Star Wars Anthology shit talk (Rogue One, Young Solo, TBD)

@sic, there are degrees between indie auteurs and completely malleable studio lapdogs.

there’s also a fourth option which is stanning for whoever got fired as the preferred director

(i’m not saying you guys do it every time this happens but you do it every time this happens)

I mean, one of them is Ron Howard, so.

Also, I think even people who are suspicious of JJ breathed a sigh of relief when Trevorrow got the sack.

Basically all the funny parts/parts that were remotely interesting

hated this so much. deeply lazy, almost completely charmless (DG and Chewie keep it afloat). More Jack Burton than Han Solo. And I love Jack Burton, but come on.

"Also the goddamn golden idol from Raiders in the background of Paul Bettany's lair."

didn't catch that at all.

the accidentally starting of a droid uprising, followed by the droids facilitating a slave labor uprising, was surprisingly slim on exposition but a nice set piece.

(i’m not saying you guys do it every time this happens but you do it every time this happens)

VegemorbsGrrl

Also the goddamn golden idol from Raiders in the background of Paul Bettany's lair.

A crystal skull of sorts too, which had everyone cheering on sight because of the unanimous love and admiration for Indy IV.

there's another theory that the crystal skull is a ref to the old canon novels

"More Jack Burton than Han Solo."

I fail to see how this is remotely an insult.

I thought this was pretty entertaining with basically few of the ponderous bits which have made other Star Wars a bit of a chore (it probably went a ten or so minutes too long, too many double-crosses, too much exposition, etc, and I could have done wo the big CRIMINALS are actually EVIL reveal, but really these are minor complaints in grand scheme of big budget films like this).

For those complaining it's entirely workman-like, I don't think The Last Jedi was a couple of stunning visuals aside really that much better for having an artier director.

it's not an insult. in a different movie it might even have been fun.

More I think about it the biggest flaw in this thing wasn't Ron Howard as director or too much kowtowing to fanboy wishes or a bunch of other things that made this a "just okay" Sw flick. It's Ehrenreich. He wasn't the right choice to embody this role, poor guy, and it shows. Han Solo shouldn't be a bland dude around which the other characters revolve. I think it would've been cool if they'd gone with him having all the arrogant charm etc. etc. cranked to 1000 and then, over the course of things, having him tune it down to more familiar levels. But Ehrenreich seems to only be able to make weird approximations of Ford's facial expressions and mannerisms and when he isn't doing that he barely registers onscreen.

Not bad - for me the worst part of the film was Kira just happening to appear on one of the billion planets in the galaxy where Solo happens to be.

Suspension of disbelief is one thing, but I get properly removed from the film with stuff like that. They don't even go crazy with like "oh my god, I can't believe it's you here, what are the bloody odds?".

Oh right enough - Solo "never tell me the odds"

This was fun fluff

Makes me _really_ want to see the stuff Lord & Miller shot

"Han Solo shouldn't be a bland dude around which the other characters revolve. I think it would've been cool if they'd gone with him having all the arrogant charm etc. etc. cranked to 1000 and then, over the course of things, having him tune it down to more familiar levels. "

see i think the script just doesnt give him (Han or Ehrenreich) anything to do. the story itself is so weak and the character so thinly written that no one has anything to hang on to.

Haven't seen this yet and most likely won't, but I read an interesting discussion of it in the WaPo:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-four/wp/2018/05/28/if-you-grew-up-on-star-wars-how-does-solo-hold-up/

Also in the WaPo:

NEVER TELL Han Solo the odds. And, given the woeful opening of “Solo: A Star Wars Story,” Han might have a bad feeling about a few other less-than-stellar numbers, too.

“Solo” defied weeks of industry projections by landing below even conservative estimates, which had the first Skywalker-free Star Wars feature film opening in the ballpark of $130 million for the Memorial Day weekend.

