Rolling Marvel Cinematic Universe thread (+ a poll: Classic or Dud?)

But with great power comes great fuckin' responsibility, y'know?

"obligation to the community + society" literally covers most of fascism's self-justification iirc

i've said this before here but quite a lot of fiction over the last few hundred years is about people who don't have to play by the same rules the normals do i.e. kings, policemen, doctors, hitmen, detectives, wizards etc because it's easier to commit action to the stage/screen if this is so - there isn't anything stopping the hero from taking whatever direct or spectacular action the drama demands. i don't think this is (necessarily) a 'fascist' mode of creative production (though i'm pretty sure it can be!) but i also don't think it's moore's beef in that graf: he's saying the IP is stale and the execs who commission it are unadventurous.

"obligation to the community + society" literally covers most of fascism's self-justification iirc

So it’s fascist until proven otherwise? Lol

A doesn’t equal B simply because B sometimes employs elements of A for “self-justification”

Superhero stories aren’t inherently fascist for any number of reasons, including the fact that superheroes don’t typically behave like fascists; except when they do, in comics that are usually “exploring the links btw superheroes and fascism.”

Superheroes are known for fighting fascists, either real (Nazis) or fictional (Hydra).

I'm not sure I entirely agree tbh, but I can see the argument - just in how the superpowered individual is inherently set apart from non-superpowered masses, making them uniquely responsible and capable, their existence automatically sets up a hierarchy with a power imbalance

He dug into this a bit in Marvelman/Miracleman book 3, how the supers and aliens remade society after they trashed London, brushing aside any objections from mere humans. It was satisfying to see someone completely defang Thatcher but it was a bit chilling at the same time. Much as I hate to give Mark Millar any credit, he deals with the power imbalances pretty effectively in Jupiter's Legacy.

Mordy had opposed social obligation to "fascism" which i thought was pretty rich - the term fascism literally comes from the idea of individuals subsuming themselves into a bigger, more powerful tool or weapon

if i was being cheeky i'd say 'avengers assemble' now but *big donald trump energy* i won't say that

but again moore is kind of throwing that stuff in gratuitously to his main point, that this IP is comfort food for aging white men.

much like 'the irishman' obv ;)

I guarantee "The Irishman" demo is like 400% older, whiter, and more male than that of the average superhero movie!

Yea easily

word

Glad we’ve identified the real enemy lol

Gabbnebb

superheroes don’t typically behave like fascists

They act like their belief in their own excellence justifies them in flauting any law or societal norm they choose in the service of gratifying their own self-righteousness.

No, you’re thinking of super villains.

no, you are

https://images.amcnetworks.com/ifc.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/pee-wees-playhouse.jpg

Funny how when i espoused a similar line of thinking to explain why I was Team Stark and not Team Cappy i got clowned in the Civil War thread

Superheroes aren't seeking power, or trying to consolidate power, or reinforce existing political structures. They're not opposing liberal democracy; or promoting nationalism, racism, xenophobia, or authoritarianism. They're not acting in a political way at all. They usually operate outside the state's control, and are at best grudgingly tolerated by the authorities. Often, the degree to which heroes should cooperate with authorities or the state is a major tension point (cf. Civil War, or the span of Captain America's entire career).

Their superhuman abilities are usually a gift, or an accident; and heroes committed to using their powers to protect the weak and powerless, often at great risk and expense to their own lives. And, fist and foremost, they protect the world from super villains, who actively seek power (of all kinds) and who exploit/attack ordinary people and seek to undermine the social order.

Of course, there are certain exceptions to all these points, in the zillion superhero stories ever written / filmed... but even at their "worst," most super-heroes are no more fascist than the cast of Watchmen (in Moore's own words from that 1987 interview):

There aren’t really any fascist superheroes in Watchmen. Rorschach’s not a fascist; he’s a nutcase. The Comedian’s not a fascist’ he’s a psychopath. Dr. Manhattan’s not a fascist; he’s a space cadet. They’re not fascists. They’re not in control of their world.

The intellectual frisson comes from the idea that superheroes could take control of their world, if they decided to... but that's generally relegated to thought experiments like Squadron Supreme.

("fist and foremost" is a typo; but I like it, LOL)

Superheroes are known for fighting fascists, either real (Nazis) or fictional (Hydra).

