oh yeah another reason to quit is how funny it would be if this fails quickly
lol gyac, I am of course part of my own problem there, so maybe it's like cutting out wine while continuing to drink beer & liquor
― rob, Monday, 31 October 2022 13:52 (one year ago) link
I drink whiskey but not wine or beer, I see no problem with this.
― barry sito (gyac), Monday, 31 October 2022 13:53 (one year ago) link
me neither! that analogy was inspired by true events
― rob, Monday, 31 October 2022 13:56 (one year ago) link
― rob, Monday, October 31, 2022 9:52 AM (seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
quitting works but prob the best thing to contribute to musk twitter failing is for a lot of people to use any new freedom from moderation to to post wildly advertiser unfriendly things, also could be funny
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:03 (one year ago) link
chaotic evil is fun because lawful evil is so consistently against me.
― i'm right back on my shit (Hunt3r), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:13 (one year ago) link
Years back a friend of mine verified me as a prank. You could disable the verification in the settings. Maybe it’s no longer possible (e.g., I lost my verified status, rightfully, when Twitter did an audit of verified users back in 2016). But, assuming that option still exists, it’s funny to me when verified users complain about being verified.
― Allen (etaeoe), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:25 (one year ago) link
I still think centralized verification is dumb and I think we’d be in a far better situation if, for individuals, publicly verifiable identity proofs were used. It’s embarrassing Reddit’s AMA subreddit does this better than Meta or Twitter! But I also understand this isn’t a mistake. Twitter doesn’t want to provide links to Meta services. Meta services don’t want to provide links to Twitter. Everyone knows but won’t admit that this shit is (or is potentially) valuable.
― Allen (etaeoe), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:31 (one year ago) link
I apologize for the barrage of posts, but this story is enraging for so many reasons. Last point, Jack, whatever you think about him, is likely right about the need for decentralized authentication and authorization. Do I trust him or his proposed implementation? I haven’t looked at it closely but I’m obviously skeptical because of the source. Nevertheless, it’s an idea that I truly believe would make the web a little safer and nicer.
― Allen (etaeoe), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:34 (one year ago) link
tangential since this is more about the mechanism of sign-in authentication and not authentication of real life identity:
lol remember when oauth was going to be the end-all, where people could bring their own auth wherever they wanted, only to be followed by oauth2 being kind of a corporate-led mess, to the extent one of the oauth creators quit the project after its release and spent the next year doing talks at conferences explaining how bad oauth2 is?
I remember a handful of sites very briefly allowing either a handful of providers or, kind of insanely, allowing you to plug in your own providerthe only vestige that remains is "sign in with google/facebook/twitter" which basically get dumped as soon as a service gets large enough they realize they're missing out on some data by not making people use their own auth
― mh, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:44 (one year ago) link
that isn't to say the two couldn't be linked, obviously. if you signed in with an identity provider explicitly linked to your organization (maybe something like the ACME mechanism LetsEncrypt uses to verify domain ownership) and that was flagged as legit by twitter, then verification of identity linked to that org could be streamlined
― mh, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:45 (one year ago) link
I don’t he has this one covered tbh
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:49 (one year ago) link
Jack, whatever you think about him, is likely right about the need for decentralized authentication and authorization. Do I trust him or his proposed implementation? I haven’t looked at it closely but I’m obviously skeptical because of the source. Nevertheless, it’s an idea that I truly believe would make the web a little safer and nicer.
― Allen (etaeoe), Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM (thirteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
i found the developer page
https://atproto.com/guides/overview
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:51 (one year ago) link
I wonder how many fake accounts there are
Also its funny he wants to charge 20$ a month to be verified - so like if Beyonce doesn't pay she is going to lose her blue logo? Why not make it more first of all or base the fee on how many followers you have
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:53 (one year ago) link
xp oh yeah I was looking at that last week but forgot it had anything to do with Dorsey
seems decent, probably won't get any traction
― mh, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:55 (one year ago) link
yeah
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:56 (one year ago) link
https://jaygraber.medium.com/web3-is-self-certifying-9dad77fd8d81
Then there is this type of thinking
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:57 (one year ago) link
the blockchain will solve this
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 14:57 (one year ago) link
lol blockchain
Seems like online identity verification is something the government could provide pretty easily. They verify people's identities all the time. (It would have the added advantage of right-wingers boycotting it becz govt). But like the digital equivalent of a passport, which could live in a secure place but you could link to from your social media bio or whatever.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 31 October 2022 14:58 (one year ago) link
phone number seems to be more important than physical address lately
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:00 (one year ago) link
Estonian solved this
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:00 (one year ago) link
Estonia*
estonianchain
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:01 (one year ago) link
https://preview.redd.it/5wle6aa325351.png?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=4c7b7f52ecfdab780639886f65fde6b894488330
speaking of Dorsey
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:02 (one year ago) link
I hate reading articles about blockchain because I am worried I am not understanding itbut then I wonder if there is actually anything worth understanding
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:06 (one year ago) link
funny I remember reading a story about Tesla where Elon would fire anyone who was discovered to have a second job or side hustle because he wanted their attention focused solely on their job at Tesla. well now Elon is the CEO of 3 separate, very different companies, plus he apparently has the time to shitpost & play video games all day, not to mention impregnating one of his subordinates every few months. is his involvement with these companies just "do this dumb idea or you're fired"??
