xp: bruce banner is still dead i think and the refocus is on jen walters; i don't think there even IS a current issue of the hulki might be cynical but i'm fairly sure the only reason for this is movie rights issues
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:37 (six years ago) link
Cho is still Hulk iirc, and there are separate Hulk and She-Hulk titles currently.
― I Wanna Be A Door (Old Lunch), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:40 (six years ago) link
How do movie rights play in(?)
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:40 (six years ago) link
hawkeye killed the hulk btw. i think the amadeus cho "totally awesome hulk" is still bumping around in the Champions series but his role in the MU seems pretty minimal these days. there was a horrible weapon x/hulk storyline last year that pretty much killed all my interest in the character. he was not too badly written for awhile there!
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:42 (six years ago) link
http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2017/07/how-marvel-made-hulk-movie-that-was-never-supposed-to-happenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-Dvi9KzZK8
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:43 (six years ago) link
don cheadle busting the hell outta ruffalo's balls there
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:44 (six years ago) link
they’re going to bring Bruce back soon, I think
― mh, Friday, 16 February 2018 00:44 (six years ago) link
Namor?
― Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, February 15, 2018 12:44 PM
Btw (circling back), this also struck me as funny... wasn’t Namor a member of like the most powerful secret team of heroes ever assembled (the “Illuminati”)... and now he’s hanging with these scrubs?
“Despite my hatred and distrust of surface-dwellers, I could not resist the opportunity to team up with... Honey Badger!”
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Friday, 16 February 2018 00:47 (six years ago) link
"you're too old now, let's be real" :D
― Nhex, Friday, 16 February 2018 02:37 (six years ago) link
Didn't Banner come back already? Or am I confusing it with the last time he died and came back?
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 17 February 2018 14:31 (six years ago) link
the hand resurrected him for a minute
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 14:36 (six years ago) link
tbf if I were them I wouldn’t have passed up the opportunity, either
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 14:37 (six years ago) link
So is that Hawkeye killing the Hulk thing tied to Old Man Logan or something? I saw that Old Man Logan was in the regular comics for a while, but haven't followed it all in a few years. I kinda checked out around time Bendis' Avengers run ended.
― earlnash, Saturday, 17 February 2018 20:20 (six years ago) link
Old Man Logan is one of a handful of characters (can't remember all of them...Miles Morales, an alternate universe Squadron Supreme member, etc.) from other earths who crossed over to 616 (or whatever they're calling it now) during the Secret Wars thing.
― Love Theme from Biodome (Old Lunch), Saturday, 17 February 2018 21:26 (six years ago) link
Old Man Logan's still in the regular comics and has his own title set in a contemporary period. I can see where the covers and promotion would make it confusing. The character has both had a mystical trip back to his own reality, where hulks are villains, and has encountered more hulks that were dimension- and time-displaced that he had to wipe out, and he picked Hawkeye to help him.
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 21:41 (six years ago) link
So because Clint killed Banner he’s now an expert Hulk-killer?
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:25 (six years ago) link
it was mentioned, but it was more an homage to the Clint/Old Logan plot of the original storyline
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:38 (six years ago) link
Yeah I noticed they’re doing an “Old Man Hawkeye” series now.
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:41 (six years ago) link
Just a mini, I believe, set in the original OML timeline.
― Love Theme from Biodome (Old Lunch), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:53 (six years ago) link
It seemed super familiar to me, and then I realized I was thinking of Old Green Arrow from “The Dark Knight Returns.”
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 23:09 (six years ago) link
I seem to remember Hickman destroyed Millar's future Marvel timeline *ages* ago during his Fantastic Four run, but I guess Secret Wars punched the universe or something
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 17 February 2018 23:29 (six years ago) link
All imaginary stories iirc.
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 18 February 2018 00:35 (six years ago) link
Infinite earths and all that. I think there's always the easy out of positing the existence of yet another reality which is nearly identical to one that we've already seen.
They kinda did this during Secret Wars itself in the Ultimate End mini where the Ultimate characters interacted with their 616 counterparts...except they were actually like 616 counterparts from a different earth than the actual 616 characters who've been around for decades (because by that point 616 had already been destroyed save a handful of survivors). It was kinda confusing as all hell.
