Better Call Saul

Yeah, I think his regular ride is a brown old beater.

xpost Except for that whole thing where Chuck conspired behind the scenes to make sure Jimmy never made it any further than the mailroom.
― a very hansom, and smart boy (Old Lunch), Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:39 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I'm repeating myself now, but as underhanded as that was--particularly when Jimmy was the one taking care of him--Chuck had every reason to think that Jimmy would be dangerous as a lawyer. And we know, from the events of this series and BB, that he was right. (And, although he stood in the way of Jimmy's being hired as a lawyer at HHM, he never stood in the way of his solo practice.)

Of course, we can (and should!) speculate about how things might have turned out differently had Chuck been completely supportive. But I don't think he's an asshole for being reluctant to get fully behind his career con-artist, family-business-bankrupting* brother's fledgling law career.

*supposing this is true

Mike was smart and had a different car parked there, yeah

My favorite part of this episode was Kim immediately concluding that Chuck was right about Jimmy forging the documents. I really didn't see that coming, but it makes sense: she knows Chuck too well to think he'd make that kind of mistake, and Jimmy too well to put that kind of determined, meticulous, fraudulent sabotage (on her behalf) past him. And there's something sweet about the fact that with her, as far as we know, Jimmy never even tries to deny it. (And she stays with him!)

Reading the AV Club review of this episode got me thinking: what was the point of that scene of Mike buying a round for the house at the bar? Will that come back to bite him in some way?

He still has a soft heart in there for humanity. He's pretty much all for his granddaughter by BB.

xpost I was thinking while watching how much I appreciated that most of the main characters are so mentally nimble. It's such a marked change from so many other shows that depend upon abject stupidity to prolong dramatic tension.

We haven't seen Mike's endgame yet. Lots of as-yet-unanswered questions re: his motives and actions against Salamanca.

Two things I've learned about Rhea Seehorn (Kim W.) tonight:

1. She has an inordinately charming Twitter account.
2. Her first name is pronounced "ray"!

I keep thinking how Jimmy doctoring the docs is the BCS equivalent of WW blowing up Tuco's office. Same thing of using what they're good at to fuck shit up but in Saul's world it's not a cool guy explosion but a tiny detail that derails some paperwork, which of course he's good at because he used to make fake IDs in high school.

Chuck is kind of a smug dick but I don't think he's been totally unreasonable in what he's done. I really don't know the whys and ethics etc of who should have mesa verde though so can't tell if HHM were underhand or acting totally normally to try and get/keep them.

Interesting that through all his grievances with Chuck, Jimmy hasn't thrown his dubious illness in his face

Orifex otm

KIm brought in the Mesa Verde account because of personal connections she had with one of the heads of staff there. She was at school or college with the brunette or something wasn't she.
I think she had brought in the firm to try to get her advanced from the backwater role she'd been demoted to. & wasn't very happy that she hadn't been put on the account she had brought in. Am I remembering that right?

So since she had the personal connection which is how she had brought in the account originally the account going with her would probably be more natural except for the reasons that Chuck had brought up. That is the new law firm might just be a little small to give the large account the attention it needed, Chuck should be able to ensure taht several people were wroking on it at any one time.
But has Kim decided that she is going to be spending all of her time on the account, which would mean trying to run a small law firm wouldn't really be remunerative realistically would it? Not quite getting that bit since the new law firm isn't actually running yet.

Part of Kim's pitch was that Mesa Verda - which she researched and wooed and brought to HHM, only to get coldly kicked to the curb by Howard - would be her sole client, and that she would dedicate all her time strictly to them.

Chuck's involvement is where if not ethics then morality gets involved. Howard was prepared to let Mesa Verde go, and let Kim have it, but Chuck's vindictiveness would not let him leave it at that. He risked his health not really to get Mesa Verde but to get it away from his brother, which Jimmy recognized. So was Chuck within his rights to get Mesa Verde back? Yes. But Jimmy was also right that it was about more than that.

https://twitter.com/petergould/status/716331573197451264

Man, CGI is scary.

http://i.imgur.com/LXOz8W2.jpg

Great framing in this ep of Chuck as king on this throne, throwing off his robe as he addressees his subjects.

yeah, that was brilliant. little bit of GoT creeping in.

