lol and the missing link between my post and yours = michael chrichton's paedophile character based on a critic who gave him a bad review
― Mädchester Amick (wins), Monday, 26 September 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link
finished IT last night and fuck man it's impossible to search ilx or google for discussion. is there an ILX thread just for IT?
i knew for years that there was some kind of fucked up orgy at the end of the book, i assumed it was this huge evil climactic thing with Pennywise, the kids and their parents or something. i'm not exactly sure why that was supposed to scare IT away for 27 years. did i miss that? did the turtle tell beverly to do that? hm
― flappy bird, Thursday, 13 April 2017 17:08 (seven years ago) link
Apart from discussion here, there's definitely a fair amount of bits and bobs on the long stephen king thread, which was just active recently but which I now cannot find even with Google...
I think the orgy is solely something that enables their escape, after they've wounded IT. I remember it seeming like the sex actually teleported them out of the catacombs when they were done but I might be misremembering. Anyway, I don't think it's supposed to directly affect IT.
― long dark poptart of the rodeo (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 13 April 2017 19:13 (seven years ago) link
stephen king c/d?
― Number None, Friday, 14 April 2017 10:17 (seven years ago) link
It recentres their chakras maaan
Then as now, kudos on the poll options itt
― virginity simple (darraghmac), Friday, 14 April 2017 10:42 (seven years ago) link
I randomly opened the book for the first time in years and opened straight to this quote:
She heard the familiar chimes from the living room—chimes that had always sounded to her like a Chinese name: Ching-Chong!
― how's life, Friday, 14 April 2017 18:54 (seven years ago) link
It was a different time
― virginity simple (darraghmac), Friday, 14 April 2017 19:04 (seven years ago) link
lol that is classic king
― briscall stool chart (wins), Friday, 14 April 2017 19:21 (seven years ago) link
that "he had always thought" or "it had always seemed to her that" is very characteristic kingism (not that other people don't do it, I just think he notably does a lot of it)
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 14 April 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link
the passage I quoted above is slaying me all over again btw, so good/bad
― briscall stool chart (wins), Friday, 14 April 2017 19:24 (seven years ago) link
This guy is totally back right? traffic over 2 threads, like 5 big films in production... 80s babies exercising their purchasing power
― briscall stool chart (wins), Friday, 14 April 2017 19:32 (seven years ago) link
yeah it's weird, i've seen several articles & talk in SK fan communities about his sudden cultural resurgence (as if he ever went away), but I think you can chalk it all up to the success of Stranger Things and two of his most beloved novels (IT & Dark Tower) getting made into movies this year.
― flappy bird, Friday, 14 April 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link
I think wins is right about purchasing power. Also the demographics of who's In Charge and making decisions to greenlight things.
― long dark poptart of the rodeo (Doctor Casino), Friday, 14 April 2017 21:00 (seven years ago) link
thought I would take a break from SK after finishing IT, but I picked up Cujo and I'm totally sucked in. It's a nice companion piece to IT, same idea really, and the prose is wild, makes sense that he wrote it in a total coke/alcohol blackout. really vicious, already so much better than Firestarter (boring! not enough fire starting).
― flappy bird, Monday, 17 April 2017 18:14 (seven years ago) link
The most effectively-horrifying element of the Cujo novel which is lost in the movie is the presentation of the dog's perspective. I found King's primitive presentation of this well-meaning creature's slow descent into a madness that it doesn't understand really affecting upon re-reading it a few years ago.
― Break the meat into the pineapples and pat them (Old Lunch), Monday, 17 April 2017 18:55 (seven years ago) link
Like, something about the knowledge that Cujo just wants to be the same good dog he was before his sickness makes the entire tableau about 100x more awful for me.
― Break the meat into the pineapples and pat them (Old Lunch), Monday, 17 April 2017 18:57 (seven years ago) link
King also does good dog perspective in Gerald's Game (which is otherwise fairly rubbish but I am kind of intrigued to see how they pull off the forthcoming adaptation for Netflix)
― Number None, Monday, 17 April 2017 19:42 (seven years ago) link
― Break the meat into the pineapples and pat them (Old Lunch), Monday, April 17, 2017 2:57 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Pretty sure 12 year old me had no capacity to appreciate this angle, must reread
― iris marduk (Jon not Jon), Monday, 17 April 2017 19:58 (seven years ago) link
Well I guess he should write a whole book from the POV of a dog. Why the hell not? It'd probably still have all the same SK tics. The dog would refer to people as "that Johnson woman," etc.
― The Thnig, Monday, 17 April 2017 20:12 (seven years ago) link
Dog would tell unfunny jokes to other dogs, be annoyingly folksy. Would at least justify the end of the book being a feeble shaggy dog story. Plus dogs come in a range of colours, so the inevitable Magical Negro could instead be red or spotty or brindled instead of black.
― I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:41 (seven years ago) link
lol
― briscall stool chart (wins), Tuesday, 18 April 2017 12:23 (seven years ago) link
The twist would be in the dog version of CUJO, where the dog would be played by a human.
― The Thnig, Tuesday, 18 April 2017 15:57 (seven years ago) link