Chapo Trap House and the rise of the dirtbag left

otoh a lot of these people would probably fail and it’d end in a classic “nerd tries to out-quip bully and gets totally humiliated” situation, probably ignoring CTH is the best option for people who don't like it

why did that twitter user above equate "women/minorities" with centrists and the democratic establishment? i mean, i know why but it's a completely disingenuous assessment to put women and minorities on the one side and "socialists" on the other.

it's mostly centrists trying to frame things this way but chapo has played into it by relishing their "dirtbag-ness." dragging out these stupid intra-left fights is good for clicks and listens and whatever.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/13/opinion/millennial-labor-movement.html

here is a good article by a black woman about the need to re-center labor in our political discussions. she talks about how her family was hurt by the evisceration of collective bargaining and the decline of midwestern manufacturing, processes overseen and supported by democrats. she didn't need to disparage other causes to make her case!

the bernie bro/brocialist nonsense was a slur and the worst thing anyone who cares about economic justice can do is embody it

xp
If you read the quote he's not talking about himself or CTH as the lieges.

I get the quote, it still sounds silly to me. if one of the keeping it 1600 guys told the sanders wing to "bend the knee", I'm pretty sure the CTH guys would justifiably mock it mercilessly

If one of the 1600 guys showed any sign of having an idea or being able to win an election, maybe not.

The bend the knee is in response to the success Corbyn had in England and with how well things like Medicare for All poll here - you can disagree with its applicability here or whatever, but it's not like they're just saying it to say it.

overall I like Chapo but there's too much dude energy around this thing, dude energy is a dangerous force

Wait, hasn't both the Keeping it 1600 guys worked on a winning presidential campaign?

xpost i agree w/that and i have no interest in them or cum town as podcasts but whenever reactionaries use that to smear the faint revival of actual (diverse) leftist energy i feel like going to war for them

Wait, hasn't both the Keeping it 1600 guys worked on a winning presidential campaign?

With one of the most charismatic politicians in American history after a disastrous GOP administration. How well has the Obama team done since 2008? Congress, Brexit, May, etc.?

If I recall correctly they won again four years later. Am I getting that right?

it's bad that it was taken out of context or whatever by notable person anyone has ever heard of before @HillaryWasRight but c'mon "get this through your fucking head: you must bend the knee to us. Not the other way around" sounds like some nerd-ass 17yo trying to sound tuff on WoW

It wasn't taken out of context by that twitter dude, but in some stupid article that I can't be bothered to read, but it also called it a coherent and practical agenda, which only makes it more laughable. And I don't really care, I just think what milo wrote was funny too. The Menaker tweets are funny as well, especially when he says that his podcast shows a 'critical mass' of fans, which frighten all the pundits, which is so stupid and self-absorbed.

tl;dr: The Dems should go left, and the chapo guys seem unpleasant and unintelligent.

If I recall correctly they won again four years later. Am I getting that right?

especially when he says that his podcast shows a 'critical mass' of fans

hmm

We are a tiny part of this, but the success of our stupid podcast shows a critical mass of people understand these people are useless

Lol. Hm, I guess you're right, these three twitter dudes really do have better credentials when it comes to winning elections.

what is the point of you

Oh FFS. The context of that quote is from the post-Labour election episode, explicitly about how Corbyn did far better than anybody expected and was shit upon by the more neoliberal types. and how the point was that coming right out and fully embracing more progressive positions actually had electoral results. It was a response to the more Establishment types who go for the bloodless, non-ideological data science and polling who hold that its the only way to win.

I posted the link upthread more from a sense of bafflement at the kinda thinking that would invoke ManBunKen in this

kingfish OTM, i can't believe how hysterical everyone is getting over this. it was taken completely out of context, "we" does not mean "chapo trap house," he was talking about the left & progressives immediately after the UK election.

Chapo is successful because FINALLY the left has something visceral like Limbaugh.

You sound like that isn't the worst thing ever.

having something visceral and impassioned instead of the lifeless and toothless tone of the DNC? yes it's great

also corbyn recently said he got his ideas for campaigning from bernie which warms my heart tbh

Not because of celebrity worship or whatever but just that like taking your unabashedly populist message to people and saying what you want to do seemingly works

There are, like, other political institutions than Rush Limbaugh and the DNC. It's not an either or. And if you're taking your clues from Rush Limbaugh, I'll doubt how deeply felt your leftist convictions are. And how smart your strategy is. It's not as if the right are doing that well at the moment.

The right has controlled discourse and policy for like 45 years, not sure what exactly you are talking about

Politics isn't reducible to policies. When you try that, you lose. Of course, when you speak to a bunch of soybean growers, you'd better be in favor of price supports, and when you speak to bankers, you'd better be in favor of financial deregulation, but both sides know that much already. Once that's out of the way, the emotional juices had better flow in your favor.

And if you're taking your clues from Rush Limbaugh, I'll doubt how deeply felt your leftist convictions are.

lmao this is amazing. don't be dense. i'm not talking about his politics, i'm talking about his style. I would put Howard Stern and Bob Grant in the same category, visceral & impassioned.

I got that it was his style, and my point still stands. You think you can separate his style from his lack of ethics, morals, his willingness to lie and manipulate, his hate mongering, etc?

yes

style = passionate broadcasting

I don't hear Rush in their DNA at all, there's more George Carlin.

Sure. They have a lot in common with Bob Grant, though I doubt they ever heard him. Felix is the only Stern fan I think, but I think there's a similarity in candor there.

George Carlin was funny tho

Biddle & Max Read are responding to this thread with similar points:

Dirtbag Left might consider showing up more than once every 4 years to complain about the DNC and vote 3rd partyhttps://t.co/myxH7C3Zvf

— Jim Ray (@jimray) July 15, 2017

I don't think it's fair to compare that to tea party-ism. The bending they're referring to is universal healthcare.

— Sam Biddle (@samfbiddle) July 15, 2017

They have created a scorched earth climate where "centrist" is an epithet.

— Buzz Andersen (@buzz) July 15, 2017

I don't think it's scorched earth, I think it's demanding more from the only not-GOP choice we have

— Sam Biddle (@samfbiddle) July 15, 2017

A strong, organized, vocal left is the only way centrists will ever get what they say they want

— Max Read (@max_read) July 15, 2017

"Showing up every four years" - glad the super lazy are just repurposing their Nader talking points.

Also, as we talked about last year, Chapo is filling the gap that some Gawkers did when their platform still existed.

If the Tea Party were what it claimed to be (grassroots rather than astroturfed), it would hardly be a horrible thing for Democrats to have - managed to get a fair number of people elected IIRC.

Yeah, they sound like what I imagine a Hamilton Nolan podcast would (and his voice couldn't be worse than Matt or Felix).

Pareene was on the Diggcast

the "bend the knee" comment was a slightly brusque but understandable reaction when for years and years, as centrists have lost ground and accomplished modest gains at best, they've also lectured the left about how "unrealistic" and "out of touch" they are. if it's an ovecorrection it's not an unfair one imo

i wouldn't even say it's an overcorrection so much as an intentionally silly hyperbole because chapo is still - get this - a comedy podcast.

i swear it's like someone had a monkey's paw and wished for a more vibrant left media and the unintended consequence was creating the worst discourse on the internet

So it goes.

centrists have lost ground and accomplished modest gains at best

As timid as it might seem to single-payer diehards (myself included), the ACA was much more than a modest gain.

^this^ is true.

Chapo is successful because FINALLY the left has something visceral like Limbaugh.

― flappy bird

nobody remembers bob lassiter.

imagine if, like, kevin williamson had written shit like that, they'd probably do a 'reading series' of it