Chuck's illness is very real, although probably completely psychological unless the story's world chooses otherwise. I'd venture to guess that we're going to see another flashback to his married days that explains its genesis. The dinner scene with Jimmy had a moment of Chuck tinkering with the lightbulbs before his brother arrived.

I think the contrast between Jimmy and Chuck has been interesting. Jimmy is painted as this guy who cuts corners and gets into some pretty dark gray legal areas but who ultimately has his heart in the right place and strives to do right by Chuck, while Chuck is always on the level and doing things above board but is ultimately a spiteful and vindictive little shit who has no compunctions about holding Jimmy back or screwing him over.

he has a lot of markings of obsessive-compulsive disorder, or the pure-o version, which is part of why he _knows_ he couldn't have screwed up the address on his own -- his world view is that he's a perfectionist, and his obsession turns that into a self-fulfilling state

imo the electromagnetic sensitivity thing works well as a shorthand for the fact that no matter how much Chuck has to have things completely by the book, clean and tidy, the world doesn't really work that way and is full of the harsh noise of legal/moral gray area

xxp Chaotic Good vs. Lawful Neutral

Lawful EVIL sorry

I don't think you could really blame either Mike or Jimmy for the consequences of their actions in this episode, ie the good Samaritan getting shot and Chuck passing out

Also if I remember right Jimmy found out that Chuck's condition is 'all in the mind' in the hospital in the first series but didn't tell anyone. Has he just been holding on to that information since then?

That's what I'm saying, I imagine it wasn't really news to him that it's 'all in the mind' but he never brings it up. IIRC he mentioned something in that ep about it being real enough to Chuck and that's what matters, or something of that ilk?

Oh I think it's common knowledge that Chuck's condition is largely psychosomatic, but everyone kind of humours him out of respect for his position.

Liked the contrasting reactions from Jimmy and Mike after being called out on their duplicitous actions; Jimmy tries to weasel out of it, Mike just shrugs and is like "yeah, what you gonna do?"

Very satisfying ep.

Doesn't make it less real. You could tell Chuck it's psychosomatic every day, but it might still have the same affect. xp

Oh I know, I'm responding to -

Also if I remember right Jimmy found out that Chuck's condition is 'all in the mind' in the hospital in the first series but didn't tell anyone. Has he just been holding on to that information since then?

Jimmy tries to weasel out of it, Mike just shrugs and is like "yeah, what you gonna do?"

Mike had leverage over Tuco that Jimmy didn't over Chuck tho

er over Nacho

Final scene of penultimate episode of season two = watching Jane die

jane was a decent person. chuck is an asshole.

― japanese mage (LocalGarda), Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:03 AM (20 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

just noting that they are broadly similar scenes, and arguably in both the focus is more on the protagonist's watching than the character's dying(/having a nasty fall)

and like from the protagonists' pov, jane was some random girl that introduced jesse to heroin and was trying to shake walt down, this is jimmy's fucking brother

agree that we the audience give much less of a shit about chuck going down

the noise when his temple hit the counter, sheesh

agree that we the audience give much less of a shit about chuck going down

― Kevin Ageusia Smith (wins), Wednesday, April 13, 2016 3:28 PM (1 minute ago)

Not everybody in we the audience, though. My wife's BCW sympathies are firmly with Chuck over Jimmy. We kind of avoid having conversations about this show anymore because they get a little uncomfortable.

*BCS sympathies, rather

interesting my wife's sympathies are def with Jimmy, whereas I see both characters as occupying a moral gray area, closer to OL's estimation upthread. Of course I find Jimmy more likeable in a lovable scoundrel kind of way.

Mike just shrugs and is like "yeah, what you gonna do?"

I think Mike felt bad about what happened, he seems to be a decent guy under the badass exterior. If I remember right he's never hurt any innocent bystanders

Nobody in the audience wants Kim hurt, though, which is the real crux of the Jimmy/Chuck drama.

