Rolling Comic Book thread 2017

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (849 of them)

http://www.loiclocatelli.com/post/159951034303/persephone

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 18 November 2017 21:09 (six years ago) link

Al Ewing, formerly of this parish, has recently added “Oh, <name>paws” to the vocabulary of the Marvel universe, for which he is I unserstand writing every book. The recipient of the upbraiding was a thinly disguised Steve Bannon.

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 19 November 2017 02:48 (six years ago) link

oh man which book was it?

Al is an absolute fucking treat and I hope he browses in an idle moment, because I have loved his work

mh, Sunday, 19 November 2017 03:43 (six years ago) link

You are gonna have to show me a clip of an 'oh blank paws' but if marvel dialogue

i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 19 November 2017 04:57 (six years ago) link

holding out for galactus to apply his great machines to the task of transforming a face into a heart

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Sunday, 19 November 2017 08:03 (six years ago) link

- HERALD, WHY HAVE YOU CHOSEN THIS PLANET?
- because it look intersting

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Sunday, 19 November 2017 08:05 (six years ago) link

As requested: https://imgur.com/a/ubvwv

Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 19 November 2017 11:00 (six years ago) link

I feel like I've seen Al use ILX-specific terminology in a Marvel comic before. (Unwashed) Hats off to him either way.

Steak-Umm Tartar in a Parkay Reduction (Old Lunch), Sunday, 19 November 2017 12:11 (six years ago) link

ha, this is awesome

oh god yes, read that and forgot about it

mh, Sunday, 19 November 2017 15:56 (six years ago) link

wow that's kinda... terrible lol

Nhex, Sunday, 19 November 2017 16:06 (six years ago) link

thank you for providing.
that is kinda terrible, but also kinda awesome

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Sunday, 19 November 2017 20:51 (six years ago) link

the paws joke never made any sense so.. yeah...

Nhex, Monday, 20 November 2017 04:09 (six years ago) link

oh, Nhexpaws

shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Monday, 20 November 2017 04:25 (six years ago) link

Really enjoyed Al Ewing's Rocket Racoon, and his stint on Doctor Who (my gf was also very impressed by that having a library assistant character, apparently Al knows his onions).

I started this year with a very half-arsed project to re-read all my comics. So half-arsed, in fact, that I am still at A. Art Out Of Time: Unknown Comic Visionaires 1900-1969 remains an awesome anthology, so much weird stuff in there. It first introduced me to Herbie! However, trying to read the tiny tiny word baloons in a lot of the stuff from the 00's/10's made me remember the times when I had both the eyesight and the tenacity to do that. #justmortalitythings

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 20 November 2017 10:55 (six years ago) link

That book was a huge deal at the time. I never got the sequel Art In Time but I might sometime.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 20 November 2017 11:51 (six years ago) link

Ordered the three Tor by Joe Kubert hardcovers then had to cancel when I found out they give them the standard Archives/Masterworks cruelty.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:27 (six years ago) link

Sick bastards.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:35 (six years ago) link

sadly the thread where "oh, wrinklepaws" originated was deleted

the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 20 November 2017 19:56 (six years ago) link

The Tor series by DC in the 70s and Marvel in the 90s are the best option left, though far from complete.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 20 November 2017 20:15 (six years ago) link

original thread quoted in here i think:
I'm old here, so what is... 'Oh, Wrinklepaws'?

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:07 (six years ago) link

the real tragedy here is the loss of "oh, wrinklepaws".

― haitch (haitch), Saturday, April 8, 2006 12:33 AM (eleven years ago)

shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:44 (six years ago) link

A few months ago I was enjoying someone's intelligent book reviews until I got to their review of a Molly Crabapple book. I have no idea what to make of her accusing Crabapple of being a turbo-capitalist co-opting important issues but I was quite shocked that she seemed to be saying that Crabapple's stories about being sexually harassed by men in her travels didn't count because she'd danced for rich white men. Someone else seemed to accuse her of making it all up.

I didn't really have the confidence or patience to look over it and criticize them. I was a bit stressed and doubted my perception and didn't want to get somebody into shit if I was completely wrong.

Is any of this talk familiar to you guys?

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 14:04 (six years ago) link

I'm a little bit paranoid my bringing this up will somehow catch Crabapple's attention and these people (who may or may not have said awful things) would be inundated by her angry fans.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 14:11 (six years ago) link

Watched a little Image Comics documentary and Jim Lee said there was a meeting in which Rob Liefeld was jumping up and down on a bed. It showed a bunch of tv appearances Liefeld had, talks about meeting with Tom Cruise and Spielberg being interested in doing an Image thing. I thought it was Stephenson and Larsen that started the shift in the company but it was really Jim Valentino.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:41 (six years ago) link

yes, because Valentino came from Aardvark-Vanaheim and Renegade (& al), so knew that indie publishers existed and proportionally paid better, with no interference. his entire "mainstream" career was only about two years?

shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 03:25 (six years ago) link

I meant the shift towards more genres and styles that were different than the founders.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 03:32 (six years ago) link

don’t forget the very special issue of Spawn where he met Cerebus

mh, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 03:59 (six years ago) link

Both issues of Splitting Image came out before Spawn #10 tbf

shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 10:13 (six years ago) link

did you miss the gabrielle bell page a couple of weeks ago about taking care of my elderly dog?

(I think it was online edition only but - highly recommended)

harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 18:17 (six years ago) link

That's great

Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link

Can't remember if I posted this before or someone else.
https://www.comics.org/issue/247718/cover/4/

Robert Adam Gilmour, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:18 (six years ago) link

ha, that ny’er piece is great

hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:21 (six years ago) link

birth of the truth bomb!

