outbreak! (ebola, sars, coronavirus, etc)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (17503 of them)

shaking hands, totally fine with never doing that ever again.

Yerac, Thursday, 9 April 2020 16:36 (four years ago) link

What will dogs think?!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 April 2020 16:55 (four years ago) link

I love a hug and a kiss but I hate shaking hands

boxedjoy, Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:25 (four years ago) link

Can we still shake cocks

Bo Johnson Coviddied (Neanderthal), Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:27 (four years ago) link

perfectly fine way of saying hello to someone is a wee nod of the head and saying "awrite" ime

COVID and the Gang (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:36 (four years ago) link

Had no idea we were going to cure Parkinsons through this.

pplains, Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:42 (four years ago) link

Finger guns are surging right now.

DJI, Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:53 (four years ago) link

great news for groping presidential candidates

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 April 2020 17:55 (four years ago) link

Also, Mike Love.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 April 2020 18:30 (four years ago) link

The Faroe Islands veterinary scientist who converted his salmon virus testing lab to SARS-CoV-2 testing in early March:

Guardian: Veterinary scientist hailed for Faroe Islands' lack of Covid-19 deaths

The 5300 tests his lab has run account for 10.8% of the island's population. For comparison,Iceland has tested 9.6%, NY state 2%, the US 0.7%, and the UK 0.4%.

speaking moistly (Sanpaku), Thursday, 9 April 2020 18:52 (four years ago) link

so many men are so cavalier about hand washing, gotta think I’ve touched a lot of pee via handshakes

brimstead, Thursday, 9 April 2020 20:02 (four years ago) link

"Urine is sterile!", shouts the non-handwashing guy.

silby, Thursday, 9 April 2020 20:04 (four years ago) link

i cut out the middle-man and wash my hands in piss

force ghost bg (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 9 April 2020 20:07 (four years ago) link

I have seen so many men, and not the ones you'd think, completely skip the sink after both urinal and stall.

☮️ (peace, man), Thursday, 9 April 2020 20:28 (four years ago) link

me too and I've been informed a fair amount of women don't wash too

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 9 April 2020 20:42 (four years ago) link

Japanese tv is telling me about an Australian trial to test the effectiveness of BCG vaccine in reducing coronavirus viral load. Which juts tells me I know even less about vaccines that the tiny amount I thought I knew.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:08 (four years ago) link

Immune systems have a lot of moving parts. T-cells are just the most specialized. It's possible the BCG vaccine triggers some generalized immune responses that are helpful against COVID-19, but not specialized to it. I leave this stuff to the people with the fancy labs and decade-long post-grad educations.

A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:15 (four years ago) link

Ed I linked a couple of pieces about this here

roxymuzak otm (gyac), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:17 (four years ago) link

BCG vaccine is not a conventional vaccine. "It does not prevent primary infection and, more importantly, does not prevent reactivation of latent pulmonary infection". Its used in treatment of superficial bladder cancer, and experimentally as an adjuvant in cancer immunonology. So, seems to be some sort of generalized immune stimulant.

Serious issues with BCG supply, it seems. I'm not sure this could be scaled up quickly.

speaking moistly (Sanpaku), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:33 (four years ago) link

BCG is a generic and it’s stable, if it turns out to be effective, they’ll scale it up. It’s cheap to produce as well.

roxymuzak otm (gyac), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:41 (four years ago) link

Which also means trump is less likely to invest in it and then rant about it.

Have been wondering if theirs childhood (and possibly pre travel) BCG Japan’s would still do anything for me.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:50 (four years ago) link

BCG confers a degree of long term immunity (some vaccines like MMR are this way, flu vaccines not so much), but one of the articles I linked said it’s safe to reimmunise anyway. Though the guidance says it doesn’t work for over 35s, but maybe that’s just the on label use? Can’t imagine bladder cancer is that common in that age group.

roxymuzak otm (gyac), Thursday, 9 April 2020 23:59 (four years ago) link

Everybody dreaded getting the BCG jag when I was at school, so many horror stories circulated the classroom!

The Corbynite Maneuver (Tom D.), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:02 (four years ago) link

I don’t remember getting mine though I have that big scar to show for it.

roxymuzak otm (gyac), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:03 (four years ago) link

Yes, it's a brutal vaccination.

The Corbynite Maneuver (Tom D.), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:04 (four years ago) link

is the BCG vaccine the one that leaves the noticeable round scar visible on the upper left arms of most Britishers (my age)? the round scar I don't seem to have and I've been half-thinking for ages I should ask the GP if my records list it?

anyway it's 25 years since I had or didn't have it, so probably makes no odds for me vs the 'rona any more. does it need topping up for its intended anti-TB purpose?

interesting articles, too tired to read properly now but thanks!

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 10 April 2020 00:05 (four years ago) link

Yeah, that's the one. Discussed before, but everybody in the UK who was between the age 10 and 14 and between the years 1953 and 2005 would have got the BCG vaccine - which, I imagine, covers pretty much all UK-born ILXors.

The Corbynite Maneuver (Tom D.), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:06 (four years ago) link

there were horror stories at my school too and also I hated the school nurse so I think my mum got the GP practice nurse to do mine instead (lol at this combo of cowardice & exceptionalism, I know) - a kinder and more practised arm-stabber for sure, but it seems odd that I would get away unscarred all the same

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 10 April 2020 00:09 (four years ago) link

They don’t do the bcg vaccination routinely in the US IIUC. The fact that I was immune to tb was a huge hassle for my green card because there’s a presumption I must have had it and therefore could have a latent infection. Had to pay the big bucks for a quantiferon (?) test. Seems unlikely bcg helps with Covid given covids prevalence in the uk.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:13 (four years ago) link

Indeed, Boris would have got it from the school nurse at Eton (Yaroo!) and look where he ended up.

