the day after the deadline: can the union survive brexit and other deep questions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8676 of them)

btw

You’ll need to complete the non-consensual conception form with the help of an approved third-party professional. You don’t have speak to, or give details about the circumstances of the conception to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) staff.

They’ll need to provide supporting information to show you’ve been in contact with them and that your circumstances meet the conditions of this exception.

Approved third-party professionals are:
•healthcare professionals, for example, doctors, nurses, midwives or health visitors
•registered social workers
•specific organisations, such as specialist rape charities - find a list of these organisations

If you need to speak to us about this exception, you can call the Tax Credit Helpline and ask to speak to the ‘specialist exceptions team’ due to your circumstances.

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:15 (six years ago) link

yeah, but i suspect that if you've set your sights on becoming a doctor or a policeman or a paramedic or whatever you're at least aware that you're going to have to face the aftermath of trauma fairly regularly

i don't think many people have ambitions to work in a benefits office, and regardless, i don't think anyone who works in the benefits office would expect that evaluating whether a woman's third child was actually the product of a 'legitimate' rape would be part of their job (xps)

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:16 (six years ago) link

thanks for posting that nv - not quite as terrible as i'd thought procedurally but jesus what an awful, dehumanising policy

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:17 (six years ago) link

it's kind of insane that this clause has been written in in the first place - the implications of why this creates an exemption while other children don't is boggling, some kind of Inquisition level Lawful Evil trap for the poorest families in the country

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:19 (six years ago) link

"if you will insist on birthing children you can't afford then fuck you, you deserve to be poor, but i guess we should probably let you off if you've been raped"

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:20 (six years ago) link

If a further pregnancy results in a multiple birth on or after 6 April 2017, you’ll get the child element for all but one of those children.

For example, if you already get Child Tax Credit for 2 or more children and you have twins, you’ll get the child element for one of the twins. If you have triplets, you’ll get the child element for 2 of the triplets.

the phrase Kafkaesque is overused a lot but

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:23 (six years ago) link

no u see it's compassionate because it means women who birth their rapist's child get an extra £13.70 a week

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:25 (six years ago) link

You can’t claim this exception if you live with the other biological parent of the child.

or if you don't want to disclose that you've been raped to HMRC or etc etc etc

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:33 (six years ago) link

caroline bokes has been on the bbc:

What I would say is I want to send a message to the West Indian community. We invited you here. We wanted you to come to the UK and help us rebuild after the second world war. We absolutely have a duty to make sure that those who have not had their status regularised - and there may well be many of them - have the opportunity now. Come and get in contact with the Home Office.

yes, members of the west indian community, please get in contact with the home office, we promise we probably won't deport you when you do, honest - you might not even lose your job!

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:34 (six years ago) link

"you" / "them" - just too hard to stay in second person isn't it

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:45 (six years ago) link

indeed

at the end of that itv news clip nokes says 'i value these people' which is nagl

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:49 (six years ago) link

just another example of how this terrible fucking government can't even do media properly

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 13:50 (six years ago) link

The statement from Nokes published last night.: https://homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk/2018/04/15/immigration-minister-op-ed-in-the-voice/

This issue came to light because measures introduced in recent years to make sure only those with a legal right to live here can access things like NHS treatment and rented accommodation, meaning people must now be able to prove their status.

Having not previously needed documentation they have now found themselves without any way of proving their status today.

All that these people require is a simple card which is available from the Home Office.

So today I am encouraging anyone who is concerned that they are not currently able to prove their status to apply.

I know that establishing status after so many years may be difficult for some people but we will do everything we can to assist them.

We will handle every case with sensitivity and will help people understand what is required and help them gather the information they need.

People don’t need formal records. Any information that people can provide, from schools they attended to places of work, family or former addresses will help build this picture.

Not clear how this process works at all. You've lived here however many years, you are ill and seek NHS treatment, at some point your name is given to them...a database check confirms residential status? So why the card?

nashwan, Monday, 16 April 2018 13:53 (six years ago) link

Residential status doesn’t confer right to treatment aiui. Anyone who has been resident in the UK since 1971 will have a right to treatment, anyone who has been resident here since 1972 without formal leave to remain will not - and would be de facto considered an illegal immigrant. The NHS will not know that.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 16 April 2018 14:16 (six years ago) link

That 1971 / 1972 division is the crux of this. If you can not prove you have been in the UK every single year since 1971 uninterrupted, you have no legal status. The people who were ‘incorrectly deported ‘ were probably here since before 71 but just couldn’t prove it, or couldn’t document that they had not gone to the Caribbean for a year at any point, etc.