– largely written and drawn by creators who have never stood up for their own rights against the companies that employ them, much less the rights of a Jack Kirby or Jerry Siegel or Joe Shuster –

They usually operate outside the state's control, and are at best grudgingly tolerated by the authorities.

good to see you coming round

They act like their belief in their own excellence justifies them in flauting any law or societal norm they choose in the service of gratifying their own self-righteousness.

Superhero stories that don't factor in the inherent potential for fascism are like seeing Yogi Bear cartoons as nature documentaries. Which is fine, no problem, but

Which is why I liked X2. Mutants merely existing was enough for right wing politicians to try and herd them up.

Which lead to near Genocide from Magneto as paunack

Payback wtf

good to see you coming round

To your notion that an “outlaw” somehow = a “fascist”? Naw, not at all.

I typed a few more words than "law" iirc

The phrase you typed didn’t seem to describe (most) superheroes, or fascism for that matter.

http://cafart.r.worldssl.net/images/Category_3563/subcat_75878/aaaaMarshallLawAdRestoiredOverlay.jpg

ITT people who don't read superhero comics tell us about the state of superhero comics today

BRB, Imma go school some poptimists on music I stopped paying attention to a decade and a half ago, should make for scintillating conversation

Not to be a FASCIST but if I could have one superpower it would be to impose like a ten post limit on people whose superpower is finding 312,187 ways to empty their bowels into a thread whose topic they aren't a fan of.

if i posted that parallax view thor gif again now would someone have the common courtesy to trenchant it this time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NSONU9uguM

I actually will take the opportunity to promote the Squadron Supreme thread I started a few years back (as that series has been mentioned a few times now, mainly by me): Squadron Supreme (Mark Gruenwald) - C or D?

Not to be a FASCIST but if I could have one superpower it would be to impose like a ten post limit on people whose superpower is finding 312,187 ways to empty their bowels into a thread whose topic they aren't a fan of.

that fuckin' morris, talking about whether superheroes are classic or dud on a thread about whether superheroes are classic or dud again

They act like their belief in their own excellence justifies them in flauting any law or societal norm they choose in the service of gratifying their own self-righteousness.

No, you’re thinking of super villains.

no, you are

Morris is right here, like this isn't even close, concern about their powers vs norms is one of the defining features of (particularly Marvel!) modern superheroes.

You know what is a fascist superhero film? The Incredibles! It's about a revolutionary who wants to force through superpowers 4 all, but the 'heroes' stop him because they hate equality. People have to be 'special', because... so I guess other people can't have better lives. No, really, it's a shit film, the scene at the end where the son cheats at running, but not enough to really impress and inspire and look super, just enough so that he will get the trophy instead of some other poor kid who had to work for it? I don't get why people like it, it's horrifying and evil.

And yeah, perhaps the biggest difference with Marvel in the sixties were how they saw superheroes as more like 'other' and 'different' instead of just being better. X-Men has always been a minority fighting for their rights. The Thing, Hulk. But it's not something the MCU has been good at, partly because the weirdest heroes were at FOX, partly because they to some extent based the Avengers on the Ultimates instead, which kinda are about fascists.

concern about their powers vs norms is one of the defining features of (particularly Marvel!) modern superheroes

analysing and deconstructing the tropes of something doesn't stop them being tropes. I believe the gentleman in question was saddened to discover this in the wake of his major works in the field.

ha, The Incredibles seemed like such Ayn Rand fanfic they made the second one pointedly not-so
https://screenrant.com/incredibles-2-theory-ayn-rand/

I remember Alan Moore many years ago talking about a 1970s UK fanzine article that raised the question of fascism in relation to superhero comics, and how influential this was on his thinking about the form - so this isn't a new thing for him, or for comics fandom.

Saying that superhero movies and comics are pretty fascist isn't (for me) the same thing as saying they're without interest or merit - in the same way that one can be a bleeding heart liberal and still take great pleasure from Dirty Harry.

Fred OTM about The Incredibles. Pixar sucks.

