Charli XCX

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1003 of them)

New single called After the Afterparty coming tomorrow. I hope it's more inline with Explode rather than the EP.

Kitchen Person, Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:18 (seven years ago) link

I hope it sounds exactly like SuperLove which I have listened to approx 500000 times in the last 48 hrs

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:44 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it sounds like either tbh

art baengels (monotony), Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

Based on the clip I heard, it sounds more closer to "Boom Clap" than SuperLove, Explode, or the EP.

It also feature Lil Yachty, but I have not heard that part.

MarkoP, Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

xpost Charli has made two of my favourite albums of the decade so far but SuperLove is still my favourite thing she's done by a long long way.

Kitchen Person, Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

As long as the new single doesn't sound like the EP, I'll be happy.

Kitchen Person, Thursday, 27 October 2016 20:54 (seven years ago) link

it's on spotify here. it sounds sort of like miley's "we can't stop" or "die tonight" from sucker with a guest rap

art baengels (monotony), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

comparing this to Boom Clap is making me imagine a sad, lonely take on going home at the end of the night and it being a bit heartbreaking rather than the never-stop-partying vibes that song title suggests

boxedjoy, Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:33 (seven years ago) link

Not feeling this. Angry Birds song still the best thing from her this year.

Jeff W, Friday, 28 October 2016 19:38 (seven years ago) link

sounds like a solid album track, but not feeling it as a single.

Van Horn Street, Friday, 28 October 2016 20:21 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, this would sound fine on her album but I was expecting so much for a lead single. She wasted Explode on the Angry Bird soundtrack.

Kitchen Person, Friday, 28 October 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

four months pass...

Charli is releasing a mixtape on Friday. The new songs sound a lot better than I was expecting. Pull Up should have been the lead single from the proper album.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04w4f3m

kitchen person, Wednesday, 8 March 2017 00:13 (seven years ago) link

these are still all produced by sophie & stargate aren't they? shocking how much better than they are than vroom vroom & after the afterparty

ufo, Wednesday, 8 March 2017 01:22 (seven years ago) link

the producers she shouted out on mista jam were danny l. harle, sophie, a.g. cook, klaus ahlund and john hill

monotony, Wednesday, 8 March 2017 03:40 (seven years ago) link

She's dead to me.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 8 March 2017 04:33 (seven years ago) link

i will listen for the cupcakke feature

dyl, Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:51 (seven years ago) link

Sounds like she's quickly losing patience with her record company. I've no idea why they didn't identity Pull Up as the obvious single. I've had it stuck in my head since last night. All three of the songs they played are so far are ahead of anything she did last year. I'm feeling very relieved.

kitchen person, Wednesday, 8 March 2017 14:35 (seven years ago) link

a few bangers on this mixtape for sure

monotony, Friday, 10 March 2017 01:51 (seven years ago) link

She's dead to me.

Charli + Klas sounds super-promising to me

(±\ PLO;;;;;;; Style (sic), Friday, 10 March 2017 02:50 (seven years ago) link

i'm 2/3rds into the mixtape and i like it a lot!

joshywinty (josh), Friday, 10 March 2017 05:28 (seven years ago) link

Holy shit, this album is fiery trash.

self-clowning oven (Murgatroid), Friday, 10 March 2017 06:07 (seven years ago) link

jaw just dropped at how abysmal "roll with me" is

i mean it's all pretty bad but that song is a new level of terrible

lex pretend, Friday, 10 March 2017 12:29 (seven years ago) link

finished it. what a dreadful release. don't get why she enjoys industry support given everything she's released outside of "boom clap" has flopped, and her cult fanbase is baffling given that she's long had no discernible artistic voice beyond desperate trend-hopping

lex pretend, Friday, 10 March 2017 13:03 (seven years ago) link

i flat-out love like 5 songs from her last album - which was stylistically quite coherent if you care about that! - so i keep hoping she can pull that off again. i agree that there appears to be a bit of a vision drift going on atm :/

