Old Man Logan's still in the regular comics and has his own title set in a contemporary period. I can see where the covers and promotion would make it confusing. The character has both had a mystical trip back to his own reality, where hulks are villains, and has encountered more hulks that were dimension- and time-displaced that he had to wipe out, and he picked Hawkeye to help him.
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 21:41 (six years ago) link
So because Clint killed Banner he’s now an expert Hulk-killer?
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:25 (six years ago) link
it was mentioned, but it was more an homage to the Clint/Old Logan plot of the original storyline
― mh, Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:38 (six years ago) link
Yeah I noticed they’re doing an “Old Man Hawkeye” series now.
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:41 (six years ago) link
Just a mini, I believe, set in the original OML timeline.
― Love Theme from Biodome (Old Lunch), Saturday, 17 February 2018 22:53 (six years ago) link
It seemed super familiar to me, and then I realized I was thinking of Old Green Arrow from “The Dark Knight Returns.”
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Saturday, 17 February 2018 23:09 (six years ago) link
I seem to remember Hickman destroyed Millar's future Marvel timeline *ages* ago during his Fantastic Four run, but I guess Secret Wars punched the universe or something
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 17 February 2018 23:29 (six years ago) link
All imaginary stories iirc.
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 18 February 2018 00:35 (six years ago) link
Infinite earths and all that. I think there's always the easy out of positing the existence of yet another reality which is nearly identical to one that we've already seen.
They kinda did this during Secret Wars itself in the Ultimate End mini where the Ultimate characters interacted with their 616 counterparts...except they were actually like 616 counterparts from a different earth than the actual 616 characters who've been around for decades (because by that point 616 had already been destroyed save a handful of survivors). It was kinda confusing as all hell.
― Love Theme from Biodome (Old Lunch), Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:16 (six years ago) link
They were the Grand Rapids 616
― EZ Snappin, Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:22 (six years ago) link
This is why I don’t get why DC or Marvel still pretends to “destroy” a universe or timeline. They always come back or are revived in a near exact facsimile. Same as “killing off” a major character.
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:36 (six years ago) link
every story is a story that can be revisited in fiction
you just say “here’s a magic box that lets these two things interact” and boom, there you go
― mh, Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:54 (six years ago) link
If you remember how exciting “Crisis on Infinite Earths” was, the first time around — it felt like DC was doing radical things that would change their universe forever. Can only go to that well once!
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:32 (six years ago) link
then again https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel_dc/images/0/09/Superman_vs_The_Amazing_Spider-Man_001.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20071025040848
― mh, Sunday, 18 February 2018 02:58 (six years ago) link
Oh jesus christ, come the fuck on already: https://www.polygon.com/comics/2018/2/20/17031924/marvel-fresh-start-relaunch-announcement
Everything is relaunching! Again!
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:00 (six years ago) link
Marvel, I'm the biggest apologist Zombie in the world, and this is me telling you that I'm frankly sick of this shit.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:02 (six years ago) link
Not paying any attention to current Marvel product, didn't know this before, which seems absolutely insane to me:
Marvel will be abandoning the confusing renumbering of September’s Marvel Legacy, which renumbered every Marvel title as if it had never been relaunched or renumbered. As an example, Black Panther #18 in September 2017 was followed immediately by Black Panther #166 in October.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 14:27 (six years ago) link
That is not in and of itself a bad idea, and has happened on a title-by-title basis once or twice - not being able to hold to it for more than six months is just laughable, though.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:00 (six years ago) link
they should take an arbitrary large number that's more than any particular series has run and start the numbering there
everyone's at issue #900 next year
― mh, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:08 (six years ago) link
The Legacy renumbering was, I'm sure, an adjustment for some people but it made some sense if, as Andrew says, they'd stuck with it. Now it just makes them look insane.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:15 (six years ago) link
The Yoshida Cebulski era is not off to a very auspicious start.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:17 (six years ago) link
The received wisdom in the comics biz was always that huge issue numbers put 'new readers' off, because they didn't like the thought of trying to collect and read eg 899 prior comics.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:21 (six years ago) link
I'm curious to know how new readers feel about four different Amazing Spider-Man #1-s in less than five years.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:25 (six years ago) link
I'm curious to know if there are any 'new readers' any more.
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:26 (six years ago) link
(Sorry, I may have exaggerated the number of issues by one. But only because the first was technically Superior Spider-Man #1.)
