The long overdue _Blade Runner_ thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1963 of them)

have you missed the central premise of 2049, which is that the 'humans' can now seemingly procreate themselves, or is that built in to 'as well to be human'?

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:47 (four years ago) link

tbh i cannot see how you could have looked forward to this based on the original (well, whichever original) and then not thought it a miraculously worthy addition.

imo yr objections would almost have to be objections in principle.

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:49 (four years ago) link

You're conversing with ledge, right?

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:50 (four years ago) link

Like, the whole master/slave thing is just… how things are? It's description rather than speculation, which is more exciting to me.

How should we and how will we treat artificial beings is pretty speculative?

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:52 (four years ago) link

xp first q was (clumsily) checking with your three pillar questions to see if that element was taken into account

second post was a fuck yall to anyone claiming this wasnt excellent

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:53 (four years ago) link

xp its not speculative in the movie, is it

ofc you could argue that any future/science fiction is a question, but

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:54 (four years ago) link

xp first q was (clumsily) checking with your three pillar questions to see if that element was taken into account

Ah, I see. Then yes, at least to my mind.

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:56 (four years ago) link

xp its not speculative in the movie, is it

the speculation is in whether that's how things should be or will be.

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:56 (four years ago) link

you may argue that the answer to those questions is clearly a) definitely not and b) most likely.

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 10:59 (four years ago) link

Sounds like there's a bit of substance there after all.

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:00 (four years ago) link

in the original, yep :)

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:07 (four years ago) link

I would watch 2049 again, I only really appreciated the original the second or third time around.

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:08 (four years ago) link

It’s not like those questions didn’t carry over into 2049.

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:10 (four years ago) link

ledge, if you rewatch id be interested to see what elements you think it falls down on (ito whats not yknow finn-critique "imo they shouldve done this but where you think whats there botches or is lacking)

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:12 (four years ago) link

I do remember the obviously sexist elements (low maintenance pleasure gal, giant blue tits) being pretty offputting.

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:15 (four years ago) link

It’s a dystopia iirc.

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:19 (four years ago) link

i’d be with you there if the ‘low maintenance pleasure gal’ didn’t represent one of the most interesting existential questions in a movie which is filled with them

(Appears only as a corpse) (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:21 (four years ago) link

i remember, just last night, thinking about how ilx would engage with depiction of things they did not themselves agree with in this movie, a work of fiction showing bad things that clearly invites us to think about these bad things as bad things

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:21 (four years ago) link

State-sponsored misogyny is an uninteresting question?

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:22 (four years ago) link

i had missed k's boss possibly giving him a come-on during a drinking scene tbh, which would at least provide some measure of .... idk balance but yknow

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:23 (four years ago) link

a work of fiction

c'mon

showing bad things that clearly invites us to think about these bad things as bad things

in a medium and genre where same bad things are frequently presented as good things.

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:28 (four years ago) link

‘k

pomenitul, Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:34 (four years ago) link

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The Pingularity (ledge), Thursday, 15 August 2019 11:36 (four years ago) link

I should watch this again, I'm just worried that I won't like it as much as the first time. Seeing this on a really good IMAX screen is one of the best movie going experiences I've had.

silverfish, Thursday, 15 August 2019 13:39 (four years ago) link

one month passes...

i thought this was a very good piece on why 2049 rules ass
https://birthmoviesdeath.com/2017/10/14/the-poetry-of-blade-runner-2049

ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Wednesday, 2 October 2019 03:49 (four years ago) link

yeah, that's a great piece

Is it true the star Beetle Juice is going to explode in 2012 (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 2 October 2019 08:27 (four years ago) link

So I watched this again, I liked it better than the first time, I had a bit more sympathy for K, but still found it hard to really care. That piece above says "No one shines like Rutger Hauer’s magnetic Roy Batty", and it suffers for it. Joshi and Wallace are horrible characters - I don't mean just evil, or unconvincing, but unpleasant to be around, speaking in crappy portentous prose-poetry. The CGI is effortlessly impressive, not as thrilling as Trumbull's model work, and it feels strangely empty - I think there's like one crowd scene? In short, technically impressive, hard to love.

