Gen X: The Generation That Never Existed

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (465 of them)

I have always really liked myself.

ILX post least likely to be cosigned since the site's inception.

pomenitul, Sunday, 20 October 2019 17:30 (four years ago) link

I also really like myself and am mostly positive about attention, at least positive attention.

L'assie (Euler), Sunday, 20 October 2019 17:45 (four years ago) link

Omg I wouldn’t be caught dead in a branded t shirt — Hard Rock Cafe? Are you kidding? No. Absolutely not then and not now.

Like I said, this is the one thing I feel so strongly that I think it connects me to “a generation” whereas most other parts of my belief system remain relatively idiosyncratic.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Sunday, 20 October 2019 17:53 (four years ago) link

I mean like corporate branded tees not band tees. Those are fine but within reason.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Sunday, 20 October 2019 17:56 (four years ago) link

Yeah band t's or things for unique restaurants don't count. I completely don't understand a plain top that just has OLD NAVY or POLO on the front. Or those years that LV monogram bags were huge.

Yerac, Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:05 (four years ago) link

Omg I wouldn’t be caught dead in a branded t shirt — Hard Rock Cafe? Are you kidding? No. Absolutely not then and not now.

This is more aligned with cultural class than generation -- like Paul Fussell wrote about this at least as far back as 1980 -- he termed it "legibility" and it was a sign of the lower classes. According to Fussell, people from higher classes avoid and often abhor clothing and accessories that have visible branding. The next step down is very subtle branding.

Though not wearing visibly branded clothing because you are providing free advertising to shitty companies is not the same as not wearing visibly branded clothing because "it's tacky"

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:47 (four years ago) link

Though not wearing visibly branded clothing because you are providing free advertising to shitty companies is not the same as not wearing visibly branded clothing because "it's tacky"

I’m in box #1 — I fullyunderstand the cultural implications but for me it’s the free advertising I object to, not “it’s tacky”

I understand why people do it I just object to doing it myself.

weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:53 (four years ago) link

agree with this assessment. feel like we have got to point where if u where anything heavily branded the autoresponse is “what does she mean by THAT”?

so im hip and wear things that say I REALLY DONT CARE DO YOU

and i approve this message (Hunt3r), Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:55 (four years ago) link

Omg I wouldn’t be caught dead in a branded t shirt — Hard Rock Cafe? Are you kidding? No. Absolutely not then and not now.

Like I said, this is the one thing I feel so strongly that I think it connects me to “a generation” whereas most other parts of my belief system remain relatively idiosyncratic.

Not every Gen xer is or was a slacker anti corpratist. There were plenty of preps too! And what they'd call "basic" now. They wore this shit.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:55 (four years ago) link

xpost LV monogram bags are still huge!

There was a time period in my genX suburban hell when Coca-Cola branded rugby-style shirts were a big thing. Awful.

Guess jeans. Reebok high-tops with the velcro closure. Branded items were certainly a Gen X thing.

mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:56 (four years ago) link

I see a lot of people wearing that Obey and Pink garbage who seem old enough to know better

Book Doula (sleeve), Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:57 (four years ago) link

I am looking at the reeboks because I love velcro shoes and the 'Reebok' is very small?

Yerac, Sunday, 20 October 2019 18:59 (four years ago) link

that is definitely not an ironic Z Cavaricci shirt -- though we were also the ironic t-shirt generation

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:16 (four years ago) link

This is more aligned with cultural class than generation -- like Paul Fussell wrote about this at least as far back as 1980 -- he termed it "legibility" and it was a sign of the lower classes. According to Fussell, people from higher classes avoid and often abhor clothing and accessories that have visible branding. The next step down is very subtle branding.

I think Fussell is otm about that. In the early days of corporate-branded clothing you'd generally see items that made some kind of statement, like wearing an STP t-shirt said, "I'm good with cars" or an Adidas t-shirt said, "I'm sporty and I travel." As you go up the class ladder fewer people feel the need to make statements like that.

What blows my mind is the sports-branded clothes and the fact that nowadays a huge section of the spectating audience wouldn't think of going to a baseball, football, or even basketball game without wearing their official team replica jersey. As late as the early '80s, iirc, that wasn't even a thing, there was no such market for that. I don't see much evidence Xers have resisted that particular phenomenon.