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 10 March 2017 13:07 (seven years ago) link

yeah it's since then that it's become evident that her approach to different aesthetics is to desperately switch up every time one of them flops. felt both the tumblr goth of the first album and the pop-punk nu-republica thing on the second were like...two-thirds of the way there both times and could've really been honed into something good but she abandoned both as soon as they didn't work out and since then the chopping and changing has been kind of embarrassing

lex pretend, Friday, 10 March 2017 13:11 (seven years ago) link

i like "pull up" and "emotional" but not into the tove-lo-a-likes and trap-esque sh*t

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 10 March 2017 13:26 (seven years ago) link

I really like the mixtape. There's some good callbacks to True Romance on here. Babygirl is so great it could be on the recent Ronika album and Pull Up is one of the best thing she's ever done. Roll With Me is the only one I'm having any trouble with.

kitchen person, Friday, 10 March 2017 15:53 (seven years ago) link

there's a fairly clear aesthetic link from True Romance tumblr goth to this, Sucker feels like the outlier.

mixtape is good, pc music stuff is much more enjoyable when they're just making pop without the deliberate awkwardness or silly concepts or whatever vroom vroom was supposed to be

babygirl and pull up are definitely highlights, and i really like lipgloss despite it being quite a mess

ufo, Friday, 10 March 2017 16:11 (seven years ago) link

Sorry but even beyond my usual PC Music partisanship I can't see how "Roll With Me" doesn't come across as immediately charming. Like, it's certainly the most alive that her or the production feel at any point on the mixtape.

Champiness, Friday, 10 March 2017 16:46 (seven years ago) link

haven't listened to this yet

i suppose the reason she continues to get industry support is b/c every now and again one of her songs will become a hit for another artist (e.g. "same old love" in the semi-recent past) and the hope probably remains that she might actually manage the same for herself again

dyl, Friday, 10 March 2017 17:05 (seven years ago) link

how much industry support does she really have? she can't even get an album out

J0rdan S., Friday, 10 March 2017 17:15 (seven years ago) link

do feel like diane martell directed video is probably her last gasp as a quasi big budget pop star unless she somehow runs into another big single

J0rdan S., Friday, 10 March 2017 17:16 (seven years ago) link

hmm so i just listened. it is not *terrible* but certainly not up to par with her albums. a couple tracks are sorta charming, mostly shoved toward the front of the tracklisting.

dyl, Friday, 10 March 2017 19:22 (seven years ago) link

I'm not too sure why it's embarrassing that her aesthetic has changed with each album. Isn't that quite a common trait in pop stars?

"Roll With Me" sounds like Britney in a sex club. It's probably my favourite! That or "Lipgloss".

monotony, Friday, 10 March 2017 21:23 (seven years ago) link

i only listened to the cupcakke verse but i like her now

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:00 (seven years ago) link

doesn't "sounds like Britney in a sex club" = "sounds like Britney"

(I haven't heard this yet, I'm kind of avoiding it and reassuring myself that even on album one she was working with Brooke Candy and (sigh) J£ZUS MILLION)

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Friday, 10 March 2017 23:16 (seven years ago) link

I'm not too sure why it's embarrassing that her aesthetic has changed with each album. Isn't that quite a common trait in pop stars?

because it seems to come as a result of the previous aesthetic not working rather than being fully explored, and at the expense of her having a really distinctive voice. i mean what is charli xcx's "thing" at this point rather than jobbing industry songwriter throwing stuff at the wall in the hope something will stick?

lex pretend, Saturday, 11 March 2017 08:16 (seven years ago) link

True Romance and Sucker were both great albums where she aesthetic did work though. It doesn't feel like she gave up on them because they were failed experiments, it just seems like she doesn't like to repeat herself and she maybe has a short attention span. The Vroom Vroom EP is the only time she really got it wrong for me. The material just wasn't good enough. This mixtape is her back on track that makes me feel a lot more hopeful about the third album than I did at any time last year. I think Charli's thing is just being an incredible songwriter.

