel like I've probably come close to the tipping point at times, and I wouldn't want to end up getting tempbanned for a particularly fruitful series of ox gallstone posts. c&p'ing dumbshit from around the web is a noble tradition without which ilx would be a wasteland of original thoughts, so maybe the mods should loosen the parameters a little or make exceptions for certain exemplary posters.

maybe certain exemplary posters could better differentiate themselves from spambots

Viagra Cialis Levitra. Deposito online della pillola, Migliori prezzi. Soddisfazione 100% garantita. Soltanto oggi - prezzo più basso di Viagra!

^otm

i don't recall this ever happening in 9 years of being here so i think you're probably safe, unregistered

Soddisfazione

http://cuentacanciones.com/it/clasicos-de-the-rolling-stones-sus-mejores-20-canciones/

magnificent

3am so trying not to lol but it's difficult when faced with that

lo siento así es como me siento

back when the secret board was still relatively secret to most of ILX (and when we had statscock) i registered a sock account and tried to rack up like 1000 posts on a random thread just so that some poster no one had ever heard of would be the top poster that month but i got banned about 50 posts in

hah

Thx mods! In my innocence it never occurred to me that there would be such a mechanism but of course I can see the reasoning behind it. Funnily enough I posted all those questions in quick succession against my better instinct, which was obv to confine them all to one post. Lesson learned, won't happen again!

Violation, ILX Code 777 section 420, part 3 (a)(2):

No user shall be banned and unbanned, regardless of the merit of the original banning or the opinions of other users, without a gigantic argument.

as it must be

as it is and ever shall be
fights about bans
amen

10 bans
50 bans
100 bans
fuck it man
lets just not even discuss it man

No user shall be banned and unbanned, regardless of the merit of the original banning or the opinions of other users, without a gigantic argument.

cough

Thursday, June 18, 2015 4:27 PM I Love AFL User imago has been Yellow Carded
http://www.deathdogs.net/WilliamSmithFiles/Hoss%201.jpg

wacky AFL board

Yeah what did imago do that I missed

about 20 posts upthread I typed the word 'hoss' with an implied air of incredulity

I accept my yellow card with grace, pardner

faux-American is NAGL 4 u

what about sarcastic faux-american

Monday, July 13, 2015 6:06 AM I Love Everything Message: 5563364 from thread: hey gawker. what the fuck is wrong with you? has been deleted.
Monday, July 13, 2015 6:06 AM I Love Everything Message: 5563363 from thread: hey gawker. what the fuck is wrong with you? has been deleted.

Reason

actionable .gifs of hulkster's balls

Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:02 PM Site supreme problematics (D-40) has been banned permanently.

uhhhhhhh

really? just for that title? seems awfully harsh

that seems to have escalated considerably!

because he typed j0hn D without the 0 or because he used "chickenshit idiots" in a thread title?

i mean ffs that Spoon poll title is like a knife down the spinal cord every time i see it, D-40 can surely be forgiven a little hurly-burly hyperbole

"chickenshit idiots" is hardly the worst or most careless insult that's ever been flung on ILX

i thought chickenshit idiots was the kind of thing you say when you don't really want to use bad words

for future reference i'll remember to use two-timin' scallywags if i ever get mad

this banning is some cowpattie deluxe hot dog

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj3DBcpfMNQ

http://otegony.com/graphics/he_is_us.jpg

If I had to bet on either a chickenshit idiot or a chickenshit hillbilly, I'd probably take the idiot if it the spread was +15.

i'm gonna guess he got 51'd, if mods could just ban anyone who beefed with them a lot of us wouldn't be here

mods can and have

riiiight, but that was an earlier era

WTF at this title? Sarahell, please note in your files that D40 got the boot for that.

― stet, Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:03 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Not the 51 boots.

And who's that guy with the one boot. What's the deal with him.

huh

i'm gonna guess he got 51'd, if mods could just ban anyone who beefed with them a lot of us wouldn't be here

― usic ally (k3vin k.), Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

mods can and have

― regret it? nope. reddit? yep. (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:16 PM (57 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

riiiight, but that was an earlier era

― usic ally (k3vin k.), Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:17 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

WTF at this title? Sarahell, please note in your files that D40 got the boot for that.

― stet, Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:03 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

― pplains, Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:17 PM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

/giphy inception

Just did a google search for earlier era and they're all memes of women having their period early?

a little excessive c'mon especially for a long time poster

anyway, headed to lunch but ftr that was a baffling ban. just unban him and claim it was a 30-minute timeout warning, or something, but sheeshkabob o'riley, come on dadgummit