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:32 (six years ago) link

Been looking at the art of Jorge Zaffino and Nestor Infante, good stuff. Infante did a bunch of daft looking Continuity comics, very 90s but also done quite well.
I like Kaja Saudek but the only thing I can find is a massive book in a Czech online store. I only discovered him recently, but I've always been a fan of his brilliant photographer brother Jan Saudek.

Considering buying a lot of comics I didn't think I'd be interested in again. This could easily be another elaborate form of procrastination, I constantly change my mind about what kind of comics I can get along with. So many things I've bought I just can't be bothered reading after I've had a look at the art, like Tipping Point from Humanoids, which had a pretty solid line-up. I just wasn't in the mood for Akira and was happy to read the synopsis.

Want to buy the first Marvel release in ages, their Horror Magazine Collection. It's not in colour so I don't think they can ruin it.

Whole bunch of Joe Kubert, Mort Meskin, Civiello (never been quite sure what to make of), Arthur Ranson, Russ Heath, Blutch, Mizuki's Kitaro books, Lone Wolf & Cub, Samurai Executioner, maybe some Planet Comics, Mystery In Space and similar science fantasy.

Reason I've been previously put off is because their drawings, taken individually don't stand up to as much scrutiny as I would like. But I've started thinking maybe that doesn't matter as much as the overall feel of their drawing styles.

Got an eye on the Showcase and Essential collections because they're getting a bit more scarce now and these comics might never be packaged so cheap and nice again.
I've never been a fan of most of the old DC artists, especially Infantino, Swan, Boring and Plastino. But I've never read enough of the really crazy old DC comics so I'm hoping Atomic Knights, Strange Adventures, Metamorpho, Metal Men and maybe even Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, Hawkman and Green Lantern will do. Throw in Amethyst (much newer), Sea Devils and a bunch of anthologies. Some decent Kubert, Heath, Ramona Fradon and Nick Cardy in there too.

The reason I'm more likely to try golden/early silver age versions of superheroes with art I'm not crazy about is there's less attempts to make characters emotional in a way the artist can't deliver, less continuity heavy long arcs and there's less attempts to be hip (although I've been told to be wary of Bob Haney in this regard). With the Showcase collections I don't need to worry about bad digital colour.

I'll never read all this and can't afford it all but I'll do what I can.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 30 November 2017 19:21 (six years ago) link

I don't know if that new horror magazine collection is among them, but there are a number of previous collections of '70s Marvel b&w magazine material that they edited for content (naked boobies: okay in 1977, not okay in 2017). I'll leave it to you to decide whether those alterations ruin the material.

Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Thursday, 30 November 2017 19:25 (six years ago) link

I mourn the essentials line, what a great thing those were. Everyone except colletta looks fantastic without color.

harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:12 (six years ago) link

I think shops probably started to hate them. A lot of them (particularly DC's Showcase line) had a very limited audience and just sat there for years, taking up a lot of space. There were times you could tell they were struggling to get rid of them.
Probably the same for Gollancz SF Gateway Omnibus series which stopped a couple of years ago.

I'd love it if they brought them back, I really believe it's one of the best things Marvel ever done. Hardly anyone outside Marvel and DC jumped on this bandwagon. There were Savage Sword Of Conan, Savage Dragon and Fred Hembeck (that one was massive) books, can't remember anything else. Dark Horse made some surprisingly cheap colour omnibuses.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:36 (six years ago) link

I absolutely hate Showcase and Essentials reprints, cheapo b&w crap is for chumps

Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:41 (six years ago) link

Seriously, any dumb a-hole who ain't willing to shell out a measly $75 for a Masterworks collection is unfit to clean my gold-plated toilet.

Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:54 (six years ago) link

hey I get all my comics from the library

Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:56 (six years ago) link

Some comics suffer for the black and white but Ditko and Colan look superior in that form.

The current Marvel colour reprints look utterly foul (especially Masterworks), so it's not like we're spoiled for good options. If you want the best colour versions it's either buying back issues (could be well outside your price range) or finding decent torrent scans.

If anyone thinks Masterworks look better than Essential books, they're... I have no words for such an ailment.

Wolfman/Colan's Night Force was recently reprinted but again, the new colouring ruins it and I'd rather seek out back issues.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:03 (six years ago) link

Another book I decided not to get because of the recolour: Winterworld by Chuck Dixon and Jorge Zaffino.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:17 (six years ago) link

The only Masterworks i own are kirby Thor editions from some years back and they look great imo

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:37 (six years ago) link

*shudder*

I don't regret burning my Masterworks and DC Archives at all. Hideous they were.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:56 (six years ago) link

Yr nuts

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 02:55 (six years ago) link

The Man of Tomorrow DC Archive editions i have are wonderful

Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 03:08 (six years ago) link

Maybe I'm nuts, but I'm very far from being the only one who hates them. I mean, some people think the Dark Horse reprints of Warren or the Yoe and PS Publishing reproductions are awful but it's a whole different level from Marvel Masterworks and DC Archives.

I dearly wish I was wrong but I paid a lot for those books, tried to convince myself they didn't look so bad and I'd be even more nuts if I managed to delude myself about it.

Here's some writing about the reproductions
http://digitizingcomics.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/marvel-masterworks-reprint-or.html

http://community.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?1611-How-do-old-comics-get-reprinted

Robert Adam Gilmour, Friday, 1 December 2017 03:31 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.