Is the Guardian worse than it used to be?

The Observer, but...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/02/if-labour-is-truly-the-party-of-equality-it-wouldnt-shut-down-the-trans-debate

there's a y in the day, and the Guardian Media Group are platforming hate speech as per

genuinely chilling. the kind of thing i would have expected in the heyday of the daily mail.

Save us from former Ed Miliband advisors passing themselves off as journalists or, perplexingly, comedians.

And people wonder why we hate British comedy.

The amount of fawning coverage the Guardian has devoted to the Queen is appalling. It's getting pretty North Korean in the UK right now, I mean I know republicans are in a minority, but not by so much, it's maybe 40/60? Let's hear their voices too for Christ's sake.

The 40 and 60 are both much lower than that, 'I dont care's surely outnumber republicans, possibly monarchists too

I think the "I'm not a royalist but..." brigade outnumber both. For the moment anyway.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/oct/03/how-we-met-i-like-to-think-of-myself-as-rational-but-this-felt-like-love-at-first-sight

It's crazy how they publish both the trans debate piece and the one above.

Optimistic.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/03/tories-heading-for-oblivion-u-turns-kwarteng-truss-45p-tax-rate

i've been waiting for tory oblivion since eu tensions were due to tear them apart long before brexit. call me when it happens.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2022/oct/06/dining-across-the-divide-being-two-blokes-in-middle-age-we-did-talk-a-bit-about-military-history

"An IT worker and a barrister are both interested in policing. But where do they stand on Brexit?"

Literally, surprisingly, written by ... Zoe Williams.

"Richard He was over a decade younger than me. He’d got longish hair and a beard, whereas I’m clean-shaven, but otherwise he looked a normal chap.

Doug I had chilli prawns, chicken and then a lemon tart."

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/oct/08/i-thought-my-boyfriend-of-10-years-was-going-to-propose-then-he-told-me-he-was-transgender

never not at it

ugh, I don't really need to click that do I

i wouldn't

Sorry but “boyfriend of ten years” and “going to propose” are mutually exclusive. I’m not clicking that shit either, but wow if you missed one such hint I’m not surprised you missed another.

The article is actually fine, she’s an ally and the article was published with her ex’s blessing. Read to the end.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cjca4x8AeH8/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

xp you know what publication doesn’t deserve to get the benefit of the doubt from people? The guardian.

yeah i looked at the opening sentence and jumped to the obvious conclusion

Also, I don’t know how you square being an ally with telling this particular story and sharing praise from your friends on your Instagram story about how brave you are.

ok I read it, and yeah it's not as vile as I presumed based on the url. tbh I'm not sure what to think of it though. the beginning is pretty rough, and the trick of switching her ex's pronouns chronologically within the story feels a little clever-clever and disrespectful. but what do I know, I suppose it could be beneficial to show people this journey and its ending not being tragic. however, it did disturb me how much the emotional beats of the break-up reminded me of a friend who is currently going through a traumatic marital crisis caused by infidelity; it's hard not to hear blame & betrayal here. ultimately, I mostly just wish you got to read her ex's version of the story

Yeah, p much. This read a lot like 'please congratulate me for not going full terf over this'.

this is genuinely the funniest thing I’ve ever readhttps://t.co/DLOCYLf8GV

— ansel avizandum (@AliceAvizandum) October 9, 2022

Lol at some of the comments.

Just totally shredded.

the reversing beep of regret

i started reading this yesterday and gave up about a third of the way in but has the grauniad ever run a piece of this length by someone who has transitioned about their experiences

me reading this:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/034/711/Screen_Shot_2020-07-24_at_11.33.38_AM.jpg

Juliet Jacques wrote one but I never read it:

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/series/transgender-journey

i started reading this yesterday and gave up about a third of the way in but has the grauniad ever run a piece of this length by someone who has transitioned about their experiences

A lot of people have already criticised this article but I'm quietly raging about how trans people *never* get to tell our own stories in our national media while cis people are free to talk about us and get every support in doing so. We are repeatedly denied our own agency. https://t.co/RbuDDqyxwX

— Elaine Scattermoon (@scattermoon) October 9, 2022

After my ex and I split up when I transitioned she married a Conservative councillor, so if anything I'm the one who should be getting the article in the Guardian here

— Natalie Washington (@Transsomething) October 9, 2022

TERFs assemble: Hadley Freeman and Sarah Ditum both joining Sunday Times, no doubt at the behest of Janice Turner and her nepo-baby husband.

The Times is maybe even worse than the Guardian for terfiness, it's just that nobody expects any better from them.

