photo-breezing

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (653 of them)

Topical Breezings:

- i have a postcard of this roger mayne picture of sandra blow - i can't find a digital version that gets its texture - but i look at it a lot & it has the qualities i like in a photograph (or a portrait), i think-

http://40.media.tumblr.com/9f2a3ef02e896ef9f096d0b4ee5f5f5e/tumblr_nbgckeGAf51qzlg5xo1_400.jpg

- & thinking of this i think i have wasted my life holding the camera still, i like blur, it's so emotional, it breaks my heart, what have i been doing, i'm ruined

- like i think my hi-iso (colour) shitty-cellphone pictures are more-satisfying-when-backlit to me than my colour film pictures, right now, to me, somehow equivalating the liveliness of grainy colour slide images in an abstract way more than standard colour negative film does

- &, iii., hey, i am borrowing the friedlander family phots book from the library, it's great, like a kind of tom-waits-&-kath-brennan cousin to nick nixon's brown sisters-

http://i.imgur.com/cOfrcrD.jpg

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Friday, 19 June 2015 04:05 (eight years ago) link

blur <3! are, bure, boke in general (can be) <3. easier to think of examples in b&w but <3 in color too

may be last person on earth who still uses film for street/ night/ color, so get a lot of it— powdery grain (suffusing the dark), smears & splotches & specters of of color

it’s one reason i’m still attached to film but as you say, film’s not necessary. sense of fugitive glimpse, evanescence, fragility, flaw, abstraction, tenderness, ever disintegrating materiality in grain or pixel. cf those rinko kawauchi cell phone pics

also reason to go back & look at past “outtakes”: stimes set aside pic that’s (lamentably) underexposed/ grainy/ out of focus/ blurred, but keep looking & it sticks, has its own charge (though important & stimes not easy to distinguish this from attachment to what pic ‘cd/wd/shd have been’ if not for flaw)

drash, Friday, 19 June 2015 19:20 (eight years ago) link

at yr suggestion sought out friedlander book too, it is great, adds to & changes my appreciation of lf (also now in love with maria friedlander)

drash, Friday, 19 June 2015 19:36 (eight years ago) link

itt crude ILP muse-off between major 20th century street-shooter spouses

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Friday, 19 June 2015 20:35 (eight years ago) link

wd nominate among others

mary frank & june leaf
eleanor callahan
lella boubat

drash, Friday, 19 June 2015 22:08 (eight years ago) link

edith gowin, vivian nee meyerowitz, soames leiter, honourary shout out to the women of women are beautiful

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Friday, 19 June 2015 22:32 (eight years ago) link

wow yeah otm
incidentally everything i see of araki's lately i love. his flowers in the nineties. he is one of those guys i/you grow into i think.

+++ i looked through & regrettably cannot justify buying this today. looks interesting. like for the writing mainly

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Saturday, 20 June 2015 21:38 (eight years ago) link

he is one of those guys i/you grow into i think

i think this may be right

the nude/bondage pics overshadow & distort reception of the totality of his work

the only araki books i own/really know are yoko & chiro (his cat) related, <3 & heartbreaking

that painful tender focus on life/love/death/mortality—

in that context, bondage pics themselves have different valence, meaning, feeling

drash, Sunday, 21 June 2015 00:34 (eight years ago) link

did i ever post this

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6HQVGHIQAABr_g.jpg:large

& yeah exactly. it's like w/ georgia o'keeffe or somebody, the secret richness & dexterity of artists who have one Thing that circulates sorta ubiquitously

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 21 June 2015 00:51 (eight years ago) link

those morning sky photographs are real beautiful i think

http://www.we-find-wildness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/DSC67331.jpg

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 21 June 2015 00:53 (eight years ago) link

also hey i am mad at myself i left christine furuya gossle off our muse index

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c9/90/f4/c990f493ccb07a446e7430fbeb3d4b51.jpg

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 21 June 2015 00:59 (eight years ago) link

also while we are talking about everything hey guess what this is finally coming soon

http://ep.yimg.com/ay/artbook/william-eggleston-the-democratic-forest-2.gif

This ten-volume set containing more than 1,000 photographs is drawn from a body of 12,000 pictures made by Eggleston in the 1980s. Following an opening volume of work in Louisiana, the ensuing volumes cover Eggleston's travels from his familiar ground in Memphis and Tennessee out to Dallas, Pittsburgh, Miami and Boston, the pastures of Kentucky and as far as the Berlin Wall. The final volume leads the viewer back to the South of small towns, cotton fields, the Civil War battlefield of Shiloh and the home of Andrew Jackson in Tennessee.

every time i've sat in a library looking through the other expanded series books it's been like this beautiful eye test

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 21 June 2015 01:03 (eight years ago) link

idk if that modes guy still reads this but fan by rian dundon came out http://www.modesvu.com/post/121831734636/fan-a-book-by-rian-dundon-essays-by-jonathan

, Sunday, 21 June 2015 13:43 (eight years ago) link

had not seen that araki quote, thanks for posting it

little book "chiro love death" closes with long series of sky photographs

this is finally coming soon

!!!!!!!!!<3<3<3<3<3

drash, Sunday, 21 June 2015 14:15 (eight years ago) link

hey dan, still here from time to time :) interested to hear what you think about the book.

eee, Monday, 22 June 2015 06:33 (eight years ago) link

i got my book the other day eee! i also have to make my way through the new thomas sauvin and the chinese photobook as well so it may be a while xp

, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 13:16 (eight years ago) link

also i think i ordered 'coastline 'by zhang xiao too and that's in one of my unopened boxes

, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 13:16 (eight years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://i.imgur.com/0kW4OFz.jpg

via IH

this brings me so much calm

, Thursday, 9 July 2015 11:06 (eight years ago) link

yes wow this is classic

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Thursday, 9 July 2015 22:28 (eight years ago) link

IH should be in the smithsonian

gr8080, Friday, 10 July 2015 15:58 (eight years ago) link

Internet History Is Hard To See

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Friday, 10 July 2015 16:02 (eight years ago) link

agreed

http://i.imgur.com/OJnIW0d.jpg

, Saturday, 11 July 2015 15:35 (eight years ago) link

GAH - wow.

Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 11 July 2015 17:35 (eight years ago) link

http://by311.tumblr.com/

, Sunday, 26 July 2015 12:54 (eight years ago) link

https://www.moma.org/visit/calendar/exhibitions/1595

:|

, Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:16 (eight years ago) link

I sublet from one of those artists once, and I just have to accept at this point that apparently people like what he makes

chinavision!, Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:58 (eight years ago) link

:|

my reaction too

drash, Sunday, 26 July 2015 17:10 (eight years ago) link

hmmm
fwiw i think i saw a bunch of things at new photography that Looked Great There & which i might've flipped by in other circumstances, so maybe the kinda graphical works will be interesting up close

it's interesting seeing things like this & wondering if there is critical mileage in another wave of ultra-quotidian faux-casual urban photography

https://www.moma.org/images/dynamic_content/exhibition_page/126896.jpg

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 26 July 2015 20:34 (eight years ago) link

kind of a deeply satisfying photo idk

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 26 July 2015 20:34 (eight years ago) link

there's sort of more going on there since thats a photo of an actual newsstand set up by the artist, selling zines, photo books, etc. in the subway. I think the photo is just supposed to be the documentation in this case? not that it makes the photo any less nice, but I don't think it's the photograph that moma is interested in, but the newsstand project itself.

chinavision!, Sunday, 26 July 2015 20:59 (eight years ago) link

I guess I don't mean 'more' going on but just that I bet if that were a regular newsstand, that photo would not have made it to moma

chinavision!, Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:14 (eight years ago) link

ha ha hey thank you for the clarification, that is helpful. really pleased to know finally i am the dad at the gallery who is only interested in what kind of d-rings they used to hang the artworks.

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:15 (eight years ago) link

think we can all agree the real enemy here is pink-floyd-based #vinylwave meme art, pretty sure next year moma is going to show three-colour jimi hendrix screenprints & letterpressed inspirational slogans

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:17 (eight years ago) link

nah I like the picture a lot... I like it better as a photo than as representation of the actual 'piece' (which I didn't know was meant to be regarded as an artwork before, but had just remembered reading about on gothamist or one of those websites)

chinavision!, Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:18 (eight years ago) link

yeah I can't believe that one xpost

chinavision!, Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:19 (eight years ago) link

aram saroyan's name taken in vain
maybe there's a reason behind it idk

龜 was talking on twitter about the absence of chinese artists in this; it's also a slightly older crowd than i would've expected, like i would've thought there are waves of fresh photography that are constitutionally limited to under thirty y/os

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Sunday, 26 July 2015 21:23 (eight years ago) link

think when we saw it that one year at MoMA birdhead was included

don't remember what came in between that was so many years ago

, Monday, 27 July 2015 02:39 (eight years ago) link

felt really weird noticing the variable exposure of a bunch of shots of cheney/rice/&c hanging out. super unfamiliar, now.

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Tuesday, 28 July 2015 09:04 (eight years ago) link

yeah these are like drug store prints!

, Tuesday, 28 July 2015 11:11 (eight years ago) link

lomography in the west wing

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Tuesday, 28 July 2015 12:00 (eight years ago) link

man, those look like hell. i've been back in the groove of scanning long-ago negatives and while i'm taking lots of shortcuts i'm doing a little better than THAT. kinda lame that fulfilling FOIA requests doesn't require running digital ICE or a little bit of fiddling with levels but i guess it's good that the public gets in this sense an 'undoctored' image. but it almost looks like these were scanned with a dirty mirror or something. (i recently went through this procedure with my baby, facing down the prospect of FINALLY rescanning maybe fifteen rolls that have haunted me ever since i botched the scans circa spring 2007.)

Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 28 July 2015 16:44 (eight years ago) link

looks like a lot of color balance problems. also looks like what happens if you leave scanning software on default settings and don't move sliders around much. I just figured the scanning job probably just fell to some government functionary to satisfy the foia request. some of my early attempts as scanning film shot indoors looked sort of similar.

chinavision!, Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:33 (eight years ago) link

i definitely don't have the techniques down. it's okay for filling the gaps of shit that i didn't get develop-and-scanned as a combo. and i never shot on good slide film or anything like that. but i'm sure i'm not really doing it "right."

Gorefest Frump (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 04:09 (eight years ago) link

oddly, for me, the bad scanning/ color correction makes those images somehow more resonant
the fact that the room looks like, just, a banal conference room, with bad lighting (as opposed to a beautifully-illuminated tv/movie set)
there’s like intimacy to them too, feel like taken with an unobtrusive rangefinder rather than big dslr
so strange to see relatively contemporary white house images with grain

drash, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 21:08 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.