I will keep doing, but not worth it! The 2016 Presidential Primary Voting Thread

Trump is a spoiled brat

Were any of these people ever as inconsistent and irresponsible in their public statements as trump?

Trump is just a salesperson who will smirk and tap dance and overpromise to close the sale, and let the buyer's remorse sink in later.

Were any of these people ever as inconsistent and irresponsible in their public statements as trump?

― Treeship, Monday, February 22, 2016 1

did you ever read Jackson's Twitter feed? Vile stuff.

@AndrewJackson

My enemies say Trail of Tears. By the Eternal, I'll make a Trail of Queers yet!

10:06 AM - 22 Feb 1831

good old reasonable, moderate Kasich:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/kasich-women-left-their-kitchens-me-when-i-first-ran-n523636

This is just nuts. Jeez, oh man.

Donald Trump has been working in the construction industry in New York for 40 years.

That's wars-and-shit right there!

Remember the good old days when "binders full of women" passed for a howler?

I think everyone itt is seriously underestimating Trump's appeal in the general. There are a ton of moderates and liberals who will vote for him but never admit it. Hillary vs. Trump is 50-50. Get ready!

He could win New York.

no

Schumer and Hilz have that state sewn up

There are definitely oddballs here and there who would vote for Trump for weird reasons, and there definitely are not enough of them to put Trump at 50-50 vs Hillary.

It'll be a lot closer than people think. And it'll be the best election of our lifetimes. No stone left unturned. We'll find out about Bill's current mistresses, Hillary's affair with Huma Abedin, Trump's mob ties, who knows what else... I can't wait!

obama won ny by 28 points in 2012 (a larger margin than in 2008)

no win in NY, and not 50-50, but i agree that it will be closer than people think.

it will be closer than people think

It all depends on how close people think it will be. I think Trump is capable of losing by 47% to 53% in the general election, if only because US politics have gone largely insane, but in terms of electoral college votes that would still be a rout.

^that's fair

Berlusconi

Amazed we have not gotten a Trump "bunga bunga" tale yet, but I'm sure we will. Probably boost this numbers, too.

‏@BretEastonEllis
Just back from a dinner in West Hollywood: shocked the majority of the table was voting for Trump but they would never admit it publicly.

Trump will cause real defections/voter turnout problems for the GOP in the general election. Dems shouldn't take this for granted, they should aggressively exploit fears about Trump and maximize Dem gains, particularly in state legislatures wherever possible.

http://theresurgent.com/i-will-not-vote-for-donald-trump-ever/

Problem is Hillary will have turnout problems of her own

^^ This is a decent reason to vote for Sanders. Much higher positives and much lower negatives.

In the fall we'll be looking back on statements like "we're sick and tired of your damn emails, Madam Secretary" as relics of a bygone era

^^ This is a decent reason to vote for Sanders. Much higher positives and much lower negatives.

― schwantz, Monday, February 22, 2016 2:29 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i don't think there is any reason to believe sanders would have a better chance beating trump (or other republicans) than clinton

To be entirely fair, one imagines sanders's negatives going up a LOT if he were up against a candidate determined to destroy him on the basis of his progressivism rather than trying to claim that ground for themselves (in compromised "pragmatic" form, but still). I'm not calling that scenario for Trump, but it has to be allowed that for millions of Americans, their effective introduction to Bernie might be a blanket of superPAC-funded ads decrying his tax-and-spend liberal radicalism, his putative palling around with 60s terrorists, and "class warfare" and whatever else.

fascinatin' emails

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/

Sanders has a higher hate ceiling at this point, whereas I'd guess most people likely to hate Clinton already hate her.

I'm actually pretty fascinated to learn more about people who are both dining with Bret Easton Ellis and voting for Trump

I think the choice of best match-up depends on how important you think the disaffected voter vote is going to be. If that's going to be the deciding factor, then Sanders is probably a better candidate to run against Trump since he also has strong appeal with the disaffected bloc. I imagine if Hillary were the nominee, some Sanders supporters would defect to Trump in the general. Likewise if Rubio or Cruz were the GOP nominee, and they were running against Sanders, some of Trump's support would go to Sanders. However, you have to balance that against the moderates who might be put off by the relative extremism of a Trump or Sanders. The conventional wisdom is that the independents who tend to be more instinctively moderate decide general elections, but this year has not been following the usual playbook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CDQWhfnVkc

some Sanders supporters would defect to Trump in the general

this number seems extremely marginal at best

The conventional wisdom is that the independents who tend to be more instinctively moderate decide general elections, but this year has not been following the usual playbook.

that's b/c we haven't gotten to the general election yet

xp. I've heard more than one person say that their two favorite candidates are Sanders and Trump. There are some people who mainly want to send a message to the establishment. Those are the two best vehicles for that sentiment.

