Actually feel sick at the amount of stupidity in this speech. It's moronic!
― stet, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:50 (six years ago) link
In what sense? Because from Trump through Sessions to Pruitt to whomever, they are still doing shitty horrible things, whether it has to go through congress or not. The only argument that can be made is that it could be even worse.
that's the only argument to make! why is this not important??
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:50 (six years ago) link
Because the prospect of worse does not make terrible better!
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:51 (six years ago) link
...
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link
Josh, your basis for argument seems to be that if it's not good enough to get this administration thrown out now, it's not worth bothering with.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link
Favor us.
things a President can do without Congress = foreign policy, ie rip up treaties, fuck up alliances, start wars, etc. you know, the good stuff!
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:53 (six years ago) link
Jfc heard 30 seconds of this shit on NPR and feeling homicidal.
― JoeStork, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:53 (six years ago) link
the whitehouse feed keeps cutting to this shot of 3-rows of trump supporters, carefully cropped so that no one else is in the same frame. it's so obviously fake and manufactured
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:53 (six years ago) link
I don't watch him talk, I'm not a glutton for punishment
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:54 (six years ago) link
also are you really hoping for something unexpected to happen? I mean
I'm hoping someone brings me a gin and tonic.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:54 (six years ago) link
otm
― sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:55 (six years ago) link
I'm hoping for a protester to yell "FUCK YOOOOOoooooo"
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:56 (six years ago) link
this speech is actually shaping up to be one of his most explicit and prominent expressions of xenophobism, "anti-globalism", bannonism
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:57 (six years ago) link
I'm hoping for more than that. (xp)
― Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:58 (six years ago) link
He's basically declared trade war on Europe and China.
And the USA will lose that.
― Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:59 (six years ago) link
Watergate took a year and a half to get going
Hmmm, more like 10 months really. And the mean attention span is about a tenth of what it was then.
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 June 2017 19:59 (six years ago) link
Paul Ryans statement is basically 'fuck obama lol'
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:01 (six years ago) link
Pruitt's talking now.
what a fucking prick
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:01 (six years ago) link
his nose so deep up trump's asshole, the buttcheeks making little hollow cupping noises as they clap over pruitt's ears
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:02 (six years ago) link
The US will get coal mines, we'll get renewables. The guy is a deal-making genius
― stet, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:03 (six years ago) link
thank you for a note of black humor, appreciated
― sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:03 (six years ago) link
does everyone else think I should stop posting too?
― Violet Jax (Violet Jynx), Thursday, June 1, 2017 2:50 PM (eleven minutes ago)
wholeheartedly
― a warm bowl of soap (WilliamC), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:04 (six years ago) link
he took no questions
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:04 (six years ago) link
yea i'm not going to watch this
― marcos, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (six years ago) link
Looks like the UK picked the wrong time to hitch its wagon to the Poor Old USA.
― Punnet of the Grapes (Tom D.), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (six years ago) link
the mean attention span is about a tenth of what it was then
it is probably easy to believe that one can accurately estimate an entire population's average attention span when one only pays attention to three things
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:05 (six years ago) link
bold predictionscott pruitt will become a U.S. senator and he will be even more hatable than ted cruz
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:06 (six years ago) link
savin' that for ilx first mentions but it seems so likely
guys the FP button under Violet Jynx's posts is in the same place as everybody else's posts
please stop confusing being mildly annoying with being hateful, etc.
I can't believe I'm posting this
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:06 (six years ago) link
lol @ Musk throwing a temper tantrum and leaving his "economic councils" as if that counts for shit
I'm glad he's bankrolling Solarcity and Tesla and battery storage projects and space exploration but god he is such a tool
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:09 (six years ago) link
xp I tried that already, it didn't work
― sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:10 (six years ago) link
one can accurately estimate an entire population's average attention span when one only pays attention to mobile-electronics-obsessed zombies
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:11 (six years ago) link
Don't misrepresent me — I've never said or thought VJ was hateful. I just wish he'd vanish.
― a warm bowl of soap (WilliamC), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:12 (six years ago) link
^^^
― sleeve, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:14 (six years ago) link
I don't know, the GOP congress under Obama was capable enough to hold/fuck things up just for the hell of it, and Trump can with a single fart undo or at least fuck up any sign of progress ... if it's that easy to do a bad job, or just destroy for destruction's sake, then maybe none of it is worth bothering with. Like, to what end? As long as there are people stupid enough to nihilistically turn the clock back, what is the point if it's relatively easy for them to do so? Because even if the congress and White House went blue, they can't just undo the shit Trump is undoing. What's taking him months to destroy was often the product of years of effort. And even if all the investigations take him down, his replacements are just as bad for all the same reasons. And if all of these investigations don't take him down, then ... seriously, why bother? We're doomed.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:14 (six years ago) link
Trump getting elected period remains just so innately disheartening.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:15 (six years ago) link
i'm just gonna cast aside any degree of investment in my health and any specific plans for the future. maybe i'll start smoking cigarettes or something. why not?
― global tetrahedron, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:19 (six years ago) link
Because even if the congress and White House went blue, they can't just undo the shit Trump is undoing
be specific, because in many cases they can actually undo the shit he is doing
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:20 (six years ago) link
and let's be really clear here - repealing the ACA, pushing through an insane tax cut, building a wall on the Mexican border, etc. - these are all things with horrible, horrible consequences and it is a good thing that they are being stopped.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:21 (six years ago) link
Are they being stopped or just seriously slowed? You can't stop something that hasn't happened yet, and I can't tell if they've been stopped or merely stymied by the gross incompetence of this administration.
Oh, and you want specific? OK. How about ... the Paris Climate Accord? Can we just rejoin? Or if some ACA replacement passes in some shape or form in the next few years ... can that just be changed? How about tax cuts, if they ever happen? Good luck getting enough momentum getting tax hikes passed, even if it's just to bring things up to old levels.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:24 (six years ago) link
Paris Climate Accord? Can we just rejoin?
probably
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:25 (six years ago) link
that's what I'm wondering. US can't actually withdraw until 2020, so if a Dem/non-idiot president wins, can't they just rejoin?
― frogbs, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (six years ago) link
The fuse is a little longer than most, but this is basically a genocidal act. Made out of willful ignorance and spite, by a reality show star.
― Trockasturm Hoar The Ramming Battle Ceraton (Old Lunch), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (six years ago) link
How widespread was voter revulsion towards Nixon and understanding of what Watergate meant when it went down? Because I only really know from Perlstein tomes, but I get a sense that maybe a lot of people didn't get/care what he'd been doing wrong? Like Trump's apologists now? The only difference is they got Twitter (and he hasn't gone down yet)
― Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (six years ago) link
Why would the world wait for us to do so? Like Brexit, I assume damage is done.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:26 (six years ago) link
We can but who would take our word? President Pruitt can withdraw again in 2024.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (six years ago) link
Or if some ACA replacement passes in some shape or form in the next few years ... can that just be changed?
yes, if the votes in congress are there. ditto taxes (remember the battle over letting Bush's ridiculous tax cuts expire?)
xp
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (six years ago) link
Also what does You can't stop something that hasn't happened yet mean because as a koan its kind of imparsable.
― Who's puttin' sponge in the zings I once zung (stevie), Thursday, 1 June 2017 20:27 (six years ago) link