― frogbs, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:07 (one year ago) link
― | (Latham Green), Monday, October 31, 2022 10:06 AM (forty-seven seconds ago) bookmarkflaglink
I dont think blockchain is that complex, it's just a large linked list which everyone on the network needs to have a copy of to verify new entries. or something like that anyway. I think there is an actual plausible use case involving authentication tokens that could in theory be used across multiple networks but, as always with blockchain stuff, there's already a much quicker and easier way to do it out there
― frogbs, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:09 (one year ago) link
heres a brief primer that pretty much covers it https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2022-the-crypto-story/
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:17 (one year ago) link
we're kind of past the era where people who were rich and/or had power had to be serious people;
I think you should probably look up the Habsburgs (or really any monarchy past a certain point)
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:32 (one year ago) link
Yeah I feel like ruling/elite classes have always been rife with buffoons, dunces, crooks and dipshits.
Didn't know about the Estonian system, it does seem like a good solution.
https://e-estonia.com/solutions/e-identity/id-card/
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:33 (one year ago) link
social media has exposed the fact that rich people arent serious, did away with the pr and professional media intermediaries
the only problem is that many of them love it and are thriving eg elon trump
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:35 (one year ago) link
I was reading something about using blockchain as "providence" (who owns or sold a work of art and who owned it before etc) but it seemed like it was full of pitfalls.
Seems like the whol blockchain idea is "we don't need governments anymore" like anarchy or something - like the programmers will solve everything but they dont know about how the world really works they just know how software works
― | (Latham Green), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:40 (one year ago) link
amazing to watch genius in real time
Fun watching these complete dumbasses reply to mostly bad ideas from random accounts for how Twitter should now change. It really does show they have no clue what they’re doing. pic.twitter.com/3UJ485rEam— Paris Marx (@parismarx) October 31, 2022
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:42 (one year ago) link
good lord
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:43 (one year ago) link
Longtime Musk associates David Sacks and Jason Calacanis appeared in a company directory over the weekend, according to photos obtained by The Washington Post. Both had official company emails and their titles were “staff software engineer.”
hahaha
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 31 October 2022 15:46 (one year ago) link
love too c0de
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:47 (one year ago) link
If there's a silver lining to this debacle it's that Musk will be allowed to fail and make a fool of himself again and again, in public, for everyone to see. Unlike most CEOs, who tend to do this stuff in private.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:51 (one year ago) link
these people are freaks (the bad kind)
― mh, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:51 (one year ago) link
Scary monsters (and super creeps).
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 31 October 2022 15:52 (one year ago) link
I read an overheated/overstuffed piece about Sacks the other day: https://newrepublic.com/article/168125/david-sacks-elon-musk-peter-thiel
not sure there's much of a thesis in there, but his politics are bad (as in Desantis donor bad) in case you were wondering
― rob, Monday, 31 October 2022 16:00 (one year ago) link
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-fired-twitter-execs-for-cause-avoid-severance-report-2022-10
this is deranged and will 100% lead to lawsuits
also, popcorn.gif at this coming up in november: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-26/musk-defends-50-billion-pay-deal-as-justified-by-tesla-s-surge i don't have a view on the outcome but hope it will lead to lols.
― 龜, Monday, 31 October 2022 16:27 (one year ago) link
interesting considering theyve owned a piece since the startup days iirc
Today I am requesting the Committee on Foreign Investment — which reviews acquisitions of U.S. businesses by foreign buyers — to conduct an investigation into the national security implications of Saudi Arabia's purchase of Twitter.https://t.co/IDwnKGaxt7— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) October 31, 2022
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 17:27 (one year ago) link
articles a couple weeks old but first ive heard
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 17:28 (one year ago) link
do ya think that maybe he did this just to read Grimes' DMs?
― frogbs, Monday, 31 October 2022 17:29 (one year ago) link
it's not so much that Alwaleed bin Talal owns a piece of Twitter, it's now that Elon Musk owns Twitter and not the public, ergo Alwaleed bin Talal has leverage over Elon, also elon is a right-wing conspiracist now so more likely to promote pro-SA stuff. iirc Alwaleed bin Talal increased his ownership % as part of the deal.
there was a popular theory going around a month or two ago that Elon was tweeting pro-putin and pro-xi propaganda to try and draw biden's attention to the deal so he could stop it. obviously that did not work and but chris murphy is still trying to score political points off it? the deal is done and it would be a huge clusterfuck for CFIUS to come in now and force the deal to be unwound.
― 龜, Monday, 31 October 2022 17:40 (one year ago) link
that theory actually seemed kinda plausible except for the fact that Elon does not seem smart enough to pull something like that off. he's clearly very deep into far-right conspiracy bullshit, can't imagine it goes any deeper than that
― frogbs, Monday, 31 October 2022 18:03 (one year ago) link
this is the guy i mentioned who left twitter for a reason, and is now part of the transition brains trust
https://www.garbageday.email/p/anti-crypto-media-personality
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 31 October 2022 18:27 (one year ago) link
good luck elon
Scoop w/ @sarafischer: Twitter engineers have been instructed to look at the old Vine code, with hopes that Vine could be revived by year-end. https://t.co/XL6kdZFhEw— Dan Primack (@danprimack) October 31, 2022
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 18:55 (one year ago) link
bit of history re vine
Man, if you want to know anything about the essential nature of social media platforms, just check out what happened to Vine when the people on the service suddenly saw themselves as workers instead of users.From “Kids These Days”: pic.twitter.com/zfrTzjk0Kx— Matt Pearce 🦅 (@mattdpearce) April 5, 2019
― lag∞n, Monday, 31 October 2022 18:58 (one year ago) link
Is convincing Musk into relaunching Vine going to be like meme people tricking Sony into re-releasing "Morbius"?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 31 October 2022 19:14 (one year ago) link
platforms are ephemeral like nightclubs but refusing to negotiate with labor is the bedrock of the capital/silicon valley marriage
― Jaime Pressly and America (f. hazel), Monday, 31 October 2022 19:35 (one year ago) link