Bob Dylan: The Bootleg Series

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2443 of them)

nothing amazing/revelatory on either of these new things, but both are fun listens nonetheless. dylan straining for the high notes on "under the boardwalk" is hilarious.
couple of things on after the empire that could've been developed into good tunes, but I get the feeling it's all pretty much off the cuff/on the spot. definitely seems to be enjoying himself...

tylerw, Tuesday, 21 June 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

four weeks pass...

Got the two volume Cutting Edge v cheap recently, the revelation for me has been that first take of Can You Please Crawl Out Your Window, definitely prefer it to the Band version - Dylan's singing seems much more passionate, for one thing. Lyrics an example of that old Dylan prescience - lines like "With his businesslike anger and his bloodhounds that kneel" and "While his genocide fools and his friends rearrange/ The religion of little tin women/That backs up their views but your face is so bruised/Come on out the dark is beginning" seems to anticipate Trump (I guess it's partly a song about tyrants)

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:40 (seven years ago) link

two months pass...

haha, pretty crazy ... i do want to hear it all though. at least once. that Paris show should be interesting!

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:00 (seven years ago) link

Haha... never change those EU copyright laws

niels, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:05 (seven years ago) link

seems that they're putting the "real" royal albert hall gig out as a 2CD set too ...
i do miss the curatorial aspect of the bootleg series, but i also am not going to complain about getting the whole damn thing.

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:09 (seven years ago) link

Ha — I just posted that to the "shit that looks like an Onion article" thread.

dinnerboat, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

form the rolling stone article -- this is wrong:
The title of this release corrects a previously released official bootleg from 1998 that identified a Manchester show – the infamous "Judas" performance – as having taken place at Royal Albert Hall
obviously confusing since they called it "the royal albert hall show" in quotes, but they knew the show took place in manchester.

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Not optimistic about the pricing on this. If the 18-disc thing went for $600 (granted, with 45s, a piece of film, and a bag of gravel from the road he crashed his motorcycle on), this'll probably be...$1000? Ugh.

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:41 (seven years ago) link

I thank in advance whoever is gonna boil this down to 4 CDs of the most killer shit

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:43 (seven years ago) link

they're saying it'll retail for around $150 -- think the packaging is going to be more bare bones, less bells n whistles (which is fine by me)

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:46 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, that sounds fairly reasonable. I would've thought this was the opportunity to release Eat the Document, but apparently not.

Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

yeah, would be great if they stitched together the performance footage into a cohesive concert film! probably will happen sometime?

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:52 (seven years ago) link

Remember thinking Eat the Document was kind of bad when I saw it decades ago on PBS, but still would be interesting to see again.

Berberian Begins at Home (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

"While doing the archival research for The Cutting Edge 1965-1966: The Bootleg Series Vol. 12, last year's box set of Dylan's mid-Sixties studio sessions, we were continually struck by how great his 1966 live recordings really are," Adam Block, president of Legacy Recordings, said in a statement.

He pretend continued. "I mean, you'd think if this stuff was really so good, someone would have told me. Who did you say his backing band was again?"

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:20 (seven years ago) link

I thank in advance whoever is gonna boil this down to 4 CDs of the most killer shit

― I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon)

This ^^^
Although I don't even know if I'd even buy a 4-disc distilled version of this. Feel I've got enough mid-60s Dylan.

Duke, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm still waiting on hearing the last box set, I don't have the money to pay for that shit :(

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:51 (seven years ago) link

Likewise I still need to hear the last box set. I am really in an old-man phase of waiting to buy this stuff (because if I stream or whatever I'll listen once and never really grapple with it), but knowing at the same time I'll probably never buy it cos my money needs to go on more boring things.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:31 (seven years ago) link

hold on now! After tylerw's article linked upthread, he got some static: supercollector was extremely skeptical about the existence of a Jim Dickinson-produced Time Out Of Mind, b-but in that previously linked Stone piece from early March: Chaiken has only begun to dip into the hundreds of hours of raw Dylan recording sessions, but he's already come across a completely different version of 1997's Time Out of Mind produced by pianist Jim Dickinson, so there!

dow, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

woah....that would be intriguing, time out of mind has such a lanois sound to it, it would seem like a completely different album

Pull your head on out your hippy haze (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

At least they agree on worthiness (also existence) of John Wesley Harding outtakes.

dow, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

it's circular dow -- I got my info from that RS article, after which the supercollector got in touch with me, said it doesn't exist. chaiken then told me that RS got things mixed up -- there are different mixes, unreleased songs and jam sessions that Jim was a part of, but the production duties were all handled by Daniel Lanois.

tylerw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

Close enough!

dow, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

That's what I usually look to prev. unreleased Dylan legit & boots for: more songs, not more versions.

dow, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

But I'll take different mixes, esp. by J.D., and jams too.

dow, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

"Likewise I still need to hear the last box set. I am really in an old-man phase of waiting to buy this stuff (because if I stream or whatever I'll listen once and never really grapple with it)"

i don't feel like copyright-extension archival mega-sets are something i need to "grapple with". like, i listened to that complete basement tapes or whatever once, and they don't contain a lot of hidden depths not previously manifested in his released work.

a confederacy of lampreys (rushomancy), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

that's true, but if you feel like listening to basement tapes for 6+ hours straight it comes in handy

niels, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 06:41 (seven years ago) link

I got a 'copy' of that complete cutting edge thing, the final disc was the only one that was a drag, the 'live bits and bobs' one, apart from the first chunk of Joan Baez tracks..

