― That Girl (thatgirl), Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:33 (twenty years ago) link
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:35 (twenty years ago) link
(Almost cross-posted with Dan there. The ditto is to DDG.)
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:35 (twenty years ago) link
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 17 July 2003 20:07 (twenty years ago) link
haha why do you think i revived this?!?!
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 22:51 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 22:52 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 22:59 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:05 (twenty years ago) link
― Millar (Millar), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:06 (twenty years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:07 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:12 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:13 (twenty years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:14 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:14 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:14 (twenty years ago) link
since when do i have any say, especially if i "love" someone, in how that person lives their life, provided i don't feel like the way they need to live their life is trampling over my same.
I know it's just your take on it, jess, but this seems either vague enough as to not mean much ("... provided I don't feel ..." grants a lot of leeway) or just bizarre. In any long-term relationship, how X lives their life affects Y in many, many ways which don't trample Y's ability to live their life the way they want to.
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:19 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:21 (twenty years ago) link
― RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:24 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:24 (twenty years ago) link
That's all I was saying, I think -- compromise as opposed to a completely "do whatever you like as long as it doesn't threaten my well-being" sort of thing.
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:25 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:31 (twenty years ago) link
(Now I'm derailing this thread. Ignore me, actually, I should be writing my paper for tomorrow morning.)
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:38 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:40 (twenty years ago) link
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:43 (twenty years ago) link
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:44 (twenty years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:55 (twenty years ago) link
"Honey, we can't go to Massachusetts, we might be attacked by a floating Gareth head."
― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 17 July 2003 23:57 (twenty years ago) link
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 18 July 2003 00:01 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 18 July 2003 00:03 (twenty years ago) link
Oh, I meant "Seattle is such a wacky place, surely FAPs could not out-wack her!" Her preference isn't east coast, it's north -- and although mine is south (basically, I want to live anywhere that has neither snow nor a Pacific Ocean), it's the northeast that I adamantly oppose.
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 18 July 2003 00:05 (twenty years ago) link
??? ur, but the Pacific Ocean is not on the east coast.
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 18 July 2003 00:08 (twenty years ago) link
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 18 July 2003 00:13 (twenty years ago) link
― di smith (lucylurex), Friday, 18 July 2003 02:36 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 18 July 2003 02:38 (twenty years ago) link
― di smith (lucylurex), Friday, 18 July 2003 02:39 (twenty years ago) link
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 18 July 2003 02:40 (twenty years ago) link
― Jimmy Carter, Friday, 18 July 2003 02:43 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 18 July 2003 02:52 (twenty years ago) link
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Friday, 18 July 2003 03:15 (twenty years ago) link
second, "giving" for the sake of it = classic, but with expectation of even partial future repayment = dud.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 18 July 2003 03:36 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 18 July 2003 03:38 (twenty years ago) link
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Friday, 18 July 2003 03:50 (twenty years ago) link
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 18 July 2003 06:39 (twenty years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 18 July 2003 06:56 (twenty years ago) link
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 18 July 2003 07:05 (twenty years ago) link
― youn, Friday, 18 July 2003 07:08 (twenty years ago) link
― duh, Friday, 18 July 2003 07:19 (twenty years ago) link
― dork, Friday, 18 July 2003 07:20 (twenty years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 18 July 2003 09:41 (twenty years ago) link