The long overdue _Blade Runner_ thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1963 of them)

it's also got a very depressing depiction of the Earth's future where there is a chronic shortage of every color except orange and teal

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:16 (six years ago) link

to be fair, thanks to the maze runner/hunger games/enders etc mk2 loves futuristic dystopian bleakness, but they are obviously aimed at the younger crew.

mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:20 (six years ago) link

Dude teal and orange is not a problem in this movie.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:26 (six years ago) link

It’s less prevalent than in the original.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:26 (six years ago) link

teal and sickly yellow, then.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:29 (six years ago) link

do a gis. some images are teal, and the others are orange.

rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:40 (six years ago) link

Jared Leto's House of Tron has a definite yellow theme going on in the film, like a giant backlit toilet bowl

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:52 (six years ago) link

saw this last night, loved it

should I see it again in IMAX

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:22 (six years ago) link

another plot hole

the horse is still radioactive but the place where it came from is no longer radioactive

that's not how radioactivity works

the late great, Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:49 (six years ago) link

radioactivity in 2049 in much more advanced, u wouldnt understand

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:58 (six years ago) link

i am pretty dense it's true

i also had a hard time figuring out how gosling figured the memory maker as the daughter

the late great, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:24 (six years ago) link

He figured it out via a Usual Suspects flashback subroutine.
And also she looks kind of like Sean Young?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:35 (six years ago) link

I appreciated the fact that they left the trail vague enough that it seemed, to my slightly slow matinee mind, like a twist I hadn't quite anticipated.

The little flashback/montage bit that happened wouldn't have been necessary had the movie been tighter, but it laid it out -- Deckard showed them how to scramble the records, explaining why it was unclear whether the kid was a boy or girl. But the girl's record, which you're mislead into thinking was the bogus one, had a disease recorded. As in, the kind of disease that would lead to a life in isolation. Her visceral reaction when she said "this is a real memory" seemed a little disproportionate to the trauma of the actual memory. She's able to brush off her parents as being offworld, having left her.

None of it directly pointed to "this is the woman" but it all fit, and was enough for someone who actually had the memory to work it out.

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:40 (six years ago) link

I was left guessing whether the disease part was true -- I'd lean on the side of "no" and it was just a very specific way for them to hide the daughter in plain sight, directly in view of the people who were seeking her, but out of reach.

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:42 (six years ago) link

The way the dude was handling the horse didn't suggest it was actually all that radioactive. Was the idea perhaps supposed to be that it had traces of some particular isotopes that indicated where it had been?

You don't see what memory K shows the girl. Then again the furnace memory did involve getting kicked in.

Noel Emits, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:46 (six years ago) link

i was waiting for harrison ford to glue on a toothpick horn on the horse but instead got glitchy hologram elvis.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:50 (six years ago) link

Enjoyed the movie. Spielberg meets Malick in a way. Not a masterpiece but pretty good and great atmoaphere.

nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:58 (six years ago) link

that’s a good description imo

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:20 (six years ago) link

nothing malickian in this beyond some of the pacing imo

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:26 (six years ago) link

wait till you see adrien brody-bot cut scenes

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:29 (six years ago) link

I think villeneueve has a distinct style, whatever else you may say about him. But the one movie that kept coming to mind while watching this was A.I.

ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:30 (six years ago) link

This is the closest stylistically to Enemy of all his movies (also my favorite of his until this one).

ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:31 (six years ago) link

Yeah i meant the pacing regarding my Malick remark. Obviously not much of the malickian-nature themes here etc..

nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:53 (six years ago) link

I really liked the slow pacing. A 90 minutes movie like this wouldve been generic as fuck. Giving the audiance time to obsorb the themes is great.

nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:58 (six years ago) link

this seemed much more plot (and in a weird way action) driven than thematic.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:11 (six years ago) link

I think there's a balance between the two more or less

nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:18 (six years ago) link

I think the pacing was off regarding plot beats -- the entire replicant rebellion gets short shrift

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:32 (six years ago) link

This was very good

Haven't read any comments yet, no doubt I'll be back in an hour frothing at ye.

The only big missteps - they would've killed k after kidnapping declare, and the three minutes of matrix was shit and should never have made the screen

Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:56 (six years ago) link

I saw it again, in IMAX, which I recommend. This is an astonishing piece of visual art.

I also picked up on some of the more subtle religious allusions the second time—Leto directly quotes Genesis at one point, in reference to the infertility of the biblical Rachel.