some Sanders supporters would defect to Trump in the general

this number seems extremely marginal at best

i would agree, but i've seen some crazy shit on facebook

I'm actually pretty fascinated to learn more about people who are both dining with Bret Easton Ellis and voting for Trump

feel like this is not surprising at all and that BEE's fans are more likely than general pop to be Trump supporters

some Sanders supporters would defect to Trump in the general

i know more than 3 ppl who have said that if sanders doesn't win the primary they'll vote for trump. presumably they respond more to style than substance

Xp I agree that HRC 's hate ceiling is likely maxed out, but I'm more concerned about her, for lack of a better term, "ambivalence" ceiling, which can impact turnout. We still don't know (a) how amicably Bernie and Hillary's camps will resolve differences or (b) just how much the likely slime of a trump vs Clinton slugfest will just turn people off in droves. I would hope that simply voting against Trump would be motivation enough to turn people out, but still ... nothing should be taken for granted.

I just talked to a dad at my kid's bday party who supports Sanders and said he'd vote for Trump over Clinton!

Sanders is toast. It'll be mathematically impossible for him by the end of March. Writing is already on the wall, Super Tuesday is his last stand.

Dr. C.: "trump's numbers did go up after paris and san Bernardino" - okay, my bad, but surely that means his numbers among Republicans, right? by which I mean, people already askeert of the muzzie boogieman?

I remain skeptical that a terrorist attack is going to move significant numbers of Democrats/Independents to Trump's column. Some folks see danger and want a badass mad dog. Others see danger and want a steady, sure hand on the tiller.

And fwiw I agree with o. nate that people whose vote can be changed by negging Hillary prolly weren't hers to begin with.

YES, we know that she shot Vince Foster in cold blood, then kept his severed penis as a trophy. In fact, she and Huma Abedin danced around it, singing lesbian anthems, while gleefully denying security requests from Benghazi.

YES, we know that she used blank checks from Goldman Sachs to funnel hush money to Bill's rape victims. Then, in a cocaine-fueled haze, she asked Communist Party HQ to send over a network tech to configure a strategically leak-prone e-mail server.

Clinton's supporters have heard it all and are still going to vote for her.

How does Sanders stack up against previous Democratic nomination challenges from the left? Much of it is before my time - my mom campaigned for Eugene McCarthy. Is Sanders more to the left and doing better than other historical left-wing protest (nomenclature?) candidates?

@BretEastonEllis
Just back from a dinner in West Hollywood: shocked the majority of the table was voting for Trump but they would never admit it publicly.

― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 February 2016 19:16 (21 minutes ago) Permalink

was he trolling?

i live in west hollywood.

i pretty much get this vibe but never voice it because i can't really relate to a lot of angelenos.

there's definitely some weirdo second plane white people seem to communicate to each other with indirectly that purposefully excludes foreigners and i'm somehow treated like i'm in on it. it's bizarre

Clinton's supporters have heard it all and are still going to vote for her.

Sounds a lot like the rationale for anyone voting Trump!

I just talked to a dad at my kid's bday party who supports Sanders and said he'd vote for Trump over Clinton!

― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, February 22, 2016 1:53 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This is basically just saying "I support whichever candidate has a penis." And also "my cognition is roughly equivalent to that of a dog that eats his own shit."

YES, we know that she shot Vince Foster in cold blood, then kept his severed penis as a trophy. In fact, she and Huma Abedin danced around it, singing lesbian anthems, while gleefully denying security requests from Benghazi.

YES, we know that she used blank checks from Goldman Sachs to funnel hush money to Bill's rape victims. Then, in a cocaine-fueled haze, she asked Communist Party HQ to send over a network tech to configure a strategically leak-prone e-mail server.

Don't forget Mena airport and the boys on the tracks!

Dr. C.: "trump's numbers did go up after paris and san Bernardino" - okay, my bad, but surely that means his numbers among Republicans, right?

yes. i am on your side btw on trump's chances - just clarifying that one point!

it'd be great to see some charts comparing polling for sanders to the equivalent 'left challenger' in recent elections. like not just their peak numbers but a line graph for the whole campaign. my sense is that this is a more sustained deal that is interesting a much wider swath of people, but it'd be nice to make that less imprsesionistic and anecdotal. he's definitely doing better than bill bradley who was the first such character i hopelessly voted for.

And also "my cognition is roughly equivalent to that of a dog that eats his own shit."

Pretty big constituency you'd be ignoring in this country.

people who are both dining with Bret Easton Ellis and voting for Trump

cokeheads w fond memories of the 80s?

xxp

i'm still surprised people hand out business cards down here. i lol every time