http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/23/19/29E71A7500000578-3136480-image-a-3_1435085917887.jpg
― lute bro (brimstead), Thursday, 2 June 2016 00:46 (seven years ago) link
Again, the brain is not a computer article is bald-faced idiocy
http://recursed.blogspot.com/2016/05/yes-your-brain-certainly-is-computer.html
― Dan I., Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link
And I hate to see the blame for it being laid at psychologists' feet--no psychologist I know thinks nonsense like the brain does not process information. The guy is way outside any kind of mainstream, except maybe the facebook "i fucking love science" kind
― Dan I., Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:14 (seven years ago) link
although, okay, i see you may have posted that disparagingly in the first place.
― Dan I., Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:18 (seven years ago) link
I like my iphone or whatever but in general I fear computers.
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 June 2016 01:26 (seven years ago) link
as someone who has studied this shit extensively, the "yes your brain is a computer" article is junk that jumps between logic-chopping and ignorance on the bio side. also surprised that a respected computer scientist can cite the church-turing thesis as evidence of anything as its generally considered by those who actually think about these things a metaphysical claim that you can't actually prove, since there's no good way to even state it that doesn't end up tautologous. the first half argues "your brain is a computer" in a sense that is just "there is a physical process of 'your brain' that can be encoded in a computer or anywhere else" at which point we might as well argue that any physical system in the world is a computer, which is interesting if self-serving from a computer-science perspective but useless otherwise.
the second half picks very partial evidence from people that really have looked at biological models and neural networks and is incredibly out of touch with the state-of-the-art (well, circa the last time i checked in which is a while ago) there.
not stanning for the article its responding to, but its pretty clear that its engaging in a massive misreading, likely from some ur-skeptical "if you say the brain isn't a computer you're mystifying consciousness and trying to invent an immortal soul" sort of slippery slope nonsense.
― germane geir hongro (s.clover), Thursday, 2 June 2016 07:42 (seven years ago) link
article is junk that jumps between logic-chopping and ignorance on the bio side
I thought you were talking about the "no your brain is not a computer here", which is a wild ride of strawmanning and empty theses dressed up in profound-sounding language.
― I've had Eno, ugh (ledge), Thursday, 2 June 2016 08:09 (seven years ago) link
People always have compared the brain to whatever the current technology is, like clockwork, steam engines, computers, holograms
― 🐸a hairy howling toad torments a man whose wife is deathly ill (James Morrison), Thursday, 2 June 2016 09:53 (seven years ago) link
to catch the ball, the player simply needs to keep moving in a way that keeps the ball in a constant visual relationship with respect to home plate and the surrounding scenery (technically, in a ‘linear optical trajectory’). This might sound complicated, but it is actually incredibly simple, and completely free of computations, representations and algorithms.
I'm not sure this guy understands what 'computation', 'representation' or 'algorithm' mean.
― I've had Eno, ugh (ledge), Thursday, 2 June 2016 10:46 (seven years ago) link
Sterling otm
― Jim Reeves in the Temple (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 2 June 2016 12:07 (seven years ago) link
Fair enough; I just grabbed a link to the first reasonable-sounding article I came across that presented an objection to the first one.
― Dan I., Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:06 (seven years ago) link
Earlier in the talk Musk made it quite clear that he believes " not all AI futures are benign." He's especially concerned that AI could take "a direction that would be not good for the future."Musk launched OpenAI to prevent such a future, but it does not appear that he has all that much faith in the plan, since he's already thinking of at least one way that humans can stay ahead of artificial intelligence that he believes will leave us so far behind as to "be like a pet or like the house cat" for the AI.The way around this, Musk explained, is something called a Neural Lace. It's essentially an artificial intelligence layer for humans.
Musk launched OpenAI to prevent such a future, but it does not appear that he has all that much faith in the plan, since he's already thinking of at least one way that humans can stay ahead of artificial intelligence that he believes will leave us so far behind as to "be like a pet or like the house cat" for the AI.
The way around this, Musk explained, is something called a Neural Lace. It's essentially an artificial intelligence layer for humans.
i know this is an ignorant opinion, but why not just stop creating artificial intelligence? how many years of sci-fi do we have telling us it's a bad idea?
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:29 (seven years ago) link
it just seems like there is no payoff to a.i. automating jobs will lead to mass unemployment unless workers succeed in seizing the means of production. virtual reality and things like sex robots will just increase alienation. smartphones are enough. computer technology should just call it a day and stop advancing. devote those resources to building a better alternative energy infrastructure.
the only thing like this i am excited for is self-driving cars.
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link
if a.i. can somehow improve medical care i am all for that too. i just don't go in for this blurring the distinction between human and machine thing. it seems very bad.
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link
hey, a friend of mine recently wrote a book about moore's law/gordon moore if you like computer stuff!
http://www.amazon.com/Moores-Law-Silicon-Valleys-Revolutionary/dp/0465055648/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1464878754&sr=1-1&keywords=moore%27s+law
(this is just a shameless plug for his book. doesn't have anything to do with the singularity. probably.)
― scott seward, Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:50 (seven years ago) link
i long for the day when 'robots taking the jobs' is met with the same dead-eyed skepticism as 'millenials in the workplace' thinkpieces
terms like 'machine learning' and 'neural networks' are pretty annoying in that the things they refer to are pretty /dumb/ and really just math that's good at finding patterns, really not even in the span of the kinds of qualities that make human intelligence intelligent in the way we think of the term
― de l'asshole (flopson), Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:52 (seven years ago) link
that's what i always assumed tbh but i am reading more and more stuff that is like, "oh yeah, automation is the new reality." or, in the academia thread, "these object oriented ontologists are just anticipating the day when there isn't a firm distinction between humans and objects, i.e. machines" (paraphrasing)
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 June 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link
this is great
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055624.full.pdf
if the brain literally was just a computer, we still wouldn't come close to having the tools to understand it
― germane geir hongro (s.clover), Saturday, 4 June 2016 02:06 (seven years ago) link
clever
― de l'asshole (flopson), Saturday, 4 June 2016 05:22 (seven years ago) link
the singularity is here
https://www.cnet.com/news/its-happening-googles-ai-is-building-more-ais/
― Violet Jynx, Wednesday, 17 May 2017 20:21 (six years ago) link
bring it
― brimstead, Wednesday, 17 May 2017 20:23 (six years ago) link
Nah. The only 'live' project mentioned in that article was "making Google Search more responsive to users' needs". All the rest was speculation about Some Day It Will Be So.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 17 May 2017 20:30 (six years ago) link
a search engine that can input its own search queries
"kill me" About 62,900,000 results (1.17 seconds) "kill me" About 62,900,000 results (1.17 seconds) "kill me" About 62,900,000 results (1.17 seconds) "kill me" About 62,900,000 results (1.17 seconds)
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 17 May 2017 20:36 (six years ago) link
Siri, ask Alexa what the time is...
― koogs, Wednesday, 17 May 2017 21:00 (six years ago) link
I hear the software just produced one of these https://i.redd.it/89clk3nfj2yy.gif
― Rimsky-Koskenkorva (Øystein), Wednesday, 17 May 2017 22:33 (six years ago) link