If McConnell is afraid of anything, it's the public seeing enough of the bill to organize the kinds of protests that killed the House bill in March, that's why
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:23 (six years ago) link
Yes, which is why the bill should not be public during recess. Which is why it would be smarter to send it to CBO and vote on it as soon as possible.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:26 (six years ago) link
What I'm trying to get at is: Why didn't they release it last week and vote today? Or schedule the vote on Monday? What are the complications they are waiting on, other than getting the votes? Is there some procedural thing I don't get? Honest question.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:28 (six years ago) link
probably cuz the bill wasn't even written as of last week. They're finishing up the details, releasing it Thursday, scoring it by the CBO as quickly as possible, and then immediately voting on it.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:29 (six years ago) link
But why care about details if they already have the votes...
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:33 (six years ago) link
I seem to recall a Supreme Court case about sloppy wording in the ACA bill. Seems like they need to run it through some Constitutional software or something.
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:37 (six years ago) link
writing legislation is a complicated process and there's bound to be some fiddling at the margins to make sure everyone's pet issues are adequately addressed.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:38 (six years ago) link
― President Keyes, Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:37 PM
Nino is dead.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:38 (six years ago) link
ie people saying "I will vote for this if you add [this provision]" - someone still has to write that provision
xp
But if they haven't even written provisions yet, how do they imagine getting a CBO score by Tuesday?
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:40 (six years ago) link
GOP members are saying they haven't even seen the bill yet. Here's my thesis: McConnell is overplaying his hand, thinking that releasing it as close to recess as possible will increase the pressure on reluctant voters to vote for it. He doesn't have the votes. Yet. He could very well get the votes, but he doesn't have the votes, and he needs the pressure because his bill is worse than we expect.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:45 (six years ago) link
McConnell is overplaying his hand
this is not a thing he is known for
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:49 (six years ago) link
McConnell claims they've been feeding CBO details bit by bit all along so what they are essentially doing is revising things they've already been given.
idk why this is so mysterious to you
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:50 (six years ago) link
I don't disagree that he's using the rapidity of the schedule to pressure votes but that is standard op procedure for a smart majority leader - you exert as much pressure as you can right up until you reach the tipping vote, then you immediately call a vote before anybody has time to change their mind. LBJ did this repeatedly, and so has every smart majority leader since.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:51 (six years ago) link
I agree. Which is why I don't think he has the tipping vote as of yet ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:52 (six years ago) link
like I said, the tell that he has the votes is that he is letting details of his schedule leak to the press. Someone like McConnell does this build momentum and pressure shakier votes, but it isn't the kind of thing you do unless you know you are safely past the margin of error.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:57 (six years ago) link
McConnell is smarter/cannier than Ryan who was dumb enough to schedule a floor vote and then have to immediately pull it, which made him look like a schmuck.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 17:58 (six years ago) link
how do you think mcconnell feels about this sort of thing
Spicer on healthcare bill: "The president clearly wants a bill that has heart in it."(Trump called House bill "mean" last week)— Philip Rucker (@PhilipRucker) June 20, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:00 (six years ago) link
currently looking like optimal scenario is:2017: ACA repeal2018: Dems take House, Trump agenda crippled2020: Trump loses re-election bid, President Harris/Franken/Gillibrand/Warren takes office, Dems get at least 51-seat majority in the Senate2021: Single-payer
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:00 (six years ago) link
http://www.theonion.com/article/panicking-mitch-mcconnell-shoves-entire-senate-hea-56289
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:01 (six years ago) link
Someone like McConnell does this build momentum and pressure shakier votes, but it isn't the kind of thing you do unless you know you are safely past the margin of error.
― Οὖτις, 20. juni 2017 19:57 (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This just seems self-evidently self-contradictory to me... If he's safely past the margin of error, who cares about shakier votes. (To me the tell is that McConnell insists on June 30th, and has insisted on June 30th all along, but that other members of the leadership are saying it's more of an aspiration.)
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:02 (six years ago) link
I realize I'm bullshitting, even more than usual, because even if they release a bill this Thursday and passes it by next Friday, I can say they didn't have the votes today. So it doesn't really matter no matter what. I just don't get why they are cutting it so close if they're playing from a position of strength.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:03 (six years ago) link
I have answered all your questions. yr own yr own now.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:05 (six years ago) link
frederik, americans can be assholes (even senators) and enjoy pulling power plays and fucking with people's heads. we (sort of) elected a bully. think bully tactics when the cruelty of our politics confuse you
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:10 (six years ago) link
he got his 51 votes, he lets details leak, which is essentially a shot across the bow to shakier committed votes saying "you said you would vote 'yes', now I'm calling your vote in and if you screw me and change yr vote EVERYONE will know it's because of you and your faithless betrayal of me and my party btw I will murder your career if you do this"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:12 (six years ago) link
it is not particularly mysterious
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:13 (six years ago) link
Yeah, but the thing is, you're wrong.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:14 (six years ago) link
"The president clearly wants a bill that has heart in it."