It's puzzling and more than a little disappointing to see people itt who are so superhumanly (HMMMMMM) knowledgeable about the medium talking in broad terms about the inherent fascism of superhero comics as if they were a gaggle of PMRC-ers denouncing rap music on the basis of that one song they half heard coming out of their kid's stereo that one time. It might help if you cited your sources because I'd bet dollars to donuts that most of the mainstream comics I've read in the past decade+ aren't among them.

i thought we were talkin about movies

Since when have we used the Marvel Cinematic Universe thread to discuss movies, get with the times, man.

xpost There are inarguably discrete examples of what you're talking about (see, for instance, the most recent instance that springs to mind, wherein the Marvel character Quake has inexplicably taken up torture as a means of getting information from a Hydra agent, an out-of-character act that isn't challenged with particular vehemence in-story and which, incidentally and uncomfortably, takes place in a comic with a photo in the letters page of a little girl dressed like the more honorable TV version of that character) but one of the central thrusts of the Marvel U for years has been powered folks (often but not always the so-called heroes) overstepping those boundaries and getting called to the carpet/taken down for their troubles. Like it's damn near a constant conversation throughout the line, and the general thrust of most of the big events. The implications of that conversation are totally debatable but only inasmuch as the debaters have more than third-hand knowledge of what's been discussed already.

1) as Ward said, nobody itt is denouncing every superhero comic ever including Herbie The Fat Fury by theorising about reasons that Alan Moore might have once perceived the genre gestalt as having some elements that resonate with his perception of fascism
2) he was talking three years ago, about comics from thirty to eighty years ago. the content in a particular selection of superhero comics from the last ten years is moot

xpost

I think that's a bit of a misread of what has been happening. It's not that one side is 'overstepping boundaries', it's a constant conversation between two sides, where what is right and wrong is shown to be murky. Team Cap was portrayed as pretty reasonable for not wanting to tow the government registration line, and their concerns were proven correct when Norman Osborn took over. In Civil War II, I don't think anything was really coherent at all, but it was the anti-government line that won the day, a perfectly reasonable agent like Captain Marvel was all of a sudden an idiot who wasn't able to realize something might be wrong with her intel. I think it's more right to say the line for the last fifteen year has featured a libertarian vs a pro-authority angle. And then recently there's been an attempt to introduce a pro underdog / uprising model, most explicitly with Champions. That book sucks, btw, but that's neither here nor there.

I don’t see how someone can criticise Dr Peterson’s ideas when it’s abundantly clear they haven’t even read all his published works and watched 200 hours of YouTube clips

It is weird that I might want people to have engaged with a thing they're discussing rather than talking about some nebulous idea of what that thing is about, I agree.

Thank u 2 Fred, though. I'm not going to argue that the conversation is like the height of sophistication but it's certainly more nuanced and ambiguous than 'superheroes = fascists'.

Yeah, this idea that it's bad to seek to know what you're talking about is really annoying to me. There's a wide area inbetween uncritically reproducing bad stuff, and not knowing anything about it at all.

And yeah, it is nuanced and ambiguous. In some way a lot of that is because a lot of writers are writing the same story at once, and some of them, like Bendis, are really not that good at writing about anything other than eating takeaway. But I also think the semi-fascist undertones are somewhat important, and can add a lot to the stories. The X-Men are best when they remember that they aren't just a persecuted minority, but also are legitimately powerful and scary. Hickman's no vision of them as basically Zionists is so good, also in the way it makes Zionism so utterly understandable, yet also very scary.

(Plugging my 'ears' @ discussion of Hickman X-books which I have yet to read.)

I think Nick Spencer is an interesting writer in this vein inasmuch as I have yet to discern his personal politics even though he clearly has a lot of complicated (if occasionally messy and ill-considered) thoughts about these issues. But yeah, there are obviously lots of other writers who don't GAF and just want to write slug-em-ups.

I'm thinking the biggest thing Spencer has done so far is the Sam Wilson / Steven Rogers Cap run, but is there anything else I should specifically read?

/thread

"I have a personal problem. I respect the creativity that goes into superhero films, but in real life and in movies, I can’t stand people wearing tight-fitting clothes,” he told Variety when asked if he’d consider directing for Marvel. “I’ll never wear something like that, and just seeing someone in tight clothes is mentally difficult. I don’t know where to look, and I feel suffocated. Most superheroes wear tight suits, so I can never direct one. I don’t think anyone will offer the project to me either. If there is a superhero who has a very boxy costume, maybe I can try."

https://www.vulture.com/2019/11/bong-joon-ho-marvel-movie-tight-clothes.html