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:26 (six years ago) link
xpost Seriously. I can't believe that initiatives like this attract new readers in significant numbers, but I'm sure they turn off new-ish readers who wonder why the fuck things are constantly restarting and they definitely turn off long-time readers who want them to just keep telling their goddamn stories already without all the gimmicky bullshit.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 15:28 (six years ago) link
This old reader feels odd about Dan Slott suddenly having written Spider-Man for a decade, I'll tell you that for nothing.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:25 (six years ago) link
I guess he's done as of the relaunch? Marvel's been cagey with their May solicits so I can't be sure. I think Nick Spencer is taking the reins.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:36 (six years ago) link
Jason Aaron taking over Avengers is a welcome change, I will say.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 16:37 (six years ago) link
For sure, shame it's Ed Mcguiness though
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:25 (six years ago) link
Also these new lines will invariably have their trade paperbacks labeled as Vol 1 - it's insane trying to figure out the order of Marvel's trades, every comic has like 10 Vol 1s!
― Screamin' Jay Gould (The Yellow Kid), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:42 (six years ago) link
It's like having a page-a-day calendar that starts over at January 1st every couple of months.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:45 (six years ago) link
Fair play, they did keep the same TPB numbering for Ms. Marvel when it was restarted back in (oof) 2016.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 21 February 2018 18:03 (six years ago) link
Agreed re: Jason Aaron – that’s the only detail here that keeps my eyes from rolling any back further in my head. But otherwise, yeah – this is totes redunk. The “Legacy” thing just happened! It’s still ramping up!
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:05 (six years ago) link
(If there are good series with good creative teams, idgaf about the numbering. But the ever-faster clip of these new “initiatives” smell so phony and desperate.)
― absorbed carol channing's powers & psyche (morrisp), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:06 (six years ago) link
a propos of nada i'v been going back through hickman's run starting with secret warriors... it's pretty amazing tbh. like all the seeds of Secret Wars are there in secret warriors and early FF run
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:20 (six years ago) link
xps uugh Ed McGuinness. Him and Humberto Ramos need to be flagged for "dead '90s style" and have their numbers retired
xp yeah, Squirrel Girl had to do the same thing with their trades. i mean they even ended up rebooting twice in one year at some point
― Nhex, Thursday, 22 February 2018 05:21 (six years ago) link
https://10deb7fbfece20ff53da-95da5b03499e7e5b086c55c243f676a1.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/3ef847520fcec477b2309a4a6057c2e3_xl.jpg
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 February 2018 07:25 (six years ago) link
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 February 2018 07:26 (six years ago) link
lol
I'm kind of dying at the fact that any time someone references an infinity stone/gem in one of the movies, someone at Marvel decides they need another comic arc about them for maximum synergy. And every plot has to be titled "Infinity <Something>", or just "Infinity" if you count the arc that wasn't really about them during Hickman's giant Avengers crossover thing.
Now that I think about it, why the heck was that called Infinity, anyway
― mh, Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:37 (six years ago) link
It's amazing they haven't had a Secret <Something> film yet.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:45 (six years ago) link
don't give them any ideas
― mh, Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:46 (six years ago) link
wait people don't like ed mcguinness??!
― NEW CHIMP THREAT (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:50 (six years ago) link
Yeah, I don't know what that's about. I mean, I guess I get it if the exaggerated cartoony-ness isn't your thing, but unfavorably comparing him to Humberto Ramos is just nuts.
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:56 (six years ago) link
i really like mcguinness' clean, chunky style - it's really distinctive
mind you as i've attested elsewhere i like humberto ramos' work too so what do i know
― NEW CHIMP THREAT (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:58 (six years ago) link
can we get Nick Spencer booted from everything and whoever is writing that X-Men book with Kitty Pryde leading a team of fascists booted from that book
mcguinness is fine, the biggest weakness he has is too many loeb collaborations
― mh, Thursday, 22 February 2018 15:59 (six years ago) link
ed mcguinness, you stand accused of collaborating repeatedly with jeph loeb - how do you plead
― NEW CHIMP THREAT (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 22 February 2018 16:02 (six years ago) link
Yeah, I like McGuinness' stuff too - at his best he's like a cross between Ron Wilson and Richard Corben. His style doesn't seem especially 90s.
Ramos otoh...
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 22 February 2018 16:14 (six years ago) link
I'll give Ramos props for never drawing a character the same way twice. Who's that guy? Oh, I guess it must be the same guy from the previous panel. You're keeping me on my toes, Ramos!
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 February 2018 16:20 (six years ago) link
All right, maybe I jumped the outrage gun a bit. Only a couple of titles reverting to #1 in May, with most other titles retaining their Legacy numbering. But I reserve my right to blow a gasket over something completely lacking in consequence once this matter once again rears it's ugly head.
Hey, Hickman is finishing his SHIELD mini at looooooooooooooooong last, so that's something. And a weekly Deadpool miniseries/RPG(?!?) by Al Ewing? Color me intrigued!
― Jock Totty's Monocle (Old Lunch), Thursday, 22 February 2018 22:57 (six years ago) link