the alt-right

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/removing-confederate-statues-from-south-mall/g4yylLQXmHni95DraX1vGM/

go longhorns

xref ilf, Photoshop arshavin threads

http://www.football365.com/news/podolski-to-sue-breitbart-after-migrant-jet-ski-story

"There is no evidence Mr Podolski is either a migrant gang member, nor being human trafficked"

looooooooool

If Mehmet Ozil had been human trafficked that might just explain his level of performance for Arsenal.

Ex-Arsenal and Germany striker considers legal action over photo error

good luck trying to prove to the court you're not a migrant gang member, mr podolski - if that is even your real name

"He was a migrant actually, emigrating to West-Germany from Poland two years before the wall came down."

^^ breitbart defence

Commie bastard.

Confederate flip-off kid kicked out of Pensacola Christian College.

He told the paper that he wanted to make the trip to Virginia because he wanted to take back the history of his ancestors he felt the KKK and Nazis were misinterpreting. He said he hoped to share “the true history” of the South and push back against Neo-Nazis he feels have wrongly “latched on” to Confederate history.

“I went up there to represent what I believe is right,” he told the News Journal.

In an Associated Press video, Armentrout said “they need to know what they fought for wasn’t slavery or oppression.”

I think maybe you should take a do-over on high school history before you head back to college.

He told the paper that he wanted to make the trip to Virginia because he wanted to take back the history of his ancestors he felt the KKK and Nazis were misinterpreting. He said he hoped to share “the true history” of the South and push back against Neo-Nazis he feels have wrongly “latched on” to Confederate history.

“I went up there to represent what I believe is right,” he told the News Journal.

In an Associated Press video, Armentrout said “they need to know what they fought for wasn’t slavery or oppression.”

yeah, sure is hard to imagine any ideological overlap between the confederacy, nazis and the kkk

redundant post alert, zing to blame

For all I know this made the rounds, but I had never seen it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=140&v=gnXBeQwmmrc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnXBeQwmmrc

he just likes to be offensive, no biggie

that is an amazing video

Doffcoat

To be fair to breitbart, and let's not be but anyway, that is an amazing picture of podolski for the purposes of the article. If he looked any more like the caricature requested Jason Statham would have to enter stage right to take the pair of them out

https://www.twitter.com/E_JonesFi/status/897506553141620737

Never thought I'd see the day. FP brings on Cernovich & describes him as a "National Security" reporter.https://t.co/iAnyXftTSq

— Eric Jones (@E_JonesFi) August 15, 2017

FP FP

Great news:

BREAKING: After alt-right organizers saw huge counter-protests in Boston, they've canceled 67 "America First Rallies" scheduled in 36 states

— Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) August 22, 2017

None of this "let them chant their garbage" nonsense. Violence works, and long may it continue.

hey asshole, the counter-protests in Boston were PEACEFUL

yeah exactly, wtf. Boston was amazing because the counter-protestors dwarfed the actual protestors. why would you advocate unprompted violence?

Because they want to deny non-white ppl their right to live?

Peaceful because of numbers, and on that occasion.

^^^^internet hardman

You wouldn't have had those numbers out without the events in Charlottesville. Sad but true.

*goes elsewhere on the internet to find pictures of Mussolini's hanged, smashed body - will use if necessary* xp

People have the right to gather, march, and demonstrate peacefully. Retaliatory violence/self-defense is obviously acceptable, but initiating violence on otherwise peaceful/non-violent demonstrators is not.

glad that's cleared up!

They are peaceful...about denying others their right to live.

statement is an oxymoron

Yes, anti-racist demonstrators are noted worldwide for initiating physical violence.

Like, I'm sure it's happened somewhere at some point but I've never, ever seen that happen

xxp

People have the right to gather, march, and demonstrate peacefully. Retaliatory violence/self-defense is obviously acceptable, but initiating violence on otherwise peaceful/non-violent demonstrators is not.

I think as far as public demonstrations go, this is correct. (Military conflicts, political assassinations, etc. are a different story)

Like, I'm sure it's happened somewhere at some point but I've never, ever seen that happen

um really

I mean

http://www.berkeleyside.com/2017/07/19/berkeley-middle-school-teacher-yvette-felarca-arrested-charges-inciting-riot/

http://i.imgur.com/YcQT4OI.gif

this is p blatant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tt0lYQCTxA

there was that video of a woman wearing a red hat that said "Make Bitcoin Great Again" being interviewed by the local news and someone comes up and hits her in the face with a bike lock.

punching Richard Spencer I approve of because it was more like a media stunt than inciting a riot or whatever. Felarca's actions were just kind of stupid and counterproductive, even tho I totally support and understand her motivations.

xp

um really

I meant at events I've personally attended over the years

oh, well yeah that's different

if it isn't clear my stance is that different situations and different contexts call for different tactics. I don't get xyzzz's bloodthirst, which seems like the kind of thing stupid kids like to indulge in while cosplaying previous conflicts (hmm who does that remind you of)

Have we solved it yet

I'm sure we're very close

and while I do think that instances of antifa/black bloc/etc striking first are mostly aberrations (or, in some cases, specifically instigated by undercover cops), I'm not about to cry over people who advocate genocide getting a whack or seven

yeah me neither

dwarf the fash with vastly superior numbers and violence is unneccesary