Mark G, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 06:45 (seven years ago) link

for those that need the full 36, Bull Moose has it for $108.97 shipped in the US. for me, the calculus has to be cost per disc I'll actually ever get around to listening to (though at that price...).

by the light of the burning Citroën, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:56 (seven years ago) link

nice.

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 17:57 (seven years ago) link

Haha... never change those EU copyright laws

Wait, this is unrelated, isn't it? I thought the EU copyright thing only affected unreleased music from 1963 or earlier, and that everything after benefits from the change in law that extended copyright from 50 to 70 years. That's why we haven't gotten any more Beatles or Beach Boys archive stuff from 1964 or beyond, isn't it?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:19 (seven years ago) link

well, dylan did one last year -- not sure what the deal is with the beatles/beach boys. i don't understand that stuff at all.

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

There was a change in the EU copyright laws (2014? )from expiring 50 years after release to 70 years after release. But there was a loophole (right?) that excluded any unreleased material, which meant anything 50 years old or older in 2014 - that is, 1964 and earlier - so the Beatles, Beach Boys and Dylan rushed out those copyright extension packages. Beatles did "The Beatles Bootleg Recordings 1963," Beach Boys did "Keep An Eye on Summer: The Beach Boys Sessions 1964" and "The Big Beat 1963," Dylan did "The 50th Anniversary Collection 1963" and "The 50th Anniversary Collection 1964." But ... that's been it, right? Was there a '65 Copyright Extension set? What did Dylan do last year? You mean "The Cutting Edge?" Not sure that was under the Copyright Extension umbrella (not that it matters), because that stuff was covered by the new laws.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:45 (seven years ago) link

Someone out there can clear this up, right? I thought he big three (BB, Dylan and Beatles) are all caught up in terms of copyright, until they go into public (EU) domain beginning in 20 years or so.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:49 (seven years ago) link

there was a 65 copyright extension set in addition to the cutting edge (it was made available as a download to people who bought the deluxe cutting edge)
http://www.searchingforagem.com/2010s/2015_50thAnniv.htm

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 18:55 (seven years ago) link

Becoming The Beach Boys, going back to the beginning in '61 (continuing into '63), came out recently, so guess the copyright coast is clear: http://omnivorerecordings.com/music/becoming-the-beach-boys-the-complete-hite-dorinda-morgan-sessions/

dow, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

Why has there been no Beatles 64 or 65 stuff then?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

ringo said he would personally murder anyone who put that stuff out w/o his permission

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:45 (seven years ago) link

Don't know how that works in America, or what happens after Brexit

Foster Twelvetrees (Ward Fowler), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

Xpost no idle threat since as we know from the morricone song, "whenever ringo laughed, ringo fired".

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 28 September 2016 20:26 (seven years ago) link

for those that need the full 36, Bull Moose has it for $108.97 shipped in the US. for me, the calculus has to be cost per disc I'll actually ever get around to listening to (though at that price...).

― by the light of the burning Citroën, Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:56 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

maybe i haven't been paying attention to box set pricing lately but this seems like kind of a big deal? much cooler than spending 100 bucks on 3 discs + assorted ephemera, imo. i dunno, maybe i'm nuts but i'd totally listen to all of these. just might take me a while.

brimstead, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 20:38 (seven years ago) link

c.f. the 27-disc pink floyd "early years" box which is at least 500 bucks

brimstead, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 20:39 (seven years ago) link

yeah this is a comparatively bare bones set, with no extraneous items. which is great imo -- one of the ridiculous selling points of the $600 Cutting Edge deluxe set last year was a leopard skin spindle.

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 20:43 (seven years ago) link

aaw come OOON now

niels, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

I get that the copyright was extended from 50 to 70 years. So why was that Beatles/Dylan/Beach Boys stuff released, then? 70 years past 1963 is 2033. 50 years was 2013 (before the law changed). So why release 1965 Dylan stuff in 2015 if the law had been successfully changed to push its public domain move all the way to 2035? Isn't 1965, for any act, now covered under the extended copyright?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:27 (seven years ago) link

i honestly have no idea

tylerw, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

i dunno, maybe i'm nuts but i'd totally listen to all of these. just might take me a while.

― brimstead, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 22:38 (fifty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I suppose you're right. But I dunno, I'm also happy to have one definitive live '66 version of "Ballad of a thin man" to listen to when the itch appears

Duke, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.