Reese and Nicole and Laura and Audrey and Elvis: Thread for BIG LITTLE LIES on HBO

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (107 of them)

wow people really love this show. i thought it was just all right! potentially i just really dislike the director

flamenco drop (BradNelson), Monday, 5 February 2018 17:27 (one year ago) Permalink

also, when laura dern is one of the leads and she's not the first person you think of in terms of standout performances (and she was so good! god, that part where she throws the phone in the pool and then raises her hand up to signal to her partner that she's ok...she can do no wrong), you know you are in the presence of a ridiculously good ensemble

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 February 2018 17:28 (one year ago) Permalink

the therapy scenes (especially the first session in episode 3) were so good that i said "this is some of the best television i have ever seen" out loud as i was watching it

otm this scene was absolutely extraordinary

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 5 February 2018 17:29 (one year ago) Permalink

i may be a total weirdo but if the entire show was just 7 hours straight of those therapy scenes i'd still be happy. i'm not sure if anyone's mentioned how good the therapist is but she goes toe-to-toe with kidman, which is saying a hell of a lot.

https://www.thecut.com/2017/03/real-life-therapists-love-the-big-little-lies-therapist.html

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 February 2018 17:33 (one year ago) Permalink

I think the fact that this wasn't all just about rich people problems helped alleviate a lot of the issues I might've otherwise had with the setting. It's mostly a very human story that could've been dropped into a different setting without losing a whole lot.

How does boy sound like? (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 February 2018 17:40 (one year ago) Permalink

i'll stop serially posting, but it's interesting that those counseling scenes weren't in the book the show is based off of - http://www.vulture.com/2017/03/big-little-lies-robin-weigert-therapy.html

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 February 2018 17:41 (one year ago) Permalink

Oh, that's so strange. But, yes, Robin Weigart is truly great (as anyone who's seen Deadwood can attest).

How does boy sound like? (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 February 2018 17:43 (one year ago) Permalink

yeah the actress that played the therapist was fantastic. just saw her in a sorta shitty movie last week in a very small role

flappy bird, Monday, 5 February 2018 17:53 (one year ago) Permalink

i may be a total weirdo but if the entire show was just 7 hours straight of those therapy scenes i'd still be happy

did you ever watch In Treatment?

rob, Monday, 5 February 2018 19:29 (one year ago) Permalink

In Treatment was so fucking creepy and not in a good way.

Right column Leftist (sunny successor), Thursday, 8 February 2018 14:11 (one year ago) Permalink

my mom loved that show but i could never imagine watching it, i get enough out of my own therapy

flappy bird, Thursday, 8 February 2018 17:46 (one year ago) Permalink

yeah I only watched the first season and it was years ago...I had actually forgotten about the plot which I think you're referring to as creepy.
It's too bad though, as BLL shows, it's an interesting dramatic situation that so often rings totally false when I see it dramatized.

rob, Thursday, 8 February 2018 18:25 (one year ago) Permalink

Dr Melfi obviously the prime example of how it should be done.

the word dog doesn't bark (anagram), Thursday, 8 February 2018 19:03 (one year ago) Permalink

one month passes...

A friend I wouldn't expect to said he watched this, so I picked up a bootleg on the weekend. Of course the thing that caught my attention in the first episode was Babe Ruth. I'd never heard Babe Ruth in my life, but as the tiny image of the album cover flashed by on the daughter's cell phone, I did a double-take--"Is that actually what I think it is?" (I was familiar with the album cover)--and backed up. At which point I guessed correctly that that was also what I was hearing. Bizarre. A little far-fetched, maybe, but interesting.

clemenza, Tuesday, 27 March 2018 22:34 (one year ago) Permalink

Couple of episodes to go--fascinating, especially (what else) the music. I just read the second season will be directed by Andrea Arnold...excellent. And Meryl Streep will be added...not sure what to say there--could be good.

clemenza, Sunday, 1 April 2018 23:31 (one year ago) Permalink

one year passes...

So, season 2...?

lefal junglist platton (wtev), Saturday, 15 June 2019 16:32 (five days ago) Permalink

First ep was fine, pretty much in line with what came before. Streep bringin' some quality pass agg into the mix.

Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Saturday, 15 June 2019 19:32 (five days ago) Permalink

I enjoyed the first one a lot - cast were amazing - but I sort of file it with bloodline, stranger things, that recent one that was a bit like this and had a title almost as bad as big little lies: decent shows that really, intensely do not need a sequel. I sort of feel like if tv really is where it’s meant to be at we can be as sceptical of these things having second series as we would be of like phantom thread 2 or 2nd reformed

shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Saturday, 15 June 2019 19:46 (five days ago) Permalink

(sort of)

shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Saturday, 15 June 2019 19:46 (five days ago) Permalink

hard agree

killing eve kinda in this category for me too, can't believe how little i care about watching it after having loved S1

Lil' Brexit (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 15 June 2019 20:01 (five days ago) Permalink

2nd reformed lol

Jeff Bathos (symsymsym), Saturday, 15 June 2019 20:32 (five days ago) Permalink

Sequel title jokes are the lamest played-out shit and anyone who makes or enjoys them should be ashamed except when I do it: boogaloo’s gold

shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Saturday, 15 June 2019 20:39 (five days ago) Permalink

I don't mind the continuation of these types of shows if there's some intention informing the decision, either a long game arc planned out in advance or some specific idea of why there should be another season beyond 'because that's what's expected'. I think shows like this (ie those which are more focused on character/relationship development than on weaving some intricate, high-concept plot) can more easily get away with perpetuation sans some lofty notion of where things are heading. In this case, I'd personally be more concerned about their reach ultimately exceeding their grasp (see: the evolution of Big Love from small-scale character piece to showcase for bugfuck psycho cult shenanigans).

Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Saturday, 15 June 2019 21:19 (five days ago) Permalink

The show I was trying to think of was dead to me, which isn’t as bad a title as big little lies obv but still seems pretty determined to communicate “you can skip this”

They all work so well as self-contained stories and the follow-ups come so soon after that it doesn’t feel as if any thought has gone into whether they should continue it, never mind how they can. Getting back on topic the only interesting avenue for further exploration in BLL I can think of is Adam Scott being kind of a creep, felt like that might be going somewhere, but even there I think the suggestion was enough

shhh / let peaceful like things (wins), Saturday, 15 June 2019 22:11 (five days ago) Permalink

I'm pretending the second season of Killing Eve doesn't exist, but I'm enjoying BLL season 2 so far. Streep vs. Witherspoon is fucking hilarious.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Saturday, 15 June 2019 23:26 (five days ago) Permalink

hard agree

killing eve kinda in this category for me too, can't believe how little i care about watching it after having loved S1


Agreed. Episode 1 of second season of killing eve left me cold.

lefal junglist platton (wtev), Sunday, 16 June 2019 20:35 (four days ago) Permalink

Re BLL on the other hand, bring it on. Unperson otm

lefal junglist platton (wtev), Sunday, 16 June 2019 20:37 (four days ago) Permalink

I was dubious, mainly because the first season was based on a novel, and I wasn't sure how they'd extend this beyond the novel; of course HBO did exactly that with the Leftovers and it arguably improved upon itself season over season (at least in my opinion). But so far I think there's enough there to keep exploring. Not sure it would need to go beyond this one, but the aftermath of those events is worth looking at. Also Adam Scott's character shaping up to be one of the only non creeps on the show.

akm, Monday, 17 June 2019 13:44 (three days ago) Permalink

I was so goddamned mad at their little daughter!

akm, Monday, 17 June 2019 13:45 (three days ago) Permalink

Wow. Lotta explosions this week, and it's only episode 2.

shared unit of analysis (unperson), Monday, 17 June 2019 13:54 (three days ago) Permalink

Yeah, I have no problem with the way they're continuing the story, particularly since Kelley & co. clearly have no intention to softpedal the potential ramifications of what came before.

Morrie Antoilette (Old Lunch), Monday, 17 June 2019 23:48 (three days ago) Permalink

I have really liked it so far

Dan S, Monday, 17 June 2019 23:59 (three days ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.