kitchen person, Saturday, 11 March 2017 15:16 (seven years ago) link

as someone who pre-Sucker would have considered her a favourite and has been cautiously supportive since, I have to say this is not going well at all for me. The abundance of guest singers accentuates the lack of personality on this release and it feels a bit like someone's prospective CV for being a popstar. That said, all of this is far better than Vroom Vroom and After The Afterparty which are both simply unacceptable.

boxedjoy, Saturday, 11 March 2017 21:36 (seven years ago) link

it's more that she gave up on them because they were commercial failures (speaking as someone who loves True Romance and quite likes most of Sucker)

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Saturday, 11 March 2017 21:40 (seven years ago) link

I don't think it was ever really likely they would be successful though, at least in a major-league way. They're both pop albums but they feel slightly out of step with the pop climates they were delivered into. I don't actually believe she's a hack, chasing success - I imagine it would actually be a lot easier for her to do that than to pursue her own artist divergences and hope the world bends to her will.

boxedjoy, Saturday, 11 March 2017 21:47 (seven years ago) link

I feel like it's her record company that still have some hope of her becoming this massive pop star (based on I Love It, Fancy and Boom Clap). I think Charli is probably happy with the level she's at commercially. She's obviously really prolific and just wants to get the music out there. In that interview I posted about this mixtape, she didn't exactly hide her frustration about the label sitting on the album for so long. It really does come across that she gets bored very easily. I could see her leaving her label and going it alone by the end of the year.

kitchen person, Saturday, 11 March 2017 22:07 (seven years ago) link

robyn's mid-level, mainstream success worked for her because she was fully independent and not splitting her profits from touring or record sales with a major label

that model is not viable for artists on major labels

there are not major label pop artists who wake up in the morning and think "i don't really care if i can be huge on the radio or not, as long as my modestly-selling albums reach a core fanbase of sophisticated pop aficionados"

it's go big or go home

james brooks, Saturday, 11 March 2017 23:18 (seven years ago) link

"roll with me" is basically a robyn song (which explains lex not liking it)

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 21 March 2017 23:46 (seven years ago) link

Out here acting like this industry prop actually writes or makes any of the music she puts out. I got nothing against that but why are we now fooling ourselves pretending she's something shes not?

orientmammal, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 10:38 (seven years ago) link

uhh what? it should be pretty clear that she writes her music (+ the songs she's done for others), maybe it's you who ought to be thinking about what could be "fooling" you i.e. pervasive culturally-sanctioned assumptions typically made about young women in creative industries

dyl, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 16:28 (seven years ago) link

nice trolling orientmammal

monotony, Wednesday, 22 March 2017 22:23 (seven years ago) link

Racoonlike

Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Wednesday, 22 March 2017 22:24 (seven years ago) link

"uhh what? it should be pretty clear that she writes her music (+ the songs she's done for others), maybe it's you who ought to be thinking about what could be "fooling" you i.e. pervasive culturally-sanctioned assumptions typically made about young women in creative industries

― dyl, "

http://i.imgur.com/BihLufY.png

http://i.imgur.com/DBDWqcd.png

This is a strange argument you are pursuing, as a simple look at her wiki page shows she is a passenger of dozens of creators who are creating her music, without which, she would not have a product to sell. Yes, her name is included, for some sense of artistic authenticity on the part of the label to fool apparently people like yourself who don't see the other 20 and at times half dozen people on one song.

Also, a strange (projection?) thing to blame it on her happening to be a woman, I'm not sure what that has to do with anything, but I guess it's what you've been taught to say but it only diverts the debate into the abyss.

orientmammal, Thursday, 23 March 2017 00:18 (seven years ago) link

*sigh* this shit again, here we go

Charli XCX is a topline writer, someone like Ariel Rechtshaid (for instance) is a producer. This can be confirmed by reading any number of interviews with her or with her collaborators, or having a passing knowledge about how pop music is written

as far as "(blaming) it on her happening to be a woman," topline writers tend to be women and producers tend to be male, and there is a consistent pattern of downplaying the former work in favor of the latter.

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Thursday, 23 March 2017 00:23 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.