Star Wars 7 shit talk

https://www.instagram.com/p/_cpEPEHEz1/?taken-by=msichicago

It's hard to compete with William Hootkins as one of the original pilots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pi1PVw792M

so $238 M weekend gross in N America est'd

seems low

gotta wait for the nerds to liquidate their kids' college funds so they can see it again

this was fine but not as great as i was hoping based on the reaction of others

also known as Fallout 4 syndrome iirc

wonder how many seats had to be disinfected for semen stains on opening night

the scene where it goes from cockpit to cockpit "red five standing by" "gold leader standing by" is my fav suspense-ratcheting scene of all time

― ogmor, Saturday, December 19, 2015 3:15 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

truth

Lost Tyree lost Dutch... they came from behind...

saw this yesterday, had a lot of fun

daisy ridley is the best thing to happen to star wars since 1980

Did u forget Squid Head

Sorry: Tessek the Quarren

What the "remix" reviews are missing, for me, is the overwhelming (in every sense of the world) sensation I got that this world had kept on existing just as it was since 1983, with the characters living on, messing their lives up, time passing just as in the real world, and only now did we somehow manage to find our way back to it, a return to neverland, more or less, tinged with the pathos of loss, of having grown up in the meantime, and yet it was there all along. We just didn't have access to it. It's a different kind of enchantment from the first trilogy precisely because it builds on that feeling of time and a world lost, but it does remember the importance of enchantment and captures it correctly.

Great post.

Feel the same way with Crystal Skull?

I rewatched Crystal Skull over the Thanksgiving holiday and it was decent! It has more jokes related to historical setting than the other Indiana Jones films (atomic bomb test, Grease-style diner fight) and the end is more of an effects-laden send-off, but there are some really good set pieces when they're springing traps and navigating ruins.

John Hurt and Karen Allen are great, Shia LaBeouf a lot less so.

Pfff, Indy's just a guy, this is a whole world. [CENSORED} - still, that felt like some genuine, unfakeable emotion.

Sorry for spoiler leakage.

Yeah, come on, dude. There's a whole other thread.

Having trouble containing my excitement :(

hehe

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWye0lkWoAAd_0x.jpg

It's just fair; a Stormtrooper was on Fridays cover

idgi

This is pretty great:

http://www.gq.com/story/oscar-isaac-guitar-star-wars-cover

Having trouble containing my excitement :(

seek help

Not all of us spend all day cumming on Virgin Spring VHS covers

pfffft

u don't know me

picturing Morbs swaggering in a north face puffa and skully now

Lol!

Saw it last night and thought Force Awakens was wonderful. Went in a cautious skeptic, left a total convert. It is just *so well done, so charismatic, so adept at tapping into the magic of the originals without being beholden to them. I very much look forward to the subsequent movies in the series.

It's bizarre to me how invested some of ILX's in-house film critics are in dissing a film they have not seen and will not see (see also the Chi-raq thread), which is never ever AGL.

Now off to the spoilers thread to chat some more.

also, booming posts from longneck and veg in this thread

i know yr not talkin bout meeee, stevie, but i will see this at some point. preferably for free.

i dunno if youve heard, but this film is actually running for more than 3 days! what a world.

its really good Morbs! I hope you enjoy it!

Careful, this is the non-spoiler thread.

Those posts are kinda spoilery. I'm going to delete them and c&p them to the spoilers thread.

yes i am looking forward to going through that in a few days. keep it non-spoilery here plz!

Mentioned it already, but I do think Guardians of the Galaxy captured the Star Wars vibe maybe better, though perhaps because it is crossed with Indiana Jones.

I disagree, I think GotG was stealing from the best while trying to stay in a category unto itself. In retrospect the choice of a pop soundtrack was extremely wise.

I'm just hoping Daisy Ridley gets to have a better post-trilogy career than Mark Hamill did.

Haven't seen it, do want to, can imagine it being a better film even though TFA was basically everything I wanted it to be... but capturing the vibe better? Than a film that has the same characters, actors and story, look & feel, and co-writer? Xp

'jupiter ascending' and 'the martian' each in their own way captured the 'star wars' vibe better than 'guardians of the galaxy' did imho but neither anywhere near as well as 'the force awakens'

jupiter ascending was horrendous and made me fall asleep

you missed all the good parts

I got as far as the first action scene with Tatum "air skating"

Guardians of the Galaxy is a better movie than The Force Awakens, but I wouldn't necessarily call it more star warsy... For one thing, the sort of pop cultural references and absurdist humour it's loaded with aren't really a Star Wars thing at all, SW is more po-faced. But I do admit that GotG was better capturing the sense of wonder in seeing weird-looking aliens, surreal cosmic environments and cool ships, which is a pretty essential part of space opera. TFA was pretty low-key in that department, at least compared to the original trilogy, which was full of that stuff.

I'd say GotG's most obvious influence is not Star Wars but Fifth Element, when it comes to humour and characterization. Also, they're both saturated with bright primary colours, whereas SW is a more subdued.

TFA was pretty low-key in that department, at least compared to the original trilogy, which was full of that stuff.

Hardly fair to compare one film with three.

A New Hope has less of it than Force Awakens, arguably. Greedo, the Jawas, Chewie, a few shots of cantina folk ... that's about it.

And Jedi? Only Jabba's palace (a feast of weirdness, admittedly), and Ewoks.

ACKBAR

but capturing the vibe better? Than a film that has the same characters, actors and story, look & feel, and co-writer?

I think so, yeah. Not in a bad way, really. I'm on the record liking the new one fine if thinking it was sort of low-stakes, but the vibe was a little too careful and proficient for me, like it was moving fast because it had to, not because the story/adventure/action was propelling it forward; I don't recall and of the OT having (what felt like) such a long lull in the middle as TFA. Guardians of the Galaxy (which I went into thinking would be terrible) I still say felt like a cross between Star Wars and Indiana Jones, more-so than something like Fifth Element, though I agree the pop-culture stuff and self-awareness gave it a bit of an advantage. I also felt Guardians had better emotional beats, too, but again, unfair advantage of surprise and freshness, etc..

As much as I wish I could recall just how it felt to see Star Wars in late 1977 when I was around three - amazingly it is my earliest memory - I can't, not quite (though I remember Empire and Jedi as a kid just fine). But I do have a couple of youngish kids, and both seemed to have a better time with Guardians than this one, too (while still liking both, more or less). But yeah, that may be because this one is sort of hampered by design to err on the side of drama and seriousness and mythology rather than silliness and world-building.

Being able to act definitely works in Ridley's favor, though to be fair, Hamill has done really well as a voice actor.

GotG was also pulling from Kirby's Cosmic Debris, whereas SW has far more Japanese mythic vibes.

Both are ultimately rooted in 20th-C pop sci-fi/space opera, but they seem slightly orthogonal

Does that mean they need braces?