Also the secret daughter has something (fictional?) called "Galatians syndrome," suggesting that Officer K is a kind of Paul of Tarsus figure, a persecutor turned convert.

Re the replicant rebellion: it's there, but subtle. The implication at the end is that the daughter is a mole the Wallace Corp, implanting memories inside the replicants that, when triggered, can push them off baseline. That's the set-up for the sequel, I would suspect—or at least, it was, before it ate shit at the box office.

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:01 (six years ago) link

they've said, although maybe not truthfully, that there were no mysteries meant to be addressed in sequels

I thought the implication at the end was that the daughter is a mole for the _rebellion_ because K, like others, has this memory that is real that he dwells on. And it's the daughter's memory -- so while he's not the child in the memory, he wants to join with his kind to protect her and team with the underground

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:08 (six years ago) link

"all the best memories are hers" or something to that effect -- the rebels know where these memories came from

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:09 (six years ago) link

whoops you probably mean mole _in_ the Wallace Corp (although she's an independent contractor), not mole _for_

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:09 (six years ago) link

yeah, that's what I meant. they probably got the rogue subcontractor idea from Snowden

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:12 (six years ago) link

actually the plot twist I was waiting for, which never came, was that Joi was a mole for the Wallace corporation, setting up an Infernal Affairs mole vs countermole narrative

maybe it's better they passed on that one

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:14 (six years ago) link

they sure riffed extra hard on the Pinocchio angle for K

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:16 (six years ago) link

I know others didn’t care for it, but there was something compelling to me about the climactic fight scene. It’s duration, the relentlessness of the water. It felt like there is something going on there at least other than robots beating on each other.

ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:17 (six years ago) link

It was a bit Bond. Maybe the car reminded me of that Bond one that went underwater.

Noel Emits, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:20 (six years ago) link

having harrison ford flail helplessly for the entirety of it was (intentional?) chuckles

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:23 (six years ago) link

I thought the look on Gosling's face, when the car is engulfed in water and he walks out of the darkness and starts firing, was perfect. It was as if all doubt and emotion drained and he was completely purpose-driven

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:26 (six years ago) link

we needed the old blade runner

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:26 (six years ago) link

I thought it was clever. It alluded to both Altman and John the Baptist while still working as a credible fight scene

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:27 (six years ago) link

the whole idea of having a rendition program to take Deckard offworld so they could really torture him, wtf

mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:28 (six years ago) link

it would have been cool to see what the posh offworld looked like. is it just a futuristic day spa? what if the torture facilities were also posh and comfortable?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:38 (six years ago) link

rosewaterboarding

it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:39 (six years ago) link

I know others didn’t care for it, but there was something compelling to me about the climactic fight scene. It’s duration, the relentlessness of the water. It felt like there is something going on there at least other than robots beating on each other.

― ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:17 (forty-six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Definitely was affecting Luv

I think perhaps it's the only force of nature we see in the entire movie?

Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Thursday, 12 October 2017 22:06 (six years ago) link

the whole idea of having a rendition program to take Deckard offworld so they could really torture him, wtf

― mh, Thursday, October 12, 2017

yeah that was weird. no one knows he's alive anyway and you've already demonstrated you can pretty much do whatever in your fancy office and dispose of bodies. maybe there's a special kind of PAAAAAIN that requires different gravity or some specific element or something?

...

...

guess this means he's DUN DUN DUH not a replicant

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Thursday, 12 October 2017 22:17 (six years ago) link

Isn't it just to avoid him being killed / retired as an illegal replicant?

Noel Emits, Thursday, 12 October 2017 22:21 (six years ago) link

maybe he wants to show him a version of rachel that is also a spaceship?
something like this:
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/d4/d7/d3/d4d7d31dc1d9ec45269e13635878fa7e--my-neighbor-totoro-studio-ghibli.jpg

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 22:25 (six years ago) link

re Galatians syndrome: Galatians is a book of the new testament; it’s one the letters from Paul, and is where Paul “plants the flag” of Christianity, ie in opposition to Mosaic Law/Judaism etc
not 100% sure yet what the significance of the reference is, if any

there’s also a Jesus-fish pattern on the outer edge of the table in the orphanage when they are studying the ledger

plus there’s weirdass gnostic stuff too

it’s a fun rabbithole to explore imo

Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 13 October 2017 01:31 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.