Disney/Lucasfilm’s “Solo” instead had a $103 million domestic debut for the four-day holiday and grossed $84.8 million for the standard three-day weekend — or barely one-third of what Disney’s first Star Wars reboot, “The Force Awakens,” opened to ($248 million) less than three years ago.

Noted in the piece:

“Solo” is the first Disney Star Wars film not to open during the winter holidays and the first to open just five months after the previous Star Wars film.

Bad press, bad movie, word travels fast? I think it has very little to do with the timing or spacing of the opening weekend

The discussion of Revenge of the Sith in that piece gets at something that has really bugged me with the reception of Solo: There are SOOOO many blockbuster franchises, and they're SOOOO formulaic, but instead of criticizing the model it has led people to praise the most minuscule of differences. So Revenge of the Sith is sorta good because the violence is pretty frightening for a blockbuster. Solo is kinda ok because it's the first Star War in a while that doesn't end with a large space battle. Etc, etc. It's kinda different for a Star Wars film. But that doesn't matter, it just means it's not what people love about Star Wars, while also not being THAT different.

Sorry, rant. But it has been annoying me these last few days.

As one of the biggest SW stans on ILX, let me just say: Meh. This felt really perfunctory, the seams showed like crazy, etc. This "Han Solo" did not feel like a person that was going to become the person on the screen in the original Star Wars. It at least felt more or less like it took place in the SW universe, but all the "crime syndicate" storylines have always been my least favorite thing in that universe. Hell, it would have been marginally better if they'd gone back to the original EU materials and brought in Prince Xizor and Black Sun instead of Paul Bettany's boring character.

All that said, the cut from "We'll have you flying in no time" to THREE YEARS LATER and trench warfare was a very Ron Howard joke, but means that prior to the train job we see exactly zero minutes of Han becoming a hotshot pilot, so all of his flying skills fall under "informed attribute" basically until he takes the controls of the Falcon.

Took me longer than necessary to recognize Jon Favreau's voice, which . . . did not fit the character. To be charitable.

I'm sure the director replacement/rewrites/reshoots were responsible for this movie not knowing what to do with Thandie Newton. But she could be taken out of the movie with no difference made to the plot at all.

when the head of the pirates took off her helmet, I first wondered if she was supposed to be the long-lost daughter of Harrelson and Newton's characters but I may have been the only one

we'll find out when her spinoff comes out

she immediately explains who they are, so that possible misconception was short-lived

damn, missed out on a franchisetunity there

I actually like the idea of infinite concentric spinoffs of less and less important characters, handled by progressively less reputable filmmakers

I'm willing to accept that _more_ Star Wars movie could be the answer

like why do we care if the mid-tier spinoff doesn't have as many ticket sales as the main episodic story? get some market segmentation in there, then genuinely let some directors do their own thing on a lower tier without having the studio jump in as quickly

xxpost I thought the same thing

if a segment of the SW audience is *rebelling* at being expected to march mindlessly into the multiplex twice a year to see the same old formulas, my heart bleeds for Disney.

Harrison Ford's looks never did much for me tbqh

when the head of the pirates took off her helmet, I first wondered if she was supposed to be the long-lost daughter of Harrelson and Newton's characters but I may have been the only one

― (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻ (mh), Tuesday, May 29, 2018 2:47 PM (twenty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I thought exactly the same thing and breathed an audible sigh of relief when Larry Kasdan proved to be smarter than that.

This "Han Solo" did not feel like a person that was going to become the person on the screen in the original Star Wars

young han is savvy enough to anticipate multiple betrayals toward the end there but maybe dænerys flying away after he dedicated years of his life to reuniting with her is the first in a series of legit solo-fying disillusion (including lando in cloud city and ultimately ben (kylo ren) in starkiller base)

For the fatigue theory, as a parent, I can see that the Star Wars toys section at target has been shrinking. A big problem on that front was the fate of the characters in 'Rogue One'.