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 16 April 2018 14:18 (six years ago) link

probably here since before 71 but just couldn’t prove it

not surprising since the burden of proof they were required to produce was up to four pieces of documentary evidence for every year they spent in the uk

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 14:22 (six years ago) link

Nightmarish condition, I think nearly everybody would struggle to provide one piece of evidence for each year, never mind four.

Dan Worsley, Monday, 16 April 2018 14:34 (six years ago) link

i'd be deported under those conditions for sure - who the fuck has literally 100+ of pieces of proof of citizenship to hand covering decades? it's absolutely a pretext to deport innocent people

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 14:39 (six years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Da60sHvW0Acxe2T.jpg

Gapes has apparently won the Hilary Benn award for thundering oratory wind that makes Tories clap very loudly today.

calzino, Monday, 16 April 2018 17:20 (six years ago) link

BBC still seems to be going with "some of generation Windrush have been threatened with deportation" so maybe they're not keeping up with this thread

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:24 (six years ago) link

apparently amber rudd said in parliament they weren’t sure anyone had in fact been wrongly deported (?!, great work everyone) so presumably the bbc are just giving the government the considerable benefit of the doubt

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:26 (six years ago) link

i'm sure it's just good journalism

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:27 (six years ago) link

good journalism/craven toadying, what’s the difference really when it’s just british citizens being bundled off back to a country they haven’t seen in 50 years, nbd

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:31 (six years ago) link

They are black though, so not that British.

(Henry) Green container bin with face (Tom D.), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:34 (six years ago) link

Enoch Powell... Racist or nationalist? Loyal ally or ruthless opportunist? The most influential man in post-war politics? Enoch at 100 is a critical reassessment of Enoch Powell's legacy by some of the leading political figures and writers of the current age. Originally released in the year of Enoch's centenary, the contributions, from writers including Iain Duncan Smith, Frank Field, Simon Heffer, Andrew Roberts, Margaret Mountford and Roger Scruton, explore the enigma of a man who... Filled the House of Commons chamber during his speeches, and turned crowds away for lack of room when he spoke publicly

(Henry) Green container bin with face (Tom D.), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:43 (six years ago) link

Racist or nationalist?

or?

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:45 (six years ago) link

If I wanted to commit suicide in the really painful manner of inducing an aneurysm I would read Scruton's contribution to that volume and expire in apoplexy

Louis Jägermeister (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 April 2018 17:55 (six years ago) link

I'm sortof amazed that it's taken so long for this to turn into a *scandal.* it's been a fucking scandal since it was first reported, which seems to be quite a while ago now.

plax (ico), Monday, 16 April 2018 18:15 (six years ago) link

Anyone who has been resident in the UK since 1971 will have a right to treatment, anyone who has been resident here since 1972 without formal leave to remain will not - and would be de facto considered an illegal immigrant.

What's the status of Ugandan Asians expelled by Amin in 1972? Or is that a whole other clusterfuck still to come?

There's probably a substantial core of Hard Brexiters who value and prioritise Commonwealth immigration over post-enlargement EU immigration in any case which explains why this is drawing condemnation from across the political spectrum. (cf Jacob Rees-Mogg parping up to attack the government today, also the Gurkhas campaign from a decade or so ago).

Matt DC, Monday, 16 April 2018 18:51 (six years ago) link

the whole thing's given extra heinousness by the government's bleating about how trading with our vitally important partners in the commonwealth will be the making of us post-brexit

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 18:59 (six years ago) link

extremely good country

Apparently, my use of this pic is 'important news'. Yes, UK goes to war without UN approval or even parliamentary debate. But the most important news is what pics I use in a tweet. Pathetic.

— Diane Abbott (@HackneyAbbott) April 16, 2018

||||||||, Monday, 16 April 2018 18:59 (six years ago) link

uh, posting that pic is, shall we say, not a great look. especially coming in the wake of all the anti-semitism scandal stuff (it's a photoshop of an israeli plane bombing civilians in Tehran).

Louis Jägermeister (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 April 2018 19:01 (six years ago) link

i mean she's right that it's small fry compared to what the government are up to but yeah check your sources more carefully before you share on social media ffs

Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 16 April 2018 19:03 (six years ago) link

Ugandan Asians had a specific law in 1972 allowing them to settle. I think they were given formal citizenship at the time. Xps

Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 16 April 2018 19:05 (six years ago) link

saw that DA tweet this morning and thought it was odd she'd even added a pic at all (even more so one which was so obviously photoshopped). didn't clock the livery and/or city until digging into the comments under that second tweet. agreed it's na-particularly-gl

||||||||, Monday, 16 April 2018 19:21 (six years ago) link

Frank Field's contribution to that 'Enoch at 100' book can be read here, for anyone who's interested: https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2012/06/enoch-powell-as-a-parliamentarian/

What results did Enoch want from this speech? If it was to awaken the country’s political elite to the dangers of sustained largescale immigration and to debate the consequences, then it must rank as Enoch’s greatest failure. At a stroke he made the subject of immigration a no-go area for elected politicians. I only felt safe in trespassing onto this territory once the mass of immigration from eastern European countries reached our shores, when the issue was no longer one of colour.

