It has one thing going for it -- Branagh NOT wearing his Poirot facial hair.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 5 May 2017 23:22 (seven years ago) link
In a way it fits with the optimism Nolan has when he is at his best, but on the other hand it seems dull and straightforward, and Nolan is really not visually interesting enough to pull this off easily. Cautiously optimistic...
― Frederik B, Friday, 5 May 2017 23:34 (seven years ago) link
mmhm yeah this has cautious optimism all over it.
― piscesx, Tuesday, 9 May 2017 20:38 (six years ago) link
As a history buff, it's a story from WWII that deserved telling. 338k soldiers rescued, essentially by every seagoing boat in S. England volunteering. 338k is 28 divisions, more than enough to have arguably turned the tide at El Alamein, and perhaps the Burma/India front. An 11 day miracle that saved the world, and few (at least in the U.S.) know about it.
I do wish this subject was tackled by David Lean, in that era, with those actors. The problem is the lack of singular heroes to wrap a narrative around.
Weird seeing a war movie without chaos. The trailer looks like some purgatory allegory, as storyboarded by Rothko.
― baby, we don't love you baby, we don't love you baby, yeah (Sanpaku), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 01:14 (six years ago) link
it's a commercial guys
― qualx, Wednesday, 10 May 2017 06:51 (six years ago) link
Rewatching Memento for the first time in years, in a decade perhaps, and even with just a faint idea about where the plot is going it's kinda boring. There's not a lot to it.
― Frederik B, Monday, 10 July 2017 21:06 (six years ago) link
coupla screens in the UK are going for the full 70mm thwack
https://lovinmanchester.com/news/manchester/manchester-one-of-the-only-imax-cinemas-in-the-uk-to-screen-dunkirk
― piscesx, Monday, 10 July 2017 21:36 (six years ago) link
Dunkirk is 106 minutes long! wonder how that happened, did he lose 3 reels?
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 July 2017 21:43 (six years ago) link
The people that escaped dying of boredom watching them, self immolated in a pile of those missing reels!
― calzino, Monday, 10 July 2017 22:02 (six years ago) link
not sure how a war movie can justify being 3 hours long if it doesn't also have grumpy batman or dream spies
― qualx, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 04:25 (six years ago) link
I'm really pretty upset that my favorite theaters in town are selling tickets to this already but won't let me buy a seat for a Thursday 7/20 showing of Valerian
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 July 2017 05:03 (six years ago) link
Early notices sound absolutely incredible but I still have only the slightest clue how it works. Seeing it next tuesday, and I kinda can't wait. Can't recall the last time I felt this way about a film, most films I look forward to are festival films, and I only get to see them after waves and waves of reviews, analysis, backlash, etc. This time, I only have scraps of information. It's kinda exhilarating.
― Frederik B, Friday, 14 July 2017 20:56 (six years ago) link
UK reviews coming in; 5/5 in the Guardian, 5/5 in Telegraph, 5/5 Empire.
incidental to this the usually quiet girl at the counter of our local Vue/Imax offered unprompted that it's "Awesome".
― piscesx, Monday, 17 July 2017 20:40 (six years ago) link
critic in my FB feed just posted "well, it's loud"
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 July 2017 20:50 (six years ago) link
saw a movie over the weekend and the trailer for this film didn't telegraph that there was anything plot-like? just an overwhelming sense of dread about war. maybe that's a good thing, but I was left with the impression it's just Nolan doing *horrible war scenes*
― mh, Monday, 17 July 2017 20:55 (six years ago) link
this time, its in the ocean
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 17 July 2017 21:00 (six years ago) link
Bradshaw's 5 star rave reviews have become so devalued over the years, he even dished out 5 to Okja last week.
― calzino, Monday, 17 July 2017 21:35 (six years ago) link
Yeah, this is really something... Looking forward to discussing this with all of you, it's probably best to see this one as cold as possible.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 09:38 (six years ago) link
I was left with the impression it's just Nolan doing *horrible war scenes*
yeah
i know virtually nothing about this either but given nolan's track record i'm certain it'll be technically accomplished but utterly empty
― bitumen: the animated series (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 July 2017 09:41 (six years ago) link
I really don't want to spoil anything, but 'technically accomplished' is a massive understatement.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 09:47 (six years ago) link
and 'utterly empty'? not getting much of a sense of characters from the reviews i've skimmed
― bitumen: the animated series (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 July 2017 09:52 (six years ago) link
There's so much stuff to think about afterwards, my head is spinning. It's not 'empty' in that sense...
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 10:01 (six years ago) link
Have vowed never to watch a Nolan again due to the same criticism as bg outlines, is there a reason to see this?
― jk rowling obituary thread (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 July 2017 10:27 (six years ago) link
you might get to see harry styles get machinegunned by the filthy jerries?