Also given that K can be so easily tracked it seems a bit of a doofus move for him to take Deckard straight to his daughter.

The Pingularity (ledge), Monday, 7 October 2019 09:58 (four years ago) link

one month passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aquTeAH_C4I

ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Monday, 11 November 2019 10:49 (four years ago) link

The CGI is effortlessly impressive, not as thrilling as Trumbull's model work

fyi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLxxbfsj8IM

an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Monday, 11 November 2019 19:44 (four years ago) link

Kalax video is better than the movie

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 12 November 2019 00:02 (four years ago) link

Differences / blade runner vs do androids dream of electric sheep

San Fran, not l a
2021, not 2019
Animal simulacrum subplot
Deckard is married
Monorail, not flying cars
Holden survives !
The voigt empathy test was developed in the Soviet Union
Rachel is tyrells niece (family name is rosen)

June Pointer’s Valentine’s Day Secret Admirer Note Author (calstars), Tuesday, 12 November 2019 00:27 (four years ago) link

One thing I liked about Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep that wouldn't have really worked in a movie I think, is that Pris and Rachel were the same model android, so they actually looked identical

Also the whole bit with the fake police station is so good

silverfish, Tuesday, 12 November 2019 14:50 (four years ago) link

came across this a couple of days ago and found it interesting

Studio Notes to a Test Screening of Blade Runner, January 21, 1981 pic.twitter.com/AGWU252v1O

— 41 Strange (@41Strange) November 10, 2019

silverfish, Tuesday, 12 November 2019 15:19 (four years ago) link

now i really wanna see a black and white version

Titanic was cliched Marxist crap. (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 12 November 2019 15:25 (four years ago) link

thx also matthewk for posting that weta video and thus introducing me to 3d modeller 'jake evill', the most metal of all 3d modellers

Titanic was cliched Marxist crap. (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 12 November 2019 15:27 (four years ago) link

seven months pass...

>KTLA illegal firework footage is trending
>multiple comments about how "congratulations, we've literally become Blade Runner"

Me, a video editor with the soundtrack: pic.twitter.com/X1nchJGadb

— Mach Dent (@Mach_Dent) July 5, 2020

4'33" at an abattoir (Sanpaku), Sunday, 5 July 2020 14:03 (three years ago) link

Awesome

sound of scampo talk to me (El Tomboto), Sunday, 5 July 2020 15:27 (three years ago) link

damn that is beautiful

avellano medio inglés (f. hazel), Sunday, 5 July 2020 16:33 (three years ago) link

I'm seeing Atari Star Wars arcade tbh.

Picasso visita el planeta de los shitposteros (Noel Emits), Sunday, 5 July 2020 16:39 (three years ago) link

Wow - yeah. Nice job senpaku

calstars, Sunday, 5 July 2020 21:56 (three years ago) link

two months pass...

Bay Area sky turns bright orange, some areas see 'snowing' ash https://t.co/SHo2ZulCV9 pic.twitter.com/fs3IOKVR46

— SFGATE (@SFGate) September 9, 2020

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:45 (three years ago) link

I have to admit, my reaction to the sky yesterday was a reconsideration of 2049 as better than I thought

Waking up today though, just low level terror

Milton Parker, Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:47 (three years ago) link

The pictures don't capture the glow, or the way light reflects differently off of surfaces when it's all soft red

Milton Parker, Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:49 (three years ago) link

Yeah as soon as I saw this pic I thought I should re-consider 2049 not lol we're fucked.

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 9 September 2020 16:52 (three years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_m9TUP_t_Y

avellano medio inglés (f. hazel), Thursday, 10 September 2020 16:50 (three years ago) link

that shot of the bridge, wow

avellano medio inglés (f. hazel), Thursday, 10 September 2020 16:51 (three years ago) link

^^^

nashwan, Thursday, 10 September 2020 17:39 (three years ago) link

i rewatched 2049 a few weeks ago and it's still fuckin great

mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Thursday, 10 September 2020 23:59 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.