Joe Biden, Senator from Citibank (oops, DELAWARE), to Run for President

What kind of response are you looking for, Milo?

Seriously, what would suffice for you as an adequate response to your earnest expressions of concern that Biden sucks and that people aren't enthusiastic, in a positive sense, about voting for him?

The point has been raised. The point has been acknowledged. The point is well taken. There are no enthusiastic Biden stans here. Like, literally no one here wanted Biden to be the nominee; literally no one here thought he was the best choice. Literally no one here thinks he is without significant problems, or that his path is assured or that his victory will be easy.

"Here's this fairly serious person raising the question of voter enthusiasm"/"Here's what we know of voter enthusiasm over the last four races and how it might have impacted the outcome"/etc.
is met with a "oh you childish peons, voting is a duty and everyone knows this and how can you even think that the candidate matters."

As I said above, it's pretty obvious that not everyone - and especially not Democratic constituencies - agrees that it's a sacred duty to hold your nose and do your supposed civic duty. Hence turnout being of supreme importance to Democratic candidates election after election.

"Here's why voter enthusiasm doesn't matter" is a response - "here's why I'm special and vote every time even though I'm not enthusiastic" is just being a dick.

is met with a "oh you childish peons, voting is a duty and everyone knows this and how can you even think that the candidate matters."

I'm very curious to know who you are quoting here. (checks) Oh, you're quoting yourself!

milo -

You're only taking positive voter enthusiasm into account. You're not reckoning with negative voter enthusiasm, which is clearly the most powerful motivating force in US politics now, and has been steadily growing in importance since Reagan. Elections are about negativity, both in the "fuck that guy, I'm voting for the other guy" sense and the "fuck 'em both, pass the bong" sense. Last time out, the negatives were on Trump's side - people who said they disliked both candidates broke strongly for him. This time out, people who tell pollsters that they dislike both candidates are breaking even more strongly for Biden.

I'm not reckoning with a thing that's not been polled, no, because that's basically just a gut feeling everyone hates Trump enough to get Biden over the line. Everyone thought that about 2016 too. The narrative now is that people didn't take him seriously and he wasn't seen as that revolting but he was hated so much that the GOP establishment was making last ditch efforts to get him off the ticket at the RNC.

As I said, the poll numbers are pumped by older, richer and whiter voters acting ahistorically. Maybe that lasts but it's a very dicey proposition - we have five months of potential unrest ahead of us and many opportunities for those people to seek the comfort of their usual authoritarian party.

Biden is recording a message for the funeral now rather than attending and "disrupting."

This idea of "negative voter enthusiasm" is a variation on the usual "vote for us, we're not the other guy" strategy and that shit just doesn't work. You win by making a positive case for your candidacy, your party and your ideology.

Idk negative enthusiasm seemed to trump positive in bernie vs biden

I'm not reckoning with a thing that's not been polled, no

But it has been polled. There are entire articles about it. You could look for them, if you were interested.

There’s negative partisanship, but that mostly explains die-hards after the fact (such as why Trump’s numbers are so strong inside the party).

“Negative voter enthusiasm” is an entirely made up phrase.

So is any phrase. Made up, that is.

it's pretty obvious that not everyone - and especially not Democratic constituencies - agrees that it's a sacred duty to hold your nose and do your supposed civic duty. Hence turnout being of supreme importance

Okay, noted. And the solution is...

The recommendations are...

The right course of action is...

Have candidates that excite people to vote for them.

And that solution can be brought into play in the current electoral environment... how?

There were other candidates. They are no longer viable for reasons both good and bad.

Personally I am fresh out of time machines.

What do you suggest now, given the real-world possibilities in front of us?

Assassinate Joe Biden.

Have candidates that excite people to vote for them.

Bored now. Leaving now. You "win."

Ok get right on that milo

But again, this isn’t the poz vibez thread. Joe Biden is garbage, Joe Biden will always be garbage and the fact that he’s a pretty shit candidate is on the heads of your party machinery if he loses.

Noted. What a refreshing piece of information you have given this thread, which was previously devoid of that perspective. Truly you have spoken truth and now our eyes are opened due to these new and surprising facts that you have dropped upon our naive and uneducated minds

boe jiden

if posting the same thing over and over again were a crime we'd all be in the slammer

Ok fair point silby, lol

dental plan
lisa needs braces

leg-shoot plan
lisa needs bidens

ok lol

Milo a confirmed CIA agitator

Ugh this thread is like wandering over to a conversation at a social gathering, hearing the convo and regretting the approach, and quietly backing away

otm

ah, but you didn't do that LL, DID YOU?

I try to read it quickly and kind of through splayed fingers

I came back to see what was up and it was worse! Happy to back away again to wait for better conditions.

ie Biden drops dead soon to make way for __________

amazed how people on ilx hope for/count on death. can understand the wish, but people don't die because you want them to

unless you're HILLARY CLINTON

lmao

Hoping for and counting on are very different things!!

I hope I won’t get laid off this year but I’m not counting on it. I hope Joe Biden dies soon but very little depends on it.

Doesn’t mean I think Kamala Harris is better, either.

The funniest timeline would be Biden dying and Hilldawg being tapped as his replacement.

The absolute funniest timeline - but also worst, of course - would be Biden dying, Hilldawg getting the nod... and eating shit again.

xp you're right silby

just don't even see the point of hoping for, since it's so unlikely to happen, and it often almost reads as expecting it to happen

looool esby

??? If I expected something to happen I wouldn’t be hoping for it.

I hope I never die but I don’t expect that at all!

What do words even mean

just don't think fantasies about political enemies dying are worth it

Can we maybe not do "Hilldawg" please?

You may not mean it this way but it feels uncomfortably reminiscent of the Limbaugh Chelsea slur.

amazed how people on ilx hope for/count on death. can understand the wish, but people don't die because you want them to

― Dan S, Sunday, June 7, 2020 9:28 PM bookmarkflaglink

well then I know one door-to-door salesman that is going to be getting an extremely strongly worded letter

irl giggle

i guess we've moved on, but imo biden is not exhibiting signs of cognitive decline. i've listened to him do long interviews and he sounds like a person who's still dealing with the effects of a lifelong stutter, not a person who's developing dementia. as with trump, i think diagnosing someone from a distance is not a great idea.

That's a fair point