― bitumen: the animated series (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 18 July 2017 10:28 (six years ago) link
There's that
― jk rowling obituary thread (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 July 2017 10:29 (six years ago) link
Buddy of mine worked on this film, operating the model planes for the action and air battle stuff, and manning the drones etc. Still don't really feel like seeing it tho tbh.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 11:47 (six years ago) link
Would love to see an angry, cine verite Battle Of Algiers type movie about Britain's brutal Mau Mau counterinsurgency released r/n. Just to piss off The Telegraph hack who came out with the " heart-hammering and heroically British" quote.
― calzino, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 12:50 (six years ago) link
yes, I wouldn't say dunkirk is one of the more overlooked bits of recent history.
― ogmor, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 13:01 (six years ago) link
manning the drones
I just want to point out that I know what LBI means here but this phrase is oxymoronic and hurt my head for a bit.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 13:35 (six years ago) link
Lol sorry
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 13:52 (six years ago) link
pedant! everyone says "drones" meaning uav. I hate it but that's where we are.
― mh, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:16 (six years ago) link
mh the u in uav stands for UNMANNED
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:22 (six years ago) link
tell that to the poor air force people guiding them and watching the video, buddy
― mh, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:25 (six years ago) link
maybe "manning the uav control board" is what I'm getting at
― mh, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:26 (six years ago) link
imo it's similar to "manning the torpedoes" which may or may not be a malapropism
― mh, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:27 (six years ago) link
Speaking of which, I bet Eye In The Sky is a better movie than this.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:29 (six years ago) link
Human torpedoes or manned torpedoes are a type of rideable submarine used as secret naval weapons in World War II. The basic design is still in use today as a type of diver propulsion vehicle.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 18 July 2017 14:31 (six years ago) link
wise critic
There will never come a time that i will scroll down on this page pic.twitter.com/QbendaBHRK— Jake Cole (@notjustmovies) July 19, 2017
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 July 2017 21:40 (six years ago) link
Slant critic otmfm!
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 July 2017 21:43 (six years ago) link
http://www.thestranger.com/film/2017/07/19/25297266/my-father-who-survived-dunkirk-would-not-have-recognized-christopher-nolans-dunkirk
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 July 2017 22:02 (six years ago) link
lol I read the comments on jake's review earlier, good reminder that the internet was a mistake
― qualx, Wednesday, 19 July 2017 22:23 (six years ago) link
weird obsession with his review coming out later than the rest of the mudslide, apparently that's a sign of bad faith
also a sign of bad faith: getting your negative review in too early, like all the DKR critics that got death threats on RT
― qualx, Wednesday, 19 July 2017 22:27 (six years ago) link
Haven't seen this yet but really enjoyed that Stranger piece. I'd like to see Atonement again.
― ryan, Wednesday, 19 July 2017 22:29 (six years ago) link
really liked this. there really isn't much of conventional plot (which I thought was a wise choice), mostly just depictions of the evacuation from three different (non-linear) angles. much of the dialogue is hard to make out and is little more than commands or shouted reactions to a deteriorating situation.
the 70mm print was beautiful too. wasn't really overdramatized either, I mean many intense scenes but not really due to the pathos of any character, more POV war sequences.
― Neanderthal, Friday, 21 July 2017 04:15 (six years ago) link
was kinda weird when Batman showed up and destroyed a few planes tho
much of the dialogue is hard to make out
Did he do his usual trick of giving the most important dialogue to the least intelligible actors?
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Friday, 21 July 2017 05:15 (six years ago) link
War is hell (on the ears). Is there a shot where a loud noise blows out someone's ear drums, and the rest of the scene plays out in a muffled haze with a high-pitched ringing?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 21 July 2017 12:37 (six years ago) link
nope
― Neanderthal, Friday, 21 July 2017 13:15 (six years ago) link
does chris nolan's insistence on casting tom hardy then covering most of hardy's face with a mask have a basis in sexual fetish y/n
― he tasted like mouth (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 21 July 2017 13:18 (six years ago) link
Lol, I thought about that as well. I love how many weird Nolanesque details that are in this film. It's not wrong that he always has had way too much exposition in his films, and in general way too much focus on legitimizing everything he does, which probably has obscured how weird and personal his films are. This time it's just all there, without bothering to explain why.
― Frederik B, Friday, 21 July 2017 13:56 (six years ago) link
just watched. I actually found the music score annoying and a tad innapropriate in most scenes. Apart from that it's a decent movie.
― Ste, Thursday, 4 June 2020 10:25 (three years ago) link
Finally saw this. Thought it was pretty good! Agree the aggressively modern white noise soundtrack was a little ... discordant, but I'm not sure I would have preferred a more predictably rousing score. I also agree with a (neither here nor there) criticism that everyone is just a little too handsome, but whatevs. Also agree that it was a surprising decision to make the movie virtually bloodless, but given so much of it is kind of metaphorically bloodless (by design) it kind of goes with the cold theme, like the entire movie is being experienced through a haze of shock.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 1 February 2021 14:37 (three years ago) link