the day after the deadline: can the union survive brexit and other deep questions

They've confirmed what was said but they're denying it had anything to do with the decision.

The positioning seems to be that the French investigators approached HMRC with a weak case and were told that it wouldn't stand up to scrutiny - with an addendum that this was a firmly established company in good standing with the government they were talking about, not a cut-out laundering front.

According to asylum Twitter, if you’re a detainee at a refugee centre your only option for communicating with friends and family are phone cards supplied by... Lycamobile!

Yup. Topping up lycamobile was one of the most practical ways I could help when I was visiting ppl in detention.

so for an immigration detainee, unless you have outside help, you have to work in the kitchens there for less than a £1 an hour to be able to top up your phone to call your family, using a telecoms company that essentially fund your jailors.

— joe (@cillanoir) April 19, 2018

mark s linked to a very good thread on Facebook that posits the almost certa

anly true idea that the point of hostile environment is primarily economic exploitation rather than deportation

Honestly, I’m not sure that’s true. May has repeatedly shown that she’s quite happy for a variety of sectors of the economy to take a battering if it means being able to say fewer brown people came here.

I would say that one outcome bolsters the other, specifically when we're talking about people who have an absolute legal right to live here

I should caveat this by saying I haven’t read the Facebook thread but there are several Tories I’d see as sympathetic to the idea of maintaining strict immigration laws in order to drive down migrant wages / claims to rights, including Boris Johnson, but May is essentially an ethno-nationalist before an economic pragmatist at heart imo.

Probably true but she's only one cog in the bigger machine

For sure - though she has repeatedly been the squeaky wheel, if that metaphor isn’t too mixed, who has held firm to what I’d loosely call a ‘racism-first’ strategy, going up against Cameron, Johnson, etc who were far more open to the “Dubai / Singapore on steroids” idea of driving down rights and increasing economic exploitation, rather than kicking people out / stopping them from coming.

The financial motive May has is probably more about making people who have every right to access healthcare, etc, from thinking twice about going to hospital, speaking to the council, etc

History of this kind of capitalism is that fear drives down costs, whether that's wages or welfare

Analysis of TM BS from 2012 https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/theresa-may-immigration-speech

George Osborne and May were famously at odds over immigration policy; he was one of the opponents to the idea of counting foreign students in immigration stats and the LRB article on May from last year mentioned a fight beteeen the two at cabinet about a Chinese businessman Osborne knew being strip searched at Heathrow.

The two would go hand in hand; are you going to make a fuss about your treatment or join a union if your employer has Border Force waiting for you at work one morning?

And it applies in a lesser way to all immigrants - the proposed registry of foreigners at all workplaces? That doesn’t care if you’re documented or not, or if you’re highly skilled or not. That’s about targeting people for the sole fact that they are foreign. Every time I think of the Home Office since I’ve lived here I can think of another horrible little story or initiative that all feeds into this.

The thread I was talking about drew useful parallels with apartheid or Jim Crow laws

The terrible truth is that May is neither - she was given a job to reduce numbers and saw it as a duty. Various ways to do so are just tools to an end.

The thread mentioned above:

(1) Here's a thought. Racist laws aren't often designed to just "get rid" of black people or other minorities. They are designed to force minority people to be 2nd class citizens.

— Solomon Hughes (@SolHughesWriter) April 18, 2018

That was Runciman’s theory and not one I particularly subscribe to. Why was TM making up lies about not being able to deport people because they owned cats? That doesn’t speak to the plodding diligence he attributes to her, it reminded me of the anecdote about her mocking George Osborne at an awards ceremony.

Anyway, Bloomberg have just posted a story about a further email leak from the Home Office that gives more info about the van story. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-19/former-may-aide-s-attempt-to-defend-her-undermined-by-email-leak

well as I say, she's a functionary, a racist functionary, but the shit system is bigger than her alone.

Thanks for the link AF, I'm crap on my phone

and if course there's a difference between individual intention and overall consequence

"Far from objecting to the plan, May’s only objection at that point was that it might look too soft on illegal immigrants."

being "soft" seems to be a cardinal sin in her book, but FFS!

https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/charities-delivering-dwps-work-programme-must-promise-not-to-attack-mcvey/

Disability charities that sign up to help deliver the government’s new Work and Health Programme must promise to “pay the utmost regard to the standing and reputation” of work and pensions secretary Esther McVey, official documents suggest.

honestly, I'm not making this up.

Re: working in detention, yeah, the spin the centres try to put on it is that it's primairly a way to help detainees feel useful and that none of the work done by them substitutes that of paid professionals. All very credible, of course.

I've mentioned before that the UK detention system feels very much like a way of importing the US prison-industrial complex to some extent - especially since most of these centres are operated by private security firms.

Fair enough but that's a really low bar xp

well yeah, yet to meet all the thousands who have been helped by amazing scheme!

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/apr/20/amber-rudd-boasted-harsher-immigration-strategy-leak-reveals

It’s not been a great day for them. Nick Timothy deleted his account, and this story came out: https://www.vice.com/amp/en_uk/article/ne9m9d/vice-exclusive-the-tory-council-candidate-who-supports-far-right-extremists

Nick Timothy deleted his account

FUCK I'M ON CHAMPAGNE TONIGHT

When he’s not knocking on doors for the local election with high profile Conservatives, Darren is attending events organised by Generation Identity, a racist group that wants to repatriate migrants. Our investigation shows that Harrison attended numerous events by the ethno-nationalist group.

^ this is perfectly confluent with the amber rudd approach tbh

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbOWSRKWkAAnN6M.jpg

casually wafting away a fart

ooh i just had a safeguarding warning this week about Generation Identity

Generation Cunts amirite?

it's the undone zipper that's more worrying tbh xp

Dan Hodges is defending Nick Timothy(!), who he says has been “hounded off Twitter” by the hard left (rather than his own incompetence).

I know we're saying "peak lib dem" a lot these days but peak lib dem pic.twitter.com/axFWQLN38U

— Crowsa Luxemburg (@quendergeer) April 20, 2018

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbNZ7XJWAAETgNe.jpg

wait did he not run away because somebody amply demonstrated he's a fucking liar?

Yeah he was hounded off by the hard left mainstream media doing their job for once.

i want to live in a world where i can pelt nick timothy with rotten eggs with no fear of comeback

he can't moan about being no-platformed and become a martyr, if he took the ball home of his own accord! the fucking dickhead!

He's probably deleted it out of embarrassment and being so uniquely terrible at his chosen career path.

I mean you’d think that but he went from one of the biggest political misjudgements ever to a career as a political commentator within a few weeks, so...

No no he was HOUNDED OFF TWITTER you monsters have you no SYMPATHY?

WHAT ABOUT HIS HUMAN RIGHTS?

Dunno how you can say all journalists are posh when Nick Timothy got comprehensively schooled

— Here's what I reckon: (@angryaboutbikes) April 20, 2018

I like the elegant simplicity of this one:

Could be worse, could be hounded out of the country you've lived in all your life https://t.co/5C6J8ETJbM

— Dawn Foster (@DawnHFoster) April 20, 2018

I miss the old politics, where you would be civil to the people denying cancer treatment to citizens in order to mollify racists.

fkn fire our journalist class into the sun already.

according to the front page of bbc news, none of this is happening.

I know this government latterly has been kind of resilient but it feels like there’s a resignation in the offing soon. when do we think rudd might go? is may at risk even? in a more benign context she would have gone already surely