The Corbynite Maneuver (Tom D.), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:18 (four years ago) link

One number I keep coming back to is 2: the current estimate for the average number of people that a coronavirus patient infects (for seasonal flu it's 1.3).

That says to me that those two people are likely to be the people you're in regular proximity with, which makes me a lot more relaxed about picking it up from a bit of packaging or from someone passing me in the street (as long as they didn't cough or sneeze on me as they passed). Am I being naive?

― Alba, Tuesday, March 31, 2020

So it turns out that now the CDC think the number is 5.7.

Gulp.

🚨New higher R0 from CDC reanalysis... it’s a 5.7!🚨(95% Confidence Interval: 3.8–8.9). Wowzers. This much higher #SARSCoV2 R0 value carries lot of implications for vaccines and treatments and containment measures needed. 📌Thread 🧵 #COVID19 https://t.co/DRlqyqC8lP pic.twitter.com/rVWZPojMxO

— Eric Feigl-Ding (@DrEricDing) April 8, 2020

Alba, Friday, 10 April 2020 00:32 (four years ago) link

where? globally, the states, uk?

ole uncle tiktok (darraghmac), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:40 (four years ago) link

Not the CDC, but to be published in a CDC-run journal. It's the same Los Alamos lab group that estimated 4.7 and 6.6 on 9 Feb. It's very much on the high side of the published estimates (which average around 3.0).

speaking moistly (Sanpaku), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:41 (four years ago) link

weve a national figure here that has gone down dramatically since the first measurement fwiw, ive seen us as tracking less than 1 for a while i think

ole uncle tiktok (darraghmac), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:42 (four years ago) link

it's been a week since I last read about R0

so the typical carrier infects a median of 5.7 people, plz correct me no matter what

less than 1 is the goal for relaxation of *some* soc-dist standards, right? (tho im holding out for 4 months after being vaccinated)

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:44 (four years ago) link

also the new 60,000 figure is assuming social distancing through May.

Not exactly hoping to wash May out too, but....positive development.

also enjoyed Fauci on the Today show today.

Bo Johnson Coviddied (Neanderthal), Friday, 10 April 2020 00:55 (four years ago) link

where? globally, the states, uk?

A reanalysis of the China data. And this is the number for unchecked transmission, ie without social distancing etc. Still, a lot higher more infectious than previously thought, if the analysis is right.

Alba, Friday, 10 April 2020 01:04 (four years ago) link

ok thanks

its definitely up where our figures started at before measures

ole uncle tiktok (darraghmac), Friday, 10 April 2020 01:06 (four years ago) link

I definitely had the OWW MY BCG jab at school but I don't have a scar. did you all have the 'daisy prick' one too? was that one you had first to check for allergy to BCG?

kinder, Friday, 10 April 2020 08:47 (four years ago) link

Not the CDC, but to be published in a CDC-run journal. It's the same Los Alamos lab group that estimated 4.7 and 6.6 on 9 Feb. It's very much on the high side of the published estimates (which average around 3.0).

ugh, I'm just doing some sums I don't understand here, but according to some equation I read on the internet a R0 of 6.6 would mean 85% of the population would need to get it survive it to get the uk govt's promised herd immunity

brr

PS I have 0 qualifications in any meaningfully science-related field so I shouldn't be trusted plugging numbers into anything

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 10 April 2020 11:51 (four years ago) link

Your post prompted me to do something I've been meaning to do since I first came across the term: look up an explanation of herd immunity. I knew it wasn't my personal interpretation, that a whole bunch of people stand in a field together and beat the virus down.

Makes sense--it's a tipping point. The daunting thing, I guess, is that to get there, most of us need to get infected first.

clemenza, Friday, 10 April 2020 12:02 (four years ago) link

In six months, what will the entire human race look like with regards to infection, anyhow?

Nhex, Friday, 10 April 2020 12:20 (four years ago) link

An interesting view on how to handle the virus in Africa

In South Africa, the average male dies before the age of 60, and 3% of the population is over 65.The median age in Africa is 18. In Europe, it’s 42. Africa is the world’s youngest continent, by far.

We must ask, then, whether African nations (including South Africa) have as much reason to fear Covid-19 as regions where so much of the population is older.

Joey Corona (Euler), Friday, 10 April 2020 12:52 (four years ago) link

a whole bunch of people stand in a field together and beat the virus down

Like the printer scene in Office Space

cuomo money, cuomo problems (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 April 2020 13:31 (four years ago) link

The Associated Press reports:

The top U.S. infectious disease official says coronavirus antibody tests are just days away. Dr. Anthony Fauci says at the last White House coronavirus task force meeting, the people responsible for developing, validating and disseminating the tests were saying “a rather large number of tests” will be available within a week.

Fauci told CNN on Friday he’s ”certain that that’s going to happen.” An antibody test could show whether a person was recently exposed to the coronavirus. Fauci says the test would say “that you were infected and if you’re feeling well you very likely recovered.”

Fauci says medical experts could then try to determine how deeply the virus “has penetrated the society” and whether previously infected people would be vulnerable to reinfection, which is particularly “important for health care workers.”

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 April 2020 13:39 (four years ago) link

“a rather large number of tests”

i wish they could be a little more specific, but this seems like very good news

let me be your friend on the other end! (Karl Malone), Friday, 10 April 2020 14:39 (four years ago) link

Extremely good news, and pretty much the necessary step on multiple fronts.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 April 2020 14:41 (four years ago) link

We had the exact same news two weeks ago and the tests ended up being useless. Hopefully these are more successful.

ShariVari, Friday, 10 April 2020 14:42 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.