the alt-right

well said

eliza, you put the word "ignored" in quotation marks but no one itt said it. what i said was that i was upset that the oxygen in the room was being consumed by this whereas there are these important projects that the left is working on and succeeding at and i worry that fighting these garbage battles will hurt those battles.

practical political action is obviously superior to transient moral outrage, but it's also brutally difficult and frequently demoralizing work

I don't do much/any political organizing any more and I do miss it but I'm so burned out by the community-level service provision to front-line groups that I'm all used up. People are doing all kinds of things at all different levels to make change or even just ameliorate the harms/deliver the benefits of the system we're already working within.

People who have the energy for moral outrage can be directed to use that energy for something practical too--they can be/get organized. How can more of that happen?

I'm pretty sure nobody has ever come around to try to organize me which, like, I know I could figure out my own ways of helping, but I'd love to be organized.

fair enough, Mordy. I don't want to mischaracterize you but I also don't want people thinking the left has not already done the work to sell these ideas.

Never Been Canvassed, Starring Silby (would watch)

I’m an ingenue

Mordy, you consumed A LOT of that oxygen over several threads, and now you're upset about it all of a sudden?

Btw, the reason this backlashed was because at the first sign of trouble half of the media bend over backwards to apologize to the MAGA wearing psychos yelling rape threats at women, because it turned out some black men had said something as well, so of course the white boys were innocent. And yeah, that's a strategic mistake, plain and simple, whoever was trying to make something out of this should have considered whether cowards would stab them in the back. American media does this all the time, so it should have been foreseen.

But nah. You can't win any political battle in the right way until you can win these types of battles. If you want Medicare4All to include funding for women's health you will have to fight every last participant in the March for Life, and how the fuck are you going to do that unless you're willing to fight them?

If you want Medicare4All to include funding for women's health you will have to fight every last participant in the March for Life

not really, those kids can't vote

This tweet is so spot-on today. Not specifically towards anyone on this thread, but the whole debacle in general:

one of my favorite observations from ta-nehisi is this, written in the context of obama but very applicable in the present moment

“Racism is not merely a simplistic hatred. It is, more often, broad sympathy toward some and broader skepticism toward others.”

— b-boy bouiebaisse (@jbouie) January 22, 2019

I'm often annoyed by the 'anti-sjw' or 'anti-liberal' left, because we did that, the 20th century workers movements ended up ignoring or excluding women and people of colour; if there's one thing to learn from the left's failures in the past century, it's the necessity of (social) liberalism as an aim of the left. And I don't encounter it in real life - none of the activists or parties I've been involved in were 'anti-identitarian' - i.e. most of them support moves like all-women candidate lists, or seek to get representation from minority groups etc. It's just the online types who have no sense of the history of the movement that think they can ditch the (so-called) liberalism in favour of pure (naive)class politics.

ever meet any voters

Sure, but their failure to understand the history of the labour movement is uderstandable.

look i know it's unpopular to tell marginalized ppl that you disagree with their strategy - even if they aren't all marginalized people but some and even if other marginalized people agree with you. however, there are positive programs that would have huge impact on marginalized communities that don't include picking fights with alt-righters or waging cultural wars. they do include things like prison reform, or measures to increase household wealth in their communities, or raising the minimum wage, or legislation that could reduce police violence (like mandatory cams). there are lots of policy options for every member of our coalition that are positive worthwhile steps. i'm not saying their pain and suffering is unimportant. i'm saying that this particular way of addressing it is unproductive esp compared to the alternatives.

and theres no risk supporting prison reform or raising the minimum wage might get turned into a culture war football by the right?

i think you're talking about a real split but not the one i'm talking about. when h00s says "battles over norms matter, but the fact that people engage in them oughtn't be misunderstood as organized political activity when there are plenty of people actually doing political work while a thousand nobodies flood the phone line of the catholic school's principal" he's talking about two groups of leftists, but one is doing actual political work and a thousand nobodies are flooding the phone line of the principal. if you criticize the latter you're not a centrist - maybe you just find the former more important. xp

― Mordy, Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:08 PM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

and some are ... the same people doing both

anyway weve been over this but my feeling is the culture war football isn't deflated by trying to pretend it doesn't exist or by playing whack-a-mole with i.e. racism just bc one racist kid goes viral, but that anti racism (again for example) clearly has to be an explicit part of any platform in which for example the figurehead of the republican party is an unapologetic racist

Wondering if some percentage of the population, same that can't tell a fake smile from a real one, is also incapable of telling a smug smirk from a friendly smile, said percentage also being heavily concentrated among reactionary conservatives

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CJZcVi5BA4

If you want Medicare4All to include funding for women's health you will have to fight every last participant in the March for Life, and how the fuck are you going to do that unless you're willing to fight them?