― Love Theme from Biodome (Old Lunch), Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:16 (six years ago) link
They were the Grand Rapids 616
― EZ Snappin, Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:22 (six years ago) link
This is why I don’t get why DC or Marvel still pretends to “destroy” a universe or timeline. They always come back or are revived in a near exact facsimile. Same as “killing off” a major character.
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:36 (six years ago) link
every story is a story that can be revisited in fiction
you just say “here’s a magic box that lets these two things interact” and boom, there you go
― mh, Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:54 (six years ago) link
If you remember how exciting “Crisis on Infinite Earths” was, the first time around — it felt like DC was doing radical things that would change their universe forever. Can only go to that well once!
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:32 (six years ago) link
then again https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel_dc/images/0/09/Superman_vs_The_Amazing_Spider-Man_001.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20071025040848
― mh, Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:58 (six years ago) link
Oh jesus christ, come the fuck on already: https://www.polygon.com/comics/2018/2/20/17031924/marvel-fresh-start-relaunch-announcement
Everything is relaunching! Again!
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:00 (six years ago) link
Marvel, I'm the biggest apologist Zombie in the world, and this is me telling you that I'm frankly sick of this shit.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:02 (six years ago) link
Not paying any attention to current Marvel product, didn't know this before, which seems absolutely insane to me:
Marvel will be abandoning the confusing renumbering of September’s Marvel Legacy, which renumbered every Marvel title as if it had never been relaunched or renumbered. As an example, Black Panther #18 in September 2017 was followed immediately by Black Panther #166 in October.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:27 (six years ago) link
That is not in and of itself a bad idea, and has happened on a title-by-title basis once or twice - not being able to hold to it for more than six months is just laughable, though.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:00 (six years ago) link
they should take an arbitrary large number that's more than any particular series has run and start the numbering there
everyone's at issue #900 next year
― mh, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:08 (six years ago) link
The Legacy renumbering was, I'm sure, an adjustment for some people but it made some sense if, as Andrew says, they'd stuck with it. Now it just makes them look insane.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:15 (six years ago) link
The Yoshida Cebulski era is not off to a very auspicious start.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:17 (six years ago) link
The received wisdom in the comics biz was always that huge issue numbers put 'new readers' off, because they didn't like the thought of trying to collect and read eg 899 prior comics.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:21 (six years ago) link
I'm curious to know how new readers feel about four different Amazing Spider-Man #1-s in less than five years.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:25 (six years ago) link
I'm curious to know if there are any 'new readers' any more.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:26 (six years ago) link
(Sorry, I may have exaggerated the number of issues by one. But only because the first was technically Superior Spider-Man #1.)
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:26 (six years ago) link
xpost Seriously. I can't believe that initiatives like this attract new readers in significant numbers, but I'm sure they turn off new-ish readers who wonder why the fuck things are constantly restarting and they definitely turn off long-time readers who want them to just keep telling their goddamn stories already without all the gimmicky bullshit.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:28 (six years ago) link
This old reader feels odd about Dan Slott suddenly having written Spider-Man for a decade, I'll tell you that for nothing.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:25 (six years ago) link
I guess he's done as of the relaunch? Marvel's been cagey with their May solicits so I can't be sure. I think Nick Spencer is taking the reins.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:36 (six years ago) link
Jason Aaron taking over Avengers is a welcome change, I will say.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:37 (six years ago) link
For sure, shame it's Ed Mcguiness though
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:25 (six years ago) link
Also these new lines will invariably have their trade paperbacks labeled as Vol 1 - it's insane trying to figure out the order of Marvel's trades, every comic has like 10 Vol 1s!
― Screamin' Jay Gould (The Yellow Kid), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:42 (six years ago) link
It's like having a page-a-day calendar that starts over at January 1st every couple of months.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:45 (six years ago) link
Fair play, they did keep the same TPB numbering for Ms. Marvel when it was restarted back in (oof) 2016.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 18:03 (six years ago) link
Agreed re: Jason Aaron – that’s the only detail here that keeps my eyes from rolling any back further in my head. But otherwise, yeah – this is totes redunk. The “Legacy” thing just happened! It’s still ramping up!
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:05 (six years ago) link
(If there are good series with good creative teams, idgaf about the numbering. But the ever-faster clip of these new “initiatives” smell so phony and desperate.)
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:06 (six years ago) link
a propos of nada i'v been going back through hickman's run starting with secret warriors... it's pretty amazing tbh. like all the seeds of Secret Wars are there in secret warriors and early FF run
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:20 (six years ago) link