Josefa, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:17 (four years ago) link

are we talking jerseys specifically, or sports-branded clothing in general? I'm pretty sure I had a Raiders hoodie in the early 80s, and the team branded hats were prevalent then too ... I definitely remember people wearing Giants and Raiders shirts and jerseys in the mid 80s.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:23 (four years ago) link

Jerseys, basically, the kind that enables the fan to essentially disguise him or herself as a member of the team, with the names of real players on the back. I do remember that kids could order jackets or obviously fake team jerseys from the Sears catalog back in the '70s, but then this whole different level of identifying with the team exploded at some recent point

Josefa, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:30 (four years ago) link

ohhhhh ok! I feel like different pro sports had slightly different timelines .... like baseball was different than football or basketball, also the shirts were different material, idk whether the actual fabric/manufacturing was a part of this. But in terms of NFL and NBA -- I wanna say that the Chicago Bulls were definitely at the forefront of this. I could be totally wrong tho!

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:36 (four years ago) link

I agree with Steve Dahl who said that if you're old enough to be on the team, you shouldn't wear the actual jersey

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:38 (four years ago) link

what if you're too old?

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:40 (four years ago) link

idk i feel like the sports merch started earlier than what you're positing, but maybe that's because where I grew up our teams actually won shit, and people like being associated with winners, and also for a kid who wants to look badass ... the Raiders logo was like a skull and crossbones and their shit was black. Like some of these teams had really non-badass logos and mascots and colors.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 19:57 (four years ago) link

relatedly, some teams were appropriated more by bangers than others -- I'm pretty sure at some point in time, certain clothing was actually prohibited at schools because of gang associations which administration believed would lead to violence. I forget when that started though -- wanna say late 80s at the earliest, but definitely 90s it was a thing.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:00 (four years ago) link

people like being associated with winners

this is the key idea that also explains a lot of the corporate-branded clothing, since people think of successful corporations as winners as well

Josefa, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:15 (four years ago) link

which brings us to .... Beck

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:19 (four years ago) link

I really like the term "basic" to describe a certain normative aesthetic ... like ^^^

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:24 (four years ago) link

so I went and looked through my books and the Strauss/Howe 13th Gen book (from the mid 90s) says Gen-X is 1961-1981; Shortly after that boomer-penned volume was published, there was Generation Ecch, which said Gen X was 1965-1977.

But I feel a real demarcation (in the US) is the sense that we are a nation in decline. Heroic figures like King and the Kennedys were killed -- a priori. Like, we don't remember that happening, it had happened. It was a historical fact. Nixon won. Then Nixon's corruption was revealed. Things still sucked. The recession, inflation, de-industrialization, the decaying infrastructure ... the cold war was still going on, but it was dumb. Our country spent a shit ton on nuclear weapons and de-funded schools and social safety nets. The Japanese made better cars. Our cars sucked and our space shuttle exploded. An actor was elected president ... twice. ... I feel like people born in the late 70s (and 1980/81) grew up with a bit more hope? Like people who were still in grade school when the Berlin Wall came down, and there was glasnost and were in middle school/high school when Clinton got elected to break the Republican decade ... people who could get jobs out of high school working for companies designing websites, etc. as opposed to the crappy retail / office jobs those who became adults earlier were more resigned to ...?

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:57 (four years ago) link

I think we were the first generation to be overeducated. ... but for the most part, college was a lot cheaper so we weren't as ridiculously in debt, as millenials, who, according to all the articles, believe they are the first overeducated generation.

sarahell, Sunday, 20 October 2019 20:59 (four years ago) link

yeah the best thing about being gen x was still getting a state school undergrad education for less than the cost of a compact car.

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:04 (four years ago) link

Yeah when I saw what my alma mater is charging these days I was truly shocked. I had a partial scholarship but tuition was so cheap my parents let me keep the scholarship checks as a reward.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:09 (four years ago) link

1 yr tuition is now more than I paid for tuition plus room & board for 4 years ( 2 years in dorm, 2 years private housing). Where the fuck is all that "extra" money going????

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:12 (four years ago) link

yeah i mostly worked over the summers (valet, serving, etc) and made enough to cover most of tuition

A-B-C. A-Always, B-Be, C-Chooglin (will), Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:14 (four years ago) link

I just looked up my tuition (UVA) and it was around $4500-$4800 for two semesters.

