Better Call Saul

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3627 of them)

maybe he has a self-winding or wind-up watch and everyone else has quartz which is battery operated.

dan selzer, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:30 (eight years ago) link

jinx

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link

BB was all about forward-motion, tension and stakes constantly being raised by virtue of a self-interested protagonist addicted to high-stakes behavior. And it was very good at that, but it also means (for me, anyway) that after its over I really have zero desire to watch it again. Knowing how various conflicts get resolved removes the tension. There's still good/great characters and a lot of well-executed setpieces but it is lacking in a certain depth, I don't feel like I would be rewarded by repeated viewings.

But BCS is v different, so much more character-driven, and that makes it feel much richer.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link

I loved the moment a couple of episodes ago when jimmy answered his phone (that he clearly hadn't bothered to hand in before the meeting) to no reaction whatsoever from chuck

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link

if you think of Hank as the protagonist of BB it becomes a lot darker

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 8 March 2016 21:43 (eight years ago) link

So the scared dude meeting with Tuco in the restaurant was Crazy 8 right? And the gun dealer was the same one who sold Walt his guns in BB.

Loved that final shot of Mike disappearing in a cloud of dust.

woman in the dunes, Tuesday, 8 March 2016 23:56 (eight years ago) link

OH MY GOD, THAT WAS TOTALLY CRAZY 8. I knew he looked familiar. He looked so young and innocent, I hardly recognized him!

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

And the gun dealer was the same one who sold Walt his guns in BB.

The great Jim Beaver.

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link

Loved that final shot of Mike disappearing in a cloud of dust.

Yes! "Why?" (Turns around, disappears.) Some Man With No Name shit right there.

bearded flack trickster god (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 08:18 (eight years ago) link

I appreciate that they've provided some context for the insanity of BB-era Tuco. Establishing both that he's a maniac when he's on speed and that, by the time Walt meets him, he's probably just finished his prison stretch.

And it just occurred to me that, chronologically-speaking, BCS could easily stretch a good way into the second season of BB without stepping on the former show's toes. I do hope we eventually see some sort of reckoning between Tuco and Mike since that's now a retconned dangling thread.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 13:17 (eight years ago) link

Funny how this show has turned out to actually be Better Call Saul (or Mike)

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:31 (eight years ago) link

arguing with a friend of mine who says this show lacks a really solid premise to hold onto. we all know Saul/Jimmy's journey is going from an amoral shyster to an even more amoral shyster and that Mike is more a complex character.

i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:44 (eight years ago) link

I don't know that it needs a solid premise. It's a character study, and I'm cool with that. I think it reminds me most of Men Of A Certain Age inasmuch as it takes a slow and ambling path around the characters without any grand destination in mind (ignoring what we know about the sister series).

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 15:48 (eight years ago) link

I think it has a solid premise. What it doesn't have (or need) is weekly cliffhangers. Our investment in the characters is what keeps us (me) coming back, not a contrived sense of plot-drive momentum. Sure, Mike is a more complex character, but it's kind of a dual journey of lapsed morality, to different extremes. Both have lines they are unwilling to cross; the show is about where those lines are and how/why they get moved.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:11 (eight years ago) link

In other words, not unlike lots of lawyer/cop shows/movies, but much, much slower.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:12 (eight years ago) link

Otm. The ethical conflicts are front and center here, and more nuanced than they were in BB.

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

Feel like whatever's holding mike back is more pragmatic than moral, in both shows he seems honestly ok with what he is

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:25 (eight years ago) link

Funny how this show has turned out to actually be Better Call Saul (or Mike)

yeah i wonder if this is something that prevents it from completely unshackling itself from breaking bad - like, if we didn't know where these guys were heading, it could seem a bit odd (just now at least) to be following the really quite distinct threads of jimmy's adventures in law and mike's adventures in becoming a magic crime guy

xpost I don't know, there's more to it than that. Like why he would rather get punched to a pulp and risk death for half the payday than take the seemingly simpler sniper route to more money, as asked (but not answered) in this ep.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

I think he just has the most finely tuned risk/reward calculator of anyone in the show.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:29 (eight years ago) link

Yeah

I mean he did kinda answer it earlier when he pointed out that killing tuco results in scrutiny from the cartel

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:33 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, kinda. But clearly ninja Mike could have pulled it off. If anything, starting a fight with an unstable and armed drug-addled dealer doesn't exactly seem any less risky. Clearly there's more backstory they have to hand out later.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:39 (eight years ago) link

Yeah, removing a pawn from the board was just move one.

Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:41 (eight years ago) link

BB is about the destructive power of high expectations, BCS is about the destructive power of low expectations. There's very little doubt in my mind that when Jimmy flips over into full Saul Goodman it'll be down to Chuck in some way.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

If I had to guess, and maybe their conflict this episode was some clue, I would guess that Jimmy's downfall will come when he tried to save Chuck from something, either something Chuck finally done wrong or something Jimmy does to get Chuck in trouble.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

Sorry, phone messing up subject-verb grammar.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

I think Nacho's question at the end is answered in the Jim Beaver scene -- Mike decides against the sniper plan when he sees the old rifle he used in Vietnam. He doesn't want to go back to that if he doesn't have to.

orifex, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:26 (eight years ago) link

I got that much. Hmm, I'm trying to remember how killing-averse Mike was in BB ...

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:28 (eight years ago) link

Aside from situations when his life was in danger, the only people I remember him killing were the cops who killed his son.

Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

He's no Walter White, at any rate.

Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:33 (eight years ago) link

He killed the Pollo Hermanos truck hijackers personally

μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:39 (eight years ago) link

Yeah wtf mikes a killer, it's like his defining characteristic

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:44 (eight years ago) link

he is going to kill jesse and walt in breaking bad because they've outlived their usefulness/are a liability

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

and only jesse killing gill stops him from doing so because the two are again indispensable to their enterprise

Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:48 (eight years ago) link

So I guess that is his moral line character arc - what will drive Mike to kill again?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:18 (eight years ago) link

I know Mike is a killer. I just genuinely couldn't remember if he had ever been a wanton killer in the Walter White mode. Like, he's always willing to do it if it's necessary but he'd always prefer to find another way, has been my take.

Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:19 (eight years ago) link

Nah he's definitely more trigger happy than that in BB. He's way keener to wack Lydia than either Walt or Jesse, for example.

Was the gun buying scene the first intimation he may have been in Nam?

the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:50 (eight years ago) link

Yeah that hadnt been mentioned before

Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:09 (eight years ago) link

Coasting/table-setting this week.

defibrillate after opening (WilliamC), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:20 (eight years ago) link

Pretty intriguing though, with Kim's secret striving, Howard and Kim, Howard and Chuck, Mike and Tuco's pre-stroke uncle, and deep background--Chuck's wife! Even deeper: the way Chuck tells it anyway, Jimmy gradually ruined their father's business, at least in part---"Dad wasn't the greatest business man"---then, after Dad had to sell, and died six months later, Jimmy cried the hardest at the funeral--"Jimmy's not a bad person. He has a good heart"---what did Chuck say after that??

dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:03 (eight years ago) link

"He just can't help himself."

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:23 (eight years ago) link

tíoooooo!

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

str breaking bad would also do this thing of having >1 stupidly long montage in an episode to fill time

This was great tho. Howard and chuck are such a pair of cunts. Have we seen the shitheel from the DA's office before? I didn't recognise him

anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:44 (eight years ago) link

Does Saul mention an ex-wife at any point in BB? I'm pretty sure he does but I'm not sure when in the series it actually happened.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:03 (eight years ago) link

Maybe coming up? Though Howard was informing/deferring to Chuck, re Kim's landing big client, so maybe now she might possibly be considered for redemption. Don't think Howard relishes having to please Chuck so fucking much.

dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

"Though"--"Thought," that is.

dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:20 (eight years ago) link

Intro set up the other reason Chuck can't stand Jimmy -- people actually like Jimmy! It was painful watching Chuck be a charisma black hole around his wife

μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:02 (eight years ago) link

Scenes like the one between Chuck and Kim this week make me reluctant to think of Chuck as a villain. Jimmy is a career con artist who embezzled thousands from the family business (supposing that latter story is true as Chuck tells it); it makes perfect sense to think that he'd make for an unscrupulous, dangerous lawyer.

Chuck certainly can be conniving and two-faced, particularly when he needs Jimmy's help. But he's also helped Jimmy, as the opening this week reminded me.

JRN, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:49 (eight years ago) link

just finished season 1 and mannnn was this good. hated just about everything the ending with jimmy turning down the partner-track gig but otherwise this was arguably at least as good as the best parts of BB, certainly much better than season 1 of BB

also marco totally died of a pulmonary embolism, not a heart attack

k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:18 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.