All behind a paywall too.

There’s no maybe about it! JT is the worst for it and her husband is a) Peter Preston’s son and b) the executive editor.

i thought this was going to be a revive about the JRM column

"In an article for Unherd in February, Freeman wrote that “there was a period, about three years ago, when I honestly thought about quitting my job. I felt so hated for saying things — things that are scientifically, biologically and factually true — and so unsupported by people who I know secretly agree with me”."

https://pressgazette.co.uk/hadley-freeman-leaves-guardian-sunday-times/

scientifically, biologically and factually? now that's writing

It may well be trolling, but Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is Steven Spielberg's third-best film:
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/oct/13/all-steven-spielberg-films-ranked-director-the-fabelmans-et-harrison-ford

Better than Duel, Raiders, Last Crusade, and Close Encounters, among others. It's not even the third-best film he worked on in 1984. The little capsule talks about "some regrettably archaic attitudes towards Indian culture", which is putting it mildly, but on top of that it doesn't even work as an action film because the editing is choppy. And none of the characters are likeable, not even Indiana Jones. And it has no good lines. The baddy falls off a bridge.

I mean, I can quote extensively from the other two Indiana Jones films. The other two Indiana Jones films. "He chose... poorly", "she talks in her sleep", "no ticket", "it's not the years, it's the mileage", "snakes", but I can't remember any of the dialogue from Temple of Doom. And it had that stupid futuristic font on the poster that didn't fit the period.

Agree, Ashley Pomeroy. Baffling choice. I was always somewhat frustrated by the film, but wanted to be generous and like it (when I was 10 or 11). I watched it again about 2 years ago and it was still poor.

And, as you justly say, there are other films 'RANKED!' below it here that are wonderful.

Nonsense.

I'm glad to hear that Freeman is leaving the Guardian. You could say: the Guardian is bad, so it doesn't matter if a bad person leaves. But still, she is a bad person and is one of the reasons it has been bad.

Temple of Doom is my favourite Indiana Jones film, it's a straightforward but very detailed homage to pre-war action serials and everything about it is deliberately kitsch (including the acting) in a refreshingly non-postmodern way, no expectation at all that you'll have seen the serials. It doesn't have that classic Spielberg feel like ROTLA or TLC, but the classic Spielberg feel is so saturated into the culture now that it's hard to get much out of it. TOD just feels different, it conjures this hyper-unreal world like a Paul Verhoeven film, there aren't any quotables but I watch films to be immersed, not to chat about best bits. And yes, some parts are pretty fucking problematic, but still less so than any of those (often ridiculously racist) serials.

You’re going to have to pick one of these mate pic.twitter.com/TMmb9BLs5F

— Flying_Rodent (@flying_rodent) October 14, 2022

On a pragmatic level, attacking a Van Gogh painting isn't going to win anybody over. Attacking art in general is uncomfortably reminiscent of certain regimes from the past.

But using soup was clever because cans of soup are potent symbols of the working class (true fact (official)). Even if the National Gallery introduces compulsory bag screening with an x-ray machine, will they ban people who carry cans of soup? But presumably they will mandate that you have to leave your bag in the cloakroom. I know from the internet that it's possible to hide fist-sized objects in a certain body cavity, but again they might introduce whole-body X-ray machines. Who knows.

The Guardian keeps sending John Harris up to Huddersfield and other places in the north to interview people on the street. Without wishing to sound snobbish I wonder if someone at the newspaper dislikes him. Hadley Freeman gets to interview Aubrey Plaza in a nice hotel in London; John Harris has to stand in the rain talking to disinterested shoppers about the need for direct action. Why is he even doing politics, anyway? He wrote a book about Britpop. He's a mid-1990s pop music writer. For such a progressive newspaper The Guardian has an odd habit of giving the heavyweight political stuff to "great modern thinkers" who are always men, e.g. Sir Michael White, Sir Simon Jenkins, Timothy Garton-Ash etc. Who all come across as low-budget knock-off of Thomas Friedman, without the first-class air travel. Meanwhile the women write about cooking and how horrible life is in New York if you're well-off.

For me Harris will never be just *a* 90s music writer, he will always be *the* 90s music writer / editor that ruined my favourite music magazine, so let's not give him too much credit there either.

cans of soup are the symbol of andy warhol (also working class (official))

was heinz though. they should've used campbells

i also wonder what happens to people who glue themselves to things. are they still there?

quite torn about the fucking up paintings thing, don't feel like i'm enthusiastically thumbs up

i mean on the other hand John Harris is trying his best to make me go full soupcan