Yerac, Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:15 (four years ago) link

don't, stop, thinkin about tomooooroowwww ♫

j., Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:33 (four years ago) link

The Coupland thing

calstars, Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:53 (four years ago) link

Primary text

calstars, Sunday, 20 October 2019 21:54 (four years ago) link

Yeah see while I am gen x I fucked around forever dipping in and out of school so I'm in the enviable position of still paying off millennial-level tuition debt. It's the best of both worlds, really.

Go-Gurt Ops (Old Lunch), Sunday, 20 October 2019 22:32 (four years ago) link

1 yr tuition is now more than I paid for tuition plus room & board for 4 years ( 2 years in dorm, 2 years private housing). Where the fuck is all that "extra" money going????

Administration salaries and to make up funding that has been cut by states.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Sunday, 20 October 2019 22:53 (four years ago) link

Healthcare and higher education graphs look very similar on the same late-90s to today x-axis in executive/admin cost increases.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Sunday, 20 October 2019 22:54 (four years ago) link

coupland’s def of genx definitely skewed heavily into late babyboom, longing for spaceage culture, self-recognition of falsity of roots boomerism.

and i approve this message (Hunt3r), Sunday, 20 October 2019 22:54 (four years ago) link

And then again, it's possible that our unique shared experiences go beyond "We are the freakies and this is our freakies tree"

Maybe. I think the fact that we are all ilx posters may be more significant when it comes to attitudes towards marketing and personal branding (especially since they do seem to be cutting across generational lines, the reason I posted in the first place). That said, I read Coupland's Generation X in Grade 8 and he remains one of my favourite authors so I may not be doing my case favours there.

All along there is the sound of feedback (Sund4r), Monday, 21 October 2019 00:00 (four years ago) link

Deja vu the song

calstars, Monday, 21 October 2019 00:06 (four years ago) link

I just had to do a "generational diversity" online lesson for work. Was not aware that there's now more millenials in the workforce then gen X (35% vs 33%). The examples of generational differences all focused on boomers vs millenials. I'm guessing it was mostly written by Gen Xers tho because it portrayed us as having some of the good qualities of all the other gens.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Monday, 21 October 2019 20:30 (four years ago) link

no one has good qualities.

and i approve this message (Hunt3r), Monday, 21 October 2019 22:17 (four years ago) link

especially not gen xers aka boomers-lite

Seany's too Dyche to mention (jim in vancouver), Monday, 21 October 2019 22:25 (four years ago) link

gen xers are the only good coworkers to have because we are the only ones who understand we’re all shit coworkers

cf Office Space

El Tomboto, Monday, 21 October 2019 22:59 (four years ago) link

I'm self-employed. I no longer have co-workers, only clients. I feel like we are the "customer service" generation.

sarahell, Monday, 21 October 2019 23:08 (four years ago) link

that makes you like the youngins

j., Tuesday, 22 October 2019 00:25 (four years ago) link

My parents (born in 1943 and 1944) are VERY adamant about not being Boomers and not having been hippies. They identify as warbabies. My father thinks he was a Beatnik and my mother thinks she was, like, a boho folkie Joan Baez type. Whatever gets you through the night, as Bob Marley sang on Shaved Fish.

Me, born 1971: I think I ended up being exactly the right age for Pacman, Thriller, Duran Duran, Members Only. Also Little Creatures and maybe Green.

Not much else. I felt too young for some stuff (Residents), and too old for some other stuff (Nirvana). I went on lots of weird detours relative to my peers, and there were certainly things that I explored later and ended up liking in retrospect.

One way in which cultural thinking about "decades" sucks is that you often don't really know you're in them; they can only be understood in hindsight.

All that said 80s music formed me and it is still my bedrock.

solos that go widdly widdly widdly (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 22 October 2019 00:54 (four years ago) link

the 90s tv/movie version of the 80s was so crazily inaccurate to me, but by 2005 the revision was the history. Its kinda like how by 1985 everyone in 1967 was hippie, or how 50s greasers were a dominant social group i guess.

it’s like by 2005 ppl acted like joy division and magazine and wire and foetus were what we ALL listened to, but man journey was huge.

and i approve this message (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 22 October 2019 02:34 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.