I liked 'Solo'. I kept thinking of it as a SW novel.

saw this in a big auditorium with maybe 25 seats filled. and.... it's lousy! mess of a plot with characters very thinly imprinted before they hit moments where it's crucial that we care about them. i guess ehrenreich wasn't *great* and certainly wasn't ford, but before anything else it's the basic problem of prequels. when they announce they're going to planet kessel, you're not like ooh, i wonder what scrapes they'll get into there, i hope they make it out... you're like, ahh, this is where we find out what the "kessel run" is, i wonder if it'll be something lame or something kinda clever, or if they'll fake out my expectations by having it turn out someone else did the piloting on the famous run or whatever, and i wonder how they'll dispatch these other side characters who we never saw before, will they die or am i gearing up for some scene where they give a farewell salute and ride off into the space sunset...? and then meanwhile the characters have been unconvincingly pulling off a crazy heist, which you'd think you could make feel either tense (after all two movies ago a crazy heist ended up with everybody dead), or like a rollicking good time, but it just kinda runs out the clock for that act of the movie.

enough surface polish and set-piece fun to kinnnnnda carry you through, but man is it pointless, and wayyy too long for the light fun side movie, with all the needless reversals and invented crises. and there are so many lurching, distracting things to yank you out of the movie. are we doing spoilers? if not i'll just say that the hat-tip to american graffiti was one stroke of cutesiness too many for this viewer, though at least you could imagine how that *started* as ron howard wanting to honor his old buddies george and harrison, or something. but what a place in the movie to shoehorn it in!

It's wild to me how entire $10,000,000+ sequences are now being spun out of sentences a stones George Lucas farted out in 1975

*stoned lol

DC’s take is, in its own way, basically the same as Walter Chaw’s. That’s enough for me to avoid this until it shows up for free on HBO.

yall are a bunch of old poops

that’s all i have to add

<3

it’s not even that it’s boring. it’s boring in the laziest possible way.

idk there was something daring in having the female lead's much-dangled secret and super meaningful motivation for all her significant looks turn out to be that she is secretly in league with a previously-unmentioned Skeletor. almost dadaist in its left-field willingness to tank conventional notions of narrative resolution.

It’s not Dadaist at all though! It’s trying very sincerely to live in the sw universe and it just FAILS! It would be more interesting if it were a series on contextless sketches of Han solo’s life! If anything it’s trying really really hard to be in the 40’s and 59’s serials “see what happens next” style but I can’t be assed to care bc the script is so bad

i already cannot recall one interesting line of dialogue from this, or any dialogue at all except woody harrelson calling alden "kid" a lot.

another interesting choice, i thought, was to make endless hay out of han's desire to fly and skill at flying but never show any of his early flying experience, and then when he's on board the falcon, to depict it as if he's never been on a spaceship before. again radically deconstructing our bourgeois assumptions about setups and payoffs and consistency of characterization.

he is the best pilot bc his dad worked in a factory and because god he just is okay?

"luke, i am your father"

*sigh* "show don't tell, darth. jeez"

maybe i'm biased because i went with a 6-yr-old and 9-yr-old but long story short i thought this ruled

a little weird for a star wars movie in that it contained no "force", no skywalkers, no spiritual mysticism, no destinies etc - so far, so han - but despite a typical 2000s desaturated colour palette it certainly felt like it came from the star wars universe. thought everyone's acting was excellent and yes it was just a series of heist set-pieces but.. like, yay?? and the way they resolved the moral question at the heart of all heist movies i.e. who benefits, was satisfying

lotsa stuff here about friendship and i genuinely got choked up with L7 died or whatever her name was lol

also this movie suggests an alternate canon where young han solo grows up into being played by liev schreiber and i don't see how you can be honestly opposed to that

i don't follow?

a critical consensus seems to be forming that you can't get from THIS han to THAT han with this movie, which, maybe that's so but you do get to a putative han played by liev schrieber so what's not to like

does that still make no sense? sorry