im more of a Matt stan but since ive followed liz she’s never brought up abortion or emphasised those views in any way, yet there are always 1000 people in replies to unrelated tweets on any topic screaming at her abt it
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:02 (five years ago) link
it looks like they're in it for the purity politics, but really it's because most of them think they finally found a valid reason to yell at a woman imo
― mh, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:10 (five years ago) link
there's plenty of women who give her shit for it tbh
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:12 (five years ago) link
holding my tongue here
― mh, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:14 (five years ago) link
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:15 (five years ago) link
Yelling directly at someone on twitter is pretty dud but 'abortion on demand without apology' is a criterion for my solidarity and that's classic
― moose; squirrel (silby), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:21 (five years ago) link
not to be an annoying stinker, but if it's ok to be like "abortion is wrong" and still be part of "the left" because you don't specifically advocate for the criminalization of abortion; would it be ok if she was like "homosexuality is wrong" if she didn't oppose equal rights? where is the line?
to be clear: i don't think anyone should be yelling at her on twitter
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:25 (five years ago) link
If it was her personal belief and she kept it to herself 100% of the time I doubt anyone would care. Alas she has written/spoken about it a few times, publicly, and that's never coming off. (on my phone and don't have links handy)
― Simon H., Friday, 8 March 2019 17:27 (five years ago) link
yeah i mean she has definitely spoken about it publicly. people aren't just assuming it from her catholicism (plenty of catholics are pro-choice)
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:28 (five years ago) link
i do think framing this particular scenario as a bunch of dudes being super-eager to yell at a woman online is dumb and honestly belittling to Bruenig. yes, dogpiling on people on Twitter is generally lame but I don't think this situation is extra-bad because of her gender.
― Evans on Hammond (evol j), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:31 (five years ago) link
while we’re having a liz breunig struggle session, i’m pretty sure her position on homosexuality is that it’s cool to be gay as long as you don’t act on your desires which uh
― invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:31 (five years ago) link
those two things seem diff to me, ymmv
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:33 (five years ago) link
xp jim
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:34 (five years ago) link
re: bg's post
oh noooo
― mh, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
fwiw it was Mike not me who implied (even he didn’t actually specify) it was men in her replies. all forms of idiots with nothing better to do with their lives have united in this cause
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
hate to be the bearer of bad news 🤷♂️ xp
― invited to an unexpected ninja presentation (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
― flopson, Friday, March 8, 2019 9:33 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
they're not the same thing but they're fairly binary moral issues which pretty much anyone from centre-right leftward is generally expected to have the "right" opinion regarding
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Friday, 8 March 2019 17:37 (five years ago) link
as i said, ymmv
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:52 (five years ago) link
i was looking around for the evidence of BG’s claim and couldn’t find it but stumbled upon this book review by liz of a memoir by a celibate lesbian christian. kinda skimmed it but didn’t see the smoking gun. i have an aunt who is a minister of a united church in rural Ontario and im 99.9% sure is lesbian, and is on the political left. my father (her brother) and i have speculated about whether or not she’ll come out after her mother dies, guess this out-celibate thing is a third way option i hadn’t considered. Christianity is so weird lol
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 17:58 (five years ago) link
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/is-there-a-christian-way-to-be-gay/
― flopson, Friday, 8 March 2019 18:02 (five years ago) link
Eli Valley vs Meghan McCain FITE
This is one of the most anti-semitic things I’ve ever seen. Also, this reveals so much more about you than it does me... https://t.co/IdfGuWcJZu— Meghan McCain (@MeghanMcCain) March 8, 2019
― Simon H., Friday, 8 March 2019 18:13 (five years ago) link
didn't realize there were non-gay UCC ministers
― moose; squirrel (silby), Friday, 8 March 2019 18:14 (five years ago) link
wau
"This is one of the most anti-semitic things I've ever seen" [retweets it to 631k followers]
― ebro the letter (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 8 March 2019 18:31 (five years ago) link
I will clarify that it was overly broad of me to imply there's a class of people who feel emboldened to yell at Elizabeth Bruenig over other targets because of misogyny and they're the primary noisemakers
on the other hand, there are definite reasons why women would yell at a woman over a man who has said the same stance, including misogyny
― mh, Friday, 8 March 2019 19:05 (five years ago) link
new ep of the Antifada w/ Matt that seems to be sickeningly timely
In this episode, we discuss the 'controversial' French 'novel' that is 'just asking questions' about the Migrant Invasion, the Great Replacement, and Yt Genocide. How did a 1970s book by some grenouille asshole named Jean Raspail become a prophetic lodestar for an ascendant white nationalist movement? How does a historical materialist analysis help us understand why dickheads like Steve Bannon and Marine Le Pen are lauding this novel 50 years later?
