http://screencrush.com/blade-runner-2049-first-reviews/
Early reviewers (whoever these people are) seem pretty pleased with it.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:20 (six years ago) link
Did you guys know this bullshit is 3 hours long
― good art is orange; great art is teal (wins), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:22 (six years ago) link
lol at them including Jesse Hawken's Seagal joke
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:22 (six years ago) link
anyway, *never* trust the early reaction roundups
I'm waiting for Armond.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:27 (six years ago) link
100% guarantee that his "better than" list will include
Valerian > Blade Runner 2049
― nomar, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:28 (six years ago) link
which might actually be correct, i still haven't seen Valerian
yeah I kinda wish I could find a roundup of early reactions to the Phantom Menace as a control
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:39 (six years ago) link
The first one I remember reading, from the day before the midnight opening, was a complete pan.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:41 (six years ago) link
OTOH Roger Ebert and Peter Travers gave it 3.5 and 4 stars, respectively ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:45 (six years ago) link
http://www.starwars.com/news/critical-opinion-the-phantom-menace-original-reviews
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link
this one is particularly hilarious
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/star-wars-episode-i--the-phantom-menace/review/
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:55 (six years ago) link
Yet The Phantom Menace is probably one of the most deliriously inventive films to have appeared in years: it displays all of George Lucas's uncommon magic, a wide-eyed genius for adventure narrative that is beyond any ordinary capacity for wonder, and in many respects the latest episode proves itself to be a more finished movie than any of the others. It is daring and beautiful, terrifying and pompous – and that's just the title sequence.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 19:56 (six years ago) link
He’s right. It’s a great film.
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:15 (six years ago) link
It only gets better with age. It’s like a fine wine.
I mean, say want you want but Jub-Jub Briggs is the best comic creation of the past three hundred moon cycles
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:18 (six years ago) link
anyway I still refuse to believe this will be any good at all
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:21 (six years ago) link
I love Star Trek part one: The Phantom Pain
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:21 (six years ago) link
― good art is orange; great art is teal (wins), Tuesday, September 26, 2017 12:22 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
jesus christ
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:25 (six years ago) link
I sincerely hope it’s good.
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:25 (six years ago) link
I hope it gets progressively worse, and whoever survives hour three gets their own replicant
― mh, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:37 (six years ago) link
there's an hour of Ford and Gosling travelling across the desert between LV and LA
Halfway through they stop and take some peyote, it’s pretty dope
― The Marmadook (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:58 (six years ago) link
that's when the secret Sean Young scene comes in
― mh, Tuesday, 26 September 2017 21:00 (six years ago) link
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2017/09/27/blade-runner-2049-first-reactions-critics-call-film-sci-fi-masterpiece/?WT.mc_id=tmg_share_fb
mostly the same article as above, but with more reviews and IDs on the reviewers (lots of newspaper critics)
― j., Friday, 29 September 2017 01:05 (six years ago) link
long movies rule
― brimstead, Friday, 29 September 2017 01:37 (six years ago) link
just watched 2022, very watanabe
― mh, Friday, 29 September 2017 01:55 (six years ago) link
xps still no one trustworthy, and a peter bradshaw rave is as often a bad sign as a good one
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 02:03 (six years ago) link
I WANT TO BELIEVE
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 September 2017 10:04 (six years ago) link
rly struggling tho
the trailers are very :| but my favorite critic proclaims it's better than the OG. my brain went offline
― rip van wanko, Friday, 29 September 2017 11:00 (six years ago) link
164 minutes
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 September 2017 11:18 (six years ago) link
Good lord.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 13:58 (six years ago) link
First reviews (Guardian, Variety) are full of praise.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:02 (six years ago) link
full of something
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:07 (six years ago) link
sorry i don't know why i said that. i hope this movie is good.
Bradshaw also gave 5 stars to Dunkirk #never forget. But I've got to admit this sounds pretty good.
― calzino, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:14 (six years ago) link
i’m listening to the new hannah peel record and it should be a soundtrack for a blade runner sequel
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:16 (six years ago) link
rip van wanko which critic was that
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:25 (six years ago) link
Edelstein: "I thought it was okay."
― El Tomboto, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:26 (six years ago) link
god I hate rotten tomatoes so much
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:52 (six years ago) link
Soundtrack release announced, 2CD edition limited to 2049 copies (lol), no one seems to know a thing about the track list yet (all zimmer? Any johannsen bits? Wallfisch bits? Etc)
I’m more stoked about the score than before; if we get a fully-engaged zimmer it could be v suitable stuff. But... he didn’t have long to write this. The last standout thing he did, he had something crazy like a year and a half.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:24 (six years ago) link
I'm deeply skeptical of all the rampant praise. I'm not saying it can't be even just a good film, but this is all very curious.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 15:38 (six years ago) link
To me it just says everyone thought it’d suck and it doesn’t suck. I’ll take a new blade runner movie that doesn’t suck. But more than that yeah we shall see.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:40 (six years ago) link
this movie still has jared leto in it right
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:41 (six years ago) link
Thus in large part my skepticism.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 15:42 (six years ago) link
this is the correct stance
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:42 (six years ago) link
Critically important typo in the prerelease PR, it’s actually Jared from Subway. To say more would be spoilers.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:43 (six years ago) link
keep that sick fuck away from replicant children
― mh, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:00 (six years ago) link
http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/blade-runner-2049-review-1202576220/
Wow, not holding back in his praise: Make no mistake: Whereas the original “Blade Runner” was (eventually) embraced for its unrealized potential, its sequel ranks as one of the great science-fiction films of all time.
― Dan Worsley, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:04 (six years ago) link