I also want Medicare4All to be available for this kid

pretty sure most all of us want the benefits of a more socialist society to benefit everybody, even the people we don't like

the MAGA wearing psychos yelling rape threats at women

Was there a source reporting this? I saw a video on Twitter where I can hear them yelling "MAGA" at a woman and she added that she could hear them yelling "build the wall".

telling people they’re racist isn’t really anti racism though if they’re not willing to listen

thats pretty much the history of racism in a nutshell though isnt it, people experiencing it describing something happening to them & everyone who isn't doing the racism basically saying they can't hear it

*everyone else who isn't

yes you don’t have to tell me

anyway i think people will find in the long run that “anti racism” tactics that make racists look like victims will turn off more persuadables than you manage to sweep up while mobilizing the faithful

“while” should say “by”

^

So this "Vietnam Vet" served as an electrician in....Kansas and Nebraska?

I guess in the CNN interview he does say "Vietnam times vet" and not Vietnam vet

xxp dont get me wrong i don't think this was a great day for anti racism or something (or great... three days).

but also like ... this wasnt an event controlled by political strategists or something. it was a media clusterfuck and most ppl i see aren't concerned w/ properly prosecuting the teen for racism as they are annoyed by media framing & exploitation of his racism for ratings

Wondering if some percentage of the population, same that can't tell a fake smile from a real one, is also incapable of telling a smug smirk from a friendly smile, said percentage also being heavily concentrated among reactionary conservatives

I'm reminded of the thread on smuggest album covers on ILM, where hardly any of the covers are smug.

anyway i think people will find in the long run that “anti racism” tactics that make racists look like victims will turn off more persuadables than you manage to sweep up while mobilizing the faithful

and give racists the platform they need. people are building entire careers in media and politics on the the outraged online reactions of their enemies. it would appear that is a p key component in how fascism works today.

for that matter ... how much can we rely on 'persuadables' if they're perpetually vulnerable to racial appeals? it seems to me anti-racisms focus is abt compelling strategies that undermine the effectiveness of right wing racial appeals, which isn't the same as trying to step lightly around race, albeit also probably not abt falling totally for the bait during these flashpoint moments

idk, i would say i'm pretty ... pessimistic abt how one goes about doing that at this point. but anything less than that feels like a trap

People who have the energy for moral outrage can be directed to use that energy for something practical too--they can be/get organized. How can more of that happen?

― There's more Italy than necessary. (in orbit)

i don't know how that happens without people who are already committed putting in a lot of work. people have to be taught the skills involved, often mentored.

-

i would like to again express my displeasure with any strategy that involves conscious avoidance of _provoking_ racist demagogues. this seems to me like an implicitly or explicitly victim-blaming strategy.

did someone use the word 'provoking'

is that how de-platforming works fernando?

because last i checked not only was this kid not deplatformed, he ended up on the today show

i would like to again express my displeasure with any strategy that involves conscious avoidance of _provoking_ racist demagogues. this seems to me like an implicitly or explicitly victim-blaming strategy.

― The Elvis of Nationalism and Amoral Patriotism (rushomancy), Wednesday, January 23, 2019 2:44 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

just to bolster this point, demos just did a fresh study that i presented on yesterday indicating that frames that alienate the firm opposition track with increased support from our base (as distinct from ourselves, advocates) & the mixed-views persuadables.

what

lol

messages that alienate our opponents are not a bad thing but a good thing xp

i think what's good is that sort of wide-ranging policy-based message, vs the singling-out of people or small groups of people who do something that offends the left's sensibilities. i think the former leads to the base galvanizing and becoming stronger, and the latter leads to people rushing to someone's defense and a bullshit redemption arc that winds up being more of a validation.

xp you know i wasnt zinging you i just literally could not parse that f

haha yeah i read it again and i couldn't parse it either

i would agree but the relationship is not causal or direct, i.e. the things that most outrage "our" "enemies" are not necessarily best at galvanizing "our" "base"

Different things with different messengers appeal to different people.

I was just thinking that a big grievance towards most politicians, parties, people with any sort of power, your friends and neighbors, is that they have distinctly been avoiding even acknowledging racism/sexism for our entire lives. This is why I often hear that white people will never, ever truly be an ally, forget them, look after your own.

the things that most outrage "our" "enemies" are not necessarily best at galvanizing "our" "base"

― the late great, Wednesday, January 23, 2019 6:19 PM (twenty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i agree, but what i'm getting at by highlighting the point is that i don't think we should let alienating the opposition stop us from using messaging that galvanizes the left base -- and, separately, it seems to me that making them howl marginalizes them further from the general public.

I recommend ash sarkar's interview with hbomberguy on novara abt his recent marathon donkey kong 64 twitch fundraiser and one of the things he talks abt is how part of what helped such a large group of ppl suggest was having graham linehan as a hate figure. i think ppl often underestimate how effective a negative focus like that can be in helping a group rally