Hell, everybody on this show prob means well, to some degree, in their own estimation---we know from a flashback on BB that the pre-stroke uncle thought he was doing stuff for the kids, raising his twin nephews to avenge the family honor etc. But in the outside world, the ones outside their heads, several of them are pretty fucking dangerous. "Jimmy has a good heart, " Chuck tells Kim, seemingly sincerely (although of course, everybody here's got levels), but he (supposedly) helped ruin their father by stealing, even though he cried at the funeral, and his "twisted romantic gesture," as Chuck calls it, has helped to send Chuck on his way perhaps (not that Chuck's own mental maze and Bad Choices didn't seal the deal). And he was something of a sense-talking, partial enabler to Walt and Jesse's careers of evil. Think both shows are mostly about this kind of thing (even, among the cartoon bikers, the little bland blond guy is just doing like he's raised to do, while dreaming of Lydia the helicopter mom with a few propellors missing [stole that last bit from some recap])

Jesse loses all illusions, if he ever had 'em, about what he's doing, way before Walt/Heisenberg, who only seems to consciously reintegrate at the very end--first by admitting that he didn't do it to provide for his family, but "because I liked it," and then petting his beloved meth cooker like it's baby Holly, right before he dies (spoiler)

back to this show: Mike looks a bit sick when Nacho tells him about the Good Samaritan getting killed; I think he might be planning to atone by fucking these punks up---or maybe he gives up and goes even further to the dark side, more money for his granddaugher xpost whattayagonnado

Chuck's complete lack of nuance or human understanding extends to his dad. I mean, Jimmy would swipe a few bucks from the till back at the store, but his dad would give the same few bucks to any grifter who came through with a sob story. And the thing is, not all of them were grifters, and sometimes the cost of helping people genuinely in need is falling for the occasional grift.

It's not like anyone ever big-time swindled him, and Jimmy is never really shown swindling anyone who's poor or really in needy in flashbacks of now -- it's greedy drunks who would take a fake Rolex or hedge fund dickheads who think they're coming out ahead.

Chuck not being able to differentiate, and assuming Jimmy has some innate character flaw, is the splinter in his eye

My favorite part of this episode was Kim immediately concluding that Chuck was right about Jimmy forging the documents.

Which in turn reminded me of how Skyler never for a moment bought any of Walt's lies, even though she didn't know the truth until relatively late in the game.

Jimmy is never really shown swindling anyone who's poor or really in needy in flashbacks of now -- it's greedy drunks who would take a fake Rolex or hedge fund dickheads who think they're coming out ahead.

reminded of some bit in one of Iceberg Slim's books where he notes that every con requires a mark that's eager to rip off the con man. the con requires a greedy mark.

Which in turn reminded me of how Skyler never for a moment bought any of Walt's lies,

? I must've been watching a different show, she bought all kinds of lies in the first couple seasons.

OK, maybe some of the more innocuous early ones, but her bullshit detector started going off a lot earlier than it could've.

Good point about Dad, assuming he was really as naive as presented--is this the way Jimmy remembers the moment of insight--which might be a lot of notions, moments, ect., compressed into a personal fable. Anyway, re comparisons of Chuck and Jimmy, was Slippin' Jimmy always that discriminating in his flopper scams? Did he only rook the drivers of fancy cars? Some poor people drive those too, for a while.
I thought Chuck was a dick but less dangerous, but come to think of it, maybe he will turn out to be as much of an enabler etc of careers of evil as Saul, or more so, however unwittingly(in some cases, carefully see-no-evil in others): like what if good old Gus, that pillar of the community and captain of industry, is a client of Chuck and Howard's firm, and/or Mesa Verde, for that metter? Might even be on the latter's board of directors.

I thought Skyler Wanted To Believe---first of all in good ol' Walt, then in perfect criminal Heisenberg (shoulda caught a clue from his choice of names)

https://imgur.com/a/U0UhP

Oops I don't think that worked

https://imgur.com/a/U0UhP

decent guy