http://podbay.fm/show/1372879721/e/1552633440?autostart=1
― Simon H., Friday, 15 March 2019 14:47 (five years ago) link
I would listen to pretty much any ep of any pod that has Christman on it. We should compile a list.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Friday, 15 March 2019 15:07 (five years ago) link
there's a pretty complete list of all their side appearances over on the subreddit
― Simon H., Friday, 15 March 2019 15:12 (five years ago) link
i didn't like this tweet, but i am putting in this thread for you to look at:
pic.twitter.com/PirIC5kr1I— Redneck Kong (@MICHAELfilm94) March 20, 2019
― goole, Wednesday, 20 March 2019 04:49 (five years ago) link
this is disgustingbeto would never do anything that cool
― i'm w/ tato, super hot AND weird!! (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 20 March 2019 07:27 (five years ago) link
ahsjfhshfj https://t.co/FJqqaPAbXi pic.twitter.com/SEt7QBbCnF— libby watson (@libbycwatson) March 20, 2019
― Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Wednesday, 20 March 2019 17:34 (five years ago) link
I feel like Bill Oakley had to be a Virgil pick but then Christman seems very into fast food as well
― blood, loud screaming and nudity (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 22 March 2019 12:06 (five years ago) link
feels more like they'll leap at any opportunity to have a golden-era simpsons writer on the show, and the fast-food stuff was just a bonus
― i'm w/ tato, super hot AND weird!! (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 22 March 2019 12:26 (five years ago) link
so it turns out one of the Chapos is from Manitowoc and I actually knew him about 10 (??) years ago
more of a friend of a friend type thing but still kinda neat
― frogbs, Monday, 25 March 2019 04:17 (five years ago) link
you knew matt? the best chapo?
― i'm w/ tato, super hot AND weird!! (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 25 March 2019 09:50 (five years ago) link
I mean, I don't have anything interesting to say about him...we played cards sometimes, I remember him being nice & funny, he was tight with a few people I still keep up with. I wonder if they know he's sorta famous now. would never have recognized it before, he looked way different back then
― frogbs, Monday, 25 March 2019 16:46 (five years ago) link
hiding in plain sight with a large beard and receding hairline
― mh, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:04 (five years ago) link
Stop Trying to Podcast the Revolution
Trendy, mindless, and devoid of context—podcasts like Chapo Trap House and Red Scare are the perfect mockeries of political dialogue for Millennials and Gen-Zers flocking to socialism like it's a brand.
― flappy bird, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:08 (five years ago) link
i sometimes think I'm wasting my life but then i remember there are people having their parents pay for them to live in brooklyn while they write popular culture takes for little-read websites
― ( ͡☉ ͜ʖ ͡☉) (jim in vancouver), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:10 (five years ago) link
signature shock-jock takes
How to tell someone has never bothered listening to the podcast they're criticizing.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:18 (five years ago) link
or they've never heard actual shock jock content and think it's mostly dumb riffing
― mh, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:24 (five years ago) link
I saw that it lumped Chapo and Red Scare together and didn't bother reading any more tbh
― Simon H., Monday, 25 March 2019 17:25 (five years ago) link
also strongly suspect the entire column would be invalidated by any of their several in-show iterations of "listening to podcasts is not doing politics"
― Simon H., Monday, 25 March 2019 17:27 (five years ago) link
I didn't read the article but I don't think there's a big difference between Howard Stern and Chapo/Red Scare. Not necessarily in terms of content or politics (though Howard has a lot in common with both), but just as "hangout" shows. They function best in the background, easy listening, with occasional riveting moments of insight/drama/rage.
― flappy bird, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:33 (five years ago) link
Matt rides a Sybian while explaining the Thermidorian Reaction.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
pod save america is stern, chapo is o&a, red scare is mancow
― XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxXxxxx (dylannn), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:35 (five years ago) link
circa 2008 for all three comparisons
― XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxXxxxx (dylannn), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:36 (five years ago) link
the premise that a podcast is supposed to be a guide to socialism or teach a nuanced approach to political thought is a huge leap of projection, and not one that writer's alone in supposing
maybe it's the post-fox news/talk radio world, but the idea that commentary is the same thing as reportage or actual political thought seems to be taken as the basis of too many arguments
having just read Matt Taibbi's take on the press's failure to actually cover things of substance re: "russiagate," I might be reaching a little but I feel like it's a problem endemic to news media right now
having also read some bullshit article in WaPo by Dana Milbank on how liberals are screwing up -- which, reading between the lines, is really about how the *press* is screwing up -- by having stances on a myriad of peripheral things irritated me this morning. if one candidate makes an offhand remark about an issue (in this case, the electoral college) it doesn't mean reporters should ask every candidate about it and then write clickbait based on that premise alone! it's the press making all issues of seemingly equal importance
it almost makes me think Beto O'Rourke has an amazingly canny strategy by not taking a strong stance on anything in particular, which is mind-blowing
― mh, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:38 (five years ago) link
just as "hangout" shows. They function best in the background, easy listening
In this sense you could also equate Chapo with HGTV real estate shows. Or any podcast to any other podcast. The content matters.
― Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Monday, 25 March 2019 17:39 (five years ago) link
xp sorry, that kind of meandered, but the CTH skewering of news media coverage of politics is one of the stronger things in their shows
― mh, Monday, 25 March 2019 17:43 (five years ago) link