Why was it then that I never raised ‘Rivers of Blood’ with Enoch? The simple truth is that I dared not confront Enoch on this issue as I felt that it was not only his biggest, but almost the only major political error he committed. The outcome of that speech is the stuff of which great Greek tragedies are made. Enoch’s talents had destined him for a commanding position in British politics. The ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech gave him a commanding position among voters, as Enoch was expressing their fears. But his political gang, who were, under Heath, only too pleased to strip him of any leadership potential, closed ranks against him. If I am right, this great mistake over the speech must have caused Enoch huge and profound regret and I never wanted to stray uninvited into this national and personal tragedy.

soref, Monday, 16 April 2018 21:03 (six years ago) link

The simple truth is that I dared not confront Enoch on this issue as I felt that it was not only his biggest, but almost the only major political error he committed.

except he continued to make similar speeches throughout the rest of his political life

Louis Jägermeister (jim in vancouver), Monday, 16 April 2018 21:20 (six years ago) link

also he mentored Thatcher and was arguably the architect of the Tories' adoption of monetarist economics but no big whoop eh Frank?

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 22:29 (six years ago) link

Amber "no Roswell" Rudd and Esther "stain on humanity" McVey have really set the bar very shockingly low today, but they are confirmed, card carrying scum of the earth after all. As for Frank Field, this dour stayer needs to go on account that he's a horrible og legitimate concernist, and like that other Labour safe seat Member of Parliament Barry Sheerman, the cunt loves this game so much he has absolutely no plans of ever dying, unlike many of his constituents. Shitheads like Field in the company of Scrotum, IDS, Simon fucking Heffer all doing tobacco enema on the Enoch corpse doesn't reflect well on Labour at all. Why is that cunt even still there?

calzino, Monday, 16 April 2018 22:35 (six years ago) link

rivers of blood and a field of shit

i'm surprised to see your screwface at the door (NickB), Monday, 16 April 2018 22:35 (six years ago) link

He is dead iirc

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Monday, 16 April 2018 22:39 (six years ago) link

Could you imagine being a Labour voter of 2nd gen Caribbean/Asian origins, and listening to that cunt eulogising Powell on the radio and him almost fucking tearing up - it's just so fucking emotional for him.

calzino, Monday, 16 April 2018 22:46 (six years ago) link

I saw this funny clip of some Irish immigrant guy in the early 60's saying "as an immigrant population here, we'd just be playing a card against ourselves by being racist toward Caribbean immigrants". My dad never got that memo!

calzino, Monday, 16 April 2018 22:53 (six years ago) link

There's probably a substantial core of Hard Brexiters who value and prioritise Commonwealth immigration over post-enlargement EU immigration

They might well value Indian GPs and the occasional Nigerian barrister, I wonder what they would think of the people who would be most likely to come, most of whom would come from Muslim majority countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan.

(Henry) Green container bin with face (Tom D.), Monday, 16 April 2018 23:44 (six years ago) link

Lots of Pakistani war criminal doctors and academics who played an active part in the '71 genocide in Bangladesh ended up getting safe haven in the UK. Which immigrants are more safer than others is a funny old game, well not really - it's usually connected to wealth.

calzino, Tuesday, 17 April 2018 00:01 (six years ago) link

if we're taking enoch powell's views seriously how about his opposition to nuclear weapons

ogmor, Tuesday, 17 April 2018 07:45 (six years ago) link

that's the kind of offensive outdated nonsense that we ought to ignore

you're my luger not my rifle (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 17 April 2018 07:50 (six years ago) link

Amber "no Roswell" Rudd

:-)

Ward Fowler, Tuesday, 17 April 2018 07:54 (six years ago) link

seen a few ppl touting the fact that lammy voted for the 2002 nationality, immigration and asylum bill as evidence of his corrupted, hypocritical nature &c. I've no interest in the furious purism of the margins but it's interesting how things and people have changed, makes me wonder what the discussion was like then

ogmor, Tuesday, 17 April 2018 09:49 (six years ago) link

Do these how they vote sites explain which bills were subject to a three line whip? I think his record on opposing gentrification is weak as well. He seems ok at times does Lammy, is good at the emotive oratory side of the game, but ultimately a professional politician, no less imo. But loads of MP's have ropy voting records. I heard someone pointing out to Gardiner the other day that he voted for Iraq. I suppose it just highlights how uniquely consistent MP's like Corbyn + McDonnell are so completely rare.

calzino, Tuesday, 17 April 2018 10:08 (six years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.