I'm sure there's heart in it. Probably snouts. And I'm guessing rodent feces as well. The best sausage, the greatest.
― smug dinner-jazz atrocity (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:15 (six years ago) link
The idea of a vote before June 30th came long before this week's leaks. That is, long before you say he got the votes.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:16 (six years ago) link
Maybe we just wait and see what happens? I think they have the votes now, but one or two waverers could be peaked off once CBO details are out.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:19 (six years ago) link
2017: ACA repeal2018: Dems take House, Trump agenda crippled2020: Trump loses re-election bid, President Harris/Franken/Gillibrand/Warren takes office, Dems get at least 51-seat majority in the Senate2021: Single-payer
lol
― Old Lynch's Sex Paragraph (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:21 (six years ago) link
Thats Americans - the real Klignons
― Dean of the University (Latham Green), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:22 (six years ago) link
hey I said "optimal" not "likely"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:24 (six years ago) link
Hm hm hm
NEWS: Senate Russia investigators promised access to key Treasury data from FinCEN - https://t.co/qFTZAVjDaz https://t.co/HleUUr2Hf3— Tom LoBianco (@tomlobianco) June 20, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:28 (six years ago) link
""This morning, Treasury briefed me on documents that are being transmitted to the Senate. I believe these documents will be sufficient to start following the money.""
some reall deep thrt stuff now
― Dean of the University (Latham Green), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:38 (six years ago) link
Wacky fun!
Does the president believe Russia interfered in 2016 campaign? Spicer: "I have not sat down and talked with him about that specific thing."— Paul Sonne (@PaulSonne) June 20, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:38 (six years ago) link
Meantime, great.
While I greatly appreciate the efforts of President Xi & China to help with North Korea, it has not worked out. At least I know China tried!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 20, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:39 (six years ago) link
2021: Single-payer
Too many sitting senators learned their political truisms in earlier battles over health care and would be unwilling to put their careers on the line against the insurance companies and their ability to propagate irrational fear through calculated misinformation.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:40 (six years ago) link
At least I know China tried! Katy Lied
― rogan josh hashana (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:41 (six years ago) link
a lot's gonna happen between now and 2021 Aimless, incl single-payer in California.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:42 (six years ago) link
happy for you
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:46 (six years ago) link
in a nutshell!
https://theintercept.com/2017/03/09/paul-ryan-fundraised-with-health-insurance-lobbying-firm-just-before-his-powerpoint/
our bribed government
― Dean of the University (Latham Green), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:51 (six years ago) link
not frustrated enough to vote against it though riiiiiiite?
Mike Lee, a member of the Senate health care working group, says in a video he doesn't know what's in the bill and is frustrated w/ process pic.twitter.com/xjpSj48M9C— Haley Byrd (@byrdinator) June 20, 2017
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 18:58 (six years ago) link
"concerned""troubled""frustrated"
― marcos, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:00 (six years ago) link
"voting yes"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:00 (six years ago) link
it's like they're begging their constituents to pressure them and give them an out but it isn't happening
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:01 (six years ago) link
yep
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:02 (six years ago) link
In which case...I'm almost amused.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:03 (six years ago) link
Josh Marshall otm:
This is sort of a subchapter of what I discussed in my last post about ‘policy literalism’. It is not only that the ‘GOP moderates always cave.’ It is that we are asked to (and almost always do) indulge this fainting couch routine or a furious bout of chin stroking that comes as a prelude to the cave.
If Capito doesn’t get that this was part of the plan all along she’s literally a fool since this has been a publicly discussed goal from the git-go. This is almost to a certainty a safety-net version of what wingnuts now commonly call “virtue-signaling”, in this case a staged demonstration or interlude put on for effect to soften the blow of signing onto the policy outcomes that are frankly unconscionable. In other words, virtue-signaling but virtue-signaling in bad faith.
This isn’t negotiating or putting a foot down. It’s play acting. It is so consistent, routine and predictable that it needs to be reported as such. Much like hiding behind the lack of a legislative text, on the off chance Sen Capito is serious, she should do something to make that clear. Otherwise, it’s just a yarn, just more nonsense to hide the ball and pave the way for the preordained outcome.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 June 2017 19:05 (six years ago) link